SARAH MARIE BRUNO HGCAL OVERVIEW Endcap More sensitive to radiation Crystals degrade quickly and must be replaced – expensive!

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Tracey Berry1 Looking into e &  for high energy e/  Dr Tracey Berry Royal Holloway.
Advertisements

Chapter 8 Planar Scintigaraphy
Guoming CHEN The Capability of CMS Detector Chen Guoming IHEP, CAS , Beijing.
LHCb PatVeloTT Performance Adam Webber. Why Upgrade?  Currently we de-focus the beams o LHCb Luminosity ~ 2x10 32 cm -2 s -1 o ~ 1 interaction per bunch.
ECAL Spike Plot Approval ECAL Anomalous Signal Plots Approval Adi Bornheim for ECAL
CMS Phase 2 Upgrade: Scope and R&D goals CMS Phase 2 Upgrade: Scope and R&D goals October 21, 2014 Jeremiah Mans On behalf of the CMS Collaboration.
Off-axis Simulations Peter Litchfield, Minnesota  What has been simulated?  Will the experiment work?  Can we choose a technology based on simulations?
Using  0 mass constraint to improve particle flow ? Graham W. Wilson, Univ. of Kansas, July 27 th 2005 Study prompted by looking at event displays like.
30 March Global Mice Particle Identification Steve Kahn 30 March 2004 Mice Collaboration Meeting.
Effects of Tracking Limitations On Jet Mass Resolution Chris Meyer UCSC ILC Simulation Reconstruction Meeting July 3, 2007.
Dec 2005Jean-Sébastien GraulichSlide 1 Improving MuCal Design o Why we need an improved design o Improvement Principle o Quick Simulation, Analysis & Results.
Energy Flow Studies Steve Kuhlmann Argonne National Laboratory for Steve Magill, U.S. LC Calorimeter Group.
In order to acquire the full physics potential of the LHC, the ATLAS electromagnetic calorimeter must be able to efficiently identify photons and electrons.
Detecting Particles Martin Gallacher – University of Birmingham.
General Trigger Philosophy The definition of ROI’s is what allows, by transferring a moderate amount of information, to concentrate on improvements in.
Application of Neural Networks for Energy Reconstruction J. Damgov and L. Litov University of Sofia.
Tracker Reconstruction SoftwarePerformance Review, Oct 16, 2002 Summary of Core “Performance Review” for TkrRecon How do we know the Tracking is working?
Intercalibration of the CMS Electromagnetic Calorimeter Using Neutral Pion Decays 1 M. Gataullin (California Institute of Technology) on behalf of the.
Hadron Calorimeter Readout Electronics Calibration, Hadron Calorimeter Scintillator Upgrade, and Missing Transverse Momentum Resolution due to Pileup Zishuo.
Jet Studies at CMS and ATLAS 1 Konstantinos Kousouris Fermilab Moriond QCD and High Energy Interactions Wednesday, 18 March 2009 (on behalf of the CMS.
LHC Detectors 101 Vivek Sharma (with slides stolen from talks of several people ) 1 Good review article: ARNPS 2006, “General purpose detectors for large.
Jan MDI WS SLAC Electron Detection in the Very Forward Region V. Drugakov, W. Lohmann Motivation Talk given by Philip Detection of Electrons and.
Summary of PHOS Internal Notes (part I) Rafael Diaz Valdes 10/25/20151.
Non-prompt Track Reconstruction with Calorimeter Assisted Tracking Dmitry Onoprienko, Eckhard von Toerne Kansas State University, Bonn University Linear.
Optimising Cuts for HLT George Talbot Supervisor: Stewart Martin-Haugh.
ENERGY RECOVERY OF THE CMS ELECTROMAGNETIC CALORIMETER DEAD CHANNELS Daskalakis Georgios, Geralis Theodoros, Kesisoglou Stilianos, Manolakos Ioannis, Eleni.
International Workshop on Linear Colliders, Geneve Muon reconstruction and identification in the ILD detector N. D’Ascenzo, V.Saveliev.
Event Reconstruction in SiD02 with a Dual Readout Calorimeter Detector Geometry EM Calibration Cerenkov/Scintillator Correction Jet Reconstruction Performance.
26 Apr 2009Paul Dauncey1 Digital ECAL: Lecture 1 Paul Dauncey Imperial College London.
Event-Specific Hadronic Event Reconstruction 1 Graham W. Wilson, University of Kansas.
1 Energy loss correction for a crystal calorimeter He Miao Institute of High Energy Physics Beijing, P.R.China.
The CMS detector as compared to ATLAS CMS Detector Description –Inner detector and comparison with ATLAS –EM detector and comparison with ATLAS –Calorimetric.
Apollo Go, NCU Taiwan BES III Luminosity Monitor Apollo Go National Central University, Taiwan September 16, 2002.
Coil and HCAL Parameters for CLIC Solenoid and Hadron-calorimetry for a high energy LC Detector 15. December LAPP Christian Grefe CERN.
Enhancing InBeam PET with single Photon (Compton) Detection CERN September 2nd 2008 VALENCIA GROUP, IFIMED José M. Benlloch (PET hardware, speaker) José.
T RACKING E FFICIENCY FOR & CALORIMETER S EED TRACKING FOR THE CLIC S I D Pooja Saxena, Ph.D. Student Center of Detector & Related Software Technology.
2004 Fall JPS meeting (English version) K.Okada1 Measurement of prompt photon in sqrt(s)=200GeV pp collisions Kensuke Okada (RIKEN-BNL research center)
PHOTON RECONSTRUCTION IN CMS APPLICATION TO H   PHOTON RECONSTRUCTION IN CMS APPLICATION TO H   Elizabeth Locci SPP/DAPNIA, Saclay, France Prague.
Bangalore, India1 Performance of GLD Detector Bangalore March 9 th -13 th, 2006 T.Yoshioka (ICEPP) on behalf of the.
1 QuickSim - brief introduction - Akiya Miyamoto KEK 22 June 2005 GLD meeting See also.
26 Apr 2009Paul Dauncey1 Digital ECAL: Lecture 3 Paul Dauncey, Imperial College London.
CALOR April Algorithms for the DØ Calorimeter Sophie Trincaz-Duvoid LPNHE – PARIS VI for the DØ collaboration  Calorimeter short description.
Status of Reconstruction in sidloi3 Ron Cassell 5/20/10.
HIGH GRANULARITY CALORIMETER ANALYSIS SARAH MARIE BRUNO CMS - CALTECH GROUP SUPERVISORS: ADOLF BORNHEIM, LINDSEY GRAY, MARIA SPIROPULU.
1 Nick Sinev, ALCPG March 2011, Eugene, Oregon Investigation into Vertex Detector Resolution N. B. Sinev University of Oregon, Eugene.
BESIII EMC Simulation & Reconstruction He Miao
1 1 - To test the performance 2 - To optimise the detector 3 – To use the relevant variable Software and jet energy measurement On the importance to understand.
Georgios Daskalakis On behalf of the CMS Collaboration ECAL group CALOR 2006 – Chicago,USA June 5-9, 2006 CMS ECAL Calibration Strategy.
LCWS11 – Tracking Performance at CLIC_ILD/SiD Michael Hauschild - CERN, 27-Sep-2011, page 1 Tracking Performance in CLIC_ILD and CLIC_SiD e + e –  H +
Measurement of inclusive jet and dijet production in pp collisions at √s = 7 TeV using the ATLAS detector Seminar talk by Eduardo Garcia-Valdecasas Tenreiro.
Update on Diffractive Dijets Hardeep Bansil University of Birmingham 12/07/2013.
TeV muons: from data handling to new physics phenomena Vladimir Palichik JINR, Dubna NEC’2009 Varna, September 07-14, 2009.
The ATLAS Electromagnetic and Hadronic End-Cap Calorimeter in a Combined Beam Test Tamara Hughes University of Victoria WRNPPC 2004.
TeV Muon Reconstruction Vladimir Palichik JINR, Dubna NEC’2007 Varna, September 10-17, 2007.
18 Sep 2008Paul Dauncey 1 DECAL: Motivation Hence, number of charged particles is an intrinsically better measure than the energy deposited Clearest with.
CMS Cathode Strip Chambers Performance with LHC Data Vladimir Palichik JINR, Dubna NEC’2013 Varna, September 10,
Operation, performance and upgrade of the CMS Resistive Plate Chamber system at LHC Marcello Abbrescia Physics Department - University of Bari & INFN,
on behalf of ATLAS LAr Endcap Group
Gamma-ray Large Area Space Telescope ACD Final Performance
Studies for Phase-II Muon Detector (|η| = ) – Plans
Gamma-ray Large Area Space Telescope
Gamma-ray Large Area Space Telescope
Spectrometry of high energy gamma ray
Plans for checking hadronic energy
Project Presentations August 5th, 2004
MOORE (Muon Object Oriented REconstruction) MuonIdentification
 discrimination with converted photons
High Granularity Calorimeter Upgrade Studies
Installation, Commissioning and Startup of ATLAS & CMS Experiments
Converted photon and π0 discrimination based on H  cut-based analysis Zhen Zhang IHEP
Presentation transcript:

SARAH MARIE BRUNO

HGCAL OVERVIEW Endcap More sensitive to radiation Crystals degrade quickly and must be replaced – expensive! New design – replace with silicon sensors Barrel Keep crystal (shashlik) design Crystal segments with scintillating fiber through the center 2

GAMMA GUN DATA SET Simulation to test performance of HGCal (endcap calorimeter) Pile-up-free sample (pile-up=noise in system, limitation of the detectors) Not realistic – we know where the photons originate, because that is input in the simulation. 3

TREE ORGANIZATION 4 Data Set ROIClusterHit Event

SCATTER PLOT - RECONSTRUCTED COLLISION (EVENT 1) 2 Regions of interest correspond to the two photons. 2 clusters in this ROI (C0 and C1) 3 clusters in this ROI (C2, C3,C4) ROI 1 ROI 2 5

SCATTER PLOT - RECONSTRUCTED COLLISION Diagonal lines of hits visible, showing location of sensor array. 6

NUMBER OF HITS FOR A GIVEN TIME OF ARRIVAL (FIRST EVENT, ONE CLUSTER) Can we improve the stability of the mean time of arrival? First thought – either just take the mode or energy weight the hits recorded. No – late hits are actual physics – photon propagating a long way in tracker. 7

TIMING INFORMATION FOR ALL EVENTS Average over all the mean times: More late hits than early hits. Early hits are noise Late hits noise, and effects of asymmetry in energy of the two electrons produced when a photon interacts with the tracker. “Tail” of late hits 8

ENERGIES OF CLUSTERS (FIRST EVENT) ( 5 Clusters total) C0 and C2 C1 and C4 C3 9 C1 and C4 have essentially no energy. This is an artifact of the clustering algorithm (not pile-up), and these two clusters can be discarded. We care about C0 and C2.

ALL EVENTS 10

HITS BY CLUSTER C0 C1 C2C2 C3C4 Most hits are in C0 and C2. Again, we see that C1 and C4 have negligible contributions. 11

ETA OF THE CLUSTERS 12

CLUSTER ETA FOR ALL EVENTS 13 Eta Number of clusters

ROI ETA 14

ROI ETA FOR ALL EVENTS 15

ROI P T 16

ROI P T F0R ALL SAMPLES 17 Samples constant in energy-- need to look at energy rather than pt. Energy = p t * cosh(eta)

ROI ENERGY (EVENT 1) 18

ROI ENERGY (ALL EVENTS) 19

FINDING THE COLLISION TIME 20

NEXT STEPS AND QUESTIONS TO ANSWER Potential problem – Some photons have energies just below the threshold. For a slightly higher energy, their inclusion would create a larger spread in the hits. What is the probability of a particular hit being above threshold? What fraction of Rechits are above threshold? How does this depend on eta? How does resolution vary with energy, eta and p t ? Look at hits in the barrel as well (so far only endcap) Higgs -> γγ sample 21

OUTSIDE OF CERN 22