( ATLAS was designed for LHC: L=10 34 cm -2 s -1 ) [ Now we expect 7.5 x instantaneous and 10 x integrated luminosity ] PILEUP: from ~30  >200 proton.

Slides:

Advertisements

Similar presentations

May 14, 2015Pavel Řezníček, IPNP Charles University, Prague1 Tests of ATLAS strip detector modules: beam, source, G4 simulations.

Advertisements

June 6 th, 2011 N. Cartiglia 1 “Measurement of the pp inelastic cross section using pile-up events with the CMS detector” How to use pile-up.

1 VCI, Werner Riegler RPCs and Wire Chambers for the LHCb Muon System  Overview  Principles  Performance Comparison: Timing, Efficiency,

The ATLAS B physics trigger

LHC SPS PS. 46 m 22 m A Toroidal LHC ApparatuS - ATLAS As large as the CERN main bulding.

IJAZ AHMEDNational Centre for Physics1. IJAZ AHMEDNational Centre for Physics2 OUTLINES oLHC parametres oRPCs oOverview of muon trigger system oIdea of.

ATLAS RPC: Cosmic Ray Teststand at INFN Lecce G. Chiodini, M. Bianco, E. Brambilla, G. Cataldi, R. Coluccia, P. Creti, G. Fiore, R. Gerardi, E. Gorini,

LHeC : Muon Systems L. Pontecorvo.

The Time-of-Flight system of the PAMELA experiment: in-flight performances. Rita Carbone INFN and University of Napoli RICAP ’07, Rome,

The digitization procedure occurs separately for each Muon technology, MDT, CSC, RPC and TGC. Here the main steps of each MuonHits to Muon Digits conversion.

Tracking at the ATLAS LVL2 Trigger Athens – HEP2003 Nikos Konstantinidis University College London.

Muon System and Physics Performance Ludovico Pontecorvo CERN-INFN.

NSW background studies Max Bellomo, Nektarios Benekos, Niels van Eldik, Andrew Haas, Peter Kluit, Jochen Meyer, Felix Rauscher 1.

14/02/2007 Paolo Walter Cattaneo 1 1.Trigger analysis 2.Muon rate 3.Q distribution 4.Baseline 5.Pulse shape 6.Z measurement 7.Att measurement OUTLINE.

Faster tracking in hadron collider experiments  The problem  The solution  Conclusions Hans Drevermann (CERN) Nikos Konstantinidis ( Santa Cruz)

Muon Detector Jiawen ZHANG Introduction The Detector Choices Simulation The structure and detector design The Expected performance Schedule.

19/07/20061 Nectarios Ch. Benekos 1, Rosy Nicolaidou 2, Stathes Paganis 3, Kirill Prokofiev 3 for the collaboration among: 1 Max-Planck-Institut für Physik,

A new generation of RPCs to be tested for the super- LHC CERN GIF workshop 20/06/2011 G. Aielli.

Barrel RPC Chamber consists of 2 double-gaps, each equipped with a common plane of 96 strips read-out by 6 front-end boards. The two double- gaps have.

Marcello Bindi, on behalf of ATLAS Collaboration KRUGER 2010 : Workshop on Discovery Physics at the LHC 06/12/20101.

Prototypes of high rate MRPC for CBM TOF Jingbo Wang Department of Engineering Physics, Tsinghua University, Beijing, China RPC-2010-Darmstadt, Germany.

Design and development of micro-strip stacked module prototypes for tracking at S-LHC Motivations Tracking detectors at future hadron colliders will operate.

Muon-raying the ATLAS Detector

Mitglied der Helmholtz-Gemeinschaft Calibration of the COSY-TOF STT & pp Elastic Analysis Sedigheh Jowzaee IKP Group Talk 11 July 2013.

Gap Production for Upscope of the Endcap RPCs Sung Keun Park Korea Detector Laboratory Korea University February 5, 2010 Workshop on the Forward CMS RPC.

Some thoughts on the New Small Wheel Trigger Issues V. Polychronakos, BNL 10 May,

The Status of the ATLAS Experiment Dr Alan Watson University of Birmingham on behalf of the ATLAS Collaboration.

T. Kawamoto1 ATLAS muon small wheels for ATLAS phase-1 upgrade LHCC T. Kawamoto (New) small wheels ? Why new small wheels for high.

Luca Spogli Università Roma Tre & INFN Roma Tre

26 June 2006Imaging2006, Stockholm, Niels Tuning 1/18 Tracking with the LHCb Spectrometer Detector Performance and Track Reconstruction Niels Tuning (Outer.

Design Studies of the ATLAS Muon Level-1 Trigger based on the MDT Detector for the LHC Upgrade O.Sasaki, Y.Suzuki, K.Nagano, M.Ishino, M.Ikeno (KEK), K.Bendtz,

Tests of RPCs (Resistive Plate Chambers) for the ARGO experiment at YBJ G. Aielli¹, P.Camarri¹, R. Cardarelli¹, M. Civardi², L. Di Stante¹, B. Liberti¹,

1 Muon Veto System and Expected Backgrounds at Dayabay Hongshan (Kevin) Zhang, BNL DayaBay Collaboration DNP08, Oakland.

Beam Test of a Large-Area GEM Detector Prototype for the Upgrade of the CMS Muon Endcap System Vallary Bhopatkar M. Hohlmann, M. Phipps, J. Twigger, A.

CGEM-IT project and beam test program G. Felici for the FE-LNF-TO team Partially supported by the Italian Ministry of Foreign Affairs under the Program.

Marcello Abbrescia RPCs for CMS during Phase II RPC rate capability M. Abbrescia, The dynamic behaviour of Resistive Plate Chambers, NIM A 533 (2004) 7–10.

CMS Upgrade Workshop - Fermilab Trigger Studies Using Stacked Pixel Layers Mark Pesaresi

Susan Burke DØ/University of Arizona DPF 2006 Measurement of the top pair production cross section at DØ using dilepton and lepton + track events Susan.

PPAC in ZDC for Trigger and Luminosity Edwin Norbeck University of Iowa Luminosity Workshop November 5, 2004.

Leonardo Rossi INFN Genova - UTOPIA #12 0 What we have learned from UTOPIA so far? Defined a set of gauge histos to compare layouts Exercised on barrel-part.

Living Long At the LHC G. WATTS (UW/SEATTLE/MARSEILLE) WG3: EXOTIC HIGGS FERMILAB MAY 21, 2015.

3 May 2003, LHC2003 Symposium, FermiLab Tracking Performance in LHCb, Jeroen van Tilburg 1 Tracking performance in LHCb Tracking Performance Jeroen van.

Siena, May A.Tonazzo –Performance of ATLAS MDT chambers /1 Performance of BIL tracking chambers for the ATLAS muon spectrometer A.Baroncelli,

Plots of RPC performance G. Cattani, University of Rome “Tor Vergata” & INFN Roma 2 on behalf of ATLAS Muon Collaboration.

CMS Cathode Strip Chambers Performance with LHC Data Vladimir Palichik JINR, Dubna NEC’2013 Varna, September 10,

RPCs with Ar-CO2 mix G. Aielli; R.Cardarelli; A. Zerbini For the ATLAS ROMA2 group.

FCAL Krakow meeting, 6. May LumiCal concept including the tracker R. Ingbir, P.Růžička, V. Vrba.

Anna Kotynia.  8 stations  fully based on micro-strip detectors Tracking detector: -low-mass detector -full azimuthal angle coverage -polar angle coverage:from.

Beam detectors in Au+Au run and future developments - Results of Aug 2012 Au+Au test – radiation damage - scCVD diamond detector with strip metalization.

Real data in the Muon Spectrometer Bernardo RESENDE and a lot of other people not named here NIKHEF Jamboree, December 2008.

Operation, performance and upgrade of the CMS Resistive Plate Chamber system at LHC Marcello Abbrescia Physics Department - University of Bari & INFN,

A high rate fast precision tracking trigger with RPCs

High Energy Physics experiments.

Status of BESIII and upgrade of BESIII

Muon Chambers and Electronics for ATLAS Phase 2 Upgrades

IOP HEPP Conference Upgrading the CMS Tracker for SLHC Mark Pesaresi Imperial College, London.

Results achieved so far to improve the RPC rate capability

ATLAS-MUON Trigger hardware developments

Tracking results from Au+Au test Beam

CMS muon detectors and muon system performance

Michele Pioppi* on behalf of PRIN _005 group

The LHC collider in Geneva

Performance of a Multigap RPC prototype for the LHCb Muon System

Performance of MDC during New Data Taking

STAR Detector Event selection and triggers Corrections to data

Niels Tuning (Outer Tracker Group LHCb)

Pre-installation Tests of the LHCb Muon Chambers

The LHCb Level 1 trigger LHC Symposium, October 27, 2001

Resistive Plate Chambers performance with Cosmic Rays

Susan Burke, University of Arizona

Presentation transcript:

( ATLAS was designed for LHC: L=10 34 cm -2 s -1 ) [ Now we expect 7.5 x instantaneous and 10 x integrated luminosity ] PILEUP: from ~30  >200 proton collisions/BC  Impact: High occupancy limits performance in vertex reconstruction and calorimeter. Maintain threshold for single isolated leptons as low as possible rejecting the pileup  Strategy : higher granularity and faster tracking detectors: time is a fourth coordinate  smarter Trigger DAQ 24/02/2016 G. Aielli - RPC 2016

Consequence on detectors  Boosted objects  up to  =6 coverage  High pileup and fast BC  very fast and granular detectors  Momentum resolution ≈15% at pT=10TeV  ~1ns sharp BCID  Particle flow capability for calorimeters with high granularity 25 mrad^2  Fine timing against pileup  < 100 pS 24/02/2016 G. Aielli - RPC 2016

24/02/2016 G. Aielli - RPC 2016  s=10 mm 2  t=2ns t(ns)

24/02/2016 G. Aielli - RPC 2016 Absolute resolution  fluctuations w.r.t. an external coherent source Relative resolution  fluctuations of multiple pickup of the same external signal (2D, CS..) Time (ns) Amplitude (mV) Duration about 3 nsec Duration about 1.7 nsec Duration about 1.0 nsec

24/02/2016 G. Aielli - RPC 2016  1.2 mm 1 mm

24/02/2016 G. Aielli - RPC 2016

24/02/2016 G. Aielli - RPC 2016 (x1;t1) (x2;t2) L doi: /j.nima

24/02/2016 G. Aielli - RPC 2016

d >>    CS z 1  d y mm Classic ATLAS case, spatial resolution limited by the strip pitch (y l ;t yl ;q yl clus ) (y k ;t yk ;q yk clus ) (x i ;t xi ;q xi clus ) (x j ;t xj ;q xj clus ) Definitions t 0 = real impact time v= signal propagation velocity (~0.15 m/ns) 2  = avalanche signal distribution width (FWHM) d= strip pitch t n = lowest time of a given cluster x n = strip id with the lowest time of a given cluster y n = strip id with the lowest time of a given cluster q yl clus =  q yl estimated charge of the cluster (through ToT) Cluster list: y l ; y k ; x i ; x j ; Real hit list:  (x i ; y l )  (x j ; y k ) Fake hit list:  (x i ; y k )  (x j ; y l )     Pitch and CS 22 24/02/2016 G. Aielli - RPC 2016

(y l ;t yl ;q yl clus ) (y k ;t yk ;q yk clus ) (x i ;t xi ;q xi clus ) (x j ;t xj ;q xj clus ) Cluster list: y l ; y k ; x i ; x j ; Real hit list:  (x i ; y l )  (x j ; y k ) Fake hit list:  (x i ; y k )  (x j ; y l )     24/02/2016 G. Aielli - RPC 2016

24/02/2016  1 mm gas gap  1.2 mm electrodes  100 x 50 cm^2 single gap  25 mm pitch strips  New Front end G. Aielli - RPC 2016

Calibration The distribution of i 1, or  t 0 i 1 (for single hits) gives the the measure of v/d and uncertainty distribution calibration. It’s a property of the system Uncertainty TDC bin; cable length, amplifier saturation, charge dispersion, strip pitch… FE noise contribution negligible 15.9 cm/ns cm/ns 24/02/2016 G. Aielli - RPC 2016

Compatibility with a real hit 62% fake cut Calibration curve with single hits Fake hits distribution The peak is displaced by taking wrongly coupled hits, the width is broadened by taking different avalanches 24/02/2016 G. Aielli - RPC 2016

1cm 200 ps resolution 100 ps resolution 24/02/2016 G. Aielli - RPC 2016

24/02/2016 G. Aielli - RPC % fake cut 95.5% efficiency

24/02/2016 G. Aielli - RPC ns 5 ns 20 ns

24/02/2016 G. Aielli - RPC

No RPCs in the inner layer just MDTs 24/02/2016 G. Aielli - RPC 2016  OUTER LAYER for High pT trigger  One doublet chamber  MIDDLE LAYER for Low pT trigger  Two doublet chambers  IN TOTAL 6 independent layers measuring Eta and Phi  Hard wired trigger system (on chamber)

24/02/2016 G. Aielli - RPC 2016

24/02/2016 G. Aielli - RPC 2016 increase the redundancy by adding the RPC inner layer 9 layers instead of 6 4 chambers instead of 3 This idea was already considered in the original project of the barrel trigger detector, but at that time the need for the 3 rd station was not stringent and it was canceled when a substantial downgrade was required to Atlas BM.CO BM.PI BO BI

24/02/2016 G. Aielli - RPC 2016

24/02/2016 G. Aielli - RPC 2016 BO BI BM Bunch crossing T0 T1 T2 5m 7,2m 9,5m

24/02/2016 G. Aielli - RPC 2016

24/02/2016G. Aielli - RPC 2016

24/02/2016 G. Aielli - RPC 2016 CERN-PH-EP arXiv: v2 [hep-ex] 25 Mar 2013

24/02/2016 G. Aielli - RPC 2016

24/02/2016G. Aielli - RPC 2016 The combination of a new electronics and an additional layer in the inner region will permit to gain several key advantages: