The National Science Database Report Summer 2006 This analysis is derived from a sample of schools and thus may not be statisticallyrobust. As more schools.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Key Stage 3 National Strategy
Advertisements

Westminster Kingsway College QUALITY. Mission of Westminster Kingsway College: To support all of its students in realising their ambitions as learners.
Plantation Primary School
We were given 2 weeks notice… All staff AfPE trained (after recent meeting) Risk Assessment up to date/CRB checks uptodate Timetable checked (2 hours PE.
Education initiatives: HR implications Cathy Brearley 30 January 2013.
Guidance notes Getting started… Go to the LNT website: Click.
Parent Forum 10 th January Outline of session – Raising Standards How do we compare with other schools on results ? What are we doing to make progress.
© Herts for Learning Ltd Inspecting Sixth Form 1 st December 2014.
Managing a Club A club is trying to persuade more people to take part. Some features of the club are: Open to all ages Takes part in competitions and.
Strategic Leadership of ICT
Local Council Administrative Network 15 computers within administration area (offices and SLT). These can also link to school administration network. School.
MCQs for a Virtual Learning Environment Karen M. Smith University of York
Continuing Professional Development Tegryn Jones Policy and Planning Officer.
Schools Expert Panel Developing the ICT Subject Leader Refocusing on ICT as a subject.
The Ofsted ITE Inspection Framework 2014 A summary.
Implementation workshop VCE Environmental Science 2013−2016 August 2012.
Please help yourself to a drink. We will start at 9.15a.m.
Performance Review and Staff Development (PRSD) The Role of Governors Governor Reviewer Training.
Performance Review and Staff Development Reviewing the Principal’s Performance A Conference for Governor Reviewers and Principals.
24 June 2011 Raising standards, improving lives Moving to outstanding post-16 provision Tom Winskill HMI Principal Officer, Framework Development Ofsted.
DEVELOPING SECONDARY STRATEGY. 2 Staffordshire Context: County Council Mission Statement To make Staffordshire “A great place to live, work, visit and.
Theory & Practice – the new Common Inspection Framework and what it means to governors UCU-LSIS-UNISON FE Staff Governors’ Conference 3 December 2012 Lorna.
1 “So who wants to lead a mathematics department?” Developing Future Secondary Subject Leaders for Mathematics – Collaborative Action Research Project.
The LCVP is funded by the Department of Education and Science under the National Development Plan A Teacher’s Experience of WSE LCVP Conference.
An Inspector Called: Key findings from Ofsted English Review 2009 “English at the Crossroads”: Ofsted 2009.
Getting Practical Science transition project Session 2.
12 TH SEPTEMBER 2014 Developing Primary Assessment.
1 Secondary Head Teachers’ Meeting Thursday 9 January 2014.
Important Information Have you got a username and password for the school SRF account? If your school has not registered before then you can do this if.
© Crown copyright 2009 Science subject leader development materials Supporting the development of effective HSW and APP practice Autumn 2009.
Raising standards, improving lives The new inspection arrangements for maintained schools and academies from September 2012.
The Quality Standards for resource provisions For deaf children and young people in mainstream school.
The leading subject association for all teachers of geography.
Key findings of mathematics inspections Jane Jones HMI JMC meeting: 5 June June 2007 Date.
Middle Leadership Programme Day 1: The Effective Middle Leader.
Sylvia Odell (Science Adviser) e: Alex Fleming (Secondary Science Consultant) e: David Harrison.
NAIGS ANNUAL CONFERENCE Ian Richardson HMI Specialist Adviser for Science Date 5 July 2007.
 March 2014 Dr Tom Robson led a whole staff Science TD day where we raised awareness amongst staff of the recent changes to the curriculum for Science.
Key Stage 3 National Strategy 1 The Key Stage 3 National Strategy Foundation subjects Conference for LEAs Day 2.
Wednesday 14 th October 2015 RE Network Meeting: 1. Draft a form to monitor the use of the schemes of work posted on the EGfL. 2. Look when tricky situations.
Group 1 research & feedback YP Today: statistics & facts Including the national picture of PE, Schools Sport & Physical Activity from YST survey.
The Coseley School A Co-operative Trust Closing the Gap Strategies – 2015/16 Believe, Achieve, Excel Closing the Gap Strategies – 2015/16 Believe, Achieve,
Governors Introduction Part Three WELCOME Accountability.
Ian Selwood School of Education, The University of Birmingham Using ICT to Reduce Teacher Workloads: Can ICT play a role, or does it add to the burden?
YEAR 9 OPTIONS INFORMATION EVENING 2nd December 2015
Reepham Primary School School Improvement and Development At Reepham Primary School we aspire to be confident and ambitious learners who care for.
Joe Murray Consulting Working effectively with teaching assistants Annual Secondary Mathematics Conference National STEM Centre, University.
Intervention and Support Inclusion Questions. Early and Strategic  How does the school provide purposeful early intervention and support to lift the.
SAM Learning GO! An Overview for Teachers. SAM Learning GO! Objective Raising attainment throughout the school year by providing student and teacher support.
Leading Effective Intervention Objectives To give subject leaders an overview of the Strategy’s plans to refresh and develop intervention and targeted.
St Luke’s Primary School Westminster Pupil Voice in Primary Science Strategies and Ideas.
Using the STEM learning impact evaluation process Also known as The Impact Toolkit (ITK)
Primary PE and Sport Premium. Outcomes of todays Session 2 Clarity on the objectives of the Primary PE and Sport Premium Understanding how schools are.
2015 / 2016 and beyond.  1. High quality leadership drives school improvement  2. Quality of teaching and learning  3. Quality of maths provision 
Sawtry Junior School Development Plan. Raise achievement and improve the quality of teaching to be good or better by: Key priority One for improvement.
ICT POLICY Donna Varney Autumn 2005 Adapted from the Becta requirements.
Parents’ Forum - Tuesday 7 th June 2016 Ofsted. Update from the last forum Parents views on the school planner… …A big review is in place, but the changes.
Developing classroom practice to raise standards Rosemarie Sadler, Primary Performance Adviser Val Phillips – Primary Performance Adviser.
INSPECTING DESIGN & TECHNOLOGY: NOW AND IN THE FUTURE Peter Toft HMI – Ofsted Specialist Subject Adviser For D&T.
Secondary National Strategy © Crown copyright 2005 Progression – Role of the subject leader.
Raising standards, improving lives
Sports Premium Funding
Welcome House Keeping Introduce my-self and my role
Mathematics Leadership Steve Lomax Gloucestershire Local Authority This workshop explores how you can lead your department to improvement through.
Purpose The aims of this session include:
The New Secondary Curriculum Regional Subject Briefing Audit Tool
RE network meeting 6th June 2018
Student Pathways Survey 2009 Principals
Standard for Teachers’ Professional Development July 2016
Governor Induction Part 3
Presentation transcript:

The National Science Database Report Summer 2006 This analysis is derived from a sample of schools and thus may not be statisticallyrobust. As more schools contribute data, the database will increasingly reflect thenational picture of science education provision in schools. National Science Database An introduction for schools

The National Science Database Report Summer 2006 This analysis is derived from a sample of schools and thus may not be statisticallyrobust. As more schools contribute data, the database will increasingly reflect thenational picture of science education provision in schools. What is the National Science Database and why has it been developed? The NAIGS / ASE National Science Database has been developed over the last two years. The idea is not new. Indeed the idea of a database is based on best practice from NAIGS science advisers who have collected and analysed data within their own LEAs for many years. What is new is that the database will provide a national picture of science provision directly to schools.

The National Science Database Report Summer 2006 This analysis is derived from a sample of schools and thus may not be statisticallyrobust. As more schools contribute data, the database will increasingly reflect thenational picture of science education provision in schools. For whom and what is the database intended? School Leadership Teams Science Departments. To support local development To compare provision with that found across the country. Available to complete on-line. Hosted on Association for Science Education website ( Developed with advice from QCA and HMI to ensure that the questions asked complement and do not duplicate those raised as part of their monitoring activities.

The National Science Database Report Summer 2006 This analysis is derived from a sample of schools and thus may not be statisticallyrobust. As more schools contribute data, the database will increasingly reflect thenational picture of science education provision in schools. How will the data be stored and who will be able to access it? The ASE stores the data securely within their website. NAIGS will analyse the data. ASE will support NAIGS in despatching reports back to contributing schools. Data provided will not be shared with other organisations or used for any purposes other than that for which it was originally intended.

The National Science Database Report Summer 2006 This analysis is derived from a sample of schools and thus may not be statisticallyrobust. As more schools contribute data, the database will increasingly reflect thenational picture of science education provision in schools. Discussions within your school Consult with your Subject Leader, and if you are in this post, with your Headteacher before you complete the on-line questionnaire. The questions asked are factual and do not require you to make a ‘judgement’ about science provision in the school. Key documents, such as the school Asset Management Plan, will need to be consulted. Use the ‘National Science Database Question Sheet’ to ensure you have all the information you need when completing the database. Download at the ASE website.the ASE website Use the ‘National Science Database Pilot 2005: Information sheet’ to help when completing the database. Download at the ASE website.the ASE website

The National Science Database Report Summer 2006 This analysis is derived from a sample of schools and thus may not be statisticallyrobust. As more schools contribute data, the database will increasingly reflect thenational picture of science education provision in schools. What will the analyses look like? Annual report in summer term Graphs and charts providing a national overview Individual schools or LAs will not be identified A LA analysis can be generated if requested and if most schools have submitted data As the database develops, we intend to provide more sophisticated analyses – but the extent to which we can do that depends on how many schools participate and how many sections they complete. Currently there is no comparison per NOR. However it is helpful to know how large the schools in the report are. The next chart will allow you to gauge where you lie in terms of schools size.

The National Science Database Report Summer 2006 This analysis is derived from a sample of schools and thus may not be statisticallyrobust. As more schools contribute data, the database will increasingly reflect thenational picture of science education provision in schools. NOR

The National Science Database Report Summer 2006 This analysis is derived from a sample of schools and thus may not be statisticallyrobust. As more schools contribute data, the database will increasingly reflect thenational picture of science education provision in schools. A taster of the report outcomes: Grouping arrangementsGrouping arrangements Staff deployment to year groupsStaff deployment to year groups KS3 and KS4 teaching timeKS3 and KS4 teaching time13 KS3 and KS4 class sizesKS3 and KS4 class sizes Departmental management / organisationDepartmental management / organisation Support staff and lab availabilitySupport staff and lab availability Staffing, recruitment and retentionStaffing, recruitment and retention ICT provisionICT provision KS3 and KS4 curriculum resourcesKS3 and KS4 curriculum resources KS4 exam board and syllabus choicesKS4 exam board and syllabus choices Science budgetsScience budgets Laboratory accommodationLaboratory accommodation59 Departmental prioritiesDepartmental priorities60 Raising standardsRaising standards61

The National Science Database Report Summer 2006 This analysis is derived from a sample of schools and thus may not be statisticallyrobust. As more schools contribute data, the database will increasingly reflect thenational picture of science education provision in schools. Grouping arrangements

The National Science Database Report Summer 2006 This analysis is derived from a sample of schools and thus may not be statisticallyrobust. As more schools contribute data, the database will increasingly reflect thenational picture of science education provision in schools. Other questions: How are pupils grouped in: –Year 7 –Year 8 –Year 10 –Year 11…….? Grouping arrangements

The National Science Database Report Summer 2006 This analysis is derived from a sample of schools and thus may not be statisticallyrobust. As more schools contribute data, the database will increasingly reflect thenational picture of science education provision in schools. Staff Deployment

The National Science Database Report Summer 2006 This analysis is derived from a sample of schools and thus may not be statisticallyrobust. As more schools contribute data, the database will increasingly reflect thenational picture of science education provision in schools. Other questions: How are staff deployed in: –Year 7 –Year 8 –Year 10 –Year 11…….? Staff Deployment

The National Science Database Report Summer 2006 This analysis is derived from a sample of schools and thus may not be statisticallyrobust. As more schools contribute data, the database will increasingly reflect thenational picture of science education provision in schools. KS3 and KS4 Teaching Time

The National Science Database Report Summer 2006 This analysis is derived from a sample of schools and thus may not be statisticallyrobust. As more schools contribute data, the database will increasingly reflect thenational picture of science education provision in schools. Other questions: How many pupils are in key stage 3 and 4 classes? Smallest class sizes? Largest class sizes? Average class sizes…. KS3 and KS4 Teaching Time

The National Science Database Report Summer 2006 This analysis is derived from a sample of schools and thus may not be statisticallyrobust. As more schools contribute data, the database will increasingly reflect thenational picture of science education provision in schools. Departmental Management

The National Science Database Report Summer 2006 This analysis is derived from a sample of schools and thus may not be statisticallyrobust. As more schools contribute data, the database will increasingly reflect thenational picture of science education provision in schools. Other questions: How many new Subject Leaders are there? How are TLRs allocated in science? How many science staff have TLRs? How many departmental meetings do departments have each term? How much non-contact time do science teachers have? Departmental Management

The National Science Database Report Summer 2006 This analysis is derived from a sample of schools and thus may not be statisticallyrobust. As more schools contribute data, the database will increasingly reflect thenational picture of science education provision in schools. Support Staff and Labs

The National Science Database Report Summer 2006 This analysis is derived from a sample of schools and thus may not be statisticallyrobust. As more schools contribute data, the database will increasingly reflect thenational picture of science education provision in schools. Other questions: How many science staff teach in the same lab throughout the week? How many science technicians do schools have? How many support staff support pupils in science? Support Staff and Labs

The National Science Database Report Summer 2006 This analysis is derived from a sample of schools and thus may not be statisticallyrobust. As more schools contribute data, the database will increasingly reflect thenational picture of science education provision in schools. Staff Recruitment and Retention

The National Science Database Report Summer 2006 This analysis is derived from a sample of schools and thus may not be statisticallyrobust. As more schools contribute data, the database will increasingly reflect thenational picture of science education provision in schools. Other questions: How many non-specialists teach science? How many new science staff are employed in each school in a year? How many science NQTs this year? How many science posts are re-advertised? How often do schools use supply staff? Staff Recruitment and Retention

The National Science Database Report Summer 2006 This analysis is derived from a sample of schools and thus may not be statisticallyrobust. As more schools contribute data, the database will increasingly reflect thenational picture of science education provision in schools. ICT and Science

The National Science Database Report Summer 2006 This analysis is derived from a sample of schools and thus may not be statisticallyrobust. As more schools contribute data, the database will increasingly reflect thenational picture of science education provision in schools. Other questions: How much access do science departments have to a school ICT suite? Is there internet access in science? How many computers are available for pupils and/or staff? Do staff feel confident to use ICT to teach science? How many interactive whiteboards and data projectors do science departments have? How far is ICT built into schemes of work? How many staff used ICT in science lessons last week? How many pupils used ICT in science lessons last week? ICT and Science

The National Science Database Report Summer 2006 This analysis is derived from a sample of schools and thus may not be statisticallyrobust. As more schools contribute data, the database will increasingly reflect thenational picture of science education provision in schools. KS3 and KS4 Curriculum Resources

The National Science Database Report Summer 2006 This analysis is derived from a sample of schools and thus may not be statisticallyrobust. As more schools contribute data, the database will increasingly reflect thenational picture of science education provision in schools. Other questions: Which KS3 /KS4 texts are used in addition to a main text? How is the QCA scheme of work used? How are published schemes used? KS3 and KS4 Curriculum Resources

The National Science Database Report Summer 2006 This analysis is derived from a sample of schools and thus may not be statisticallyrobust. As more schools contribute data, the database will increasingly reflect thenational picture of science education provision in schools. Exam Board and Syllabus Choices

The National Science Database Report Summer 2006 This analysis is derived from a sample of schools and thus may not be statisticallyrobust. As more schools contribute data, the database will increasingly reflect thenational picture of science education provision in schools. Other questions: Which exam board is used most? Which is the most popular GCSE course? How many group study single science? How many groups study triple / separate sciences at KS4? How many group study 21 st Century science? Exam Board and Syllabus Choices

The National Science Database Report Summer 2006 This analysis is derived from a sample of schools and thus may not be statisticallyrobust. As more schools contribute data, the database will increasingly reflect thenational picture of science education provision in schools. Science and Budgets

The National Science Database Report Summer 2006 This analysis is derived from a sample of schools and thus may not be statisticallyrobust. As more schools contribute data, the database will increasingly reflect thenational picture of science education provision in schools. Other questions: How much funding is allocated via a formula? How much is allocated through internal bids? How much is spent on consumables, text books, ICT equipment and photocopying? Science and Budgets

The National Science Database Report Summer 2006 This analysis is derived from a sample of schools and thus may not be statisticallyrobust. As more schools contribute data, the database will increasingly reflect thenational picture of science education provision in schools. Lab Accommodation How old is the oldest unrefurbished lab? How old is the newest lab? Is the lab accommodation suitable? How many labs are in poor condition? How many labs have been refurbished recently? How many new labs are planned?

The National Science Database Report Summer 2006 This analysis is derived from a sample of schools and thus may not be statisticallyrobust. As more schools contribute data, the database will increasingly reflect thenational picture of science education provision in schools. Departmental Priorities, Raising Standards Current areas for development? Departmental strengths? Are you happy for others to contact you to learn? What has had the greatest impact on raising standards?

The National Science Database Report Summer 2006 This analysis is derived from a sample of schools and thus may not be statisticallyrobust. As more schools contribute data, the database will increasingly reflect thenational picture of science education provision in schools. The National Science Database is…… a unique project; will provide schools with valuable data and an annual report; will gather a realistic national picture of actual science provision; will highlight strengths and weaknesses in provision; and enable feedback to key agencies