Anastasia Muiti, NEMA Monitoring of adopt a river project.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
outcome mapping The Challenges of Assessing Development Impacts
Advertisements

Chemawawin Cree Nation. Community Planning Change, Expectations and Performance Some Observations Chief Clarence Easter Chemawawin Cree Nation Aboriginal.
Challenging Evaluation: An Introduction to Outcome Mapping Amy Etherington & Rebecca Lee Mini-training for IDRC Interns & PDAs December 7 & 8, 2005.
Learning from imGoats experiences with Outcome Mapping
Outcome mapping. Outcome Mapping Developed by the evaluation unit of Developed by the evaluation unit of
Child Safeguarding Standards
Lucila Beato UNMIL/HRPS
A Complimentary Approach to Developing Progress Markers in Outcome Mapping Julius Nyangaga and Heidi Schaeffer.
Monitoring and Evaluation in the CSO Sector in Ghana
Supporting continuous improvement in the replication process Getting to Grips with Replication Seminar 3: Monitoring, evaluation & continuous improvement.
Mapping the Policy Process Technical Assistance for Civil Society Organisations Bosnia and Herzegovina Office This project is funded by the European Union.
An Introduction to an Integrated P,M&E System developed by IDRC Kaia Ambrose October, 2005.
ECVET WORKSHOP 2 22/23/24 November The European Quality Assurance Reference Framework.
UELSU reps conference Student Engagement: What does is mean for you?
Challenge Questions How good is our strategic leadership?
Evaluation. Practical Evaluation Michael Quinn Patton.
Monitoring for impact in a programme’s sphere of influence a case study of the ´Quality Education and vulnerability Programme´ in Zimbabwe Robert Chipimbi.
February 8, 2012 Session 3: Performance Management Systems 1.
Role of NEMA in facilitating RCE operations in Kenya By Dr Ayub Ndaruga Director, Environmental Education, Information and Public Participation, NEMA-Kenya.
1 Evaluation is a Partnership Dr. Darla M. Cooper Associate Director Center for Student Success Basic Skills Coordinators Workshop September 17, 2009.
Outcome Mapping Team Meeting February Key evaluation challenges measuring development results establishing cause & effect in an open system timing.
It is my business to locate trouble… Making Evaluation Work.
Program (project team) Overall Goal / Vision Interest, Motivation, Role & Responsibility of the Project Intermediate Goal(s) Boundary Partners & their.
Outcome Mapping and Monitoring HIA Progress in Thailand Decharut Sukkumnoed Rungthip Sukkumnoed Duangjai Rungrojcharuenkij Health Public Policy Foundation.
Gendered Outcome Mapping Sana SHAMS \ Mudasir MUSTAFA PAN LOCALIZATION PROJECT ( CENTER FOR RESEARCH IN URDU LANGUGE PROCESSING.
Basic Workshop For Reviewers NQAAC Recognize the developmental engagements Ensure that they operate smoothly and effectively” Ensure that all team members.
Overview of Title I Part A Farwell ISD. The Intent of Title I Part A The intent is to help all children to have the opportunity to obtain a high quality.
March 26-28, 2013 SINGAPORE CDIO Asian Regional Meeting and Workshop on Engineering Education and Policies for Regional Leaders Programme Evaluation (CDIO.
United Nations Volunteers Volunteerism for Development in the context of CBA Adeline Aubry CBA Volunteerism & Community Adaptation Specialist United Nations.
Monitoring and Evaluation of GeSCI’s Activities GeSCI Team Meeting 5-6 Dec 2007.
FUNCTION 5: MONITORING M5 – S1. 1.Situation Monitoring 2.Humanitarian Response Monitoring 3.Coordination Performance Monitoring Types of Monitoring.
Programmes of Work Revision lesson 5 Tuesday 29 th March.
From policy to practice and back to policy 3 March 2015 Children in Wales Conference Gail Bennett, Parenting Network Chair Flintshire Early Years and Family.
ASEF Risk Communication for Public Health Emergencies, 2015 Overview.
Third Sector Evaluation: Challenges and Opportunities Presentation to the Public Legal Education in Canada National Conference on “Making an Impact” 26.
School Improvement Partnership Programme: Summary of interim findings March 2014.
SUMMARY PROJECT OUTLINE (SPROUT) ITC-ILO/ACTRAV Training Course A : Trade Union Training on ILS & the ILO Declaration on Fundamental Principles &
(FODESA) 1999 – 2009 SAHELIAN AREAS DEVELOPMENT FUND.
UNITED NATIONS POLICE STANDARDIZED BEST PRACTICES TOOLKIT ON GENDER MAINSTREAMING POLICING IN PEACEKEEPING 1.
Introduction to Outcome Mapping
Capturing Transformative Change in Education: The Challenge of SDG Target 4.7 Susan Gallwey, Irish Development Education Association November 2015.
EVIDENCE BASED POLICY RECOMMENDATIONS – TAKE AWAY LESSONS ON HOW TO PROGRESS EFFECTIVE ALCOHOL EDUCATION BETSY THOM Drug and Alcohol Research Centre MIDDLESEX.
Assessing Contribution and Enhancing Social Learning: An Introduction to Outcome Mapping (OM) 16 December 2004 Kaia Ambrose.
Waisea Vosa Climate Change Unit Division of Political and Treaties Ministry of Foreign Affairs and International Cooperation.
C4EO – Ways of Working Heather Rushton, Planning and Performance 1.
Local HWTS Monitoring Eva Manzano, CAWST Technical Advisor Laos Vientiane, Lao PDR November 11, 2014.
Key Messages from the National Parenting Coordinators’ Network 10 September 2014 Gail Bennett, Parenting Network Chair Flintshire Parenting Strategy Coordinator.
Session 2: Developing a Comprehensive M&E Work Plan.
Stuart Murray Age Concern Wigan Borough Elaine Jones & Joan Brogden Volunteer Researchers Wigan Borough.
Steps in development of action plans ITC-ILO/ACTRAV Course A3 – Trade Union Training on Information Management for Trade Union Organization, Research.
Planning for Curriculum Framework Implementation.
Translating ideas into proposals for action programmes
Auditing Sustainable Development Goals
PURPOSE AND SCOPE OF PROJECT MONITORING AND EVALUATION M&E.
Competency Based Learning and Development
Assessing Contribution and Enhancing Social Learning: An Introduction to Outcome Mapping (OM) 16 December 2004 Kaia Ambrose.
Weeraboon Wisartsakul
CATHCA National Conference 2018
Introduction to Outcome Mapping
Monitoring for impact in a programme’s sphere of influence
ORGANIZATIONAL PRACTICES MONITORING PRIORITIES VISION PROGRESS MARKERS OUTCOME JOURNALS MISSION STRATEGY MAPS STRATEGY JOURNALS BOUNDERYPARTNERS ORGANIZATIONAL.
Evaluation: Framing Outcomes For Impact
Competency Based Learning and Development
Translating ideas into proposals for action programmes
Engendering Change Mid-Term Learning Review
Translating ideas into proposals for action programmes
OGB Partner Advocacy Workshop 18th & 19th March 2010
Translating ideas into proposals for action programmes
A brief introduction to the usefulness of Outcome Mapping for assessing impact
Interest, Motivation, Role & Responsibility of the Project
Presentation transcript:

Anastasia Muiti, NEMA Monitoring of adopt a river project

Why Monitor a Programme? Monitoring and Evaluation is a key component of any programme and activity. Monitoring and evaluation will help to see the outcomes of activities being implemented at the community level and the achievements realized.

Monitoring needs to be: Useful Affordable Light in work Understandable

Use monitoring information Feeding learning into management cycle Meeting reporting requirements Supplying information for evaluations Contributing to publications Reducing risk Helping a partner learn

Monitoring ….. Using outcome mapping (OM) OM is an approach to planning and assessing projects that aim to bring real change & tangible change, was developed by IUCN It actively engages the project team in designing a monitoring framework & evaluation plan & promotes self assessment OM considers: Behaviour change, boundary partners, & contributions of each partner OM is based on the principle of participation

Boundary Partners Those individuals, groups, and organizations with whom the program: Interacts directly to effect change Anticipates opportunities for influence Engages in mutual learning Who is a boundary partner?

Sphere of influence Adopt a River Program The rest of the world = partners

Boundary Partners have Boundary Partners programprogram’s bpbp’s bp Programme

Outcome Challenge : Definition: OC describes the ideal behavioural changes, relationships, actions and interactions in the partner Describes how these changes will contribute to the success of the program Written like this: “The program/project intends to see the partners who are actively involved in data collection, uploading in MiniSASS and ultimately restoring the Nairobi rivers”.

10 Changes Sought Ecosystem Human System Changes in Behaviour Changes in State

Monitoring cntd…… Each stakeholder/ boundary partner has a role to play towards the implementation of the project The OM programme categorizes the activities into three (3) levels The stakeholders are expected to progress from easy to achieve to truly transformative activities and therefore the activities are regarded as progress markers

3 Levels of Progress Markers The program sets out what it would: Expect to see the boundary partner doing? Like to see the boundary partner doing? Love to see the boundary partner doing?

Progress markers = ladder of change Truly transformative Set quite high More active, engagement Early response to program’s basic activities Love to see Like to see Expect to see

Progress markers are graduated  Move from easier to more difficult to achieve changes in behaviour  Describe the change process of a single boundary partner  Are more complete than a single indicator

Monitoring Changes in the Stakeholders 15 Two types of Journals are used to monitor and report progress. These are; Outcome Journal Progress markers – at the 3 levels you assess what you expect those you are engaging in to achieve. Progress Journal organizational practices and strategies/activities within your institution

Outcome Journal 16 Uses progress markers to chart boundary partner’s progress Sets starting point or benchmark Captures details on changes in the boundary partner, contributing factors & actors, and sources of evidence

Outcome journal 17  The Outcome Journal is kept and filled by the project contact person that the coordinating institution will work with in regard to project implementation in their institution.  E.g. Designated teacher, Patron of an environmental club; Community Development Officer or the Public Relations Officer;.  Each stakeholder is expected to note the project activities they are involved in.  The journal should state progress on each progress marker that they have implemented.  It should capture a description of activities, lessons learnt.

Example of an Outcome Journal StakeholderDo you have indicators? Outcome description period Com men t Support documen t University of Nairobi Expect to see Designate a person to be in charge of the project Attend,meetings for project implementation A person designated to be in charge of the project Letter of appointm ent, Minutes of the meetings Like to see Train staff & students on Project issues 20 club members trained Collect Data Data collected 20/7/15 Collect & Identify species Upload data into the software Interpret the data

Example of an Outcome Journal Stakeholde r Do you have indicators? Outcome description period Com men t Support documen t University of Nairobi Love to see Proposal writing for fund raising Undertake restoration activities

Progress Journal 20  Captures data on the strategies being employed to encourage change in the boundary partner  Helps the program gauge its contributions to the achievement of outcomes and modify its actions accordingly  Feeds into work planning & (modifications) or new activities  Records data on how the program is operating as an organization to fulfill its mission  Includes information on the program’s practices

Example of an progress Journal Type of activity Progress description Date Testimonials (outcomes, lessons learnt) Support docume nt (web links) Capacity building Club members workshop 25/7/1520 club members trained Training report Data collection Data collected from the designated points 3/8/15 Identificatio n of species Identification of collected species 3/8/155 groups identified Data uploaded on the MiniSASS 5/8/15

OM approach focuses on….. Improving rather than proving. Understanding rather than simply reporting. Creativity and knowledge, rather than just taking credit.

Thank you