1 History of Ethics Section 3 Some Kantian Themes.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
March 27, 2012 Kantian Deontology. Act Utilitarianism An action is morally wrong if and only if there is an alternative action that produces a greater.
Advertisements

Non-Consequentialism
What is deontology?.
KANTIAN ETHICS IN FIVE EASY (?) STEPS. Sandel’s Classification of Normative Ethical Theories 1.Core concept: maximizing happiness – Utilitarianism (morality,
Kantian Ethics (Duty and Reason)
Immanuel Kant The Good Will and Autonomy. Context for Kant Groundwork for Metaphysics of Morals after American Revolution and Before French- rights.
Deontology: the Ethics of Duty
categorical imperative
Kant. Kant desire Kant desire impulse Kant desire impulse incentive.
Philosophy 220 Kantian Moral Theory and the Liberal View of Sexual Morality.
Deontological Ethics Deontological theory—Asserts that the rightness of actions is determined partly or entirely by their intrinsic value Consequentialist.
How Actions Can Be Morally Evaluated l Teleological Ethics: morality is defined in terms of the consequences of actions l Deontological Ethics: morality.
Ethical Theories High-level account of how questions about morality should be addressed. Similar to engineering models? V=IR: a tool to solve many engineering.
How Actions Can Be Morally Evaluated l Teleological Ethics: morality is the means to achieve what is identified as good or valuable l Deontological Ethics:
How Actions Can Be Morally Evaluated l Teleological Ethics: morality is the means to achieve what is identified as good or valuable l Deontological Ethics:
Kantian Ethics Exam Questions
Kant’s deontological ethics
Kant’s Ethics of Duty 3 insights form the basis for his theory  An action has moral worth if it is done for the sake of duty. (DUTY)  An action is morally.
Kantian Ethics Introduction to Philosophy Jason M. Chang.
Kant’s Deontological Ethics. The Plan  What is Deontology?  Good Wills and Right Actions  The Categorical Imperative  Examples and Applications.
Deontological Ethics Is saving someone from drowning a morally praiseworthy act? Do motives play any role in whether an act is morally praiseworthy?
Kantian ethics (& suicide): Kantian ethics (& suicide): Immanuel Kant ( ). A German philosopher. Ought implies Can Maxims Categorical Imperative.
Immanuel Kant. Two worlds Reason is part of the intelligible world Sensible (Lesser faculty) Part of the world of nature (empirical)
Categorical and Practical Imperative
Kant’s Ethics Kant’s quotes are from FUNDAMENTAL PRINCIPLES OF THE METAPHYSICS OF MORALS.
The Categorical Imperative Kantian Ethics. Learning Intentions and Outcomes You will: Investigate the three formulations of the Categorical Imperative.
Ethical Principles: “Good” vs. “Right” Current Issues – LHS.
Immanuel Kant Deontological Ethics.
Introduction to Ethics Lecture 12 Kant By David Kelsey.
Kant (5) Humanity as an end in itself. 3 formulations of the CI Universal law formulation: Act only according to that maxim whereby you can at the same.
The Sheriff’s Dilemma How to structure your answer.
Utilitarianism Objection –Too permissive –Utilitarian response: (1) bite the bullet (2) try to show negative side-effects, long-term consequences –Rebuttal.
Setting the state for Kant --Are there any acts that are wrong, regardless of the consequences? (Are consequences all that matter?) --Case: Bombing Hiroshima.
KANT Kant was looking for some sort of objective basis for morality – a way of knowing our duty.
Class 6 Kant. Immanuel Kant (1724–1804) From Königsberg, Germany.
Utilitarianism Act Utilitarianism: The right act is that which maximizes happiness (only version we’ve been discussing thus far) Rule Utilitarianism: The.
© Michael Lacewing Kant’s Categorical Imperative Michael Lacewing
AIT, Comp. Sci. & Info. Mgmt AT02.98 Ethical, Legal, and Social Issues in Computing September Term, Objectives of these slides: l to describe an.
The Moral Philosophy of Immanuel Kant The Ethics of Duty and Reason
Ethics AIO 2015 LECTURE 2.
Kant and Kantian Ethics: Is it possible for “reason” to supply the absolute principles of morality?
Immanuel Kant The Categorical Imperative The Age of Reason Immanuel Kant.
Lesson Objective Key Words Lesson outcomes Hypothetical Categorical Imperatives Freedom To evaluate the differences between the Hypothetical and Categorical.
Immanuel Kant and the Enlightenment Immanuel Kant: German ( ) Enlightenment: 1700's (18th Century) Applies the new rational scientific method of.
KANTIANISM AND EUTHANASIA ATTITUDES TO KEY ISSUES.
Lecture 13 Kantian ethics Immanuel Kant ( )
Kant (1) Grounding for the Metaphysics of Morals, Section 1.
Immanuel Kant The Categorical Imperative. Part I. The Ethics of Duty More than any other philosopher, Kant emphasized the way in which the moral life.
What is the opposite of Utilitarianism? We are still addressing the question of HOW we should be moral.
EECS 690 January 27, Deontology Typically, when anyone talks about Deontology, they mean to talk about Immanuel Kant. Kant is THE deontologist.
“The only thing that can be good, without qualification, is an action performed solely because it is our duty.” (Boatright (2004) p52)
Social Ethics continued Immanuel Kant John Rawls.
Introduction to Ethics Lecture 12 Kant
KANT Kant was looking for some sort of objective basis for morality – a way of knowing our duty.
Kant’s theory of imperatives
Immanuel Kant & Categorical Imperative
Immanuel Kant.
Moral Theory Overview: Immanuel Kant
The Categorical Imperative
Kant and Kantian Ethics:
Deontology Immanuel Kant ( ) Founder of Deontology.
Kant’s Categorical Imperative - revision
Immanuel Kant The Categorical Imperative.
Introduction to Philosophy Lecture 14 Immanuel Kant
Kantian Ethics.
The Categorical Imperative
Deontology Immanuel Kant ( ) Founder of Deontology.
Introduction to Ethics Online Course & Instructor
History of Philosophy Lecture 17 Immanuel Kant’ Ethics
Presentation transcript:

1 History of Ethics Section 3 Some Kantian Themes

2 Kant & Morality Kant wanted to supply a criterion for morality based on reason alone, & thus on what all rational beings could accept. Kant introduced ‘The Categorical Imperative’ (CI).

3 First Formulation of the CI ‘ Act only on that maxim through which you can at the same time will that it should become a universal law’ (see note 1 [final slide of this Section]).

4 Universalization Kant’s universalization (concerning a world in which everyone acts on a proposed maxim) is distinguished from Hare’s universalizability (which requires that like cases be judged alike). Kant’s first formulation rules out actions of which the maxim (when universalized) involves either a ‘contradiction in concept’ or a ‘contradiction in will’.

5 To Consider Distinguish between ‘a contradiction in concept’ and a ‘contradiction in will’.

6 Problem: First Formulation Overcomes some objections, but allows many actions to be impermissible under some descriptions (or maxims) but permissible under others.

7 Second Formulation of the CI Urges us to treat humanity always as an end but never as a means alone: ‘So act as to treat humanity… in every case at the same time as an end, never as a means only’ (see note 2 [final slide of this Section]). Bans exploitation; rejects racial discrimination. Seems to fare better than the first formulation.

8 To Consider Think about whether Kant’s advocacy of treating people as ends & never only as means captures or fails to capture the core of morality.

9 Third Formulation ‘So act that your will can regard itself at the same time as making universal law through its maxim’ (see note 3 [final slide of this Section]). Variant: ‘So act as if you were through your maxims a law-making member of a kingdom of ends’ (see note 4 [final slide of this Section]).

10 Problems: Second and Third Formulations Similar problems to the first one. Indifference towards non-human animals. Cases where someone is treated as a means whatever we do. Kant’s examples (lying, promises, etc.), seem to work because they turn on human institutions that depend on solidarity. But few other actions (maxims) resemble these.

11 Final Thought Kant’s belief that each moral agent has obligations to all others, regardless of their location or community (his cosmopolitanism) is arguably one of his most important contributions to ethics.

12 References 1. Kant, Immanuel, Groundwork for the Metaphysic of Morals, trans. Thomas K. Abbott, ed. Lara Denis (Peterborough, Ontario: Broadview, 2005), p Kant, ibid., p Kant, ibid., pp Kant, ibid., p. 92.