Gordon McGregor March 5-12, 2005 Moriond EW, La Thuile. MiniBooNE: Current Status.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Neutrinos from kaon decay in MiniBooNE Kendall Mahn Columbia University MiniBooNE beamline overview Kaon flux predictions Kaon measurements in MiniBooNE.
Advertisements

Measurement of the off-axis NuMI beam with MiniBooNE Zelimir Djurcic Columbia University Zelimir Djurcic Columbia University Outline of this Presentation.
05/31/2007Teppei Katori, Indiana University, NuInt '07 1 Charged Current Interaction measurements in MiniBooNE hep-ex/XXX Teppei Katori for the MiniBooNE.
03/07/2007Teppei Katori, Indiana University, PMN07 1 Neutrino Interaction measurements in MiniBooNE hep-ex/ Teppei Katori and D. Chris Cox for.
P AUL N IENABER S AINT M ARY ’ S U NIVERSITY OF M INNESOTA FOR THE M INI B OO NE C OLLABORATION J ULY DPF2009.
MiniBooNE: (Anti)Neutrino Appearance and Disappeareance Results SUSY11 01 Sep, 2011 Warren Huelsnitz, LANL 1.
Miami 2010 MINIBOONE  e e  2008! H. Ray, University of Florida.
Sam Zeller, NO-VE Workshop, 02/07/06 1 Neutrino and Antineutrino Cross Sections at MiniBooNE Sam Zeller Columbia University (for the MiniBooNE collaboration)
LSND/MiniBooNE Follow-up Experiment with DAEdALUS W.C. Louis Los Alamos National Laboratory August 6, 2010.
(Status of ) The search for nm to ne oscillations at MiniBooNE
Neutrino Physics - Lecture 7 Steve Elliott LANL Staff Member UNM Adjunct Professor ,
1 MiniBooNE and Sterile Neutrinos M. Shaevitz Columbia University WIN 05 Workshop Extensions to the Neutrino Standard Model: Sterile Neutrinos MiniBooNE:
1 Neutrino Oscillations: The Next Steps? M. Shaevitz Columbia University WIN 05 Workshop Introduction MiniBooNE and LSND Determining   : Reactor Oscillation.
First Results from MiniBooNE May 29, 2007 William Louis Introduction The Neutrino Beam Events in the MiniBooNE Detector Data Analysis Initial Results Future.
10/24/2005Zelimir Djurcic-PANIC05-Santa Fe Zelimir Djurcic Physics Department Columbia University Backgrounds in Backgrounds in neutrino appearance signal.
July 19, 2003 HEP03, Aachen P. Shanahan MINOS Collaboration 1 STATUS of the MINOS Experiment Argonne Athens Brookhaven Caltech Cambridge Campinas Dubna.
Zelimir Djurcic Physics Department Columbia University Status of MiniBooNE Status of MiniBooNEExperiment WIN07, Calcutta WIN07, Calcutta January 15-20,2007.
MiniBooNE Update Since Last PAC Meeting (Nov 2007) Steve Brice (FNAL) PAC Meeting 27 March 2008.
Atmospheric Neutrino Oscillations in Soudan 2
NEW RESULTS FROM MINOS Patricia Vahle, for the MINOS collaboration College of William and Mary.
HARP for MiniBooNE Linda R. Coney Columbia University DPF 2004.
5/1/20110 SciBooNE and MiniBooNE Kendall Mahn TRIUMF For the SciBooNE and MiniBooNE collaborations A search for   disappearance with:
The Elementary Particles. e−e− e−e− γγ u u γ d d The Basic Interactions of Particles g u, d W+W+ u d Z0Z0 ν ν Z0Z0 e−e− e−e− Z0Z0 e−e− νeνe W+W+ Electromagnetic.
The Muon Neutrino Quasi-Elastic Cross Section Measurement on Plastic Scintillator Tammy Walton December 4, 2013 Hampton University Physics Group Meeting.
Results and Implications from MiniBooNE LLWI, 25 Feb 2011 Warren Huelsnitz, LANL
05/09/2011Teppei Katori, MIT1 Teppei Katori Massachusetts Institute of Technology Phenomenology 2011 symposium (Pheno11), Madison, WI, May 9, 2011 Test.
University of Delaware Physics Seminar Morgan Wascko 28 February, 2005 LSU Slide 1 MiniBooNE and Oscillations Sin 2 2   e m2m2 Neutrino Event Display.
Gordon McGregor Saturday, November 8th, 2003 NBI03, Tsukuba, Japan. The MiniBooNE Target.
MiniBooNE - Booster Neutrino Experiment Andrew Green Indiana University DPF 2002May 27, 2002.
Sterile Neutrino Oscillations and CP-Violation Implications for MiniBooNE NuFact’07 Okayama, Japan Georgia Karagiorgi, Columbia University August 10, 2007.
The NOvA Experiment Ji Liu On behalf of the NOvA collaboration College of William and Mary APS April Meeting April 1, 2012.
MiniBooNE Michel Sorel (Valencia U.) for the MiniBooNE Collaboration TAUP Conference September 2005 Zaragoza (Spain)
Teppei Katori Indiana University Rencontres de Moriond EW 2008 La Thuile, Italia, Mar., 05, 08 Neutrino cross section measurements for long-baseline neutrino.
I. Neutrino Oscillations with the MiniBooNE Experiment at FNAL ● Louis – 4-Year Plan and Status of the MiniBooNE Experiment ● Mills – Fluxes, Cross Sections,
MiniBooNE : Current Status Heather Ray Los Alamos National Lab.
1 DISCOVERY OF ATMOSPHERIC MUON NEUTRINO OSCILLATIONS Prologue First Hint in Kamiokande Second Hint in Kamiokande Evidence found in Super-Kamiokande Nov-12.
Mineral Oil Tests for the MiniBooNE Detector Jennifer L. Raaf University of Cincinnati November 8, 2001 Overview of MiniBooNE Experiment Detector Event.
Preliminary Results from the MINER A Experiment Deborah Harris Fermilab on behalf of the MINERvA Collaboration.
Latest Results from the MINOS Experiment Justin Evans, University College London for the MINOS Collaboration NOW th September 2008.
MiniBooNE Cross Section Results H. Ray, University of Florida ICHEP Interactions of the future!
Recent results from SciBooNE and MiniBooNE experiments Žarko Pavlović Los Alamos National Laboratory Rencontres de Moriond 18 March 2011.
A Letter of Intent to Build a MiniBooNE Near Detector: BooNE W.C. Louis & G.B. Mills, FNAL PAC, November 13, 2009 Louis BooNE Physics Goals MiniBooNE Appearance.
Mini Overview Peter Kasper NBI The MiniBooNE Collaboration University of Alabama, Tuscaloosa Bucknell University, Lewisburg University of California,
Search for Sterile Neutrino Oscillations with MiniBooNE
Medium baseline neutrino oscillation searches Andrew Bazarko, Princeton University Les Houches, 20 June 2001 LSND: MeVdecay at rest MeVdecay in flight.
MiniBooNE MiniBooNE Motivation LSND Signal Interpreting the LSND Signal MiniBooNE Overview Experimental Setup Neutrino Events in the Detector The Oscillation.
April 26, McGrew 1 Goals of the Near Detector Complex at T2K Clark McGrew Stony Brook University Road Map The Requirements The Technique.
Susan Burke DØ/University of Arizona DPF 2006 Measurement of the top pair production cross section at DØ using dilepton and lepton + track events Susan.
Status of MiniBooNE Short Baseline Neutrino Oscillation Experiment Jonathan Link Columbia University International Conference on Flavor Physics October.
Search for active neutrino disappearance using neutral-current interactions in the MINOS long-baseline experiment 2008/07/31 Tomonori Kusano Tohoku University.
Outline: IntroJanet Event Rates Particle IdBill Backgrounds and signal Status of the first MiniBooNE Neutrino Oscillation Analysis Janet Conrad & Bill.
Gordon McGregor Saturday, November 8, NBI03, Tsukuba, Japan. The Neutrino Flux At MiniBooNE.
Results and Implications from MiniBooNE: Neutrino Oscillations and Cross Sections 15 th Lomonosov Conference, 19 Aug 2011 Warren Huelsnitz, LANL
1 Icarus-T600 Collaboration Carlo Rubbia Univ. of Pavia, Italy and INFN, Sezione Pavia (Oct. 3,2006) Progress Report to the SPS-C.
A New Upper Limit for the Tau-Neutrino Magnetic Moment Reinhard Schwienhorst      ee ee
Fermilab E-898 Ray Stefanski Fermilab Annual Users Meeting June 8, 2005.
MiniBooNE: Status and Plans Outline Physics motivation Beamline performance Detector performance First look at the data Conclusions Fernanda G. Garcia,
Observation Gamma rays from neutral current quasi-elastic in the T2K experiment Huang Kunxian for half of T2K collaboration Mar. 24, Univ.
 CC QE results from the NOvA prototype detector Jarek Nowak and Minerba Betancourt.
T2K Experiment Results & Prospects Alfons Weber University of Oxford & STFC/RAL For the T2K Collaboration.
Precision Measurement of Muon Neutrino Disappearance with T2K Alex Himmel Duke University for the The T2K Collaboration 37 th International Conference.
MiniBooNE: Current Status Outline Physics motivation Beamline performance Detector performance Preliminary results Conclusions Fernanda G. Garcia, Fermilab.
Recent Results from the T2K ND280 detector Jonathan Perkin on behalf of the T2K collaboration KAMIOKA TOKAI 295 km.
Neutrino-Nucleon Neutral Current Elastic Interactions in MiniBooNE Denis Perevalov University of Alabama for the MiniBooNE collaboration presented by:
R. Tayloe, Indiana U. DNP06 1 A Search for  → e oscillations with MiniBooNE MiniBooNE does not yet have a result for the  → e oscillation search. The.
Neutrino-Nucleon Neutral Current Elastic Interactions in MiniBooNE Denis Perevalov University of Alabama for the MiniBooNE collaboration presented by:
5/31/2006Fermilab Users Meeting1 Zelimir Djurcic Physics Department Columbia University MiniBooNE, NO A, MINER A.
Neutral Current Interactions in MINOS Alexandre Sousa, University of Oxford for the MINOS Collaboration Neutrino Events in MINOS Neutrino interactions.
The MiniBooNE Little Muon Counter Detector
Impact of neutrino interaction uncertainties in T2K
Presentation transcript:

Gordon McGregor March 5-12, 2005 Moriond EW, La Thuile. MiniBooNE: Current Status.

Gordon McGregor March 5-12, 2005 Moriond EW, La Thuile. 2 Why MiniBooNE? Results from the LSND experiment and solar and atmospheric neutrino experiments can be explained by neutrino oscillations with distinct values of Δm 2. The Standard Model, with only 3 neutrino flavors, cannot accommodate all the Δm 2 values. Either one or more of the results is not due to oscillations, or there is physics beyond the Standard Model.

Gordon McGregor March 5-12, 2005 Moriond EW, La Thuile. 3 The BooNE Collaboration Y. Liu, I. Stancu University of Alabama S. Koutsoliotas Bucknell University R. A. Johnson, J. L. Raaf University of Cincinnati T. Hart, R. H. Nelson, M. Wilking, E. D. Zimmerman University of Colorado A. A. Aguilar-Arevalo, L. Bugel, L. Coney, J. M. Conrad, J. Link, K. McConnel, J. Monroe, D. Schmitz, M. H. Shaevitz, M. Sorel, G. P. Zeller Columbia University, Nevis Labs D. Smith Embry Riddle Aeronautical University L. Bartoszek, C. Bhat, S. J. Brice, B. C. Brown, D. A. Finley, R. Ford, F. G. Garcia, P. Kasper, T. Kobilarcik, I. Kourbanis, A. Malensek, W. Marsh, P. Martin, F. Mills, C. Moore, E. Prebys, A. D. Russell, P. Spentzouris, R. Stefanski, T. Williams Fermi National Accelerator Laboratory D. Cox, A. Green, T. Katori, H. Meyer, C. C. Polly, R. Tayloe Indiana University G. T. Garvey, A. Green, C. Green, W. C. Louis, G. A. McGregor, S. McKenney, G. B. Mills, H. Ray, V. Sandberg, B. Sapp, R. Schirato, R. Van de Water, N. Walbridge, D. H. White Los Alamos National Laboratory R. Imlay, W. Metcalf, S. Ouedraogo, M. Sung, M. O. Wascko Louisiana State University J. Cao, Y. Liu, B. P. Roe, H. Yang University of Michigan A. O. Bazarko, P. D. Meyers, R. B. Patterson,F. C. Shoemaker, H. A. Tanaka Princeton University P. Nienaber St. Mary’s University of Minnesota E. Hawker Western Illinois University A. Curioni, B. T. Fleming Yale University - 13 universities and 2 national laboratories

Gordon McGregor March 5-12, 2005 Moriond EW, La Thuile. 4 Introducing MiniBooNE: The Booster Neutrino Experiment Different systematics: beam energy ×10 LSND (same L/E), event signatures and backgrounds different. Anticipate >4σ significance over entire LSND 90% CL region. The goal: to check the LSND result. 8GeV Booster ? magnetic horn and target decay pipe 25 or 50 m LMC 450 m dirt detector absorber νμ→νeνμ→νe K+K+ ++  ++

Gordon McGregor March 5-12, 2005 Moriond EW, La Thuile. 5 No high level analysis needed to see neutrino events.  479k neutrino candidates in 4.6×10 20 protons on target. Neutrino Events - the world’s best short baseline ν beam

Gordon McGregor March 5-12, 2005 Moriond EW, La Thuile. 6 CC Quasi-elastic Simple topology. Kinematics give E ν and Q 2 from E μ and Θ μ. ν μ disappearance analysis. NC π 0 Production resonant: coherent: π 0 → γγ. Reconstruct invariant mass of the two photons. Background to the ν e appearance analysis. CC Resonant π + Fledgling analysis. Should help disentangle nuclear interaction model. CCPiP oscillation search? The Data νμνμ μ-μ- W+W+ N N π+π+ νμνμ μ-μ- W+W+ p+p+ n

Gordon McGregor March 5-12, 2005 Moriond EW, La Thuile. 7 Red band: Monte Carlo with current uncertainties from Yellow band adds optical model variations. flux prediction. σ CCQE CC ν μ Quasi-elastic preliminary Selection based on PMT hit topology and timing. ~80% purity in remaining dataset. Data and MC relatively normalized.

Gordon McGregor March 5-12, 2005 Moriond EW, La Thuile MeV CC ν μ Quasi-elastic preliminary CC ν μ energy resolution. Monte Carlo a = 3.79×10 -2 b = 8.36×10 -2

Gordon McGregor March 5-12, 2005 Moriond EW, La Thuile. 9 NC π 0 Production preliminary N TANK >200, N VETO <6, no decay electron. Perform two ring fit on all events. Require ring energies E 1, E 2 > 40 MeV. Fit mass peak to extract signal yield and background (shape from Monte Carlo).

Gordon McGregor March 5-12, 2005 Moriond EW, La Thuile. 10 Sensitive to production mechanism. Coherent is highly forward peaked. NC π 0 Production preliminary Errors are shape errors Dark grey : flux errors Light grey : optical model

Gordon McGregor March 5-12, 2005 Moriond EW, La Thuile. 11 CM framelab frame  Θ CM = π/2 cosΘ CM = 0 small γ γ opening angle Θ CM = 0 cosΘ CM = 1  photon energies asymmetric NC π 0 Production preliminary

Gordon McGregor March 5-12, 2005 Moriond EW, La Thuile. 12 CCPiP Event Selection Neutrino events with 2 Michels: First (Neutrino) subevent Must be in beam spill Tank Hits>175, Veto Hits<6 Need at least 2 Michels: 20<Tank Hits<200, Veto hits<6 Monte Carlo event breakdown: 78% resonant single pion – all resonant channels 9% coherent pion production 13% background (multi pion 7%, QE 4%, DIS 2%) This data set is 2.62×10 20 protons on target events : 4-5 times more than all bubble chamber data combined. νμνμ μ-μ- W+W+ N N π+π+ e-e- μ+μ+ e+e+ preliminary

Gordon McGregor March 5-12, 2005 Moriond EW, La Thuile. 13 CCPiP Michels preliminary Energy distribution fits Michel spectrum. Separate into close and far samples – with respect to the muon track. Close (μ - ) capture on C (8%): τ =2026±1.5 ns Close Michels τ =2057±14 ns Far (μ + ) do not capture: τ = ±0.04 ns Far Michels τ =2215±15 ns

Gordon McGregor March 5-12, 2005 Moriond EW, La Thuile. 14 CCPiP Reconstructed Distributions Statistical errors only on data and MC. Reasonable agreement in muon energy, perhaps some physics in angle. Muon energy from Čerenkov ring only. All plots relatively normalized. preliminary

Gordon McGregor March 5-12, 2005 Moriond EW, La Thuile. 15 CCPiP : E ν and Q 2 Reconstruct CCPiP interaction as QE with a Δ(1232) resonant state instead of a recoil nucleon, and assume the target nucleon is at rest. Low Q 2 suppression: Larger than in CCQE sample. K2K sees it too. preliminary

Gordon McGregor March 5-12, 2005 Moriond EW, La Thuile. 16 Estimates of ν μ  ν e Appearance 1 × pot Signal Mis ID Intrinsic ν e Δm 2 =1.0eV 2 Δm 2 =0.4eV 2

Gordon McGregor March 5-12, 2005 Moriond EW, La Thuile. 17 MiniBooNE Oscillation Sensitivity Δm 2 = 0.4 eV 2 Δm 2 = 1 eV 2 - systematic errors on backgrounds average ~5% 1 × pot 5σ3σ1.6σ 2σ 1σ

Gordon McGregor March 5-12, 2005 Moriond EW, La Thuile. 18 Looking ahead: FY 2006 and beyond MiniBooNE approved for FY06 running. Some or all of FY06 running may be in antineutrino mode: studies of O(1 GeV) ν μ interactions. If MiniBooNE sees a signal, there is potential for a direct search for sterile oscillations at SNS or FNAL using a stopped pion source: hep-ph/

Gordon McGregor March 5-12, 2005 Moriond EW, La Thuile. 19 Conclusions MiniBooNE is running well. Currently 4.57×10 20 protons on target. ν μ  ν e appearance results by hopefully late 2005.