RSVP-TE Signaling Extension for Explicit Control of LSP Boundary in MRN/MLN draft-fuxh-ccamp-boundary-explicit-control-ext-01.txt draft-fuxh-ccamp-boundary-explicit-control-ext-01.txt.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Page - 1IETF 76, Hiroshima, November 8-13, 2009 GMPLS Signaling Extensions for Evolutive OTNs control draft-fuxh-ccamp-gmpls-extension-for-evolutive-otn-03.txt.
Advertisements

IETF 78, Maastricht, Netherlands, July 25-30, 2010Page - 1 Requirement and Framework for Multi Stages Multiplexing Configuration in G.709 network draft-fuxh-ccamp-multi-stage-multiplex-config-req-01.
Slide title In CAPITALS 50 pt Slide subtitle 32 pt GMPLS RSVP-TE Extensions for OTN and SONET/SDH OAM Configuration draft-kern-ccamp-rsvp-te-sdh-otn-oam-ext-00.
Page - 1 Stateful PCE Kexin Tang Xuerong Wang Yuanlin Bao ZTE Corporation draft-tang-pce-stateful-pce-01.txt.
RSVP-TE Extensions for SRLG Configuration of FA
Information model for G.709 Optical Transport Network (OTN) draft-bccg-ccamp-otn-g709-info-model-04 CCAMP WG, IETF 80 th Prague.
Page - 1IETF 76, Hiroshima, November 8-13, 2009 Explicit Control of Region Boundary for PCE-Based Inter-Layer draft-lin-pce-ccamp-multilayer-lsp-00.txt.
RSVP-TE extensions for dynamic hostname traversing OSPF routing areas draft-zheng-ccamp-rsvp-te-dynamic-hostname-00 Zhi Zheng,
Information model for G.709 Optical Transport Network (OTN) draft-bccg-ccamp-otn-g709-info-model-03 CCAMP WG, IETF 79 th Beijing.
RSVP-TE extensions for services aware MPLS draft-fuxh-mpls-delay-loss-rsvp-te-ext-00 Xihua Fu, Malcolm Betts, Qilei Wang ZTE Dave McDysan, Andrew Malis.
Requirements for PCE Applied in OTN Networks draft-zhang-pce-reqs-for-otn-00.txt Fei Zhang Feng Gao Yuanlin Bao ZTE Corporation.
IETF 77, Maastricht, Netherlands, July 25-30, 2010Page - 1 Information Modele Electro-Optical Multi- Layer G.709 network draft-xie-ccamp-multi-elec-opt-network-ext-req-00.
Protocol Extension Requirement for Cooperation between PCE and Distributed Routing Controller in GMPLS Networks draft-zhaoyl-pce-dre-01.txt Yongli Zhao,
IETF 77, Anaheim, March 21-26, 2010Page - 1 Requirements for Path Ownership Transfer between Management Plane and Control Plane in a MPLS-TP network draft-bao-mpls-tp-path-transfer-reqs-00.txt.
OSPF-TE extensions for GMPLS Control of Evolutive G.709 OTN
Requirement and protocol for WSON and non-WSON interoperability CCAMP WG, IETF 81th, Quebec City, Canada draft-shimazaki-ccamp-wson-interoperability-00.
1 draft-ali-ccamp-rc-objective-function-metric-bound-02.txt draft-ali-ccamp-rsvp-te-include-route-02.txt draft-ali-ccamp-xro-lsp-subobject-02.txt CCAMP.
IPv4 and IPv6 Mobility Support Using MPLS and MP-BGP draft-berzin-malis-mpls-mobility-00 Oleg Berzin, Andy Malis {oleg.berzin,
Signaling & Routing Extension for Links with Variable Discrete Bandwidth draft-long-ccamp-rsvp-te-availability-03 draft-long-ccamp-ospf-availability-extension-02.
CCAMP WG, IETF 76th, Hiroshima, Japan draft-zhang-ccamp-gmpls-g709-framework-00.txt Fatai Zhang Dan Li Jianrui.
MPLS - 73nd IETF Minneaplis1 Composite Transport Group (CTG) Framework and Requirements draft-so-yong-mpls-ctg-framework-requirement-00.txt draft-so-yong-mpls-ctg-framework-requirement-00.txt.
OSPF-TE extensions for OTN (draft-ashok-ccamp-gmpls-ospf-g709-03) CCAMP IETF-80 (Mar-2011) Rajan Rao Ashok Kunjidhapatham.
Page th IETF Vancouver, B.C., Canada Operating Virtual Concatenation (VCAT) and the Link Capacity Adjustment Scheme (LCAS) with GMPLS Greg Bernstein.
OSPF-TE extensions for GMPLS Control of Evolving G.709 OTN draft-ceccarelli-ccamp-gmpls-ospf-g CCAMP WG, IETF 81 th Quebec City.
CCAMP WG, IETF 79th, Beijing, China draft-zhang-ccamp-gmpls-evolving-g txt GMPLS Signaling Extensions for the Evolving G.709 OTN Control Fatai Zhang.
1 Framework for GMPLS based control of Flexi-grid DWDM networks draft-ogrcetal-ccamp-flexi-grid-fwk-02 CCAMP WG, IETF 86 Oscar González de Dios, Telefónica.
PCEP extensions for the computation of route offers with price draft-carrozzo-pce-pcep-route-price-00 G. Carrozzo, G. Bernini, G. Landi {g.carrozzo, g.bernini,
ZTE CORPORATION Extensions of BRPC and PCEP to Support Inter- AS Bidirectional LSP Path Computation draft-wang-pce-inter-as-extentions-00 Xuerong.
OSPF extensions for supporting spectrum sub-band allocation draft-wang-ccamp-flexigrid-wavelength-range-ospf-02 Qilei Wang Xihua.
CCAMP WG, IETF 81th, Quebec City, Canada draft-zhang-ccamp-gmpls-evolving-g txt Authors & Contributors GMPLS Signaling Extensions for the Evolving.
Framework for latency and loss traffic engineering application draft-fuxh-ccamp-delay-loss-te-framework-00.txt draft-fuxh-ccamp-delay-loss-rsvp-te-ext-00.txt.
1 IETF-81, MPLS WG, Quebec City, Canada, July, 2011 draft-ali-mpls-inter-domain-p2mp-rsvp-te-lsp-06.txt MPLS WG IETF-81 Quebec City, Canada July, 2011.
CCAMP WG, IETF 76th, Hiroshima, Japan draft-zhang-ccamp-gmpls-g709-lmp-discovery-02.txt LMP extensions for G.709 Optical Transport Networks Fatai Zhang.
Framework for G.709 Optical Transport Network (OTN) draft-ietf-ccamp-gmpls-g709-framework-05 CCAMP WG, IETF 82 nd Taipei.
CCAMP WG, IETF 80th, Prague, Czech Republic draft-ietf-ccamp-gmpls-g709-framework-04.txt Framework for GMPLS and PCE Control of G.709 Optical Transport.
RSVP-TE Extensions to Notification for Shared Mesh Protection CCAMP WG, IETF 81th draft-he-ccamp-notification-shared-mesh-protection-00 Wenjuan He
1 Requirements for GMPLS-based multi-region and multi-layer networks (MRN/MLN) draft-ietf-ccamp-gmpls-mln-reqs-01.txt CCAMP WG, IETF 66 Jul. 10, 2006 Kohei.
CCAMP WG, IETF 75th, Stockholm, Sweden draft-zhang-ccamp-gmpls-evolving-g txt Fatai Zhang Guoying
June 4, 2003Carleton University & EIONGMPLS - 1 GMPLS Generalized Multiprotocol Label Switching Vijay Mahendran Sumita Ponnuchamy Christy Gnanapragasam.
RSVP-TE Extensions to Establish Associated Bidirectional LSP MPLS/CCAMP WG, IETF 81th, Quebec draft-ietf-ccamp-mpls-tp-rsvpte-ext-associated-lsp-01 Fei.
1 Framework for GMPLS based control of Flexi-grid DWDM networks draft-ogrcetal-ccamp-flexi-grid-fwk-02 CCAMP WG meeting, IETF 87 Oscar González de Dios,
Multi layer implications in GMPLS controlled networks draft-bcg-ccamp-gmpls-ml-implications-05 D.Papadimitriou (Alcatel-Lucent) D.Ceccarelli (Ericsson)
Extensions to PCEP for Hierarchical Path Computation Elements PCE draft-zhang-pcep-hierarchy-extensions-00 Fatai Zhang Quintin Zhao.
OIF Liaison on Routing IETF 75 – Stockholm – Jul ‘09 L. Ong (Ciena)
Draft-chen-rtgwg-resource-management-yang-00IETF 94 RTGWG1 PCE-initiated IP Tunnel draft-chen-pce-pce-initiated-ip-tunnel-00 Xia Chen, Zhenbin Li(Huawei)
Draft-psenak-ospf-segment-routing-ospf-extension-03 draft-psenak-ospf-segment-routing-ospfv3-extension-00 IETF 88, November 3-8, 2013 P. Psenak, S.Previdi,
CCAMP WG, IETF 79th, Beijing, China draft-ietf-ccamp-gmpls-g709-framework-03.txt Framework for GMPLS and PCE Control of G.709 Optical Transport Networks.
1 draft-ali-ccamp-te-metric-recording-02.txt CCAMP – IETF 84 – Vancouver July - August 2012 Zafar Ali Cisco Systems Clarence Filsfils  Cisco Systems Kenji.
Extensions to Path Computation Element Communication Protocol (PCEP) for Hierarchical Path Computation Elements (PCE) PCE WG, IETF 84 draft-zhang-pce-hierarchy-extensions-02.
GMPLS extensions to communicate latency as a Traffic Engineering performance metric draft-wang-ccamp-latency-te-metric-03.txt draft-wang-ccamp-latency-te-metric-03.txt.
GMPLS extensions to communicate latency as a Traffic Engineering performance metric draft-wang-ccamp-latency-te-metric-00.txt draft-wang-ccamp-latency-te-metric-00.txt.
RSVP-TE Extensions to Realize Dynamic Binding of Associated Bidirectional LSP CCAMP/MPLS WG, IETF 79th, Beijing, China draft-zhang-mpls-tp-rsvpte-ext-associated-lsp-01.
1 RSVP-TE Path Diversity using Exclude Routes draft-ietf-ccamp-lsp-diversity-03.txt Zafar Ali Cisco Systems George SwallowCisco Systems Clarence Filsfils.
6. Hierarchy bis - Signaled FAs CCAMP, IETF64 Kohei Shiomoto:
ASON routing implementation and testing ASON routing extensions IETF 76 – Hiroshima – Nov‘09 L. Ong (Ciena)
GMPLS Signaling Extensions for G
Zhenbin Li, Kai Lu Huawei Technologies IETF 98, Chicago, USA
Connectionless OAM yang model
Group multicast fanOut Procedure
ASON routing implementation and testing ASON routing extensions
MPLS LSP Instant Install draft-saad-mpls-lsp-instant-install-00
RSVP-TE Signaling Extension for Explicit Control of LSP Boundary in MRN/MLN draft-fuxh-ccamp-boundary-explicit-control-ext-02.txt Xihua Fu Qilei Wang.
Operating Virtual Concatenation (VCAT) and the Link Capacity Adjustment Scheme (LCAS) with GMPLS draft-ietf-ccamp-gmpls-vcat-lcas-02.txt Greg Bernstein.
GMPLS Signaling Extensions for the Evolving G.709 OTN Control
GMPLS Signaling Extensions for the Evolving G.709 OTN Control
OSPF Extensions for ASON Routing draft-ietf-ccamp-gmpls-ason-routing-ospf-03.txt IETF67 - Prague - Mar’07 Dimitri.
Iftekhar Hussain (Presenter),
DetNet Information Model Consideration
draft-liu-pim-mofrr-tilfa-00
ISIS Extensions for FlexE Link Advertisement
Presentation transcript:

RSVP-TE Signaling Extension for Explicit Control of LSP Boundary in MRN/MLN draft-fuxh-ccamp-boundary-explicit-control-ext-01.txt draft-fuxh-ccamp-boundary-explicit-control-ext-01.txt Xihua Fu, Qilei Wang, Yuanlin Bao ZTE Corporation Ruiquan Jing, Xiaoli Huo China Telecom

Requirement for Explicit Control of LSP Boundary Selection of Server layer/Sub-layer – [RFC 4206] only describes a region boundary determination algorithm. – It needs to explicitly describe which server layer and/or sub-layer should be triggered.

Selection/Creation of FA-LSP based on the Latency agreement between operator and its user. – Latency characteristic of each OTN FA-LSP is different. – The selection or creation of FA-LSP should base on the Latency agreement between operator and its client. – It needs to explicitly inform boundary nodes the latency agreement parameters. Requirement for Explicit Control of LSP Boundary

Configuration of Multi Stages Multiplexing – In following figure, the server layer and sub-layer information is not enough for data plane to know that ODU0 is mapped into ODU3 tunnel by ODU0-ODU1-ODU3 then ODU4. – It needs to explicitly indicates the multiplexing hierarchies (e.g., ODU0- ODU1-ODU3-ODU4) used for boundary node to configure it to the data plane and trigger one specific corresponding tunnel creation. Requirement for Explicit Control of LSP Boundary

The ERBO (Explicit Route Boundary Object) is introduced in PATH message It has ever been presented in 76th and 77th meeting in CCAMP and PCE. It is used for the explicitly control hierarchy LSP creation. ERBO has the same format as the ERO. Explicit Route Boundary Control

BOUNDARY_ATTRIBUTES A new sub-object (BOUNDARY_ATTRIBUTES) is introduced into ERBO to carry the attributes associated with boundary nodes. – It follows an IPv4 or IPv6 or unnumbered interface ID sub- object in ERBO. – A list of attribute TLV can be inserted into ERBO, such as Server layer/Sub layer information, Multi Stages Multiplexing hierarchy information and latency characteristic.

BOUNDARY_ATTRIBUTES Server layer/sub layer attribute TLV and Multiplexing hierarchy attribute TLV is shown below. – Server layer attribute TLV indicates the server layer and sub layer to be triggered. – Multiplexing hierarchy attribute TLV indicates the Multi Stage Multiplexing hierarchy information.

BOUNDARY_ATTRIBUTES Latency attribute TLV – This sub-TLV include minimum, maximum, average and variation latency performance parameters which the FA- LSP must meet.

Procedure of Signaling Source node sends RSVP-TE path message with ERBO which indicates one or multiple pairs of boundary nodes and some related attributes. Intermediate node will extract a pair of boundary nodes from ERBO and related attribute. It triggers the FA-LSP creation or selection according to the BOUNDARY ATTRIBUTE in ERBO.

Next steps Refine the document according to the feedback of meeting and mailing list.