Gamma-ray Large Area Space Telescope Tower 1 TVAC tests Bad ladders issues.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Tracker Subsystem1 GLAST LAT Project FM8/14 PSR, Oct. 5, 2005 GLAST LAT Tracker Towers 8/14 Pre-Ship Review INFN-Pisa.
Advertisements

6 Mar 2002Readout electronics1 Back to the drawing board Paul Dauncey Imperial College Outline: Real system New VFE chip A simple system Some questions.
MDC-II LVL-1 Trigger Khaled Teilab for the MDC Trigger Team.
GLAST LAT ProjectMonthly Review, September 1, Tracker SubsystemR. Johnson 1 GLAST Large Area Telescope: Tracker, W.B.S August Status Meeting.
GLAST LAT Project Instrument Analysis Meeting– May 27, 2005 Hiro Tajima, TKR Bad Strips 1 GLAST Large Area Telescope: TKR Bad strips analysis update Hiro.
Read-out strips (roughly). Some initial observations: *) We are exercising the chip well above the “tracking” region. Lowest workable input charges are.
GLAST LAT Project TKR Tower 4 and 5 hand-off review – June 8,2005 Hiro Tajima, TKR Tower 4 and 5 hand-ff review 1 GLAST Large Area Telescope: TKR Hand-off.
Tracker Subsystem1 GLAST LAT Project FM7/9 PSR, Sept. 9, 2005 GLAST LAT Tracker Tower7/9 Pre-Ship Review INFN-Pisa.
A.Chekhtman1 GLAST LAT ProjectInstrument Analysis meeting, June, 24, 2005 CAL retriggering study with SLAC data. Alexandre Chekhtman NRL/GMU Gamma-ray.
GLAST LAT ProjectMarch 24, C Tracker Peer Review, WBS GLAST Large Area Telescope: Tracker Subsystem WBS C: On-Orbit Calibration and.
GLAST LAT Project LAT Instrument Analysis Meeting – May 26, 2006 Hiro Tajima, TKR Efficiency Trending 1 GLAST Large Area Telescope: TKR Efficiency Trending.
1 Hybrid & Module Testing Status Week of 6/6-6/10.
Tracker Subsystem1 GLAST LAT Project FM4/5 PSR, May 31, 2005 GLAST LAT Tracker Tower-4/5 Pre-Ship Review INFN-Pisa.
GLAST LAT Readout Electronics Marcus ZieglerIEEE SCIPP The Silicon Tracker Readout Electronics of the Gamma-ray Large Area Space Telescope Marcus.
GLAST LAT Readout Electronics Marcus ZieglerIEEE SCIPP The Silicon Tracker Readout Electronics of the Gamma-ray Large Area Space Telescope Marcus.
IA meeting, Feb. 3, 2006 Mutsumi Sugizaki TKR Noise Stdudy 1 LAT TKR Noise Study Current Status Mutusmi Sugizaki (and short comment about TOT=255 event)
Analysis Meeting – April 17 '07 Status and plan update for single hadron scale check with minimum bias events N. Davidson.
UCSB Encapsulation Studies UC Santa Barbara Based upon a 6 week study by F. Garberson in collaboration with A. Affolder, J. Incandela, S. Kyre and many.
Tracker Subsystem1 GLAST LAT Project FM-B PSR, 10 Feb, 2005 GLAST LAT Tracker Tower-B Pre-Ship Review Luca Latronico INFN-Pisa
Patrick Spradlin, SCIPP trip to LLU, May 2, 2001 Detector Characteristics.
An offline look at TIF data David Stuart UC Santa Barbara May 2, 2007.
Tracker Subsystem1 GLAST LAT Project FM6 PSR, July 21, 2005 GLAST LAT Tracker Tower6 Pre-Ship Review INFN-Pisa.
GLAST LAT ProjectLadder wirebonds break - MRB 03 Dec 2004 L. Latronico1 Ladder Wirebonds break MRB Meeting – 3 december 2004.
10/21/2005 Inst Ana Meeting TKR Noise Flares1 TKR Noise Flares observed in TKR #11 and #8 Mutsumi Sugizaki, Hiro Tajima, and TKR team.
UM PPS Lab Activities - HV Readout Long Run - Single Source Saturation Test PPS meeting April 30, 2012.
February 19th 2009AlbaNova Instrumentation Seminar1 Christian Bohm Instrumentation Physics, SU Upgrading the ATLAS detector Overview Motivation The current.
GLAST LAT ProjectFebruary 10, 2004 R. Johnson Tracker MCM Production Readiness Review 1 GLAST Large Area Telescope: Tracker Subsystem MCM Production Readiness.
Performance of SPIROC chips in SKIROC mode
MTCC –II & HCAL noise chasing Mandakini Patil India-CMS meeting Jan07 Shantiniketan.
FPIX_flip_chip_test module calibration tests November 14 th 2012.
Tracker Subsystem1 GLAST LAT Project Production Readiness Review, 25 August, 2004 GLAST LAT Tracker TOWER-A PRR TKR Tower Electrical Test Plan Luca Latronico.
GLAST LAT ProjectMarch 24, F Tracker Peer Review, WBS GLAST Large Area Telescope: Tracker Subsystem WBS F: On-Orbit Calibration and.
4 th Workshop on ALICE Installation and Commissioning January 16 th & 17 th, CERN Muon Tracking (MUON_TRK, MCH, MTRK) Conclusion of the first ALICE COSMIC.
High Gain Mystery of WS(1-5) Solved (Hopefully…) C.Woody HBD Meeting April 13, 2010.
GLAST LAT ProjectMarch 24, B Tracker Peer Review, WBS GLAST Large Area Telescope: Tracker Subsystem WBS B: EM Mini-Tower Robert Johnson.
1 BFEM Trigger Diagnostics Mar 12, 2002 Tsunefumi Mizuno Note: For reference, this document includes some works already reported (pages 2-5 and 7). The.
1 EMC Trigger Summery from RunII and discussion for RunIII H.Torii, Kyoto Univ. ERT Lvl-1 meeting.
Status of TRD Pre-trigger System K. Oyama, T. Krawutschke, A. Rausch, J. Stachel, P. von Walter, R. Schicker and M. Stockmeier for the T0, V0, and TRD.
Calibration of the gain and measurement of the noise for the apv25 electronics K. Gnanvo, N. Liyanage, C.Gu, K. Saenboonruang From INFN Italy: E. Cisbani,
Tracker Subsystem1 GLAST LAT Project TRAY DELTA MRR, 18 Nov., 2004 GLAST LAT Tracker Delta Manufacturer Readiness Review for Tray Assembly and Test at.
GLAST LAT ProjectMarch 24, C Tracker Peer Review, WBS GLAST Large Area Telescope: Tracker Subsystem WBS C: Electronics Module Testing.
K0 meeting 2007/10/17 Taito Kawasaki. ~ 10/8 (Mon) : Prepare for experiment 10/9 (Tue) : Beam on (1.0 GeV mode) | 9 days, 18 shifts | Normal run : 31.
Anatoli Romaniouk TRT Test manual Some important information p. 2-3Some important information p. 2-3 Noise studies p.4-7Noise studies p.4-7 Operation with.
LHCb VELO Upgrade Strip Chip Option: Data Processing Algorithms Giulio Forcolin, Abdul Afandi, Chris Parkes, Tomasz Szumlak* * AGH-Krakow Part I: LCMS.
GLAST LAT Project September 15, 2006: Pre-Shipment Review Presentation 9 of 12 LAT Test Results 1 GLAST Large Area Telescope LAT Pre-Shipment Review LAT.
GLAST LAT Project LAT Instrument Analysis Meeting – June 30, 2006 Hiro Tajima, TKR Efficiency Trending, NRL 1 GLAST Large Area Telescope: TKR.
F Don Lincoln, Fermilab f Fermilab/Boeing Test Results for HiSTE-VI Don Lincoln Fermi National Accelerator Laboratory.
Eleuterio SpiritiILC Vertex Workshop, April On pixel sparsification architecture in 130nm STM technology ILC Vertex Workshop April 2008 Villa.
Study of gas mixture containing SF6 for the OPERA RPCs A.Paoloni, A. Mengucci (LNF)
1 Outline First look at the 2007 data with the offline reconstruction (~1000evts) : –Clusters. –Reconstructed Space points. FastOffline plots: –2 differents.
Introduction  Goal: Study noise occupancy of the FE-I4B chips on the quad-module mounted on the stavelet with serial power  About one month ago, observed.
GLAST LAT ProjectMRB 09/14/2005 L. Latronico1 Tower 14 – Layer Y0 malfunction MRB Meeting – 14 September 2005.
Noise results from SR1 combined SCT barrel tests Summary of some initial results Alan Barr, UCL Pepe Bernabeu, Valencia.
Electrical Tests of Modules and Ladders Markus Friedl (HEPHY Vienna) 2 October 2014.
Week 22: Schematic Week 23-Week 27: Routing Gerber files have been available since 9th July 1st prototype: – PCB manufacturer: supervised by KIT – Cabling:
PIXEL 2000 P.Netchaeva INFN Genova 0 Results on 0.7% X0 thick Pixel Modules for the ATLAS Detector. INFN Genova: R.Beccherle, G.Darbo, G.Gagliardi, C.Gemme,
Procedure for MCM rework on tray MID 070
Jean-Sebastien Graulich, Geneva
MODULE QUALIFICATION STATUS AT LIVERPOOL
Tower 8 – X6 anomaly MRB Meeting – 24 August 2005.
Mini-Tower test results
The Silicon Drift Detector of the ALICE Experiment
GLAST LAT tracker signal simulation and trigger timing study
Investigation on tray MID 063 Back
Noise analysis of the 1m3 DHCal test beam
Maki KUROSAWA VTX Group 2014 Feb 20
GLAST Large Area Telescope:
GLAST Large Area Telescope:
Shaped Digital Readout Noise in CAL
Presentation transcript:

Gamma-ray Large Area Space Telescope Tower 1 TVAC tests Bad ladders issues

Tower 1 TVAC tests: bad ladders issues Description of the issues Layer Y0 (BTM 005 Front) – ladder 3. –Strange behavior during the charge-injection tests (single strip occupancy always close to 50% - independent of the threshold – as if the ladder was not biased). –Noise level not consistent with missing bias. –Observed during the first CPT after the vibe test (in air, room temperature), then disappeared. Layer X16 (MID 063 Back) – ladder 0. –Left side of ladder 0 noisy. –Right side of ladder 0 completely dead. –First observed during the first hot soak. –Consistently there since then.

Tower 1 TVAC tests: bad ladders issues X16: noise occupancy measurement Bias voltage set to 0 V. Tue Mar 08 16:11: , T=? Channels 238 and completely dead (never showing up in the data stream). All other channels are very noisy due to missing bias (the occupancy plot shape is due to the limited size (64) of the GTRC event buffer. Bias voltage set to 100 V. Mon Mar 07 23:24: , T=45C Channels completely dead (never showing up in the data stream).

Tower 1 TVAC tests: bad ladders issues X16: noise occupancy vs. threshold Threshold=30 (range 0), bias=80V Tue Mar 08 01:06: , T=45C Threshold=35 (range 0), bias=80V Tue Mar 08 01:08: , T=45C Threshold=40 (range 0), bias=80V Tue Mar 08 01:09: , T=45C Threshold=50 (range 0), bias=80V Tue Mar 08 01:11: , T=45C

Tower 1 TVAC tests: bad ladders issues X16: trigger rate measurement Bias voltage set to 0 V. Wed Mar 09 12:29: , T = ? Bias voltage set to 100 V. Wed Mar 09 12:40: , T = ? Bias voltage set to 80 V. Tue Mar 08 01:15: , T = 45 C

Tower 1 TVAC tests: bad ladders issues X16: noise and gain measurement I Bias voltage set to 0 V. Tue Mar 08 16:05: , T=? Channels 238 and completely dead (never showing up in the data stream). Bias voltage set to 80 V. Tue Mar 08 00:08: , T=45C Channels completely dead (never showing up in the data stream).

Tower 1 TVAC tests: bad ladders issues X16: noise and gain measurement II Bias voltage set to 0 V. Wed Mar 09 12:24: , T=? Channels 238 and completely dead (never showing up in the data stream). Bias voltage set to 100 V. Wed Mar 09 12:35: , T=? Channels completely dead (never showing up in the data stream).

Tower 1 TVAC tests: bad ladders issues X16: conclusions Register tests are OK. The left side of ladder 0 is much noisier than normal, as if the ladder was not biased. Noise occupancy – as measured with random trigger – is *NOT* strongly dependent on the threshold on discriminators. The right side of ladder 0 (1/2 roughly) is completely dead – it never shows up in the data stream, not even the electronics noise is observed. *NOT* consistent with a simple short on the HV line. –The number of ‘dead’ channels varies with time and bias voltage (and temperature?). Different runs with the bias voltage set to 0V give identical results. Results from different runs with normal bias voltage slighlty different. –The number of dead channels is *NOT* multiple of 64  no correlation with the GTFEs. It seems like it’s NOT a MCM issue. –Not an effect of the GTRC buffer size (at least 2 GTFEs are ‘dead’ at the trigger rate test, which does *NOT* even involve data readout). –A short to ground of the preamplifiers input (wire bondings in contact with the tray/wafer) could explain this kind of behavior. Changing the HV makes some difference. Probably *NOT* an open on the HV line.

Tower 1 TVAC tests: bad ladders issues Y0: noise and gain measurement Evident problems during the tests with charge injection: the occupancy for all the channels of ladder 3 was close to 50%, no matter what the threshold on the discriminator was. Just like the ladder itself was not biased. The bias line is not shorted to ground as the leakage current measurment gave standard results

Tower 1 TVAC tests: bad ladders issues Y0: noise occupancy Three clusters of noisy channels on ladder 3. If the ladder was not biased, noise would be much higher over the entire ladder.

Tower 1 TVAC tests: bad ladders issues Discussion on possible intervention on Tower1 Minimal intervention to identify root cause/confirm current ideas would require: –removal of 1 or 2 sidewalls –inspection of layers X16, Y0 –reinstallation of the sidewalls  can be done (already done for towerA)  minimum delay 1 week Fix would require (at minimum) –complete tower disassembly –fix bad wire-bonds on layers X16-Y0 or use other trays –tower reassembly  could be decided after results of inspection  minimum delay 2 weeks on tower-1, 1 week on tower-3