Working Systemically To Increase Student Achievement Collecting, Interpreting, and Using Data.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Inquiry-Based Instruction
Advertisements

Popping Question the Enduring Understanding: Students will know that there is a logical sequence of steps to solving problems..
NCOSP Learning Community Forum March 2007 Science Curriculum Topic Study Examining Student Thinking.
Complete puzzle at your table  Discuss with tablemates what is noticeable about the puzzle once it is together.  Do the traits from your puzzle resemble.
TIMELESS LEARNING POLICY & PRACTICE. JD HOYE President National Academy Foundation.
Advancing Assessment Literacy Data Analysis II: Examining & Interpreting Data.
Iowa Core Leadership Webinar Series March Webinar Outcomes We will respond to YOUR questions regarding the Iowa Core. We will provide time.
Name Staff Developer, Director, Facilitator
Examining Monitoring Data
Instruction aligned to Iowa Core: What does it look like? #CCSS.
Data Days Strategic Alliance II Sacramento, CA University of California Davis.
The Oregon System for Teacher and Administrator Professional Growth and Support System Focus on Student Learning and Growth Goals October
Glendale Elementary School District Professional Development August 15, 2012.
Data Driven Dialogue: Practical Strategies for Collaborative Inquiry
RTI SUMMIT APRIL 28, 2010 GAIL JESSETT, SPOKANE PUBLIC SCHOOLS DEBBIE LAHUE, NORTHEAST WA ESD 101 Coaching Within Your Team Becoming Each Other’s Best.
Advancing Assessment Literacy Setting the Stage I: Engaging Stakeholders.
Copyright©2007 Education Service Center Region XIII Mineral Wells ISD 5E CSCOPE Overview.
] Using Data to Improve Instruction: Building on Models that Work St. Louis, MO Professional Development Model Using the Surveys of Enacted Curriculum.
Teacher Evaluation and Professional Growth Program Module 4: Reflecting and Adjusting December 2013.
PRINCIPAL SESSION 2012 EEA Day 1. Agenda Session TimesEvents 1:00 – 4:00 (1- 45 min. Session or as often as needed) Elementary STEM Power Point Presentation.
 Read through problems  Identify problems you think your team has the capacity and interest to solve  Prioritize the problems and indicate the.
1 System Implementation and Monitoring: Regional Session Day 1.
Coaching Data Teams JANE COOK LITERACY & TECHNOLOGY COACH, EASTCONN BETH MCCAFFERY SCHOOL IMPROVEMENT COORDINATOR, LEARN.
Making Science Accessible to English Learners: A Guidebook for Teachers A Matchbook Version Carr, J., Sexton, U., & Lagunoff, R. (2006). Making science.
Data-Driven Dialogue - Copyright 2006 – MiraVia LLC – All rights reserved Data Driven Dialogue: Practical Strategies for Collaborative Inquiry Developed.
Welcome! Find your “vertical team” table Be sure you know everyone at your table. We will begin at 8:30!
Understand the purpose and benefits of guiding instructional design through the review of student work. Practice a protocol for.
Candidate Support. Working Agreements Attend cohort meetings you have agreed upon. Start and end on time; come on time and stay for the whole time. Contribute.
Moderation and Validation of Teacher Judgements in School.
Goal Setting in Educator Evaluation Sept. 11 th,
Activity 1 Systems of Professional Learning Module 5 Grades K–5: Focus on Deepening Implementation.
Instructional Leadership: Planning Rigorous Curriculum (What is Rigorous Curriculum?)
Instructional Leadership: Planning for Improvement.
PLMLC Leadership Series London Region Day 2 Ellen Walters, YCDSB Shelley Yearley, TLDSB Tuesday March 1, 2011.
Action Research in the Classroom EDU 5120 Baker University Dr. Christy Ziegler.
A Data Coach’s Guide to Improving Learning for All Students: Unleashing the Power of Collaborative Inquiry © 2008 by Corwin Press. All rights reserved.
GOING DEEPER INTO STEP 1: UNWRAPPING STANDARDS Welcome!
Instructional Leadership Supporting Common Assessments.
Module II Creating Capacity for Learning and Equity in Schools: The Mode of Instructional Leadership Dr. Mary A. Hooper Creating Capacity for Learning.
Jere Baxter Middle Vision, Mission, and Values Karen Flowers Teresa Hogue Margie L. Johnson, Ed.D. August 2, 2016.
Inquiry-Based Instruction
Welcome PLEASE COMPLETE THE FOLLOWING TASKS WHILE WAITING FOR THE CLASS TO BEGIN: Rate your knowledge of the MTSS process using the colored dot. Rate.
Welcome Please sit in groups. Thanks. November 29, 2016
Quarterly Meeting Focus
Una Elementary Leadership Meeting
The Year of Core Instruction
JE Moss Elementary Leadership Meeting
Transforming Grading Robert Marzano
Welcome Please sit in groups. Thanks. January 4, 2017
Using Collaborative Inquiry to Empower Culture and Climate Change
Jones Paideia Poverty Simulation Follow-Up Meeting
Getting Started with MMD
CCRS Quarterly Meeting English Language Arts
May 19, 2017 Margie Johnson, Ed.D. Business Intelligence Coordinator
Central Office Poverty Simulation Follow-Up Meeting
July 26, 2017 Margie Johnson, Ed.D. Collaborative Inquiry Coordinator
Welcome Please sit in groups. Thanks. October 11, 2016
Welcome to Fostering a Culture of Collaborative Professionalism
Joelton Middle Vision and Mission
Understanding AYP Campus Data
Two Rivers Collaborative Inquiry Data Meeting
Connecticut Core Standards for English Language Arts & Literacy
Welcome Please sit in groups of 3 or 4. Thanks. October 10, 2016
Welcome Please sit in groups. Thanks. January 4, 2017
Welcome Please sit in groups. Thanks. January 10 & 25, 2017
Parent-Teacher Partnerships for Student Success
DuPont Tyler Middle Mission and Vision
Connecticut Core Standards for English Language Arts & Literacy
Murrell TELL Survey Data Dive
Data-Driven Dialogue Phase 1 Phase 2 Phase 3 Phase 4 Predict Go Visual
Presentation transcript:

Working Systemically To Increase Student Achievement Collecting, Interpreting, and Using Data

—Breakout Session B— Engaging in Collective Inquiry about Data

SEDL’s WSM

Data Competency Breakout Sessions: A.Collecting and Selecting Data for All the Right Reasons B.Engaging in Collective Inquiry About Data

Breakout Session B Intended Outcomes: –Participants will understand the need to guide purposeful and collective inquiry about data. –Participants will engage in a collective inquiry process using actual campus data reports. Essential Learning: District teams have a responsibility to ensure that schools have the capacity to use data for decision making.

If you torture data sufficiently, it will confess to almost anything. —Fred Menger

Data to Be Reviewed Campus AYP Information URL: Campus Accountability and Demographic Data URL: Campus NCLB HQ Report URL:

Campus Information Public middle school; grades 7–8 738 students 98% Hispanic; 2% White 20% LEP; 11% Special Education; 9% GT 82% eligible for free or reduced lunch program 14% mobility rate Number of teachers in core academic subject areas: 35 Regular; 2 Special Education

Step 1—Engaging Writing Predictions Without looking at the data, write a prediction about it on an index card. Definition of Prediction –Reasoning about the future –In a scientific context, a rigorous statement forecasting what will happen under special conditions (If A is true, then B will also be true).

Step 1—Engaging (Continued) Give your predictions to the table facilitator, who will shuffle them. The table facilitator will read the predictions, one at a time. After the prediction is read, table group members will suggest assumptions that could be made about the prediction. Please limit discussion to 2 minutes per prediction.

Definition Assumption –Something taken for granted or accepted as true without proof

Reflection What did you learn about yourselves and others when making predictions and assumptions about data you have not yet seen? What are the benefits and challenges of this step in the collective inquiry process? Share your reflections with the table facilitator, who will record two or three ideas from the group on a 11x17 sheet. Post sheets on the wall.

Step 2—Reviewing Please follow your table facilitator’s instructions. 1.Take out the review guide and follow those instructions as the table facilitator calls for a piece of data to be reviewed by everyone at the table, as a group. Repeat for other data sheets. 2.Stay on task and allow everyone to contribute to the discussion about the specific piece of data being reviewed. Highlight the data as indicated by the review guide. 3.While the data are important, the main focus of this step is the collective nature of everyone being on the same page. You have 12 minutes for this review.

Step 3—Interpreting the Data In your table group, record the group’s conclusions and suggest at least two or three possible explanations. You have 12 minutes. Our Conclusions and Possible Explanations Our Conclusions Possible Explanations Information Needed Next Steps

Closing Data review, analysis, and interpretation is a timely but needed process. You have been engaged in a mini-version of a collective inquiry process: engaging, reviewing, and explaining. The process has been adapted from Love, N. (2000). Using data—Getting results. Cambridge, MA: Regional Alliance at TERC. Wellman, B. & Lipton, L. (2004). Data-driven dialogue: A facilitator’s guide to collaborative inquiry. Sherman, CT: MiraVia, LLC.

Reflection How does the 3-step process reinforce learning theory? Of what value would the 3-step process be in your working systemically efforts?

District Team Meetings After a 15 minute break, please rejoin your district team in the large meeting room. When you join your team, you will be provided with focus questions for a report on this breakout session. You will have about five minutes to report. Also please complete the Working Systemically rubric individually. Your information will be needed at the synthesis session this afternoon. Thank you.

District Team Member Report Create a report on the breakout session you attended, keeping in mind the objective for this session: District teams will raise their awareness about knowledge and skills needed in collecting, interpreting, and using data. In your report, please include responses to the following questions: –What knowledge and skills were demonstrated, modeled, and/or explained in the breakout session? –How useful would these be in your working systematically efforts?