November 20, 2014 Mapping croplands using Landsat data with generalized classifier over large areas Aparna Phalke and Prof. Mutlu Ozdogan Nelson Institute.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Plans to improve estimators to better utilize panel data John Coulston Southern Research Station Forest Inventory and Analysis.
Advertisements

Organizing a spectral image database by using Self-Organizing Maps Research Seminar Oili Kohonen.
K Means Clustering , Nearest Cluster and Gaussian Mixture
Model generalization Test error Bias, variance and complexity
Computer Graphics : Clipping
Face Recognition and Biometric Systems
Multiple Criteria for Evaluating Land Cover Classification Algorithms Summary of a paper by R.S. DeFries and Jonathan Cheung-Wai Chan April, 2000 Remote.
Handwritten Character Recognition Using Artificial Neural Networks Shimie Atkins & Daniel Marco Supervisor: Johanan Erez Technion - Israel Institute of.
Genetic Algorithms  An example real-world application.
1 Learning to Detect Objects in Images via a Sparse, Part-Based Representation S. Agarwal, A. Awan and D. Roth IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and.
Supervised classification performance (prediction) assessment Dr. Huiru Zheng Dr. Franscisco Azuaje School of Computing and Mathematics Faculty of Engineering.
Lecture 5 (Classification with Decision Trees)
On Comparing Classifiers: Pitfalls to Avoid and Recommended Approach Published by Steven L. Salzberg Presented by Prakash Tilwani MACS 598 April 25 th.
Computer Vision Lecture 8 Performance Evaluation.
CSCI 347 / CS 4206: Data Mining Module 06: Evaluation Topic 01: Training, Testing, and Tuning Datasets.
A Statistically Valid Method for Using FIA Plots to Guide Spectral Class Rejection in Producing Stratification Maps Mike Hoppus & Andrew Lister USDA-Forest.
Convolutional Neural Networks for Image Processing with Applications in Mobile Robotics By, Sruthi Moola.
Ilie Dumitrescu National Institute of Statistics Third International Conference on Agricultural Statistics MEXSAI-ICAS-III Cancun- Mexico, 2-4 November.
A Genetic Algorithms Approach to Feature Subset Selection Problem by Hasan Doğu TAŞKIRAN CS 550 – Machine Learning Workshop Department of Computer Engineering.
Efficient Model Selection for Support Vector Machines
Data Mining Practical Machine Learning Tools and Techniques Slides for Chapter 5 of Data Mining by I. H. Witten, E. Frank and M. A. Hall 報告人:黃子齊
Self-organizing Maps Kevin Pang. Goal Research SOMs Research SOMs Create an introductory tutorial on the algorithm Create an introductory tutorial on.
Aim: How can we simplify powers of i?
Version 2012 Updated on Copyright © All rights reserved Dong-Sun Lee, Prof., Ph.D. Chemistry, Seoul Women’s University Chapter 5 Errors in Chemical.
Metrology Adapted from Introduction to Metrology from the Madison Area Technical College, Biotechnology Project (Lisa Seidman)
March 19, 2015 Mapping croplands using Landsat data with generalized classifier over large areas Aparna Phalke and Prof. Mutlu Ozdogan Nelson Institute.
Transfer Learning Task. Problem Identification Dataset : A Year: 2000 Features: 48 Training Model ‘M’ Testing 98.6% Training Model ‘M’ Testing 97% Dataset.
A Novel Local Patch Framework for Fixing Supervised Learning Models Yilei Wang 1, Bingzheng Wei 2, Jun Yan 2, Yang Hu 2, Zhi-Hong Deng 1, Zheng Chen 2.
CROSS-VALIDATION AND MODEL SELECTION Many Slides are from: Dr. Thomas Jensen -Expedia.com and Prof. Olga Veksler - CS Learning and Computer Vision.
August 20, 2015 Mapping croplands using Landsat data with generalized classifier over large areas Aparna Phalke and Mutlu Ozdogan Center for Sustainability.
ICCS 2009 IDB Workshop, 18 th February 2010, Madrid 1 Training Workshop on the ICCS 2009 database Weighting and Variance Estimation picture.
Akram Bitar and Larry Manevitz Department of Computer Science
Inter-rater reliability in the KPG exams The Writing Production and Mediation Module.
Submitted by : Mark Gakman, Herzel Abramov Supervisors : Ina Rivkin, Eli Shoushan Vitaly Savuskan, Avi Hohama, Prof. Yael Nemirovsky.
Conditionals-Mod8-part41 Conditionals – part 4 Replace background Barb Ericson Georgia Institute of Technology May 2007.
Validation Defination Establishing documentary evidence which provides a high degree of assurance that specification process will consistently produce.
Machine Learning Tutorial-2. Recall, Precision, F-measure, Accuracy Ch. 5.
February 19, 2015 Mapping croplands using Landsat data with generalized classifier over large areas Aparna Phalke and Prof. Mutlu Ozdogan Nelson Institute.
How Good is a Model? How much information does AIC give us? –Model 1: 3124 –Model 2: 2932 –Model 3: 2968 –Model 4: 3204 –Model 5: 5436.
An Interval Classifier for Database Mining Applications Rakes Agrawal, Sakti Ghosh, Tomasz Imielinski, Bala Iyer, Arun Swami Proceedings of the 18 th VLDB.
Cropland mapping in South America
Landsat-based cropland mapping in Europe and North Africa Aparna Phalke and Mutlu Ozdogan.
Revealing Mechanisms in Online Learning Networks Moshe Mazuz Prof. Reuven Aviv.
U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey Chandra Giri Ying Zhong 7/15/2015 Cropland Extent Mapping in South America.
Data Mining Practical Machine Learning Tools and Techniques By I. H. Witten, E. Frank and M. A. Hall Chapter 5: Credibility: Evaluating What’s Been Learned.
EKT 314/4 WEEK 2 : CHAPTER 1 INTRODUCTION TO EI ELECTRONIC INSTRUMENTATION.
Modeling of Core Protection Calculator System Software February 28, 2005 Kim, Sung Ho Kim, Sung Ho.
Deep Learning Overview Sources: workshop-tutorial-final.pdf
Indicate the length up to one estimated value…. A. B. C.
April 23, 2015 Mapping croplands using Landsat data with generalized classifier over large areas Aparna Phalke and Prof. Mutlu Ozdogan Nelson Institute.
3D Perception and Environment Map Generation for Humanoid Robot Navigation A DISCUSSION OF: -BY ANGELA FILLEY.
Temporal Classification and Change Detection
METHODS A series of measurements were taken from six locations throughout our institution. A standard dose of F-18 was measured in addition to three standards;
Experiment 1 (Randomly Split & Merge)
How Good is a Model? How much information does AIC give us?
A Framework for Automatic Resource and Accuracy Management in A Cloud Environment Smita Vijayakumar.
TITLE Authors Institution RESULTS INTRODUCTION CONCLUSION AIMS METHODS
A New Approach to Track Multiple Vehicles With the Combination of Robust Detection and Two Classifiers Weidong Min , Mengdan Fan, Xiaoguang Guo, and Qing.
Prof. Carolina Ruiz Department of Computer Science
CellNetQL Image Segmentation without Feature Definition
By: Mohammad Qudeisat Supervisor: Dr. Francis Lilley
Smita Vijayakumar Qian Zhu Gagan Agrawal
network of simple neuron-like computing elements
Handwritten Characters Recognition Based on an HMM Model
NRA Probationary Course
Spatial Statistics A 15 minute Tour….
Structure of a typical back-propagated multilayered perceptron used in this study. Structure of a typical back-propagated multilayered perceptron used.
Compare replicates And standards.
Outlines Introduction & Objectives Methodology & Workflow
Prof. Carolina Ruiz Department of Computer Science
Presentation transcript:

November 20, 2014 Mapping croplands using Landsat data with generalized classifier over large areas Aparna Phalke and Prof. Mutlu Ozdogan Nelson Institute for Environmental Studies University of Wisconsin - Madison

Updates on following  LDA model training and tuning  LDA results of sample footprints

Basic Definitions Model tuning is the process in which one or more parameters of a device or model are adjusted upwards or downwards to achieve improved or specified results The aim of LDA model tuning is to calibrate the parameters of propagation models and improve the key performance indicators.

Methodology R algorithm Divide training data in 75%-25% splits LDA model trained on 75% data and tested on 25% data This procedure repeated 1000 times with random sets of train and test LDA model accuracy check with train and test within scene or within footprint.

Results Group 1:

Results Group 2:

Results Group 3:

Results Group 4:

Results Group 5:

Results Group 6:

Results LDA model accuracy at different levels

LDA classified image sample result: MeanStd Min Variance Range Counts Slope Elevation Max Inputs

LDA classified image results turkeyGroup/zoneAll mean1.11E E E-04 sd-1.83E E E-03 max-8.13E E E-04 min-3.44E E E-04 var1.34E E E-07 range-7.63E E E-05 count1.99E E E-02 slope7.91E E E-01 elevation2.82E E E-04 LDA coefficients of sample example

Own Within group/zone All LDA classified image sample results

Conclusion Model tuning helped us in understanding dynamics of whole process, which gives a more accurate picture of how the model is behaving.

Thank you