Excerpted from Dallas Roark’s Introduction to Philosophy, 1982 Epistemology: How do we know? Excerpted Dallas Roark’s Introduction to Philosophy, 1982.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
© Michael Lacewing A priori knowledge Michael Lacewing
Advertisements

Empiricism on a priori knowledge
Making Sense of Kant Faced the twin issues of Western philosophy: individual v collective meaning v emptiness Lived and taught in the late 1700s Opened.
Verificationism and religious language Michael Lacewing
Popper On Science Economics Lawlor. What is and inductive inference? Example: “All Swans are white” Needs an observation to confirm it’s truth.
Pragmatism: metaphysics is meaningful only if it has practical consequences What we mean by reality is the product of our ideas and ideals, all of which.
What do you see? According to logical positivism, do your statements have meaning? What do you see? According to logical positivism, do your statements.
1 From metaphysics to logical positivism The metaphysician tells us that empirical truth-conditions [for metaphysical terms] cannot be specified; if he.
Excerpted from Geisler and Feinberg’s Introduction to Philosophy: A Christian Perspective (Baker, 1980). What is Truth? Major Theories of Truth From Geisler.
Epistemology revision Responses: add a ‘no false lemmas’ condition (J+T+B+N) Responses: replace ‘justified’ with ‘reliably formed’ (R+T+B) (reliabilism)
Charting the Terrain of Knowledge-1
© Cambridge University Press 2011 Appendix A Propositions.
Sociology 690 Quantitative Methods Epistemology and the Philosophy of Science.
Introduction to Ethics Lecture 6 Ayer and Emotivism By David Kelsey.
A. J. Ayer and Emotivism Jon Sanders. Sir Alfred Jules “Freddie” Ayer 1910 – 1989 Language, Truth and Logic (1936) Educated: Eton; Christ Church, Oxford.
Oleh: DEBBIE HARIMU (P ) 1 DEFINITIONS of PHILOSOPHY.
Is there a rational basis for the belief in God..
The Verification Principle & Religious Language The Logical Positivists, led by the philosophers of the Vienna Circle and then further developed by A.J.Ayer.
Major Meta Theory Schools: The Positivists Positivists: generalizations apart from observable reality considered unacceptable Logical Positivism: statements.
The Problem of Knowledge. What new information would cause you to be less certain? So when we say “I’m certain that…” what are we saying? 3 things you.
Qualitative research in psychology. A distinct research process Inquiries of knowledge that are outside the framework prescribed by the scientific method,
“God talk is evidently non-sense” A.J. Ayer. Ayer is a logical positivist – a member of the Vienna Circle. Any claim made about God (including Atheistic)
Religious Language  Language is about communication  Religious language is a means of communicating about religion  This can be within three contexts:
Positivism -v- Pragmatism. MMUBS Mres Epistemology, session 4, slide-1 Positivism -v- Pragmatism Is knowledge composed of a correct.
Philosophy of science II
Lecture 7: Ways of Knowing - Reason. Part 1: What is reasoning? And, how does it lead to knowledge?
1 Foundations of American Education, Fifth Edition L. Dean Webb, Arlene Metha, & K. Forbis Jordan L. Dean Webb, Arlene Metha, & K. Forbis Jordan. Foundations.
Definitions of Reality (ref . Wiki Discussions)
Positivism -v- Pragmatism. MMUBS Mres Epistemology, session 4, slide-1 Positivism -v- Pragmatism Is knowledge composed of a correct.
KNOWLEDGE What is it? How does it differ from belief? What is the relationship between knowledge and truth? These are the concerns of epistemology How.
1/54 The Relation Between Christian Faith and the Natural Sciences Steve Badger and Mike Tenneson Evangel University.
Basic Critical Thinking Skills Essentials of Clear Thinking: Claims and Issues.
LO: I will know how thinkers have solved the problem of speaking meaningfully about God by making negative statements of what God is not.
Exemplifying a Critical RE Approach to Philosophy and Ethics Christina Davis – London School of Economics Angela Goodman – Institute of Education Angela.
Philosophy.
Rachel Petrik Based on writing by A.J. Ayer
Epistemology revision Concept empiricist arguments against concept innatism:  Alternative explanations (no such concept or concept re- defined as based.
Is it possible to verify statements about God? The Logical Positivists would say no – God is a metaphysical being and it is impossible to empirically verify.
Introduction to Philosophy Mr. Kott. Overview of Today… What is Philosophy? What is Philosophy? Four Major Areas of Philosophy Four Major Areas of Philosophy.
Lecture №1 Role of science in modern society. Role of science in modern society.
1 DEFINITIONS of PHILOSOPHY By Mr.Anand Christi. 1 DEFINITIONS of PHILOSOPHY ETYMOLOGY: ENGLISH = PHILOSOPHIE, OLD FRENCH =PHILOSOPHIA, GREEK = PHILOSOPHI,
Can religious language be meaningful? Today’s lesson will be successful if you can: Explain the Verification Principle Critique the Verification Principle.
Excerpted from Geisler and Feinberg’s Introduction to Philosophy: A Christian Perspective (Baker, 1980) What is Philosophy? Excerpted from Geisler & Feinberg’s.
Epistemology: Theory of Knowledge Question to consider: What is the most reliable method of knowing?
Ayer & the Weak Verification Principle LO’s: 1: To understand the ideas of A.J. Ayer 2: To consider how he developed the verification principle LO’s: 1:
What is Philosophy.
Philosophy of Science Lars-Göran Johansson Department of philosophy, Uppsala University
My Philosophy teacher wants to kill me! Ellie: I think Karen is going to kill me. Rosie: She doesn’t seem that bad to me; she never acts like she hates.
Philosophy of science What is a scientific theory? – Is a universal statement Applies to all events in all places and time – Explains the behaviour/happening.
Some Philosophical Orientations of Educational Research You Do What You Think, I Think.
The Cosmological Argument Today’s lesson will be successful if: You have revised the ideas surrounding the cosmological argument and the arguments from.
 As an exercise, assume that Jesus did survive the crucifixion and his resurrection appearances were just the man Jesus meeting his followers. What problems.
POSITIVISM ALI H. RADDAOUI UNIVERSITY OF SFAX. INTRODUCTION  History: Spirit of the Enlightenment; Age of reason – 17 th and 18 th centuries;  Positivism.
Seeing the Father John 14:5-11.
Metaphysics: The Study of the Nature of Existence or Reality I
Knowledge Acquisition
Verificationism on religious language
How do we know things? The Scientific Method
Did King Harold die at the battle of Hastings?
Question 1: INSTRUCTIONS Each person will answer the questions. If you get it right, you get the points. If you get it wrong, you get a strike.
Philosophy of Religion Revision: Religious Language
Flying pig spotted in Amazon Jungle…
Discussion: Can one meaningfully talk of a transcendent metaphysical God acting (creating sustaining, being loving) in a physical empirical world? Ayer.
‘A triangle has three sides’
Psych 231: Research Methods in Psychology
Branches of Philosophy
Religious Language as cognitive, but meaningless
Verification and meaning
Fact and Opinion: Is There Really a Difference
Science Review Game.
Presentation transcript:

Excerpted from Dallas Roark’s Introduction to Philosophy, 1982 Epistemology: How do we know? Excerpted Dallas Roark’s Introduction to Philosophy, 1982 By Steve Badger

Excerpted from Dallas Roark’s Introduction to Philosophy, 1982 What is knowledge? 1.Opinion plus evidence equals knowledge 2.Opinion plus probability equals knowledge 3.Observation equals knowledge 4.Knowledge equals opinions that one has a duty to accept 5.Knowledge is equated with the right to be sure 6.Opinion requires no plus to be knowledge

Excerpted from Dallas Roark’s Introduction to Philosophy, 1982 What is knowledge? “To know means that a person accepts a true proposition to be right or correct for “the best of reasons.” (10) “The man who knows must not be guessing, he must not hit on the truth by chance, he must not relly on bad reasons if he relied on reasons at all.” (10)

Excerpted from Dallas Roark’s Introduction to Philosophy, 1982 What is knowledge? “Knowing involves two different kinds of experiences: (1) direct experience, sometimes called the directly evident, and (2) reason processes, sometimes called the indirectly evident.” (10) Is knowledge possible?

Excerpted from Dallas Roark’s Introduction to Philosophy, 1982 Ways to Knowledge 1.Testimony (authority) 2.The physical senses 3.Reason 4.Phenomenology (essences) 5.Self-revelation 6.Intuition 7.Apprenticeship (pp.9-22)

Excerpted from Dallas Roark’s Introduction to Philosophy, 1982 Verification Principle A J Ayer ( ) For a statement to be meaningful (true) it must be either 1) purely definitional or else 2) verifiable by onor of more of the five senses. All other statements (ethical, theological, metaphysical) are nonsense or meaningless. Logical Positivism Self-refuting

Excerpted from Dallas Roark’s Introduction to Philosophy, 1982 Falsification Principle Anthony Flew and Karl Popper Any statement or proposition is meaningless unless it is subject to falsification (at least in principle) Flew used it to challenge a belief in God Self-refuting But Flew recently changed his mind…