11 juni 2007 Ecological classification in the Netherlands1 Diederik van der Molen Ministry of Transport, Public Works and Water Management CIS workshop.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Monitoring network development for the WFD in The Netherlands: State of affairs Jos Timmerman RIZA.
Advertisements

The EU Water Framework Directive and Sediments The Water Framework Directive was transposed into law in EU Member States at the end of Nearly two.
EEA 2012 State of water assessments Ecological and chemical status and pressures Peter Kristensen Project manager – Integrated Water Assessments, EEA Based.
Environmental flows in Europe Mike Acreman. Green and pleasant land? Thames basin 10,000 km mm rainfall 15 million people significant water stress.
Anne Lyche Solheim, Norwegian Institute for Water Research, Oslo, Norway Workshop on ”In situ trialing for ecological and chemical studies in support of.
TMAP – WFD Workshop Reference Values Hamburg 29 – 30 November 2004 Overview WFD Implementation Harald Marencic Common Wadden Sea Secretariat.
An overview of water quality monitoring schemes for compliance with the WFD An Overview An overview of water quality monitoring schemes for compliance.
Fish migration from a Water Framework Directive perspective
Indicators to communicate progress towards good status WG DIS, April 2015.
Bárbara Willaarts 1,2, Mario Ballesteros 2 and Nuria Hernández-Mora 3 1 Observatorio del Agua-Fundación Botín 2 CEIGRAM-Universidad Politécnica de Madrid.
MODULE 1 Water Framework Directive, Relation of WFD with Daughter Directives, River Basin Management Planning, Water Bodies, Typology, Classification River.
WFD Characterisation Report Dr Tom Leatherland Environmental Quality Manager 29 October 2003.
Water.europa.eu Water Framework Directive - a framework for Community action in the field of water policy Marieke van Nood WFD Team, DG ENV.D.2, European.
© WRc plc 2010 Agenda item 3b: Summary of WISE electronic delivery: presentation of an example.
Biological methods to detect the effects of hydrological and morphological pressures Introduction and overview of questionnaire responses.
Seite Foto Pulkau Foto Gebirgsbach General chemical and physico- chemical elements – Type-specific assessment of rivers in Austria Karin Deutsch.
Austrian Approach for Identification of Water Bodies Workshop on Identification of Surface Water Bodies Brussels, 25/26 September 2003 Birgit Vogel Austrian.
CLASSIFICATION OF RIVERS AND LAKES
Management of the coastal and marine environment: The legal framework of the European Union from the first EEC Directives to the Water Framework Directive.
EFFECT OF AGGREGATION METHODS ON ECOLOGICAL ASSESSMENT Paul Latour Ministry of Transport, Public Works and Water Management CIS WORKSHOP ON NATIONAL CLASSIFICATION.
DETERMINATION AND MANAGEMENT OF SENSITIVE AREAS ON THE BASIS OF WATERSHED IN TURKEY MINISTRY OF FORESTRY AND WATER AFFAIRS.
Finnish Environment Institute Seppo Rekolainen REBECCA News in March 2005.
Europe-wide monitoring obligations under the EU Water Framework Directive Jos G. Timmerman Institute for Inland Water Management and Waste Water Treatment.
Polsko-Norweski Fundusz Badań Naukowych / Polish-Norwegian Research Fund Pragmatic combination of BQE results into final WB assessment in Norway Anne Lyche.
Working Group A ECOSTAT Intercalibration Progress Coast GIGs JRC, Ispra, Italy, March 2005 Dave Jowett, Environment Agency (England and Wales), Coast.
River Intercalibration Phase 2: Milestone 4 reports Presented by Wouter van de Bund Joint Research Centre Institute for Environment and Sustainability.
TECHNICAL ASSISTANCE FOR THE CONVERSION OF RBPAPs INTO RBMPs MONITORING INCEPTION WORKSHOP ISTAMBUL February Alfredo CORROCHANO CODORNÍU Carmen.
Centre for Economic Development, Transport and the Environment in Lapland1 Classification and monitoring of the surface waters of Finland National.
CIS Working Group 2A ECOSTAT Overall Approach to the Ecological Classification 01 July 2003 D/UK WGL CIS 2A.
Thematic assessments based on results from RBMPs Coastal and transitional ecological status & related presures Inland surface waters Hydromorphological.
Hümeyra BAHÇECİ (Expert)
Marcel van den Berg / Centre for Water Management The Netherlands
Monitoring, assessing and classifying the environment
Intercalibration results 2006/2007
CIS - Project 2.4 Transitional and Coastal Waters
Dave Jowett, Chair UK Marine Task Team
Working Group A ECOSTAT October 2006 Summary/Conclusions
Progress on Intercalibration COAST GIGs
One-out-all-out and other indicators
Experiences of designing WFD-monitoring networks in the Netherlands
SoE Guidance – Biological reporting sheets
EU Water Framework Directive
EEA - EMMA Workshop November 20-21, 2006 EEA, Copenhagen
Water Directors meeting - Dresden
Setting Classboundaries
Claire Vincent Environment and Heritage Service United Kingdom
One-out-all-out and other indicators
COAST Lisbon February Claire Vincent Environment and Heritage Service United Kingdom.
Design of monitoring networks for rivers in Austria
One-out-all-out and other indicators
The normal balance of ingredients
on a protocol for Intercalibration of Surface Water
Project 2.7 Guidance on Monitoring
Saltmarsh Intercalibration CW
CIS Working Group 2A ECOSTAT SCG Meeting in Brussels
confidence in classification
Working Group 2A ECOSTAT progress report Presented by Wouter van de Bund Joint Research Centre Institute for Environment and Sustainability.
Water Directors meeting Warsaw, 8-9 December 2011
WG 2.3 REFCOND Progress report for the SCG meeting 30 Sep-1 Oct 2002
EU Water Framework Directive
Working Group 2A ECOSTAT Guidance for the intercalibration process Wouter van de Bund Joint Research Centre Institute for Environment and Sustainability.
WFD CIS 4th Intercalibration Workshop
CIS WG D meeting 7 April 2011 DG ENV, Brussels
Intercalibration: problems of selecting types
WISE – Freshwater WFD visualization tool
Communicating progress under WFD
WG A ECOSTAT Draft Mandate
Typology and Intercalibration Typology System
Summary overview of methods used to define GEP in practice by countries represented in the ad-hoc group Dr. Ursula Schmedtje.
Dutch approach for setting GEP (and MEP)
Presentation transcript:

11 juni 2007 Ecological classification in the Netherlands1 Diederik van der Molen Ministry of Transport, Public Works and Water Management CIS workshop on national classification systems for the assessment of the ecological status of surface waters Paris, June 2007

11 juni 2007 Ecological classification in the Netherlands2 content Typology Biological assessment General physical chemistry Hydromorpholgy Open ends –Heavily modified & artificial water bodies –Intercalibration large rivers –One-out-all-out

11 juni 2007 Ecological classification in the Netherlands3 Typology  10 River types  9 Lake types  1 Transitional water type  3 Coastal water types Natural water bodies Heavily modified & Artificial water bodies Objective GEP derived from natural types  ~10 types for ditches and small canals  Typology only for rivers > 10 km 2 & lakes > 0.5 km 2  Including large rivers e.g. Rhine and Meuse

11 juni 2007 Ecological classification in the Netherlands4 Biological quality elements: annex V.1.1 X X comp&ab blooms

11 juni 2007 Ecological classification in the Netherlands5 Fytoplankton Lakes Biomass: chlorophyll-a Composition and abundance combined in blooms-criterion: speciescriterion EQ R Aphanizomenon flos-aquae 2000 fil/ml0.5 Microcystis aeruginosa cel/ml0.4 etc EQR fytoplankton = average of EQR(chlorophyll) and lowest bloom-score Coastal- and transitional waters Biomass: chlorophyll-a Composition and abundance: Phaeocystis-criterion Values related to OSPAR convention

11 juni 2007 Ecological classification in the Netherlands6 Macrophytes Lakes Abundance: different growth-forms and depth-distribution of the lake Composition: all species have a positive score (1-4) based on their presence EQR macrophytes = average of abundance and composition metrics Rivers Similar for abundance and composition Fytobenthos: based on %negative indicator species EQR macrophytes = average of abundance, composition and fytobenthos metrics Coastal- and transitional waters Quantity and quality of sea-grass Quantity and quality of tidal-marshes

11 juni 2007 Ecological classification in the Netherlands7 Macro-invertebrates Lakes and rivers Based on dominant positive taxa, dominant negative taxa and type-specific taxa Coastal- and transitional waters Species on the level of the water body Abundance on the level of the water body Species of specific habitats Still in progress - Intercalibration

11 juni 2007 Ecological classification in the Netherlands8 Fish Lakes Composition based on general species Abundance based on –%Bream (eutrophication) –%Pearch&Roach (vegetation) –Limnophilic (vegetation) –‘Black’ fish (O2 dynamics) Age structure only for large, deep lakes EQR fish: weighing of sub-metrics Rivers Composition (nr species) and abundance (%numbers) based on guilds, e.g. rheophilic Transitional waters: Work in progress (Intercalibration)

11 juni 2007 Ecological classification in the Netherlands9 Relation pressures – quality elements Eutrophi- cation Toxic compounds Hydro- logy Morphology/ habitat Connec- tivity Fytoplankton X Macrophytes/ Fytobenthos xXX Macro- invertebrates xxxX Fish xxxX

11 juni 2007 Ecological classification in the Netherlands10 Deviations from annex V.1.1 Tidal rivers: no macro-invertebrates –no confidence on reference conditions –dominated by invading species Rivers and shallow lakes: no age structure of fish fauna –Large rivers: no data –Small rivers: metrics not good enough (FAME) –Small lakes: too much natural variation Some coastal types: no macroalgae and angiosperms –Not present, because of high dynamics pressure: polluted sediments pressure: commercial fisheries

11 juni 2007 Ecological classification in the Netherlands11 General physico-chemical elements

11 juni 2007 Ecological classification in the Netherlands12 Hydromorphology Assessment only relevant for “high status” and “Maximum Ecological Potential” Mainly used for diagnoses

11 juni 2007 Ecological classification in the Netherlands13 Status ecological classification of natural water types Biology and general physico-chemistry politically approved as provisional objectives Intercalibration results autumn 2007 Regional experiences Final approval Dec 2007 (?) Also (in Latin/Dutch) available on

11 juni 2007 Ecological classification in the Netherlands14 Heavily modified & Artificial water bodies About 95% of lakes and rivers are Heavily modified / Artificial Water level management in lakes Dams and shoreline modification in rivers Artificial canals and ditches At present local authorities derive ecological objectives for the water bodies 1.Some follow the Guidance A&HMWB, starting with reference conditions of comparable natural type 2.Most start with present situation and all relevant measures (“Prague-matic”)

11 juni 2007 Ecological classification in the Netherlands15 Classification of A&HM water bodies 0,8 0,6 0,4 0,2 1,0 GES 0,28 0,55 0,42 0,15 GEP Values for metrics of heavily modified water bodies are mainly based on ‘best sites’ … for both biology and physical- chemistry

11 juni 2007 Ecological classification in the Netherlands16 Large rivers Rhine, Meuse, Schelde, Eems  Heavily modified  Reference conditions?  High economic value  High ecological potential  How can Intercalibration be used to set the ambition in Europe?  Further action needed?

11 juni 2007 Ecological classification in the Netherlands17 One-out-all-out?! 3 – 4 biological quality elements for each type/water body 5 – 6 general physical chemical quality elements –Checking procedure cf Classification guidance specific pollutants (Rhine 15, Meuse & Scheldt 7)  O-o-a-o will cause little green on the maps!  Ecological status largely not determined by biology!  Standards for specific pollutants have an ecological basis,  but no clear relation with  biological assessment of the complete ecosystem and  measures other than reduction of emissions  Exclude specific pollutants from ecological status assessment?  3 assessments: ecology, priority substances and other pollutants?

11 juni 2007 Ecological classification in the Netherlands18 Thanks for your attention! also on behalf of Paul Latour Marcel van den Berg