CAA Options: Collection of Evidence CTE Connection December 8, 2006 Rod Duckworth, Director of Career and Technical Education OSPI.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Getting to Know the Math COE Office of Superintendent of Public Instruction Scott Brittain April 24, 2012.
Advertisements

ESEA: Developing the Paraprofessional Portfolio Prepared by Carolyn Ellis Logan, Consultant Professional Development/Human Rights Department Michigan Education.
SB 578: Professional Development and Renewal Jeffrey A. Aranowski, Division Supervisor Public School Recognition/Office of the General Counsel Illinois.
Teacher Evaluation Update Marzano Protocol System.
Data Collection An overview of how data are collected and used in Washington state.
Career and Technical Education in Arizona adds so much value to the lives of its citizens and the state’s economy that every parent and student considers.
Implementation of the North Carolina Read to Achieve Program May 7, 2013.
NYS Assessment Updates & Processes for New Social Studies Regents Exams September 18, 2014 Candace Shyer Assistant Commissioner for Assessment, Standards.
Career and Technical Education in 2006 and Beyond Rod Duckworth Director of Career & Technical Education Office of Superintendent of Public Instruction.
Carl D. Perkins Career and Technical Education Improvement Act of 2006.
Principal Leadership Academy Basic Leadership Training November 2012.
 Please sign in.  You must register for the course to receive PAC.  PAC is valuable for advancing on the salary schedule.
REGIONAL PEER REVIEW PANELS (PRP) August Peer Review Panel: Background  As a requirement of the ESEA waiver, ODE must establish a process to ensure.
Nevada CTE & CTECS: Programs, Standards, Assessments & Credentials January, 2014 Nevada Department of Education Office of Career, Technical and Adult.
1. Goal: To prepare all students for success in college, work, and citizenship 2.
New Beginnings for CTE in Texas. HB 809 Dissemination of information regarding employment opportunities to secondary school students Effective: September.
Welcome What’s a pilot?. What’s the purpose of the pilot? Support teachers and administrators with the new evaluation system as we learn together about.
1 Let’s Meet! October 13,  All four people have to run.  The baton has to be held and passed by all participants.  You can have world class speed.
Developing Monitoring and Pre-Scoring Plans for Alternate/Alternative Assessments Virginia Department of Education Division of Student Assessment and School.
Student Learning Objectives The SLO Process Student Learning Objectives Training Series Module 3 of 3.
Student Learning Objectives 1 Phase 3 Regional Training April 2013.
World Languages Portfolio. Student Growth Portfolio with Peer Review 2  THE GOAL: A holistic and meaningful picture of the value a teacher adds to students,
November 7,  Provisos are in annual Appropriations Bills  Proviso 1A.60 included in bill  Very prescriptive.
Interim Joint Committee on Education June 11, 2012.
Iowa’s Teacher Quality Program. Intent of the General Assembly To create a student achievement and teacher quality program that acknowledges that outstanding.
1 The CAA Options: Current Status and What May be in Your Future Ron Donovan and Robert Butts Office of Superintendent of Public Instruction Cathy Fromme.
Data supported by professional development Baron Rodriguez Chief Information Officer Oregon Department of Education Mickey Garrison School Improvement.
2008 Legislative Session Legislative Session Wrap-up Brian Jeffries Office of Superintendent of Public Instruction Washington Education Research Association.
SD Secondary Career & Technical Education (CTE) Perkins Updates – July 2013.
Assessing Students With Disabilities: IDEA and NCLB Working Together.
Implementation of the North Carolina Read to Achieve Program CCSA March 25, 2013.
Evaluation Team Progress Collaboration Grant 252.
Issues and Concerns Facing State Departments of Education -Secondary and Postsecondary- (Washington and Florida) May 16, :30 – 11:30.
NCATE Standard 3: Field Experiences & Clinical Practice Monica Y. Minor, NCATE Jeri A. Carroll, BOE Chair Professor, Wichita State University.
WERA December 2008 Mathematics Assessment Office of Superintendent of Public Instruction Mathematics Assessment Office of Superintendent of Public Instruction.
Developing a Monitoring and Pre-Scoring Plan for the Virginia Grade Level Alternative (VGLA) Adapted from the Virginia Department of Education Division.
PERSONNEL EVALUATION SYSTEMS How We Help Our Staff Become More Effective Margie Simineo – June, 2010.
October 2009 Oregon Department of Education 1 Diploma Options 2009.
HONG KONG EXAMINATIONS AND ASSESSMENT AUTHORITY 2007 HKCE English Language Examination Criteria and Standards for the SBA Component HKedCity Seminar, 10.
CURRICULUM, INSTRUCTION, AND ASSESSMENT UPDATE FEBRUARY 2014 VERONA PUBLIC SCHOOLS.
Commission on Teacher Credentialing Ensuring Educator Excellence 1 Bilingual Coordinators’ Network Meeting September 25, 2008.
CAA Options: Reading Collection of Evidence Lesley Klenk, CAA Options Administrator Fall Workshop October 2007.
Oregon’s Core Standards and Assessment Standards & Assessment Task Force March 20, 2008.
Reform Model for Change Board of Education presentation by Superintendent: Dr. Kimberly Tooley.
TPEP Teacher & Principal Evaluation System Prepared from resources from WEA & AWSP & ESD 112.
Program Standards for Bilingual Authorization Jo A. Birdsell, Ed.D. Commission on Teacher Credentialing Technical Assistance Meetings November 21 & 25,
BISD Update Teacher & Principal Evaluation Update Board of Directors October 27,
Transforming the Learning, Teaching, and Leadership Environment Summer Institutes 2001 Office of Superintendent of Public Instruction/Association of Washington.
Developing Monitoring and Pre-Scoring Plans for Alternate/Alternative Assessments Virginia Department of Education Division of Student Assessment and School.
CCSSO Task Force Recommendations on Educator Preparation Idaho State Department of Education December 14, 2013 Webinar.
Teacher Licensure PI-34 Wisconsin’s New Process. New License Stages  Initial Educator 5 year, non-renewable  Professional Educator 5 year renewable.
Annual Assessment and Accountability Meeting Updates
Implementing edTPA An Overview.
County Vocational School District Partnership Grant, Cohort 3 Technical Assistance Workshop January 6, 2017.
Introduction to Teacher Evaluation
Overview of SB 191 Ensuring Quality Instruction through Educator Effectiveness Colorado Department of Education Updated: June 2012.
Phyllis Lynch, PhD Director, Instruction, Assessment and Curriculum
Standards-based Grading and Reporting
USBE: Tracy Gooley and Tanya Semerad
Introduction to Teacher Evaluation
Family Engagement Coordinator Meeting July 25, 2018
K-1 Literacy Pilot Update
Five Required Elements
Alternate Assessment Updates
Conducting Local Monitoring Visits Based Upon Maryland’s Unique Workforce and Economic Development Needs During the 2008 Maryland General Assembly Session.
Instructional Services Division of Educational Services
Instructional Services Division of Educational Services
Essential Skills (Required for DTCs, Recommended for STCs)
Assessing Students With Disabilities: IDEA and NCLB Working Together
Size, Scope, and Quality Definition Perkins V Town Hall Meeting
Presentation transcript:

CAA Options: Collection of Evidence CTE Connection December 8, 2006 Rod Duckworth, Director of Career and Technical Education OSPI

House Bill 6475   The Alternative Assessment (as it was called then) was the top educational bill facing the Washington State Legislature during the 2006 session. Both the House of Representatives and the Senate exchanged several versions before it was finally passed in the last days of the legislative session.

The Collection of Evidence  A Collection of Evidence is a selection of student work in a specific content area that the student has gathered over the course of several months. It clearly demonstrates a breadth and depth of the WASL skills and knowledge in the content area. The student work is referred to as a set of “work samples” and each work sample is accompanied by a signed affidavit that it is the student’s work. The work samples are always written products in all of the content areas. They may be on-demand samples, independent samples, or classroom samples with limited teacher direction.

Collection of Evidence Pilot  Over an eight month period, 75 teachers contributed to the development of materials for the Collection of Evidence. They chose 2-5 students and helped them to develop collections. Throughout the pilot, teachers had the opportunity to comment on, revise, and support the development process.  Twenty schools, Skill Centers, and Alternative programs participated  Small/large, urban/rural, affluent/low income, East/West, and ethnically diverse  203 collections were scored by teachers on April 24-25, 2006  As a result of what we learned from the pilot, we have  Refined the submission guidelines, scoring criteria, and administrative protocols  Identified and annotated quality student work samples  Created a handbook for educators to explain the process for implementation  Created a Collection of Evidence book that provides a complete guide to all of the content expectations for reading, writing, mathematics and Career and Technical Education programs

State Board approval in process  OSPI presented to the State Board of Education in May, June, July and August  Based on the State Board’s feedback as well as input from district educators, educational agencies, and the general public, OSPI has improved the COE’s components by doing the following:  Implementing revisions to the content guidelines and administrative protocols to increase clarity and reflect the importance of teacher and student knowledge in the process;  Planning intensive training around the state to build capacity in large and small districts to support student access to the COE;  Applying a set of Professionally Accepted Standards for Reliability and Validity to each part of the COE development including the scoring process and scoring criteria

Guidelines and Protocols  Content guidelines are the “requirements” for submitting a COE. They inform teachers, students and parents how many work samples should be submitted, what kind of work samples are to be submitted, and what state standards will be measured across the collection.  Administrative protocols are the “rules” for submitting a COE. All supervising teachers, participating students, and building principals sign paperwork on each COE to ensure that the work is representative of the skills and knowledge of the student  Upon the advice of the State Board of Education, OSPI staff has moved the first submission date for the COE to June 15, This allows all teachers, including CTE teachers, additional time for training, development of work samples, and implementation between the CTE pathways and content areas of reading, writing, and mathematics.

Scoring process, criteria and rigor  Students will register for the COE November- January  COEs will be scored for sufficiency (rules and requirements) and proficiency (meets the standard)  Scorers will use a scoring process similar to the WASL  Scorers use scoring guides that assess the same skill, at the same level of rigor, as the WASL.

Trainings planned for the State  A full schedule of trainings is planned between September 2006-April The trainings are targeted for specific audiences and designed to build expert trainers all over the state. The participants will include:  ESD content staff will provide regional training  Teachers from nine regions will receive an introduction to the COE with materials  District Assessment Coordinators will train on the implementation of the assessment  Teachers who work with culturally diverse students will build culturally diverse work samples  Teachers who work with CTE students will build CTE-specific work samples  All teachers whose students are submitting COEs

Materials and resources for schools  OSPI, in conjunction with teachers from all content areas, have developed publications and support materials that are (or will be shortly) available on the OSPI website. Some of them are:  A “Frequently Asked Questions” document that answers many educator questions about all three CAA Options  A list of CTE industry certificates that may be used to support a student’s COE  Annotated work samples from each content area that demonstrate high to low examples of student work  The COE book that explains the content guidelines and administrative protocols for teachers  An Educator handbook for the CAA Options  PDF copies of all administrative forms for the COE  Example tasks to support teacher work samples in the classroom

Collection of Evidence for CTE Students In Spring 2006, OSPI in conjunction with CTE educators, began working together to build the specific components of a COE for CTE students. The two types of COEs for CTE students are:  A COE using CTE coursework for examples of reading, writing, and mathematics  A COE using CTE coursework along with an industry certificate or credential for examples of reading, writing and mathematics

Trainings for CTE Educators  Two major work sample trainings for CTE educators only.  The two trainings are scheduled for December 2006 and February  Over 200 participants have registered for the workshops.  CTE teachers will produce work samples in the areas of agriculture, health and science, technology, and marketing.