Nick DiPasquale, Director Chesapeake Bay Program Office Environmental Protection Agency December 4, 2014 The Bay’s Health & Future: How it’s doing and.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Planning for Our Future:
Advertisements

Carin Bisland, Associate Director Chesapeake Bay Program Office Environmental Protection Agency November 21, 2014 The Bay’s Health & Future: How it’s doing.
Harris Creek Case Study: Oyster Restoration and GIT Collaboration Chesapeake Bay Program Management Board August 2, 2012 Peyton Robertson Fisheries Goal.
Carin Bisland, Associate Director Chesapeake Bay Program Office Environmental Protection Agency December 4, 2014 The Bay’s Health & Future: How it’s doing.
Scientific, Technical Assessment, and Reporting Scientific, Technical Assessment, and Reporting Partnering, Leadership & Management Partnering, Leadership.
Chesapeake Bay Program Goal Development, Governance, and Alignment Carin Bisland, GIT6 Vice Chair.
Chesapeake Bay Program Goal Development, Governance, and Alignment Carin Bisland, GIT6 Vice Chair.
 Jennifer Volk Environmental Quality Specialist; UD Cooperative Extension Chair, Chesapeake Bay Program Water Quality Goal Implementation Team.
Chesapeake Bay Program Presented by: Elizabeth Mills, Heather Plumridge, Elizabeth Repko Possibilities, Problems, and Promise.
Independent Evaluator Chesapeake Bay Partner’s Response to the National Research Council’s Report Management Board, November 1, 2011 ~ 9-11 AM.
Nick DiPasquale, Director Chesapeake Bay Program Office (EPA) 1 CBP Program Update Local Government Advisory Committee March 14, 2014.
GIT 6 Role in Advising Management Board on Alignment Issues Carin Bisland, GIT6 Vice-chair.
Update on Forest Goals and Progress in the Chesapeake Bay Partnership Citizens Advisory Committee Meeting, 8/23/13 Sally Claggett & Julie Mawhorter, US.
1 Jim Edward Chair, IRC April 13, 2014 Issues Resolution Committee: Recommendations to PSC on Key Issues Raised during the Public/Partner Comment Period.
CBP Agreement and EC Membership Options for Principals’ Staff Committee Consideration April 17, 2013 Draft 4/1/13 for GIT 6 Review.
Chesapeake Bay Program: Governance and Goals Options for Principals’ Staff Committee Consideration March 7, 2013.
Drafting the new Chesapeake Bay Agreement, Goals and Outcomes May 16, 2013.
Being Accountable/Communicating Assessment Information to the Public in 2012 Update to the Management Board April 2012 Margaret Enloe, ACB CBPO and Nita.
Drafting the New Chesapeake Bay Agreement, Goals and Outcomes – Decision/Actions From Management Board Meetings June 13 and 18, 2013.
James Edward, Deputy Director Chesapeake Bay Program Office U.S. Environmental Protection Agency November 20, 2014 The Bay’s Health & Future: How it’s.
Options for CBP Agreement and EC Membership For Principals’ Staff Committee Consideration March, 2013.
Drafting the new Chesapeake Bay Agreement, Goals and Outcomes May 16, 2013.
Progress on Coordinating CBP and Federal Leadership Goals, Outcomes, and Actions Principals’ Staff Committee Meeting 2/16/12 Carin Bisland, Associate Director.
CBP Agreement and EC Membership Options for Principals’ Staff Committee Consideration April 17,
James Edward, Deputy Director Chesapeake Bay Program Environmental Protection Agency The Bay’s Health & Future: How it’s doing and What’s Next The New.
Citizen’s Advisory Committee / Local Government Advisory Committee Joint Meeting December 5, 2013 Jim Edward, Deputy Director Chesapeake Bay Program (EPA)
CRC Staffer Update Sarah Brzezinski Fostering Chesapeake Stewardship GIT 5.
Jim Edward, Deputy Director Chesapeake Bay Program, EPA 1 CBP Program Update on Bay Agreement Comments, Final Draft, and 2-Year Milestone Status Citizens.
U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey CBP Partnership Team- Enhance Monitoring in the Bay and its Watershed Scott Phillips, USGS Jonathan.
FY2012 ChesapeakeStat Development Team Enhancements – content, design, function 1.Redesign Goal Overview Pages Objective: Communicate the mission and vision.
Bay Guidance Programs. The Bay Program partnership includes: 19 federal agencies Nearly 40 state agencies and programs in DE, MD, NY, PA, VA,
Safeguarding California: Implementation Action Plans Listening Tour October 2015.
Indicator Status Updates Overview Nita Sylvester, EPA CBPO Chair of STAR’s Indicator Workgroup.
CBP Agreement and EC Membership Options for Principals’ Staff Committee Consideration April 17, 2013 Draft 4/5/13 for MB Review 1.
Citizen Stewardship Outcome Kick Off Meeting 11/18/2014.
Visual Decision Frameworks –Habitat GIT Adaptive Management based on annual review. Share progress and address challenges and opportunities Adjust management.
Abridged Chesapeake Bay Agreement: Initial Reactions WRTC September 6, 2013.
Key Functions & Responsibilities (from the old governance document) – Coordinates the program-level adaptive management system and assists the GITs in.
Jeff Horan, Habitat GIT Chair February 16, 2012 CBP Decision Framework in Action.
Nicholas DiPasquale, Director Chesapeake Bay Program Environmental Protection Agency The Bay’s Health & Future: How it’s doing and What’s Next The New.
State of the Chesapeake Bay Program Nick DiPasquale, CBP Director, EPA Executive Council Annual Meeting June 16,
Land Use Metrics & Methods Outcome Management Strategy Peter Claggett U.S. Geological Survey December 4, 2014.
For EBTJV meeting October 26, 2010 Executive Order Strategy for Protecting and Restoring the Chesapeake Bay Watershed.
Chesapeake Bay Program
CRC Staffer Update Megan Hession Habitat Goal Implementation Team.
Zoë P. Johnson, NOAA Chesapeake Bay Office Mark Bennett, USGS
Quarterly Progress Meeting - May 2017
CBP Biennial Strategy Review System:
Chesapeake Bay Program Budget & Finance Workgroup Meeting
Chesapeake Bay Program Updates
Quarterly Progress Meeting - May 2017
Quarterly Progress Meeting - August 2017
Concepts and Timeline for Developing a CBP Biennial Strategy Review System (DRAFT) October 31, 2016 (DRAFT)
Riparian Forest Buffers
Public Access John Davy, National Park Service,
Jim Edward Chair, IRC April 13, 2014
The Watershed Agreement and the Phase 3 WIPs
The Bay’s Health & Future: How it’s doing and What’s Next
Concepts and Timeline for Developing a CBP Biennial Strategy Review System DRAFT August 29, 2016 DRAFT 12/4/2018 DRAFT.
CBP Biennial Strategy Review System:
2016 – 17 Bay Barometer.
The Watershed Agreement and the Phase 3 WIPs
Communications Workgroup Retreat July 25, 2018 | Harrisburg, PA
Chesapeake Bay Watershed Agreement Outcomes and Phase III WIPs
I AM RACHEL FELVER. Hello!
CBP Agreement and EC Membership Options for
LGAC Input on Outcomes.
Monitoring & Assessment, Adaptation Outcomes
CBP Citizen Advisory Committee Briefing February 22, 2013 Meeting
CBP Organizational Structure
Presentation transcript:

Nick DiPasquale, Director Chesapeake Bay Program Office Environmental Protection Agency December 4, 2014 The Bay’s Health & Future: How it’s doing and What’s Next The Chesapeake Bay Watershed Agreement Management Strategies

How partners are working... Vision Principles GOALS OUTCOME CBP’s Executive Council (EC) agreed to Watershed Agreement GOALS & initial OUTCOMES Mgmt. Strategy CBP’s Principals’ Staff Committee (PSC) tracks OUTCOMES, ensuring they are measureable & achievable; adapting as needed CBP’s Management Board (MB) to manage and track the STRATEGIES, adapting them as necessary over time for success Mgmt. Strategy Mgmt. Strategy

Sustainable Fisheries Goal  B lue Crab Abundance Outcome  Blue Crab Management Outcome  Oyster Outcome  Forage Fish Outcome  Fish Habitat Outcome Vital Habitat Goal  Wetlands Outcome o Black Duck  Stream Health Outcome o Brook Trout  Fish Passage Outcome  SAV Outcome  Forest Buffer Outcome  Tree Canopy Outcome Water Quality Goal  2017 WIP Outcome  2025 WIP Outcome  Water Quality Standards Attainment and Monitoring Outcome Toxic Contaminants Goal  Toxic Contaminant Research Outcome  Toxic Contaminant Policy and Prevention Outcome Healthy Watersheds Goal  Healthy Watersheds Outcome Stewardship Goal  Citizen Stewardship Outcome  Local Leadership Outcome  Diversity Outcome Goals and Outcomes

Land Conservation Goal  Protected Lands Outcome  Land Use Methods and Metrics Development Outcome  Land Use Options Evaluation Outcome Public Access Goal  Public Access Site Development Outcome Environmental Literacy  Student Outcome  Sustainable Schools Outcome  Environmental Literacy Planning Outcome Climate Resiliency  Monitoring and Assessment Outcome  Adaptation Outcome Goals and Outcomes

Management strategy – A single document that summarizes the Partnership’s management process and the collective thinking for each outcome or related group of outcomes. What’s Next?

Key Elements of Management Strategies

Process for Developing the Management Strategies GIT funding for MS development and metric development 1 st stage – Gathering the Players Assigned to GIT/workgroup/Action Team (screen shot of org chart) – each with a chair, a coordinator, and a staffer. Letter from Secretary Gill as PSC Chair GIT expertise on identifying stakeholders Web process for self-identified stakeholders

Process for Developing the Management Strategies 2 nd stage – Research/information collection - Each is slightly different. Where there is a lot of history with a particular outcome in the CBP partnership, often use more traditional established workgroups to get the work done (e.g. SAV) Where the MS requires more investment from stakeholders traditionally outside the CBP partnership (diversity, local leadership), more research and investment in up front understanding may be necessary (focus groups, workshops, etc) 3 rd stage – Writing – Who holds the pen? Who is involved? 4 th stage – Review – MB/public 5 th stage – Edit/improve/release “finalize”

Review and Adoption

Learn more at watershedagreement Join the discussions at managementstrategies