703: Data, Outcomes and Practice: Connecting the Dots CWTP Leadership Academy Conference September 29, 2010 1 The Pennsylvania Child Welfare Training Program.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Administrative Office of the Illinois Courts Child Protection Data Courts Project Using Data to Continuously Improve Illinois Courts.
Advertisements

Welcome! Review of the National Part C APR Indicator 4 Family Data FFY 2011 ( ) Siobhan Colgan, ECTA, DaSy Melissa Raspa, ECTA.
Using Data to Plan Waiver Strategies and Drive Improvements: Key Indicators and Trends April 11, 2012.
___State Program Improvement Planning (PIP) Process and Expectations Date (7/30/07)
Semonti Basu PBS Technical Assistance Facilitator Grace Martino-Brewster PBS Specialist Austin Independent School District Connecting Data Dots Using data-based.
How do LaSalle County Children Enter the Child Welfare System? LaSalle County Indicated reports FY 2010 SourceNumber Percent of total Law enforcement20755%
How do Morgan & Scott County Children Enter the Child Welfare System? Morgan and Scott Counties Indicated reports FY 2010 SourceNumber Percent of total.
Who lives in Rock Island County? Rock Island County Demographics by Race and/or Ethnic Group, 2009 estimate N = 148,826 White113, % Black or African.
How do McLean County Children Enter the Child Welfare System? McLean County Indicated reports FY 2010 SourceNumber Percent of total Law enforcement23350%
How do Peoria County Children Enter the Child Welfare System? Peoria County Indicated reports FY 2010 SourceNumber Percent of total Law enforcement19235%
How do Sangamon County Children Enter the Child Welfare System? Sangamon County Indicated reports FY 2010 SourceNumber Percent of total Law enforcement21638%
How do Logan County Children Enter the Child Welfare System? Logan, Mason and Menard Counties Indicated reports FY 2010 SourceNumber Percent of total.
1 Child and Family Services Review Program Improvement Plan Kick-Off Division/Staff Name Date (7/30/07)
CENTER FOR SOCIAL SERVICES RESEARCH School of Social Welfare, UC Berkeley Data Are Your Friends: California’s Child Welfare Outcomes and Accountability.
1 Lessons Learned about the Service Array from the First Round of Child and Family Services Reviews (CFSRs) The Service Array Process National Child Welfare.
Child Welfare Practice Model
1 CFSR STATEWIDE ASSESSMENT LESSONS LEARNED (State) CFSR Kick Off (Date)
The California Child Welfare System: Data Snapshot Barbara Needell, MSW, PhD Emily Putnam Hornstein, MSW Joseph Magruder, MSW Center for Social Services.
Identifying the Underlying Factors Related to Placement Stability in Florida Penelope (Penny) L. Maza, Ph.D. Consultant National Resource Center for Child.
1 Trends in Child Outcomes (C-3 / B-7) and Family Outcomes (C-4) Analysis and Summary Report of All States’ Annual Performance Reports Christina.
Program Staff Presentation 1 Program Staff Presentation.
Taking Research to Practice: Rethinking Outcomes and Performance Measures for the Child and Family Service Reviews John D. Fluke, Child Protection Research.
CENTER FOR SOCIAL SERVICES RESEARCH School of Social Welfare, UC Berkeley California’s Child Welfare System: Using Data from CWS/CMS Barbara Needell, MSW,
 Department of Family and Children Services, Santa Clara County  San Jose State University School of Social Work  Santa Clara County Children’s Issue.
Parent Bill of Rights We believe that parents have rights and that their concerns are reasonable and important.
Contra Costa County Disproportionality – Examples and Changes Ray Merritt; Dorothy Powell; Children and Family Services Research and Evaluation.
Measuring a Collaborative Effort a Child Welfare – Drug & Alcohol Family Preservation example Family Design Resources, Inc.  Fawn Davies  Deborah W.
AB 636 Mental Health/CWS Partnership Sacramento, CA 3/17/06 Barbara Needell, MSW, PhD Center for Social Services Research University of California at Berkeley.
DIVISION OF FAMILY & CHILDREN SERVICES G-FORCE MEETING May 2009.
1 G-FORCE MEETING Division of Family & Children Services September 25, 2009.
1 Leading Efforts to Identify and Address Disparities: A Response to Disproportionality Joyce James: Associate Deputy Executive Commissioner, Center for.
Data Quality Initiative-Update May 14, Data Quality Initiative The eWiSACWIS Data Quality Initiative will support counties, the BMCW and the Special.
CENTER FOR SOCIAL SERVICES RESEARCH School of Social Welfare, UC Berkeley California’s Child Welfare System: A Data Snapshot Barbara Needell, MSW, PhD.
CENTER FOR SOCIAL SERVICES RESEARCH School of Social Welfare, UC Berkeley California’s Child Welfare System: Using Data from CWS/CMS Barbara Needell, MSW,
Making CWLA Work for You Presentation to CWLA Southern Region and Georgia Association of Homes and Services for Children Membership October 5, 2006 Atlanta,
Subjects of Maltreatment Reports April 2011 through March 2012.
DIAKON Lutheran Social Ministries/Family Design Resources Tools That Work Conference 11/03 Implementing Best Practice Standards in Permanency Planning.
1 Quality Counts: Helping Improve Outcomes for Pennsylvania’s Children & Families September 22, 2008.
NATIONAL YOUTH IN TRANSITION DATABASE (NYTD) A Guide for Implementation.
CA COUNTY PEER QUALITY CASE REVIEW (Insert Review Week Dates)
When permanency remains elusive: A longitudinal examination of the early foster care experiences of youth at risk of emancipating Joe Magruder, MSW Emily.
Trends in Child Welfare Outcomes CA Blue Ribbon Commission May1, 2013 The Performance Indicators Project is a collaboration of the California Department.
Florida Center for Reading Research: Mission & Projects Dr. Marcia L. Grek Council of Language Arts Supervisors, May 2003.
Child and Family Service Review CFSR 101. Child and Family Service Review CFSR stands for the Child and Family Service Review. It is the federal government’s.
Project KEEP: San Diego 1. Evidenced Based Practice  Best Research Evidence  Best Clinical Experience  Consistent with Family/Client Values  “The.
Child Welfare in Georgia: How Effective Are We? Andrew Barclay, Barton Child Law and Policy Clinic (Founder), Emory University School of Law.
Supervisor Core Training: Managing for Results Original presentation was created for Version 1.0 by Daniel Webster, Barbara Needell, Wendy Piccus, Aron.
1 CHILDREN SAFE AND THRIVING WITH FOREVER FAMILIES, SOONER DIVISION OF FAMILY & CHILDREN SERVICES Isabel Blanco, Deputy Director of Field Operations September.
Common Goals: Child Safety, Permanency and Well-Being Citizen Review Panel National Conference May 21-23, 2008 St. Paul, Minnesota Christeen Borsheim,
Methods of Statistical Analysis and Dissemination of Census Results in Guyana MORGAN CLITUS DIAS SENIOR CARTOGRAPHER BUREAU OF STATISTICS GEORGEOWN,GUYANA.
The Child and Family Services Review (CFSR) February 2008 Update.
AB 636 presented at the joint hearing between the ASSEMBLY COMMITTEE ON HUMAN SERVICES and the ASSEMBLY SELECT COMMITTEE ON FOSTER CARE Sacramento, CA.
1 DHS Board Meeting Promoting Safe and Stable Families Program Overview Mark Washington Division of Family and Children Services August 18, 2010.
Background Objectives Methods Study Design A program evaluation of WIHD AfterCare families utilizing data collected from self-report measures and demographic.
Provincial Permanency Data Results for DFNAs and CFSAs Prepared by Service Analysis Branch May 27, 2009.
County Name Next Steps Meeting and Licensing Exit Conference Date.
Georgia SHINES Enhancements 5.1 Release Tentative Release Date: March 18, 2012.
Child and Family Services Reviews Onsite Review Instrument.
As Is Future, Alaska & Providers ITOTS Working Group August 18, 2008.
Teamwork and Partnership in Foster Care and Adoption
Performance Outcomes System
Panhandle Partnership for Health and Human Services
209: Visitation: The Heart of Permanency Planning
Texas Department of Family and Protective Services January 23, 2015
Another Planned Permanent Living Arrangement (APPLA)
GOT PERMANENCE? DIVISION OF FAMILY & CHILDREN SERVICES G-FORCE MEETING
Texas Department of Family and Protective Services December 19, 2014
Trends in Child Outcomes (C-3 / B-7) and Family Outcomes (C-4)
Using the CCWIP Data Portal
Children Services Committee Meeting
Presentation transcript:

703: Data, Outcomes and Practice: Connecting the Dots CWTP Leadership Academy Conference September 29, The Pennsylvania Child Welfare Training Program

The DAPIM™ Model 1. Define 2. Assess 3. Plan 4. Implement 5. Monitor 2 The Pennsylvania Child Welfare Training Program Data, Outcomes, Practice: Connecting the Dots

Define New Data Package  Population Flow  Outcome Measures Old Data Package  CFSR Composites  CFSR Measures  Permanency Measures  Safety Indicators 3 The Pennsylvania Child Welfare Training Program Data, Outcomes, Practice: Connecting the Dots

Assess New Data Package  Trends  Geographic Comparisons  County Trends  County to Class  County to Region  County to State Old Data Package  Trends  Geographic Comparisons  Case Characteristics  Age  Race / Ethnicity  Gender  Reason for Removal  Placement Setting  JPO Status 4 The Pennsylvania Child Welfare Training Program Data, Outcomes, Practice: Connecting the Dots

Plan – In what direction are trends moving? – What populations are positively affected? – What populations are negatively affected? – What programmatic or practice changes – internal or external to the county – impacted the results. 5 The Pennsylvania Child Welfare Training Program Data, Outcomes, Practice: Connecting the Dots

Example – Permanency 6 The Pennsylvania Child Welfare Training Program Data, Outcomes, Practice: Connecting the Dots

Example – Measure The Pennsylvania Child Welfare Training Program Data, Outcomes, Practice: Connecting the Dots

Implement – What lessons can be learned from populations with positive trends? – What are the needs of populations with unfavorable trends? – What steps need to be implemented to effect change? – Do policies need to be changed or implemented? – What external sources (e.g. judges) need to be involved? 8 The Pennsylvania Child Welfare Training Program Data, Outcomes, Practice: Connecting the Dots

Example – Measure The Pennsylvania Child Welfare Training Program Data, Outcomes, Practice: Connecting the Dots

Example – Measure The Pennsylvania Child Welfare Training Program Data, Outcomes, Practice: Connecting the Dots

Example – Measure 3.1 Question for the Group: What does it all mean? 11 The Pennsylvania Child Welfare Training Program Data, Outcomes, Practice: Connecting the Dots

Monitor – Time needed to have a measurable effect – Understand concurrent influences – Set benchmarks 12 The Pennsylvania Child Welfare Training Program Data, Outcomes, Practice: Connecting the Dots

(break) 13 The Pennsylvania Child Welfare Training Program Data, Outcomes, Practice: Connecting the Dots

Practical Examples A How-To Guide for Digging Deeper 14 The Pennsylvania Child Welfare Training Program Data, Outcomes, Practice: Connecting the Dots

How to Look at the Data Why is the data from last year? 15 The Pennsylvania Child Welfare Training Program Data, Outcomes, Practice: Connecting the Dots

Example - Adoption 16 The Pennsylvania Child Welfare Training Program Data, Outcomes, Practice: Connecting the Dots

Example - Adoption Of all children who were in foster care on the first day of the period, and who were in foster care for seventeen continuous months or longer, what percent were discharged to a finalized adoption within twelve months of the first day of the period? This measure excludes children who, as of the first day of the period, were placed in a kinship setting. 17 The Pennsylvania Child Welfare Training Program Data, Outcomes, Practice: Connecting the Dots

Example – Adoption Of all children who were in foster care on the first day of the period, and who were in foster care for seventeen continuous months or longer, what percent were discharged to a finalized adoption within twelve months of the first day of the period? This measure excludes children who, as of the first day of the period, were placed in a kinship setting. 18 The Pennsylvania Child Welfare Training Program Data, Outcomes, Practice: Connecting the Dots

Example 19 The Pennsylvania Child Welfare Training Program Data, Outcomes, Practice: Connecting the Dots

How to Look at the Data What sort of data is it? 20 The Pennsylvania Child Welfare Training Program Data, Outcomes, Practice: Connecting the Dots

Example – Descriptive 21 The Pennsylvania Child Welfare Training Program Data, Outcomes, Practice: Connecting the Dots

Example – Prescriptive 22 The Pennsylvania Child Welfare Training Program Data, Outcomes, Practice: Connecting the Dots

How to Look at the Data What is a trend? What does it look like? Is it really a trend? 23 The Pennsylvania Child Welfare Training Program Data, Outcomes, Practice: Connecting the Dots

Is this a Trend? 24 The Pennsylvania Child Welfare Training Program Data, Outcomes, Practice: Connecting the Dots

How about this? 25 The Pennsylvania Child Welfare Training Program Data, Outcomes, Practice: Connecting the Dots

What To Look At Start with the graphs. Use the tables to drill down. Review: Everything in the New Data Packages CFSR Composite Scores 26 The Pennsylvania Child Welfare Training Program Data, Outcomes, Practice: Connecting the Dots

How to Look at the Data Why not look at everything? 27 The Pennsylvania Child Welfare Training Program Data, Outcomes, Practice: Connecting the Dots

How to Look at the Data OK, I understand how to look at the graphs to identify measures I need to understand better, but – How do I dig into the data? How do I identify demographic / case specific trends? 28 The Pennsylvania Child Welfare Training Program Data, Outcomes, Practice: Connecting the Dots

Where Can We Find Demographic Data? Old Data Package – Measure worksheets. New Data Package – Case Level Data 29 The Pennsylvania Child Welfare Training Program Data, Outcomes, Practice: Connecting the Dots

Sliced, Diced, Served » Geographic – Class, Region, Statewide » Age » Race / Ethnicity » Gender » JPO Status » Kinship Status » Removal Reason 30 The Pennsylvania Child Welfare Training Program Data, Outcomes, Practice: Connecting the Dots

Example – Measure 1.1 Who is driving this change? 31 The Pennsylvania Child Welfare Training Program Data, Outcomes, Practice: Connecting the Dots

Sliced, Diced, Served » Geographic – Class, Region, Statewide » Age » Race / Ethnicity » Gender » JPO Status » Kinship Status » Removal Reason 32 The Pennsylvania Child Welfare Training Program Data, Outcomes, Practice: Connecting the Dots

Example – Measure The Pennsylvania Child Welfare Training Program Data, Outcomes, Practice: Connecting the Dots

Example – Measure The Pennsylvania Child Welfare Training Program Data, Outcomes, Practice: Connecting the Dots

Excel Tricks 1.Use a Highlighter 2.Add things up, quickly 3.Compare Groups 4.Succeed with small numbers 35 The Pennsylvania Child Welfare Training Program Data, Outcomes, Practice: Connecting the Dots

Small Numbers / Compare Groups Small Numbers Affects Small Counties & Smaller Groups It is often useful to compare two groups and get an Average 36 The Pennsylvania Child Welfare Training Program Data, Outcomes, Practice: Connecting the Dots

Example – Compare Groups 37 The Pennsylvania Child Welfare Training Program Data, Outcomes, Practice: Connecting the Dots

Example – Compare Groups 38 The Pennsylvania Child Welfare Training Program Data, Outcomes, Practice: Connecting the Dots

Example – Compare Groups 39 The Pennsylvania Child Welfare Training Program Data, Outcomes, Practice: Connecting the Dots

Example – Compare Groups 40 The Pennsylvania Child Welfare Training Program Data, Outcomes, Practice: Connecting the Dots

Example – Compare Groups 41 The Pennsylvania Child Welfare Training Program Data, Outcomes, Practice: Connecting the Dots

Ask Hard Questions! Think about when the trend started. Ask yourself about: – Policy Changes – Personnel Changes – External Factors – Demographic Changes 42The Pennsylvania Child Welfare Training Program Data, Outcomes, Practice: Connecting the Dots

Questions to Ask Yourself Basic questions included with data packages. Are only a starting point. Additional questions will depend on answers to initial questions 43 The Pennsylvania Child Welfare Training Program Data, Outcomes, Practice: Connecting the Dots

Connect the Dots DAPIM™, Flywheels, Data Packages & You 44 The Pennsylvania Child Welfare Training Program Data, Outcomes, Practice: Connecting the Dots

Questions? Hornby Zeller Associates, Inc. (717) The Pennsylvania Child Welfare Training Program Data, Outcomes, Practice: Connecting the Dots