ESA Living Planet Symposium 28 June - 2 July 2010, Bergen, Norway A. Albertella, R. Rummel, R. Savcenko, W. Bosch, T. Janjic, J.Schroeter, T. Gruber, J.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
SPP STREMP Results STREMP STREMP quantifies regionally the mass transport between hydrosphere, ocean and atmosphere. It provides an assessment of.
Advertisements

Global Ocean Tide Models – Assesment of Errors and their Impact on GRACE gravity fields Roman Savcenko and Wolfgang Bosch Deutsches Geodätisches Forschungsinstitut.
A Comparison of topographic effect by Newton’s integral and high degree spherical harmonic expansion – Preliminary Results YM Wang, S. Holmes, J Saleh,
Ocean circulation estimations using GOCE gravity field models M.H. Rio 1, S. Mulet 1, P. Knudsen 2, O.B. Andersen 2, S.L. Bruinsma 3, J.C. Marty 3, Ch.
1 Internal waves and tidal energy dissipation observed by satellite altimetry E. Schrama, TU Delft / Geodesy The Netherlands
26/11/2012 – Observatoire de Paris Analysis of wind speed evolution over ocean derived from altimeter missions and models M. Ablain (CLS)
MR P.Durkee 5/20/2015 MR3522Winter 1999 MR Remote Sensing of the Atmosphere and Ocean - Winter 1999 Active Microwave Radar.
Satellite geodesy. Basic concepts. I1.1a = geocentric latitude φ = geodetic latitude r = radial distance, h = ellipsoidal height a = semi-major axis, b.
The Four Candidate Earth Explorer Core Missions Consultative Workshop October 1999, Granada, Spain, Revised by CCT GOCE S 43 Science and.
ASIC**3 Workshop -- May 2006 Measuring Global Sea Level Rise With Satellite Radar Altimetry ASIC**3 Workshop -- May 2006 Laury Miller NOAA/NESDIS Lab for.
The Four Candidate Earth Explorer Core Missions Consultative Workshop October 1999, Granada, Spain, Revised by CCT GOCE S 59 Performance.
ARCGICE WP 1.4 ERROR ESTIMATES IN SPATIAL AND SPECTRAL DOMAINS C.C.Tscherning, University of Copenhagen,
The Four Candidate Earth Explorer Core Missions consultative Workshop October 1999, Granada, Spain, Revised by CCT GOCE S 23 The gravity.
ARCGICE WP 5.2 Plan for development of Atctic geoid using GOCE C.C.Tscherning, University of Copenhagen,
Principles of Sea Level Measurement Long-term tide gauge records  What is a tide station?  How is sea level measured relative to the land?  What types.
Time-depending validation of ocean mass anomalies from GRACE by means of satellite altimetry and numerical models Henryk Dobslaw and Maik Thomas GeoForschungsZentrum.
The Four Candidate Earth Explorer Core Missions Consultative Workshop October 1999, Granada, Spain, Revised by CCT GOCE S 1 Gravity Field.
Dynamic Planet 2005 Cairns, Australia August 2005
Meeting French Ressources Organization for GOCE Paris, the 14th of may, 2003 From altimetry to operational oceanography, need for a precise geoid. Exemple.
Use of G99SSS to evaluate the static gravity geopotential derived from the GRACE, CHAMP, and GOCE missions Daniel R. Roman and Dru A. Smith Session: GP52A-02Decade.
Geoid improvement over Alaska/Yukon area by GRACE and GOCE models X Li 1, JL Huang 2, YM Wang 3, M Véronneau 2, D Roman 3 1 ERT Inc USA 2 Geodetic Survey.
WP3.1-ECOOP First annual meeting - Athens T3.1 Optimal synergy between altimetry and in-situ data Claire Dufau (1) Enrique Alvarez (2), Ole B. Andersen.
Institut für Erdmessung (IfE), Leibniz Universität Hannover, Germany Quality Assessment of GOCE Gradients Phillip Brieden, Jürgen Müller living planet.
1 Assessment of Geoid Models off Western Australia Using In-Situ Measurements X. Deng School of Engineering, The University of Newcastle, Australia R.
ESA Living Planet Symposium, Bergen, T. Gruber, C. Ackermann, T. Fecher, M. Heinze Institut für Astronomische und Physikalische Geodäsie (IAPG)
OC3522Summer 2001 OC Remote Sensing of the Atmosphere and Ocean - Summer 2001 Active Microwave Radar.
Satellite Altimetry - possibilities and limitations
ESA living planet symposium 2010 ESA living planet symposium 28 June – 2 July 2010, Bergen, Norway GOCE data analysis: realization of the invariants approach.
GEOF334 – Spring 2010 Radar Altimetry Johnny A. Johannessen Nansen Environmental and Remote Sensing Center, Bergen, Norway.
Resolution (degree) and RMSE (cm) Resolution (degree) and RMSE (cm)
Towards improved GRACE de-aliasing - first results from dynamical and residual ocean tide analysis Wolfgang Bosch 1), Detlef Stammer 2), Frank Flechtner.
Mapping Ocean Surface Topography With a Synthetic-Aperture Interferometry Radar: A Global Hydrosphere Mapper Lee-Lueng Fu Jet Propulsion Laboratory Pasadena,
1 Geoid and Geoid Change: Discussion Topics Roger Haagmans, Boulder, 21October 2009.
Data Requirements for a 1-cm Accurate Geoid
1 Metingen van getijden dissipatie uit satelliet observaties E. Schrama, TU Delft / DEOS The Netherlands
Numerical aspects of the omission errors due to limited grid size in geoid computations Yan Ming Wang National Geodetic Survey, USA VII Hotine-Marussi.
Effect of High Resolution Altimetric Gravity Anomalies on the North America Geoid Computations Yan M. Wang and D. Roman National Geodetic Survey NOAA Montreal,
Improved Satellite Altimeter data dedicated to coastal areas :
OSTST March, Hobart, Tasmania Ocean Mean Dynamic Topography from altimetry and GRACE: Toward a realistic estimation of the error field Marie-Helene.
Lecture 21 – The Geoid 2 April 2009 GISC-3325.
Case study on heterogeneous geoid/ quasigeoid based on space borne and terrestrial data combination with special consideration of GOCE mission data impact.
OSTST Meeting, Hobart, Australia, March 12-15, 2007 EIGEN-5 activities in GFZ and GRGS R. Biancale, J.-M. Lemoine, S. Bruinsma, S. Loyer* CNES/GRGS Toulouse,
E. Schrama TU Delft, DEOS Error characteristics estimated from CHAMP, GRACE and GOCE derived geoids and from altimetry derived.
Regional Enhancement of the Mean Dynamic Topography using GOCE Gravity Gradients Matija Herceg 1 and Per Knudsen 1 1 DTU Space, National Space Institute,
International Symposium on Gravity, Geoid and Height Systems GGHS 2012, Venice, Italy 1 GOCE data for local geoid enhancement Matija Herceg Per Knudsen.
Full Resolution Geoid from GOCE Gradients for Ocean Modeling Matija Herceg & Per Knudsen Department of Geodesy DTU Space living planet symposium 28 June.
C.C.Tscherning, Niels Bohr Institute, University of Copenhagen. Improvement of Least-Squares Collocation error estimates using local GOCE Tzz signal standard.
Recent Investigations Towards Achieving a One Centimeter Geoid Daniel R. Roman & Dru A. Smith U.S. National Geodetic Survey GGG 2000, Session 9 The Challenge.
SPP Mass Transport and Mass Distribution in the Earth System Contribution of the New Generation of Satellite Gravity and Altimetry Missions to Geosciences.
A comparison of different geoid computation procedures in the US Rocky Mountains YM Wang 1, H Denker 2, J Saleh 3, XP Li 3, DR Roman 1, D Smith 1 1 National.
Improved Marine Gravity from CryoSat and Jason-1 David T. Sandwell, Emmanuel Garcia, and Walter H. F. Smith (April 25, 2012) gravity anomalies from satellite.
ESA living planet symposium Bergen Combination of GRACE and GOCE in situ data for high resolution regional gravity field modeling M. Schmeer 1,
Improving Regional Geoid by optimal Combination of GRACE Gravity Model and Surface Gravity Data YM Wang, DR Roman and J Saleh National Geodetic Survey.
Mayer-Gürr et al.ESA Living Planet, Bergen Torsten Mayer-Gürr, Annette Eicker, Judith Schall Institute of Geodesy and Geoinformation University.
1 July 20, 2000 Geosat Follow-On An examination from an operational point of view Impact on operational products Overall system performance (from sensor.
Surface and bottom topography of the oceans. How do we measure seafloor topography? Why is ocean bathymetry important? Questions:
The OC in GOCE: A review The Gravity field and Steady-state Ocean Circulation Experiment Marie-Hélène RIO.
SCM x330 Ocean Discovery through Technology Area F GE.
Scientific Roadmap towards Height System Unification with GOCE 5th International GOCE User Workshop, Paris, Th. Gruber (1), R. Rummel (1), M.
An oceanographic assessment of the GOCE geoid models accuracy S. Mulet 1, M-H. Rio 1, P. Knudsen 2, F. Siegesmund 3, R. Bingham 4, O. Andersen 2, D. Stammer.
Determination of the Mean Dynamic Topography at the Coast using the Geodetic and Ocean Approaches and Consequences for Worldwide Height System Unification.
How Do we Estimate Gravity Field? Terrestrial data –Measurements of surface gravity –Fit spherical harmonic coefficients Satellite data –Integrate equations.
Validation strategy MARCDAT-III meeting - Frascati, Italy - May 2011 The validation phase to compare all the algorithms together and to select the best.
ESA Living Planet Symposium, 29 June 2010, Bergen (Norway) GOCE data analysis: the space-wise approach and the space-wise approach and the first space-wise.
Uncertainties of MDT and geostrophic currents estimated from GOCE and satellite altimetry: A case study in China's Marginal Seas Shuanggen Jin 1,2, Guiping.
ESA’s Earth Observation Programmes and GOCE
Dynamic Planet 2005 Cairns, Australia August 2005
Consistent Ocean Mass Time Series from LEO Potential Field Missions
Difference between GPS ellipsoid and sea level heights (N)
GOCE in Ocean Modelling and the GOCINO project.
Presentation transcript:

ESA Living Planet Symposium 28 June - 2 July 2010, Bergen, Norway A. Albertella, R. Rummel, R. Savcenko, W. Bosch, T. Janjic, J.Schroeter, T. Gruber, J. Bouman IAPG München, DGFI München, AWI Bremerhaven Dynamic Ocean Topography from GOCE Some Preparatory Attempts

ESA Living Planet Symposium 28 June - 2 July 2010, Bergen, Norway GEOTOP project Deutschen Forschungsgemeinschaft German Priority Research Program SPP1257 IAPG München: geodesy IPG Dresden: geodesy DGFI München: altimetry AWI Bremerhaven: oceanography

ESA Living Planet Symposium 28 June - 2 July 2010, Bergen, Norway To determine the ocean circulation and its mass and heat transport assimilation of geodetic data of the dynamic ocean topography and oceanographic in-situ data This objective is possible thank to the gravity missions GRACE + GOCE

ESA Living Planet Symposium 28 June - 2 July 2010, Bergen, Norway Computation of a “geodetic” DOT from GRACE/GOCE geoid models and multi-mission altimeter data Adaptation this geodetic DOT to an ocean circulation model Assimilation the geodetic DOT together in-situ oceanographic data into the ocean model Determination of the mass and heat transport Comparison and analysis of the geodetic DOT and the oceanographic DOT obtained from the ocean circulation model runs

ESA Living Planet Symposium 28 June - 2 July 2010, Bergen, Norway H = h-N H = dynamic ocean topography ( ~ ±2 m) h = sea surface height (from altimetric measurements) N = geoid height (from recent geoid models)

ESA Living Planet Symposium 28 June - 2 July 2010, Bergen, Norway EGM96 geoid model (Lmax = 360) Topex-Poseidon ground tracks Distribution of the geodetic data

ESA Living Planet Symposium 28 June - 2 July 2010, Bergen, Norway SPECTRUM of the data GEOID: spherical harmonic representation

ESA Living Planet Symposium 28 June - 2 July 2010, Bergen, Norway Sea surface anomaly along one track of Topex-Poseidon mission: black lines tracks at different time red line on 2004/12/26 (tsunami event) ALTIMETRY: discrete data along ground tracks SPECTRUM of the data

ESA Living Planet Symposium 28 June - 2 July 2010, Bergen, Norway long wavelength short spectral representation spatial represention global regional local long wavelength short spectral representation spatial represention global regional local geoid undulation sea surface height (altimetry) The data have different distribution and different spectral resolution

ESA Living Planet Symposium 28 June - 2 July 2010, Bergen, Norway H = h-N the data are not consistent! Different distribution  different representation  different definition of their spectrum The high frequencies present in h contain dynamic ocean topography and a high frequency geoid part To have control on the error propagation it is necessary to have consistent data (= covering the same spectral range)  It is necessary to filter the data with minimum possible signal attenuation

ESA Living Planet Symposium 28 June - 2 July 2010, Bergen, Norway

Our two different approaches for the DOT computation GLOBAL approach: make altimetric data, which have a local distribution, “global” extending the data also in the land areas (IAPG) PROFILE approach: filtering the altimetric data along the satellite tracks (DGFI)

ESA Living Planet Symposium 28 June - 2 July 2010, Bergen, Norway First preliminary corrections Reference system (Topex or GRS80 ellipsoid) Tide system: zero tide, mean tide (altimetry) or tide free (ITG03) Coordinates: ellipsoidal (altimetry) or spherical (geodesy and oceanography)

ESA Living Planet Symposium 28 June - 2 July 2010, Bergen, Norway Global approach

ESA Living Planet Symposium 28 June - 2 July 2010, Bergen, Norway Global approach

ESA Living Planet Symposium 28 June - 2 July 2010, Bergen, Norway Global approach sea altimetry land synthesis joint SHA SHS

ESA Living Planet Symposium 28 June - 2 July 2010, Bergen, Norway Global approach Sea surface and geoid are expressed in series of spherical harmonic functions The same filter up to a certain degree can be applied Jekeli-Wahr filter

ESA Living Planet Symposium 28 June - 2 July 2010, Bergen, Norway Spectral filtering of geoid heights applying 2D JW (N sh ) 2. Spatial filtering of sea surface heights to achieve spectral consistency 1D(h i ) 3. Filter correction to consider differences between spectral and along track filtering (2D JW [N SH ]i-1D JW [N i ]) 4. Computation of filtered DOT  =1D(h i ) - 2D JW (N sh ) + (2D JW [N SH ]i-1D JW [N i ]) Profile approach

ESA Living Planet Symposium 28 June - 2 July 2010, Bergen, Norway 422 nd cycle of TOPEX/Poseidon and 79 th cycle of Jason-1

ESA Living Planet Symposium 28 June - 2 July 2010, Bergen, Norway data Geoid = ITG-Grace03 Gravity Field Model (TU Bonn) –data from 09/2002 to 04/2007 –no a-priori information –only satellite data –maximum degree L =180 –full Variance-Covariance matrix (VCM) Altimetry –2004 –Missions Topex and Jason

ESA Living Planet Symposium 28 June - 2 July 2010, Bergen, Norway Differences few cm open ocean ± 40 cm along coastline global approach profile approach

ESA Living Planet Symposium 28 June - 2 July 2010, Bergen, Norway

Filter up L=60

ESA Living Planet Symposium 28 June - 2 July 2010, Bergen, Norway Filter up L=120

ESA Living Planet Symposium 28 June - 2 July 2010, Bergen, Norway Data assimilation Assimilation is carried out column by column of ocean model (FEOM) using a type of ensemble Kalman filter algorithm (LSEIK). Only data in radius of 900 km are considered for each column assimilation. Observational increment is weighted by function that approximates Gaussian of 245 km. Result is DOT that reflects the influence of the geodetic DOT data used and ocean model parameterization.

ESA Living Planet Symposium 28 June - 2 July 2010, Bergen, Norway

Conclusions Differences between the global and profile approach Improve the filtering, specially along the coastline Full error propagation (geoid + altimetry) to DOT Spectral consistency of geodetic DOT and ocean model Comparative analysis of geodetic and oceanographic mean dynamic ocean topography