6 Gev tower = ~560 chns SMD adc:.62x 6,000/(560-120)/6 ~ 8.45 MeV/Chn ~ is consistent with original calibration! Center strip (GeV) Center strip (chn)

Slides:

Advertisements

Similar presentations

CBM Calorimeter System CBM collaboration meeting, October 2008 I.Korolko(ITEP, Moscow)

Advertisements

Particle identification in ECAL Alexander Artamonov, Yuri Kharlov IHEP, Protvino CBM collaboration meeting

STAR Status of J/  Trigger Simulations for d+Au Running Trigger Board Meeting Dec5, 2002 MC & TU.

Tracey Berry1 Looking into e &  for high energy e/  Dr Tracey Berry Royal Holloway.

Same Channel Same Satellite. Channel 3B N18 Channel 3B N18 Channel 3B N19 Channel 3B N19 Channel 3B M2 Channel 3B M2 A0 vs A1A0 vs A2A1 vs A2.

QCD Background… and the Resolution Saminder Dhaliwal August 30 th 2005.

EEMC Calibration in 2004 MIP signature w/ SMD Absolute gains for SMD, pre/post-shower, towers HV setup scheme for 2005 running Jan Balewski, IUCF Joint.

The performance of Strip-Fiber EM Calorimeter response uniformity, spatial resolution The 7th ACFA Workshop on Physics and Detector at Future Linear Collider.

Upsilon Trigger Efficiency in pp Rosi Reed UC Davis.

1 Calice Meeting 20/9/06David Ward What did we learn from DESY 2005 run? DESY run May CERN run August Data/MC comparisons for ECAL.

GLAST LAT Project Instrument Analysis Meeting– May 27, 2005 Hiro Tajima, TKR Bad Strips 1 GLAST Large Area Telescope: TKR Bad strips analysis update Hiro.

1Calice-UK Cambridge 9/9/05D.R. Ward David Ward Compare Feb’05 DESY data with Geant4 and Geant3 Monte Carlos. Work in progress – no definitive conclusions.

1 P. Loch U of Arizona October 13, 2009 Radial Smearing Simple radial energy distribution in tower grids Simple radial energy distribution in tower grids.

SiD Cal R. Frey1 Some EGS Studies… Compare with Geant4  Questions of range/cutoff parameters EM Resolution understood? Moliere radius – readout gap relation.

Non-photonic electron production in STAR A. G. Knospe Yale University 9 April 2008.

FMS review, Sep FPD/FMS: calibrations and offline reconstruction Measurements of inclusive  0 production Reconstruction algorithm - clustering.

1 The Study of D and B Meson Semi- leptonic Decay Contributions to the Non-photonic Electrons Xiaoyan Lin CCNU, China/UCLA for the STAR Collaboration 22.

1 Shower maximum detector (SMD) is a wire proportional counter – strip readout detector using gas amplification. SMD is used to provide a spatial resolution.

W  eν The W->eν analysis is a phi uniformity calibration, and only yields relative calibration constants. This means that all of the α’s in a given eta.

LAr Response to pions: Data vs MC S.Paganis (Wisconsin) with Isabelle Winterger,Martin Aleksa LAr Week CTB Meeting, CERN, 10-May-2005.

STAR Analysis Meeting, BNL, Dec 2004 Alexandre A. P. Suaide University of Sao Paulo Slide 1 BEMC software and calibration L3 display 200 GeV February.

Photon-jet reconstruction with the EEMC – Deuxième Partie Pibero Djawotho Indiana University Cyclotron Facility June 18, 2008 STAR.

The status of high p T Non-photonic electron-hadron correlations in AuAu 200GeV collisions Wenqin Xu University of California, Los Angeles For the STAR.

STAR Collaboration Meeting, BNL, Feb 2005 Alexandre A. P. Suaide University of Sao Paulo Slide 1 BEMC software update L3 display 200 GeV February.

ScECAL BeamTest Analysis Asian ScECAL Meeting Jan 14 th, 2010 Adil, Satoru Uozumi, DongHee Kim.

CTB04: electron Data vs MC Stathes Paganis University of Sheffield LAr CTB04 WG 25-Aug-05.

The Electromagnetic Calorimeter – 2005 Operation J. Sowinski for the Collaboration and the Builders Indiana Univ. Michigan State Univ. ANL MIT BNL Penn.

EM Resolution Studies D. Banfi, L. Carminati (Milano), S.Paganis (Wisconsin) egamma WG, Atlas Software Week, CERN, 26-May-2005.

G4 Validation meeting (5/11/2003) S.VIRET LPSC Grenoble Photon testbeam Data/G4 comparison  Motivation  Testbeam setup & simulation  Analysis & results.

First look at non-Gaussian tails with the new Reconstruction Stathes Paganis Univ. of Sheffield LAr-H8 Working Group, 18-Oct-05.

1ECFA/Vienna 16/11/05D.R. Ward David Ward Compare these test beam data with Geant4 and Geant3 Monte Carlos. CALICE has tested an (incomplete) prototype.

SCECAL progress report Tohru Takeshita (Shinshu) _DESY Beam Test summary _improvements for FNAL BT _FNAL module _current status at Fermilab.

CALOR April Algorithms for the DØ Calorimeter Sophie Trincaz-Duvoid LPNHE – PARIS VI for the DØ collaboration  Calorimeter short description.

In-Medium Fragmentation Functions via Direct  Measurements at STAR Experiment Ahmed M. Hamed Winter Workshop on Nuclear Dynamics, Ocho Rios, Jamaica Januray.

Performance of Shower Maximum Detectors Saori Itoh (Shinshu Univ.) GLC calorimeter group (KEK,Kobe,Konan,Niigata,Shinshu,Tsukuba) Introduction Detector.

STAR Collaboration Meeting, BNL – march 2003 Alexandre A. P. Suaide Wayne State University Slide 1 EMC Update Update on EMC –Hardware installed and current.

Nantes — 2008, July Analysis of results from EmCal beam test at CERN PS (and SPS) energies P. La Rocca & F. Riggi University & INFN Catania University.

E-EMC developments and plan Jan Balewski IUCF, Indiana Detector status Run 3 goals Calibration Software status STAR Analysis Meeting BNL, October

Longitudinal Spin Asymmetry and Cross Section of Inclusive  0 Production in Polarized p+p Collisions at 200 GeV Outline  Introduction  Experimental.

Gamma-Jet Analysis in Heavy-Ion Collisions Saskia Mioduszewski for the High-p T Working Group.

Reconstructing energy from HERD beam test data Zheng QUAN IHEP 3 rd HERD work shop Xi’an, 20 Jan

2000/9/23 JPS meeting in Niigata1 Measurement of single gamma and  0 with PHENIX EMCal (I) H.Torii Kyoto Univ./RIKEN for the PHENIX Collaboration. Sep/23/2000,

Search for High-Mass Resonances in e + e - Jia Liu Madelyne Greene, Lana Muniz, Jane Nachtman Goal for the summer Searching for new particle Z’ --- a massive.

Some feedbacks from DRS data analysis (very preliminary) F. Scuri - I.N.F.N Sezione di Pisa RD52 – Collaboration Meeting – Pavia, March 12, 2013 F. Scuri.

Abstract Abdul-Salam 5, D. Arkhipkin 2, S. Chatopadhyay 4, T.M. Cormier 5, W. Dong 1, S. Guertin 1, M.M. de Moura 3, A. Pavlinov 5, A. Stolpovsky 5, A.

Outline Motivation The STAR/EMC detector Analysis procedure Results Final remarks.

 -jet measurements Table of Contents:  Motivation  Preliminary QA of  -trigger Data  Shower Shape Analysis  Experimental Challenges  Summary  

Testbeam analysis Lesya Shchutska. 2 beam telescope ECAL trigger  Prototype: short bars (3×7.35×114 mm 3 ), W absorber, 21 layer, 18 X 0  Readout: Signal.

Report on the Beam Test Analysis Satoru Uozumi Apr GLDCAL meeting Topics of this talk are: Comparison of various MIP calibration methods Some problems.

Toward a  +Jet Measurement in STAR Saskia Mioduszewski, for the STAR Collaboration Texas A&M University 1.

EEMC STAR Jan Balewski, IUCF, Indiana STAR Collaboration Meeting MSU, August 2003 Upper Structure Mounted 8/1/2003 Run 3 hardware calibration.

DE/dx in ATLAS TILECAL Els Koffeman Atlas/Nikhef Sources: PDG DRDC (1995) report RD34 collaboration CERN-PPE

Direct Photon v 2 Study in 200 GeV AuAu Collisions at RHIC Guoji Lin (Yale) For STAR Collaboration RHIC & AGS Users’ Meeting, BNL, June 5-9.

DESY BT analysis - updates - S. Uozumi Dec-12 th 2011 ScECAL meeting.

8.1 The Rectangular Coordinate System and Circles Part 2: Circles.

LHCf Collaboration Meeting, Catania, 4-6 July 2009 MC comparison: Fluka vs Epics Oscar Adriani.

IHEP Hadron Shower Shape Song LIANG ihep.ac.cn CMS-IHEP, China

Elena Bruna Yale University

Jet Measurements with Neutral and Di-jet Triggers in Central Au+Au Collisions at √sNN = 200 GeV with STAR Nihar Ranjan Sahoo (for the STAR collaboration)

Mickey Chiu University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign

The reconstruction method for GLD PFA

Track Extrapolation/Shower Reconstruction in a Digital HCAL

Introduction The aim of this talk is to try to get a feeling on the expected degradation of performance of a calibration once we move from MonteCarlo.

Simulation study for Forward Calorimeter in LHC-ALICE experiment

Current status Minjung Kim.

Song LIANG ihep.ac.cn CMS-IHEP, China

Song LIANG ihep.ac.cn CMS-IHEP, China

Reaction Plane Calibration

Electron PID & trigger using EMCal

Inclusive p0 Production in Polarized pp Collisions using the STAR Endcap Calorimeter Jason C. Webb, Valparaiso University, for the STAR Collaboration Outline.

Presentation transcript:

6 Gev tower = ~560 chns SMD adc:.62x 6,000/( )/6 ~ 8.45 MeV/Chn ~ is consistent with original calibration! Center strip (GeV) Center strip (chn) Center strip (GeV) Center strip (chn) BSMD central strip to Tower ratio for eta and phi (from Ahmed analysis)

BEMC: Transverse Shower Shape from Electrons PHI PLANE SHOWER PROFILE Priscilla Kurnadi For 6 GeV electrons w/ ~ 6.6 MIP’s/GEV gives ~ 40 MIP’s in cluster ~ 24 MIP’s (62%) ~ 8 MIP’s ~ 1 MIP’s Profile from: With rough calibr of ~ 8.4 MeV/chn means single MIP ~ 18 chns vs. ped rms ~ 10 chns ???