3.1 Inductive and Deductive Reasoning Warm-up (IN) Learning Objective: to use deductive reasoning to reach conclusions, make a convincing argument, and.

Slides:

Advertisements

Similar presentations

Geometry Chapter 2 Terms.

Advertisements

Sec 2-3 Concept: Deductive Reasoning Objective: Given a statement, use the laws of logic to form conclusions and determine if the statement is true through.

Geometry 2.3 Big Idea: Use Deductive Reasoning

Bell Work 1) Find the value of the variables 2)Write the conditional and converse of each biconditional, and state if the biconditional is true or false.

A. What is Proof? Math 20: Foundations FM20.2

For Monday, read Chapter 4, Sections 1 and 2. Nongraded homework: Problems on pages Graded HW #4 is due on Friday, Feb. 11, at the beginning of.

Inductive and Deductive Reasoning Geometry 1.0 – Students demonstrate understanding by identifying and giving examples of inductive and deductive reasoning.

Lesson 2-4 Deductive Reasoning. Ohio Content Standards.

Part 2 Module 3 Arguments and deductive reasoning Logic is a formal study of the process of reasoning, or using common sense. Deductive reasoning involves.

You will be working with your elbow partner…decide right now who will be Partner A and who will be Partner B.

Deductive vs. Inductive Reasoning. Objectives Use a Venn diagram to determine the validity of an argument. Complete a pattern with the most likely possible.

Inductive vs Deductive Reasoning

Deductive and Inductive Reasoning

2.3: Deductive Reasoning p Deductive Reasoning Use facts, definitions and accepted properties in logical order to write a logical argument.

Chapter 1-4: Properties Commutative Property: the order in which you add or multiply numbers does not change the sum or product Ex = * 8.

Logic and Reason. Deductive Reasoning Reasoning that moves from the general to the particular Watchdogs bark at strangers. The watchdog did not bark at.

Warm Up 1. How do I know the following must be false? Points P, Q, and R are coplanar. They lie on plane m. They also lie on another plane, plane n. 2.

1.7 Logical Reasoning Conditional statements – written in the form If A, then B. Statements in this form are called if-then statements. – Ex. If the popcorn.

Deductive versus Inductive Reasoning Consider the following two passages: Argument #1 Mr. Jones is a member of the Academy of Scholarly Fellows and only.

Introduction to Geometric Proof Logical Reasoning and Conditional Statements.

2.3 Apply Deductive Reasoning. Objectives Use the Law of Detachment Use the Law of Detachment Use the Law of Syllogism Use the Law of Syllogism.

 Over the years you have made conjectures, using inductive reasoning, based on patterns you have observed.  When you make a conjecture, the process of.

LOOKING FOR CLUES DEDUCTIVE REASONING. DEDUCTIVE LOGIC “The process of reasoning from one or more general statements (premises) to reach a logically certain.

Arguments A falasafaz! presentation 1. Which arguments? Not this More like this 2.

Chapter 2.3 Notes: Apply Deductive Reasoning Goal: You will use deductive reasoning to form a logical argument.

Alejandro Gonzalez M2 Algebra Geo Journal 2. Conditional if then statements A conditional statement or if then statements is a statement written in the.

Reasoning and Critical Thinking Validity and Soundness 1.

Deductive Reasoning Chapter 2 Lesson 4.

Deductive Reasoning.  Conditional Statements can be written using symbolic notation  p represents hypothesis  q represents conclusion  is read as.

 ESSENTIAL QUESTION  How can you use reasoning to solve problems?  Scholars will  Use the Law of Syllogism  Use the Law of Detachment UNIT 01 – LESSON.

Question of the Day!  We shared a lot of examples of illogical arguments!  But how do you make a LOGICAL argument? What does your argument need? What.

DEDUCTIVE REASONING MOVES FROM A GENERALIZATION THAT IS TRUE OR SELF-EVIDENT TO A MORE SPECIFIC CONCLUSION DEDUCTIVE REASONING.

Lesson 2-4 Deductive Reasoning Deductive reasoning- uses facts, rules, definitions, or properties to reach logical conclusions Law of Detachment: If p.

Properties and Numbers 1.4. Deductive Reasoning Using facts, properties or rules to reach a valid conclusion Conjecture: statement that could be true.

2.2 Inductive and Deductive Reasoning. What We Will Learn Use inductive reasoning Use deductive reasoning.

AGENDA – ALGEBRA 1A SEPT. 3, 2012 (TUESDAY)  Warm-Up  Lesson Logical Reasoning and Counterexamples  Objectives – Identify the hypothesis and conclusion.

1.2 Inductive Reasoning. Inductive Reasoning If you were to see dark, towering clouds approaching what would you do? Why?

Philosophical Method  Logic: A Calculus For Good Reason  Clarification, Not Obfuscation  Distinctions and Disambiguation  Examples and Counterexamples.

2.1 Conditional Statements Ms. Kelly Fall Standards/Objectives: Students will learn and apply geometric concepts. Objectives: Recognize the hypothesis.

2.4 Deductive Reasoning 2.5 Postulates Geometry R/H Students will be able to distinguish between Inductive and Deductive Reasoning, and to determine the.

Ch. 2.3 Apply Deductive Reasoning

“Education is the most powerful weapon which you can use to change the world.” ― Nelson Mandela Do NowNelson Mandela  Put your homework assignment (examples.

Section 2.3: Deductive Reasoning

5-Minute Check Converse: Inverse: Contrapositive: Hypothesis: Conclusion: The measure of an angle is less than 90  The angle is acute If an angle is.

I think therefore I am - Rene Descartes. REASON (logic) It has been said that man is a rational animal. All my life I have been searching for evidence.

Inductive Reasoning Notes 2.1 through 2.4. Definitions Conjecture – An unproven statement based on your observations EXAMPLE: The sum of 2 numbers is.

Chapter 2 Section 2.3 Apply Deductive Reasoning. Deductive Reasoning Uses facts, definitions, accepted properties, and the laws of logic to form a logical.

1-4 Properties How are real-life situations commutative?

Or how to win a debate by changing the topic.

2-3 Apply Deductive Reasoning

Warm Up For this conditional statement: If a polygon has 3 sides, then it is a triangle. Write the converse, the inverse, the contrapositive, and the.

2.2 Inductive and Deductive Reasoning

Chapter 2 Review Geometric Reasoning.

Applying Deductive Reasoning

1.7 Logical Reasoning and Counterexamples

Sec. 2.3: Apply Deductive Reasoning

Warmup Definition: Perpendicular Lines—

2-3 Deductive Reasoning Objectives:

DEDUCTIVE vs. INDUCTIVE REASONING

Drill: Tuesday, 10/18 2. Determine if the conditional “If x is a number then |x| > 0” is true. If false, give a counterexample. OBJ: SWBAT analyze.

2.3 Apply Deductive Reasoning

Drill: Wednesday, 11/1 Determine if the conditional “If x is a number then |x| > 0” is true. If false, give a counterexample. Write the contrapositive.

Chapter 2.3 Notes: Apply Deductive Reasoning

Welcome to Interactive Chalkboard

2-3 Apply Deductive Reasoning

Goal 1: Using Symbolic Notation Goal 2: Using the Laws of Logic

If there is any case in which true premises lead to a false conclusion, the argument is invalid. Therefore this argument is INVALID.

If there is any case in which true premises lead to a false conclusion, the argument is invalid. Therefore this argument is INVALID.

Chapter 2.3 Notes: Apply Deductive Reasoning

Presentation transcript:

3.1 Inductive and Deductive Reasoning Warm-up (IN) Learning Objective: to use deductive reasoning to reach conclusions, make a convincing argument, and recognize valid and invalid arguments. 1. What comes next in each pattern? a. b. 2. All people who bought tickets before 7 p.m. got good seats. Ty bought his ticket at 6 p.m. Did he get a good seat? 3. If the butler did it, he would have mud on his shoes. There is no mud on his shoes, and he has only one pair of shoes. Did the butler do it? 4. People who eat undercooked hamburgers may get sick. Mrs. Lura ate a hamburger and didn’t get sick. Was the hamburger undercooked? 32 yes no Not possible to say 243

Ex 1 - Notes Tell whether the argument uses inductive or deductive reasoning. Using facts, definitions, and accepted properties in a logical order to reach a conclusion a. Find the next step in the pattern b. If the pizza is overcooked, then the oven was too hot or the pizza was left in the oven more than 10 minutes. The pizza is overcooked after being taken out of the oven in 9 minutes. The oven was too hot. inductive deductive Deductive Reasoning - ?

c. Jonah is taller than Emily and Matt is shorter than Emily. Who is taller, Jonah or Matt? deductive Checking Key Concepts – p. 113 Syllogism – A form of deductive reasoning consisting of a major premise, a minor premise, and a conclusion.

Witch Trial If she is a witch, thenshe will burn. p q If she burns, thenshe is made of wood. q r If she is made of wood, then she will float. r s If she floats, then she weighs the same as a duck. s t

conclusion If she is a witch, then she weighs the same as a duck. p t **An entire syllogism is false if even one of the steps has a counterexample. So…make sure each step is always true! Logic puzzle!

HW – p #1-15, Out – Explain the difference between inductive and deductive reasoning. Summary – I understand… OR I’m confused about… Challenge Probs. For EC…