Minutes Document March 2006 Terry Cole, AMDSlide 1 802-11 Editor’s Best Practices Terry Cole, AMD 802.11 WG Technical Editor & Simon Barber, Devicescape.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Doc.: IEEE /2079r0 Submission July 2007 Terry Cole, AMDSlide 1 WG Technical Editors Opening Report (July) Date: Authors:
Advertisements

Doc.: IEEE wng0 Submission November, 2013 Pat Kinney, Kinney ConsultingSlide 1 Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal.
March 2010 Plenary Session Notes on IEEE 802 Governance Review IEEE 802 Presentation Submission Template (Rev. 9) Document Number: ec EC Date.
Editor’s Guideline July 2006 Terry Cole, AMDSlide Editor’s Guideline Version 1.1 Terry Cole, AMD WG Technical Editor & Simon Barber,
Submission doc.: IEEE /0643r0May 2008 Terry L Cole (AMD)Slide 1 WG Technical Editor’s Mid-Plenary Report (May) Date: Authors:
Doc.: IEEE /527r1 Submission November 2001 John Barr, MotorolaSlide 1 Project: IEEE Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks (WPANs)
Doc.: IEEE /0765r0 Submission July 2005 Jesse Walker (Intel Corporation) Slide 1 Motion Move To form an IEEE Study Group to receive WLAN.
Doc.: IEEE /197R0 Submission March 2003 Terry Cole, AMDSlide WG Technical Editor’s Report Terry Cole, AMD (WG technical editor status.
DICOM to ISO-DICOM Report to joint ISO TC215/WG2 – DICOM WG10 meeting January 24, 2004, San Diego.
Doc.: IEEE /011 Submission January 2000 Al Petrick, ParkerVision TGd IEEE – TGd Jan 10 –15, 2000 Tel Aviv, Israel.
Doc.: IEEE /197R3 Submission July 2003 Terry Cole, AMDSlide WG Technical Editor’s Report Opening Session, July 2003 Plenary Meeting Terry.
Doc.: IEEE /0054r0 Submission March 2013 Mika Kasslin, NokiaSlide 1 TG1 Closing Report for March 2013 Notice: This document has been prepared.
Doc.: IEEE Submission Slide 1 NOTE: Update all red fields replacing with your information; they are required. This is a manual update in appropriate.
EIRB Review Guide For Committee Members Version 01/05/
Doc.: IEEE /0828r0 Submission May 2007 Harry Worstell, AT&TSlide 1 Procedural Clarification Notice: This document has been prepared to assist.
Doc.: IEEE /xxxxr0 Submission July 2007 Terry Cole, AMDSlide Common Editorial Comment Resolution Process Date: Authors:
Doc.: IEEE /320R0 Submission May 2003 Terry Cole, AMDSlide SDL Amendments Terry Cole, AMD WG Technical Editor.
1 Session # n GRIDMAN TG Closing Report IEEE Presentation Submission Template (Rev. 9) Document Number: IEEE n-11/0020 Date Submitted:
Doc.: IEEE /238r0 Submission January 2006 Simon Barber, Devicescape Software IncSlide 1 Process for simultaneous balloting Notice: This document.
Doc.: IEEE /0034r0 Submission January 2004 Dr. John R. Barr, MotorolaSlide 1 Project: IEEE Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks.
Doc.: IEEE Submission March, 2014 Pat Kinney, Kinney ConsultingSlide 1 Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area.
P SystemC Analog/Mixed-Signal (AMS) extensions Working Group July 6, 2015 | Martin Barnasconi | P Chair.
Balloting Preparation Overview Link 11 A/B PDG - Link 11 A/B Network Simulation Standard.
Proposed P802.16s Amendment Extension Request to RevCom
FAST TRACKING IN THE IEEE
TG 1 March Session Closing Report
TGn Editor Report Jan 2009 Date: Authors:
September 2016 Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks (WPANs) Submission Title: [TG4s Closing Report for September 2016]
Editor’s Guideline Version 1.0
WG Technical Editor’s Report
WG Technical Editor’s Report
Proposed P802.16s Amendment Extension Request to RevCom
November 2008 doc.: IEEE /1437r1 July 2011
Proposal for P&P Change - #2009-1
P802.11n report to EC on request for approval to proceed to RevCom
P802.11n report to EC on request for approval to proceed to RevCom
P802.11z conditional approval report to ExCom
GRIDMAN Task Group - Session #109
WG Technical Editor’s Opening Report (March)
doc.: IEEE <doc#>
WG Technical Editor’s Report
doc.: IEEE <doc#>
IEEE Standard Roll-up Report
TGs Montreal Closing Report
Task Group G Report March 10, 2003
WG Technical Editor’s Report
doc.: IEEE <doc#>
Editor’s Guidelines Version 1.0
IEEE C /48 Project IEEE Working Group on Mobile Broadband Wireless Access Title New Business Item/
Submission Title: [WG-TG3 Closing Report March03]
Process for simultaneous balloting
doc.: IEEE <doc#>
Proposed TGv Selection Process
Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks (WPANs) Submission Title: [A Brief Overview of Draft Approval.
<month year> doc.: IEEE ptc May 2013
doc.: IEEE <doc#>
Submission Title: [WG-TG3b Meeting Report September05]
Reaffirmation Status Report
<month year> doc.: IEEE < e> <March 2016>
WG Technical Editor’s Report
Proposed TGv Selection Process
Submission Title: TG4m 4TV Closing Report for September 2013
Task Group G Report January 17, 2003
802.11F Meeting Report March 2002 Month 1998 doc.: IEEE /xxx
TG 1 November Session Opening Report
GRIDMAN Task Group - Session #108
Reaffirmation Status Report
September 2016 Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks (WPANs) Submission Title: [TG4s Closing Report for September 2016]
<month year> doc.: IEEE < e> <September 2019>
<month year> doc.: IEEE < e> <September 2019>
Presentation transcript:

Minutes Document March 2006 Terry Cole, AMDSlide Editor’s Best Practices Terry Cole, AMD WG Technical Editor & Simon Barber, Devicescape WG Co-Technical Editor March 2006

Minutes Document March 2006 Terry Cole, AMDSlide 2 Getting started… The IEEE SA website has a lot of info you will need, document templates, etc. Home Page: – ndex.htmlhttp://standards.ieee.org/resources/development/i ndex.html Writing The Draft: – riting/index.htmlhttp://standards.ieee.org/resources/development/w riting/index.html

Minutes Document March 2006 Terry Cole, AMDSlide 3 Numbering the Draft Before first Ballot –0.xy, where x/y denotes major/minor revision level –Always monotically increasing. –No standard meaning to x and y. Use as your TG likes. Ballot Drafts –B.0, where B is denotes the bth ballot or recirculation Drafts in between Ballots –B.xy, where symbols have same meaning as above Number every draft distributed or posted by you uniquely! Example: –TG created drafts 0.1, 0.2, 0.5, and 0.9 and 0.91 before putting forward draft 1.0 for WG ballot –TG creates drafts 1.1 and 1.2 before adopting draft 2.0 for recirculation. –TG creates draft 3.0 for sponsor ballot (including some editorial work from 2.0 to 3.0) –TG creates draft 4.0 for sponsor ballot recirculation. –TG submits draft 4.0 for REVCOM (ALWAYS same as last sponsor ballot) along with a list of editorial errata to be addressed during publication.

Minutes Document March 2006 Terry Cole, AMDSlide 4 Interim Draft Checklist Labeled and named correctly –Labeled according to style guide on the top of each page –Draft number assigned according to practice (see separate slide) –Examples: IEEE P802.11k/D3.4, March 2006 (Draft Amendment to IEEE Std (tm), 2006 Revision Draft 5.1) IEEE P802.11r/D2.0, March 2006 (Draft Amendment to IEEE Std (tm), 2006 Revision Draft 5.1, as amended by IEEE P802.11k/D3.4, xxx and yyy) IEEE P802.11s/D2.0, March 2006 (Draft Amendment to IEEE Std (tm), 2006 Revision, as amended by IEEE Std k(tm)-2007, xxx and yyy) Updated copyright notice per style guide and current year in copyright notice “This is an unapproved IEEE Standards Draft, subject to change” on the bottom of all pages Note that there is not a requirement for completeness. –I recommend explaining major work items still to be done with an editor note

Minutes Document March 2006 Terry Cole, AMDSlide 5 Ballot Draft Checklist Must meet all requirements for posting as an interim draft, PLUS: Substantially Complete –NO Avoidable TBDs! –No Incomplete Text –No Outstanding Motions To Be Done –I recommend explaining EACH exception with an editor note and why it cannot be completed now! No publication flaws of these types: –“reference not found” errors –“figure not found” errors –TOC updated Pages numbered and lines numbered If WG ballot: –Available for review as a technical document by the appropriate deadline, but only if challenged (even if by only one person). Not out of order if unchallenged. –Change bar version (FROM LAST BALLOT) AND clean version If sponsor ballot: –MEC Section I comments completed before opening of first ballot –MEC Section II comments completed before last recirculation

Minutes Document March 2006 Terry Cole, AMDSlide 6 Posting a Draft The Task Group editor should follow this procedure: 1.Make sure the draft satisfied proper numbering, interim draft requirements, and, if applicable, ballot draft requirements. 2.You may post.doc or.pdf or both formats, and you may need to post clean and red- line versions. Send these in a single as attachments for posting with a clear subject: x Draft for Posting. If you zip the file(s) you must rename to.xzy and mention this in the . Zip files are not deliverable in many systems and in particular not to Harry’s ATT address. 3. to Harry using primary and backup addresses. You should also copy Stuart, myself and Simon. So that is to and with cc to: and 4.Call Harry on his cell phone. This is for editor’s use only. The number is If you don’t get Harry, then call Stuart. This is also for editor use only, his number is Harry or Stuart will post quickly, and you and the task group chair will get a confirmation . 6.The Task Group chair should announce the draft availability over the appropriate reflectors and in appropriate meeting sessions. Note: Posting of drafts to any other sites, including our own temporary file server space at meetings or on open company ftp sites, is not allowed.

Minutes Document March 2006 Terry Cole, AMDSlide 7 Baselines & Revisions IEEE rules prevent amendments from being published while a revision is in progress All current amendments will have to be based on ma. Groups to decide on a group by group basis how they want to track 11ma.

Minutes Document March 2006 Terry Cole, AMDSlide 8 How to handle simultaneous drafts... Best practices described in next 2 slides. Original presentation in doc 11/06/238r1 Note: –Approved means approved by REVCOM –None of this process affects the need for drafts to be based ONLY on previously approved documents when they are finally presented to REVCOM.

Minutes Document March 2006 Terry Cole, AMDSlide 9 When a revision and another amendment are in progress… –Your amendment should be based on the latest draft of the revision text AND the latest draft of all amendments expected to be approved prior to yours –Your document must then be sent for sponsor balloting with all the below: the current, complete approved base text (prior to the revision) the latest draft of the revision the latest draft of all amendments expected to be approved before yours –These amendments are only included if they make technical changes that are relevant to your amendment. your amendment. –If a technical change happens in a part of the revision text or part of the amendment text expected to be approved prior to your amendment, and that change is technically relevant to your amendment then your amendment should be re-circulated. Relevant technical change is decided by the ballot resolution group (the TG itself in ’s case)

Minutes Document March 2006 Terry Cole, AMDSlide 10 When other amendments are in progress… –Your amendment should be based on the current, complete approved base text AND the latest draft of all amendments expected to be approved prior to yours –Your document must then be sent for sponsor balloting with all the below: the current, complete approved base text the latest draft of all amendments expected to be approved before yours –These amendments are only included if they make technical changes that are relevant to your amendment. your amendment. –If a technical change happens in a part of the revision text or part of the amendment text expected to be approved prior to your amendment, and that change is technically relevant to your amendment then your amendment should be re-circulated. Relevant technical change is decided by the ballot resolution group (the TG itself in ’s case)

Minutes Document March 2006 Terry Cole, AMDSlide 11 IEEE Review Insertion Numbering 2006 IEEE Style Guide changes now mean that all amendments will renumber inserted text, figures, and tables based on ma Add letter after current number To insert between 2 letter clauses, add second letter. Needed for insertions ONLY, not additions to end of current numbers.

Minutes Document March 2006 Terry Cole, AMDSlide 12 IEEE MEC process Make sure your chairs are aware of this –Time constraints that this will put on sponsor ballot –Section I has to be addressed before you can start Sponsor Ballot –Section II comments have to be addressed before last SB recirculation –Section III comments are suggestions