Study of B s         Supreet Pal Singh Prof. Kajari Mazumdar Prof. J.B.Singh 1India-CMS Meeting 27th-28th.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Sabino Meola Charged kaon group meeting 12 October 2006 Status of analysis.
Advertisements

1 Preliminary stuff Summer09 ppMuMuX sample with CMSSW_3_3_2 –it requires opposite charge generated dimuons from heavy processes or K, pi, K0 L decays.
III Convegno sulla Fisica di ALICE. Frascati 1 Vertex reconstruction and selection strategies for D s detection in Pb-Pb collisions Sergey Senyukov,
Study of the e + e   η  process at √s = 1 GeV (main systematic error in the e + e   e + e  η analysis)
Tentative flow chart of CMS Multi-Muon analysis 1 – DATASETS 2 - RESOLUTIONS 3 – FAKE RATES 4 – NUCLEAR INT MODEL 5 – IP TEMPLATES MODEL 6 – SAMPLE COMPOSITION.
Anne Dabrowski Northwestern University Collaboration Meeting 22 nd February 2005 Update Kmu3 Branching Ratio measurement A. Dabrowski, February
August 12, 2000DPF Search for B +  K + l + l - and B 0  K* 0 l + l - Theoretical predictions and experimental status Analysis methods Signal.
Emily Thompson May 5 – UMass HEP Exp Group Meeting 1 Tag-probe method: Fitting Z → μ + μ - mass peaks Motivation: 1. Want to use long p T tail of muon.
1D. Dutta, BARC CMS Ann HI Meet 20 th June 2008 Z 0 studies in CMS:Status &Workplan Dipanwita Dutta NPD, BARC, Mumbai.
MC Study of B°  S Jianchun Wang Syracuse University BTeV meeting 06/27/01.
MC Study on B°  S (Status Report) Jianchun Wang Syracuse University BTeV meeting 05/25/01.
Heavy Flavor Production at the Tevatron Jennifer Pursley The Johns Hopkins University on behalf of the CDF and D0 Collaborations Beauty University.
Dimuon Channel ( Z  μμ ) L uminosity ~180 pb -1 (recorded) 2 isolated muons with both having matching central tracks |η μ | 15 GeV 65.0 < M μ 1 μ 2
Study of the semileptonic decays at 4170 MeV Koloina Randrianarivony Marina Artuso (Syracuse University)
B tagging as a key to New Physics (Physics TDR report) Valery Andreev UCLA October 9-10, 2006 DOE review, task L.
A Method to measure  + /   detection efficiency asymmetry at LHCb Liming Zhang 08/15/07.
B Production and Decay at DØ Brad Abbott University of Oklahoma BEACH 2004 June 28-July 3.
Donatella Lucchesi1 B Physics Review: Part II Donatella Lucchesi INFN and University of Padova RTN Workshop The 3 rd generation as a probe for new physics.
Outline: (1) The data sample (2) Some news on the analysis method (3) Efficiency revised (4) Background revised (5) Data: spectrum + “phi-curve”
1 ZH Analysis Yambazi Banda, Tomas Lastovicka Oxford SiD Collaboration Meeting
1 A Preliminary Model Independent Study of the Reaction pp  qqWW  qq ℓ qq at CMS  Gianluca CERMINARA (SUMMER STUDENT)  MUON group.
CP violation measurements with the ATLAS detector E. Kneringer – University of Innsbruck on behalf of the ATLAS collaboration BEACH2012, Wichita, USA “Determination.
Selection cuts on Bs→ with FTK F. Crescioli, P. Giannetti, M. Dell'Orso, G. Punzi, G. Volpi 2/5/2006.
Commissioning Studies Top Physics Group M. Cobal – University of Udine ATLAS Week, Prague, Sep 2003.
HERA-LHC, CERN Oct Preliminary study of Z+b in ATLAS /1 A preliminary study of Z+b production in ATLAS The D0 measurement of  (Z+b)/  (Z+jet)
Search for B s →  +  - and B d →  +  - Decays at CDF Cheng-Ju Lin (Fermilab) Representing CDF Collaboration SUSY 2004 Tsukuba, Japan June 17, 2004.
Quarkonia spectra in PbPb at 2.76 TeV Abdulla Abdulsalam (Dr. Prashant Shukla) BARC, Mumbai Outline Motivation Event selection Kinematic cuts Acceptance.
Study of L1 and HLT efficiency in VBTF Monika Jindal (Panjab University, Chandigarh) Jasbir Singh (panjab University, Chandigarh), Kajari Mazumdar (TIFR,
Possibility of tan  measurement with in CMS Majid Hashemi CERN, CMS IPM,Tehran,Iran QCD and Hadronic Interactions, March 2005, La Thuile, Italy.
IOP HEPP: Beauty Physics in the UK, 12/11/08Julie Kirk1 B-triggers at ATLAS Julie Kirk Rutherford Appleton Laboratory Introduction – B physics at LHC –
Measurement of the branching ratios for Standard Model Higgs decays into muon pairs and into Z boson pairs at 1.4 TeV CLIC Gordana Milutinovic-Dumbelovic,
Low p T Muon trigger studies for J/       Supreet Pal Singh (Panjab University, Chandigarh) Prof. J.B.Singh (Panjab University, Chandigarh) Prof.
Search for the decay B c  B s  Masato Aoki September 13, B s  J/  channel 1.Pion reconstruction efficiency 2.Cut variables and optimization.
MSSM H 0  3 prong using vertexing at CMS Helsinki b/tau workshop Lauri A. Wendland / HIP.
 0  5  Outline Event selection & analysis Background rejection Efficiencies Mass spectrum Comparison data-MC Branching ratio evaluation Systematics.
Status of RPC trigger analysis and Muon Trigger efficiencies for W-> μν study By Archana Sharma, Suman B. Beri Panjab University Chandigarh India-CMS Meeting.
Drell-Yan study in CMS at 10 TeV, with 100 pb -1 Monika Jindal K.Mazumdar, D. Bourilkov, J.B. Singh 1LHC Physcis meeting.
Sabino Meola Kloe meeting 10 March 2005 Status of analysis.
Paul Balm - EPS July 17, 2003 Towards CP violation results from DØ Paul Balm, NIKHEF (for the DØ collaboration) EPS meeting July 2003, Aachen This.
29,30 July 2010 India CMS Meeting,BARC Mumbai 1 Update on Z’-> τ τ->τ jet+ τ jet analysis Nitish Dhingra(P.U.,India) Kajari Mazumdar(TIFR,India) Jasbir.
Update on WH to 3 lepton Analysis And Electron Trigger Efficiencies with Tag And Probe Nishu 1, Suman B. Beri 1, Guillelmo Gomez Ceballos 2 1 Panjab University,
Abstract Several models of elementary particle physics beyond the Standard Model, predict the existence of neutral particles that can decay in jets of.
Jet + Isolated Photon Triple Differential Cross Section Nikolay Skachkov: “Photon2007”, Paris, 9-13 July 2007 DO Measurement of Triple Differential Photon.
Susan Burke DØ/University of Arizona DPF 2006 Measurement of the top pair production cross section at DØ using dilepton and lepton + track events Susan.
Charged Particle Multiplicity, Michele Rosin U. WisconsinQCD Meeting May 13, M. Rosin, D. Kçira, and A. Savin University of Wisconsin L. Shcheglova.
4/12/05 -Xiaojian Zhang, 1 UIUC paper review Introduction to Bc Event selection The blind analysis The final result The systematic error.
Tomas Hreus, Pascal Vanlaer Overview: K0s correction stability tests Jet-pt correction closure test Study of Strangeness Production in Underlying Event.
Kalanand Mishra June 29, Branching Ratio Measurements of Decays D 0  π - π + π 0, D 0  K - K + π 0 Relative to D 0  K - π + π 0 Giampiero Mancinelli,
Jessica Levêque Rencontres de Moriond QCD 2006 Page 1 Measurement of Top Quark Properties at the TeVatron Jessica Levêque University of Arizona on behalf.
Stano Tokar, slide 1 Top into Dileptons Stano Tokar Comenius University, Bratislava With a kind permissison of the CDF top group Dec 2004 RTN Workshop.
Z  BF using  hadronic events Silke Duensing Aug 8th, 2003.
Aug _5071 Top stop by charm channel analysis using D0 runI data OUTLINE physics process of top to stop Monte Carlo simulation for signal data.
EWK Drell-Yan: Status and Plans
Status of the measurement of K L lifetime - Data sample (old): ~ 440 pb -1 ( ) - MC sample: ~125 pb -1 ( mk0 stream ) Selection: standard tag (|
Photon Selection Algorithm Ming Yang , Mingshui Chen BESIII Meeting
Study of B s         Supreet Pal Singh Prof. Kajari Mazumdar Prof. J.B.Singh 1India LHC weekely meeting.
QWG Sept 20-22, Jundong Huang Indiana University 1 DØ Quarkonium Production at DØ Jundong Huang Indiana University Quarkonium Workshop FermiLab September.
Upsilon production and μ-tagged jets in DØ Horst D. Wahl Florida State University (DØ collaboration) 29 April 2005 DIS April to 1 May 2005 Madison.
Eric COGNERAS LPC Clermont-Ferrand Prospects for Top pair resonance searches in ATLAS Workshop on Top Physics october 2007, Grenoble.
B meson studies - from commissioning to new physics effects.
Muons from single top events for DC04
2vtx tagged dijets mass resolution study
Update on LHCb Level-1 trigger
(2S) Measument with CMS 10 TeV Data
(2S) Measument with CMS 10 TeV Data
Gluon Gluon to jpsi jpsi
Update of
10 TeV BJ/K at CMS Zheng Wang Apr
Gluon Gluon to jpsi jpsi
Susan Burke, University of Arizona
Presentation transcript:

Study of B s         Supreet Pal Singh Prof. Kajari Mazumdar Prof. J.B.Singh 1India-CMS Meeting 27th-28th March 2009

Introduction to Bs   K+K+ K-K-  .. PV SV B0sB0s B s decays in Secondary vertex 2  2 tracks from  (       BR ~ 50 %) B s mass = GeV 2India-CMS Meeting 27th-28th March 2009

The branching ratio has been predicted to be 1.6 x in Standard Model. source : C. Q. Geng and C. C. Liu, J. Phys. G 29, 1103 (2003). The latest update on the Upper limit is from D0 experiment which gives the upper limit as 3.2 x So,for 10 pb -1 luminosity corresponding we expect to see about 1000 events of the type Bs  . 3India-CMS Meeting 27th-28th March 2009

Work Done Signal events have been generated through full reconstruction chain in CMSSW_2_2_3 on the line of official data production. EvtGenLHC generator has been used to generate the signal sample with standard user_decay_file : “GeneratorInterface/EvtGenInterface/data/Bs_phimumu_KK.dec” The analysis has been done using PAT in CMSSW_2_2_5. 4India-CMS Meeting 27th-28th March 2009

Signal events Criteria : 1) MSEL =1, no pt thresholds. 2) 2 muons in the event with P T > 2.5 GeV and |  | < 2.5 Generator efficiency = 1.85 x No. of events analyzed = 8607 No. of reconstructed events with 0 muons = 351 No. of reconstructed events with 1 muons = 2098 No. of reconstructed events with 2 muons = 4364 No. of rec. events with more than 2muons = India-CMS Meeting 27th-28th March 2009

Background events Main source of background  QCD events. Not being able to submit the jobs for the dataset : “/InclusivePPmuX/Summer08_IDEAL_V9_v4/GEN-SIM-RECO “ For the present work the analysis has been done on : “/InclusiveBBmu_Pt20/Summer08_IDEAL_V9_v1/GEN-SIM-RECO “.  For this dataset: MSEL=1 At least one  in the event with P T > 5 GeV and |  | < 2.5 and b-bbar filter. No. of Background events analyzed = No. of reconstructed events with 0 muons = No. of reconstructed events with 1 muons = No. of reconstructed events with 2 muons = No. of rec. events with more than 2muons = India-CMS Meeting 27th-28th March 2009

Generator level plots for B s 0  vs P T Bs0Bs0 7India-CMS Meeting 27th-28th March 2009

ΔR between Generated and Reconstructed muons ΔR < 0.01 For ΔR < 0.01 signal efficiency = 87 % 8India-CMS Meeting 27th-28th March 2009

P T &  of reconstructed muons PTPT  We are loosing the muons in Central region due to low energy Leading pair of muons with opposite charge is selected for the analysis 9India-CMS Meeting 27th-28th March 2009

ΔR between leading pair of muons with opposite charge Signal efficiency = 93 % Bkgd. Efficiency = 59 % ΔR < India-CMS Meeting 27th-28th March 2009

Invariant mass of dimuon after ΔR <1.5 cut J/  For mass veto of 3.1 GeV: Signal efficiency = 92 % Bkgd. efficiency = 90 % 11India-CMS Meeting 27th-28th March 2009

Track Analysis 12India-CMS Meeting 27th-28th March 2009

Selection of tracks In the event those tracks (other than muons) are selected which lies in the opposite hemisphere of the leading jet (  jet.  track < 0) Kinematic constraint on tracks: Track P T > 400 MeV Track |  < 2.4 Tracks assigned mass = GeV The two tracks having opposite charge with invariant mass closest to M   (1.019 GeV) are chosen. 13India-CMS Meeting 27th-28th March 2009

Track P T and  distributions P T >0.4 GeV The tracks are for signal (B s   events  track P T track |  | < India-CMS Meeting 27th-28th March 2009

Invariant mass of track1 and track2 Two tracks with opp. charge and < M(tk + tk - ) < GeV are selected. Efficiency ~ 67 % 15India-CMS Meeting 27th-28th March 2009

Invariant mass of         16India-CMS Meeting 27th-28th March 2009

Future Plans Study the signal and QCD background simultaneously. Generate more signal events for high statistics. Study secondary vertex properties for B s meson by kinematical fitting of the vertex for dimuon and the Kaons. Put the kinematic selection cuts to increase the quality of the analysis and check the variation for both signal and background. 17India-CMS Meeting 27th-28th March 2009