Predictability associated with nonlinear regimes in an idealzied atmospheric model Sergey Kravtsov University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee Department of Mathematical.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
The Simple Linear Regression Model Specification and Estimation Hill et al Chs 3 and 4.
Advertisements

Non-Gaussian Statistical Timing Analysis Using Second Order Polynomial Fitting Lerong Cheng 1, Jinjun Xiong 2, and Lei He 1 1 EE Department, UCLA *2 IBM.
Modelling and Identification of dynamical gene interactions Ronald Westra, Ralf Peeters Systems Theory Group Department of Mathematics Maastricht University.
SVM - Support Vector Machines A new classification method for both linear and nonlinear data It uses a nonlinear mapping to transform the original training.
Computer vision: models, learning and inference Chapter 18 Models for style and identity.
Low-frequency variability in the mid-latitude atmosphere induced by an oceanic thermal front: Application to the North Atlantic Ocean Yizhak Feliks 1,2.
Effects of model error on ensemble forecast using the EnKF Hiroshi Koyama 1 and Masahiro Watanabe 2 1 : Center for Climate System Research, University.
Targetting and Assimilation: a dynamically consistent approach Anna Trevisan, Alberto Carrassi and Francesco Uboldi ISAC-CNR Bologna, Italy, Dept. of Physics.
Sensitivities of the MJO to the Shape and Strength of the Tropical Warm Pool in the Stochastic Skeleton Model [BIRS 15w5023] Stochasticity and Organization.
Propagation of Error Ch En 475 Unit Operations. Quantifying variables (i.e. answering a question with a number) 1. Directly measure the variable. - referred.
How to tell the president the facts Haiganoush K. Preisler Pacific Southwest Research Station USDA Forest Service, Albany, CA 6 August, 2003 JSM – San.
Empirical Mode Reduction and its Applications to Nonlinear Models in Geosciences D. Kondrashov University of California, Los Angeles Joint work with Michael.
Nonlinear Mechanisms of Interdecadal Climate Modes: Atmospheric and Oceanic Observations, and Coupled Models Michael Ghil Ecole Normale Supérieure, Paris,
Nonlinear, Data-based Reduced Models of Climate Variability Michael Ghil Ecole Normale Supérieure, Paris, and University of California, Los Angeles Joint.
Beam-beam studies for Super KEKB K. Ohmi & M Tawada (KEK) Super B factories workshop in Hawaii Apr
G. Hendeby Performance Issues in Non-Gaussian Filtering Problems NSSPW ‘06 Corpus Christi College, Cambridge Performance Issues in Non-Gaussian Filtering.
On the Mechanisms of the Late 20 th century sea-surface temperature trends in the Southern Ocean Sergey Kravtsov University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee Department.
Wind Regimes of Southern California winter S. Conil 1,2, A. Hall 1 and M. Ghil 1,2 1 Department of Atmospheric and Oceanic Sciences, UCLA, Los Angeles,
Numerical Analysis - Simulation -
Yoshiharu Tanaka (YITP) Gradient expansion approach to nonlinear superhorizon perturbations Finnish-Japanese Workshop on Particle Helsinki,
High Climate Sensitivity Suggested by Satellite Observations: the Role of Circulation and Clouds AGU Fall Meeting, San Francisco, CA, 9-13 December, 2013.
1 / 41 Inference and Computation with Population Codes 13 November 2012 Inference and Computation with Population Codes Alexandre Pouget, Peter Dayan,
Federal Department of Home Affairs FDHA Federal Office of Meteorology and Climatology MeteoSwiss High-resolution data assimilation in COSMO: Status and.
Linear-Regression-based Models of Nonlinear Processes Sergey Kravtsov Department of Mathematical Sciences, UWM Collaborators: Dmitri Kondrashov, Andrew.
Data and modeling issues in population biology  Alan Hastings (UC Davis) and many colalborators  Acknowledge support from NSF.
Non-Gaussianity, spectral index and tensor modes in mixed inflaton and curvaton models Teruaki Suyama (Institute for Cosmic Ray Research) In collaboration.
Geographic Information Science
University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee Geographic Information Science Geography 625 Intermediate Geographic Information Science Instructor: Changshan Wu Department.
Climatic Effects of Mesoscale Turbulence in the Ocean and Atmosphere Sergey Kravtsov University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee Department of Mathematical Sciences.
Biological Modeling of Neural Networks Week 8 – Noisy output models: Escape rate and soft threshold Wulfram Gerstner EPFL, Lausanne, Switzerland 8.1 Variation.
Components of the Global Climate Change Process IPCC AR4.
GP33A-06 / Fall AGU Meeting, San Francisco, December 2004 Magnetic signals generated by the ocean circulation and their variability. Manoj,
Corrective Dynamics for Atmospheric Single Column Models J. Bergman, P. Sardeshmukh, and C. Penland NOAA-CIRES Climate Diagnostics Center With special.
Propagation of Error Ch En 475 Unit Operations. Quantifying variables (i.e. answering a question with a number) 1. Directly measure the variable. - referred.
A Stochastic Model of Platoon Formation in Traffic Flow USC/Information Sciences Institute K. Lerman and A. Galstyan USC M. Mataric and D. Goldberg TASK.
Image Restoration Fasih ur Rehman. –Goal of restoration: improve image quality –Is an objective process compared to image enhancement –Restoration attempts.
2.There are two fundamentally different approaches to this problem. One can try to fit a theoretical distribution, such as a GEV or a GP distribution,
Linear-Regression-based Models of Nonlinear Processes Sergey Kravtsov Department of Mathematical Sciences, University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee Collaborators:
Stepwise change in time series Radical change of between alternative stable states (attractors) Resistance, resilience Reversibility, trajectory of change.
Information Geometry and Model Reduction Sorin Mitran 1 1 Department of Mathematics, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC, USA Reconstruction.
Teleconnections of Atlantic Multidecadal Oscillation Sergey Kravtsov University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee Department of Mathematical Sciences Atmospheric.
An Interpretation of Non-Gaussian Statistics in Geophysical Data Climate Diagnostics Center/University of Colorado and.
Fitting Mathematical Models to Data Adapting Likelihood Based Inference Meaningful Modeling of Epidemiologic Data, 2010 AIMS, Muizenberg, South Africa.
Asymptotic behaviour of blinking (stochastically switched) dynamical systems Vladimir Belykh Mathematics Department Volga State Academy Nizhny Novgorod.
Statistics Presentation Ch En 475 Unit Operations.
FORECASTING METHODS OF NON- STATIONARY STOCHASTIC PROCESSES THAT USE EXTERNAL CRITERIA Igor V. Kononenko, Anton N. Repin National Technical University.
Reconstructing spatiotemporal characteristics of sea-level pressure variability in reanalysis data set using a feature-tracking approach S. Kravtsov 1,
A Random Subgrouping Scheme for Ensemble Kalman Filters Yun Liu Dept. of Atmospheric and Oceanic Science, University of Maryland Atmospheric and oceanic.
First-principles-based modeling of geomagnetically induced currents (GIC) at mid- and low-latitudes Pulkkinen, A., N. Buzulukova, L. Rastaetter, M. Kuznetsova,
Towards a Robust and Model- Independent GNSS RO Climate Data Record Chi O. Ao and Anthony J. Mannucci 12/2/15CLARREO SDT Meeting, Hampton, VA1 © 2015 California.
North Atlantic eddy-driven jet and circulation patterns: Structures, preferred paths and transitions Abdel Hannachi Department of Meteorology 1. Background.
Kinematics of eddy–mean-flow interaction in an idealized atmospheric model Sergey Kravtsov and Sergey K. Gulev University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee Department.
Future Directions in Ensemble DA for Hurricane Prediction Applications Jeff Anderson: NCAR Ryan Torn: SUNY Albany Thanks to Chris Snyder, Pavel Sakov The.
An Empirical Model of Decadal ENSO Variability Sergey Kravtsov University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee Department of Mathematical Sciences Atmospheric Science.
Using Adjoint Models to Understand the Response of the Ocean Circulation to the North Atlantic Oscillation Kettyah Chhak, Georgia School Board Andy Moore,
Reconstructing sea-level pressure variability via a feature-tracking approach S. Kravtsov 1, 2, I. Rudeva 3, 2, and S. K. Gulev 2 1 University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee,
L’Aquila 1 of 26 “Chance or Chaos?” Climate 2005, PIK, Jan 2005 Gabriele Curci, University of L’Aquila
Detection in Non-Gaussian Noise JA Ritcey University of Washington January 2008.
Reconciling Non-Gaussian Climate Statistics with Linear Dynamics and Philip Sura Climate Diagnostics Center/CIRES/CU, and.
Emerging Research Opportunities at the Climate Modeling Laboratory NC State University (Presentation at NIA Meeting: 9/04/03) Fredrick H. M. Semazzi North.
ENSO Frequency Cascade and Implications for Predictability
Center for Climate System Research
(Y. Itoh, M.A.Papa,B.Krishnan-AEI, X. Siemens –UWM
Dynamics of ENSO Complexity and Sensitivity
Eddy-Driven Coupled Variability in a Mid-Latitude Climate Model
A Mechanistic Model of Mid-Latitude Decadal Climate Variability
Dynamics of Annular Modes
Dynamics of Annular Modes
Fig. 5 Schematics illustrating enhancement in April tornado activity due to SST. Schematics illustrating enhancement in April tornado activity due to SST.
Presentation transcript:

Predictability associated with nonlinear regimes in an idealzied atmospheric model Sergey Kravtsov University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee Department of Mathematical Sciences Atmospheric Science Group Collaborators: N. Schwartz, J. M. Peters, University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee, USA Presentation at the AGU Fall Meeting 2011, San Francisco, CA, USA December 7,

Atmospheric flow regimes x — large-scale, low-frequency flow x’ — fast transients, F — external forcing N 3 can be approximated as Gaussian noise If N 1 and N 2 are small or linearly parametrizable, x will also be Gaussian-distributed Deviations from gaussianity — REGIMES — can be due to N 1, N 2 and F

Two paradigms of regimes Regimes are due to deterministic non- linearities (e.g., Legras and Ghil ‘85) Regimes are due to multiplicative noise (Sura et al. ’05) The first type of regimes is inheren- tly more predictable

Is there enhanced predictability associated with regimes? We address this ques- tion by studying the out- put from a long simula- tion of a three-level QG model (Marshall&Molteni ’93) The QG3 model is tuned to observed clima- tology and has a realistic LFV with non-gaussian regimes (Kondrashov et al.)

Regime Identification Regimes defined as regions of enhanced probability of persistence relative to a benchmark linear model (cf. Vautard et al. ’88; Kravtsov et al. ‘09), in Uz200 and Psi200 EOF-1–EOF-2 subspaces

Four Distinct Regimes in QG3 model 1: AO + 2: AO – Psi 3: NAO + Uz 3: N-AO + AO Regimes 1 and 2 are largely zonally symmetric and stati- stically the same bwn the two metrics Non-AO Regimes 3 in Uz and Psi are less zonally sym- metric; they are distinct regimes Similar regimes were obtained before

Regimes and Predictability “Predictable” R1 and R2 have precursor regions of low RMSD (blue areas in fig.) Same precursor regions for lead 5 and 10-day fcst Initializations in precursor regions end up in regimes

Initializations from precursor regions slow down in regime regions and stay there, while maintaining low spread Predictable regimes: Regime 1Regime 2 Day 1 Day 5 Day 10

Initializations from non- precursor regions spread out faster and quickly decay to climatology Unpredictable states: Non-regimeRegime 3 Day 1 Day 5 Day 10

Discussion Regimes are not always associated with enhanced predictability (cf. Sura et al. ‘05) In QG3, the predictable regimes arise as a combination of (i) nonlinear slowdown of trajectories’ decay toward climatology (deterministic nonlinearity) and (ii) reduced spread of trajectories in regime regions (multiplicative noise). Unpredictable regimes don’t have (ii). Detailed effects of deterministic nonlinearity and multiplicative noise onto predictability are studied by fitting a nonlinear stochastic SDE to the QG3 generated time series (Peters and Kravtsov 2011)