UCI Library Website Chris Lee Archana Vaidyanathan Duncan Tsai Karen Quan.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Village Quick Turn-around Usability Testing Workshop script F. Guillon – Oct. 08.
Advertisements

Agent-Based Architecture for Intelligence and Collaboration in Virtual Learning Environments Punyanuch Borwarnginn 5 August 2013.
Web E’s goal is for you to understand how to create an initial interaction design and how to evaluate that design by studying a sample. Web F’s goal is.
Usability Testing: Easier is Better Cokie Anderson Associate Professor Oklahoma State University
Energy Information Administration Usability Testing Colleen Blessing.
Informatics Team 5 Initial Presentation David Schramm Rubin Singh Chad Curtis Jesse Danielson.
Project 4: User interface for logging food intake and activities Thanh Le Christine Liang Warren Trinh Muhammad Zaman.
Trials and Tribulations of Usability Testing by Scott Grissom1 Trials and Tribulations of Usability Testing Scott Grissom Grand Valley State University.
Senior Project Database: Design and Usability Evaluation Stephanie Cheng Rachelle Hom Ronald Mg Hoang Bao CSC 484 – Winter 2005.
Christ In Me Ministries Conceptual Model Presented By: Nicole Burrell, Erica Moore, Kimberly Sledge.
Usable Privacy and Security Carnegie Mellon University Spring 2008 Lorrie Cranor 1 Designing user studies February.
Student Research Conference 2011 Submitting a Research Conference Proposal.
Netgen (16-22 year olds, grown up with the web – expectations) Kathy Collier, Australian National University.
Web 2.0 Testing and Marketing E-engagement capacity enhancement for NGOs HKU ExCEL3.
Write On! Creating an Online Dissertation Writing Group.
Causality Project Team 1 David Conley Vijay Hattiangadi Byung Lee Jennifer Stoneking.
SUNIL GAHLAWAT LU GAN MIYA SYLVESTER YIRAN WANG Usability and Utility of TopicLens a Visualization System for the Exploration of Topic Models.
RESEARCH TECHNIQUES RESEARCH TECHNIQUES FOR STUDENTS USING PRIMARY AND SECONDARY SOURCES.
Web Site Usability Study John Gottfried Spring 2008.
U SAGE OF THE L IBRARIES W EBSITE ON S MART P HONES - Arpit Bansal - Richard Cau - Deepa Prabhu.
Interim Presentation Group 4 - May 14th, 2012 Langson Library Redesign.
Dobrin / Keller / Weisser : Technical Communication in the Twenty-First Century. © 2008 Pearson Education. Upper Saddle River, NJ, All Rights Reserved.
Action Research Use of wikispaces to improve levels of independent learning in AS Physics Cath Lowe.
MAC Fall Symposium: Learning What You Want to Know and Implementing Change Elizabeth Yakel, Ph.D. October 22, 2010.
Screening & Transitioning EPA Applicants
EE LECTURE 4 REPORT STRUCTURE AND COMPONENTS Electrical Engineering Dept King Saud University.
EasyChair Reviewer sign up and bidding Art Hsieh Jean Huang Norik Davtian Ryan Nissenbaum.
Research on the Interaction Between Human and Machines University of Houston-Clear Lake Tasha Y. David.
What is Usability? Usability Is a measure of how easy it is to use something: –How easy will the use of the software be for a typical user to understand,
Project 3 Cookie Cutters Kevin Huynh Sean Tsusaki Jordaniel Wolk.
Shawnee Mission School District Media Library A Project Proposal By: Anita Able, Christian Madrigal, Jennifer Nicolotti, and Cynthia Sickendick.
UCI Library Website Chris Lee Archana Vaidyanathan Duncan Tsai Karen Quan.
1 Faculty Center for Instructors and Roster Contacts Accessing Faculty Center Class Roster Grade Roster Request Grade Changes Grade Approval Process Next.
Work package 2: User analysis and usability testing Responsible partner: Danish Data Archives WP leader: Anne Sofie Fink, DDA.
Conducting Usability Tests 4 Step Process. Step 1 – Plan and Prep Step 2 – Find Participants Step 3 – Conduct the Session Step 4 – Analyze Data and Make.
Department of Psychology Experiment Management System Experimenter Tutorial Stony Brook University Subject Pool Office
Welcome to the Usability Center Tour Since 1995, the Usability Center has been a learning environment that supports and educates in the process of usability.
Project 4: User interface for logging food intake and activities Muhammad Zaman, Warren Trinh, Thanh Le, and Christine Liang.
Participating in the Participant Pool Participants’ Tutorial Participant Pool Coordinator
Spring 2009 | CM/CS 348 Human Computer Interaction | Self-Services for Students Study Diary Study The CM/CS 348 class performed individual diary studies.
VIVA Web Revision Outreach Committee VIVA Users Group Meeting November 1, 2007.
LINKS Evaluation. Why evaluate? Evaluation of the LINKS Advising Program is particularly important in this pilot year. It gives participating staff, students.
A Usability Assessment of EBSCO Discovery Service David Comeaux – Web Development Librarian Emily Frank – Instructional Technologies Librarian Mike Waugh.
Usability Evaluation, part 2. REVIEW: A Test Plan Checklist, 1 Goal of the test? Specific questions you want to answer? Who will be the experimenter?
The Information School of the University of Washington Information System Design Info-440 Autumn 2002 Session #15.
By Godwin Alemoh. What is usability testing Usability testing: is the process of carrying out experiments to find out specific information about a design.
AVI/Psych 358/IE 340: Human Factors Evaluation October 31, 2008.
Faculty Center for Instructors Roles and Access Faculty Center Features Grade Changes and Approval.
Web Page Design The Key to a Successful Web Page by Judy Bogdanets.
EasyChair Project Reviewer sign up and bidding Art Hsieh Jean Huang Norik Davtian Ryan Nissenbaum.
Publishing Services Bureau Web Communications Services Tips for managing the publication process Communications Workshop October 23, 2003.
Usability Engineering Dr. Dania Bilal IS 582 Spring 2007.
EasyChair Reviews, comments and meta-reviews Interim Presentation Team: Super-Chairs Aaron Donk, Vatsal Shah, Ammar Taki El-Din, Gilberto Bardales.
12 things that you need to know about Open Access, the REF and the CRIS Rowena Rouse Scholarly Communications Manager June 2016.
Quarterly Geo/SIG Coordinator Webinar June 25, 2014.
Coordinated Employer/Business Services Policy
Usability Evaluation, part 2
The User Experience: Online and IRL
It’s On the Way: Conducting Library Website Usability Test
Collaboration with Google Drive
Evaluation of UCI’s Library Website
Initial Presentation Group 4
Group: Chris, Daniel, Jeff, Kathy, Shirelle, Vincent
INF 132: Project 2B Course Management System for Students
Project 1 - Finding courses at UC Irvine Extension
Project 1 - Finding courses at UC Irvine Extension
Redesigning the Archival Services’ Website with User Perspectives
Climate Surveys.
Gathering data, cont’d Subjective Data Quantitative
Introduction to Web Authoring
Presentation transcript:

UCI Library Website Chris Lee Archana Vaidyanathan Duncan Tsai Karen Quan

Usability Problem People are not able to find the “Search our Site” link at the bottom of the UCI Library home page that directs them to a separate search box to search throughout the website

??? omg wtf bbq

Reasons for the Link Two search boxes Other library websites Cost vs. Benefits Next Generation Melvyl

Our Thoughts "Search our site" is not obvious to user Link size is small, not noticeable The link is only visible at the bottom of the page Link at the bottom of the page is overlooked

Our Plan Keep the Next Generation Melvyl search box prominent on the site Place the search box for the website somewhere obvious to the user Make a clear distinction between the two separate boxes

Methods

User Profile & Study Details Undergraduate UCI students Possible sub-groups (Faculty, staff, graduates) Total users anticipated to be around Contact and recruit: s, personal requests. Location of study: Study rooms in libraries/Student center Estimated minutes per session.

Procedure Primary o Guided user testing of existing website/prototypes  Audio/video recording- (Screen capture)  Users will be asked to think aloud  Experimental script Secondary o Short structured interview of users after testing o Paper- based questionnaire  Pre selected questions  Free response feedback  Demographic information o Pilot testing

User Tasks Have users search for information about library fines on the library web site. Have them search for the book Marketing and Feminism on library web site. Have them find the maps & directions page. Have them find out where they can use a copy of Photoshop in the library. Have them find the price for color printing. Have them find out how long laptops can be checked out for.

Sample Questionnaire What is your academic major? ______ On a scale of 1(very difficult) to 5(very easy) rate how you feel you performed for each task o Task 1 o Task 2 o Task Elaborate on any difficulties you had while performing the tasks How often do you use the UCI Libraries Website? o At least once per week o A few times per month o Once or twice a quarter o Once or twice a year o Never Did you notice the search box for the website? YES NO

Phases User Testing Data Analysis Design Prototypes Re-evaluation/Re-test Design Final Version Report Delivery

Results

Analyze Data Collected data will be in the form of Audio and video recordings o Analyze user-tasks step-by-step o Analyze user’s comments etc. Brief User Inteviews o Background information (ease of task, frequency of usage, major etc.) Additional notes

Proposing Changes Analyze findings from research data Collect user annoyances and suggestions Use HCI guidelines to create several alternative design prototypes

Evaluating Prototypes Re-test using the same procedures for data collection (with room for revision) Randomly assign subjects to prototypes for their tasks, then let them use all 3 prototypes and pick one they prefer

Finalizing a Design Review prototype evaluations based on o Hard data from timed experiments o User satisfaction and preference questionaires Pick one prototype or create improved prototypes Test until we have one or two “ultimate” designs DELIVER (report/recommendations)

Timeline and Tasks 4/22 - Initial Presentation Create prototypes (~1 week 4/22 – 4/29) Pilot studies (~1 week 4/29 – 5/06) 5/06 - Interim Presentation User evaluation of prototypes (~2 weeks 5/06 - 5/22) o Re-evaluate interview protocol if necessary Revise prototypes and develop final design(~1 week 5/23- 5/30) Final presentation and report (5/30 - 6/03) 6/03 – Final Presentation 6/04 – Final Report

Division of Labor Duncan/Karen: Official Prototyper Chris/Archana: Report Writers Everyone: UI Testing (teams of two) Interview protocol distributed work User testing split into teams o Data aggregated later for further analysis

Fin