doc.: IEEE /132r0 Submission November 1999 Ian Gifford, M/A-COM, Inc.Slide 1 IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks TG1 Working Agenda 8Nov99 to 12Nov99 Hyatt Regency Kaua'i, 1571 Poipu Road Koloa, HI USA

doc.: IEEE /132r0 Submission November 1999 Ian Gifford, M/A-COM, Inc.Slide 2 Contents Kaua’i Objectives TG1 Motions –Motion #1 - Vice Chair WG Motions –Motion #2 - LB #1 Commencement –Motion #3 - Electronic or empower Tel-Aviv for Comment Resolution –Motion #4 - OR Status for Bluetooth

doc.: IEEE /132r0 Submission November 1999 Ian Gifford, M/A-COM, Inc.Slide 3 Kaua’i Objectives 1. PROVIDE A MOTION TO SUBMIT THE DRAFT TO WG LETTER BALLOT #1 2. PROVIDE A MOTION TO REVIEW THE COMMENTS FROM WG LB #1 ON OR BEFORE 10-14JAN00 INTERIM 3. PROVIDE AN UPDATE ON TG1 4. PROVIDE AN OVERVIEW OF THE IEEE DRAFT DERIVED FROM THE BLUETOOTH SPECIFICATION(S) <TUTORIAL #3 5. PROVIDE A MOTION TO WG TO INVOKE "OR" STATUS FOR BSIG, IF APPROVED FWD TO SEC AS A MOTION 6. DRAFT TG1 OPERATING RULES AND PROVIDE A MOTION RESULT TO WG, WG APPROVAL 7. PROVIDE A MOTION TO REPLACE PARVIZ KERMANI WITH CHATSCHIK BISDIKIAN

doc.: IEEE /132r0 Submission November 1999 Ian Gifford, M/A-COM, Inc.Slide 4 IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks Motions

doc.: IEEE /132r0 Submission November 1999 Ian Gifford, M/A-COM, Inc.Slide 5 Motion 1: I move to replace Parviz Kermani with Chatschik Bisdikian as IEEE P TG1 Vice Chair. Forward to WG. Moved:Tom Siep Second:Mike McInnis All in Favor:16 All Opposed: 0 Abstaining: 0 TG1 Vice Chair Requires 50% (Procedural) Passed

doc.: IEEE /132r0 Submission November 1999 Ian Gifford, M/A-COM, Inc.Slide 6 The Current P Working Group is comprised of 42 voting members: 1Mr. Houman Alborzivoter 2Mr. Dimitri Alexandrouvoter 3Mr. Simon Baatz (Simon)voter 4Mr. Edul Batliwala (Edul)voter 5Mr. Alan Bien (Alan)voter 6Dr. Chatschik Bisdikianvoter 7Mr. Dave Carlson (Dave)voter 8Mr. Harshal Chhaya (Harshal)voter 9Mr. Wm. Caldwell Crosswyvoter 10Mr. William Cruz (Bill)voter 11Mr. Richard Ditch (Rich)voter 12Mr. Richard Eckard (Dick)voter 13Mr. Kurt Fischer (Kurt)voter 14Mr. Matthias Frank (Matthias)voter 15Mr. Ian Gifford (Ian)voter 16Ms. Nada Golmie (Nada)voter 17Mr. Allen Heberling (Allen)voter 18Mr. Robert Heile (Bob)voter 19Mr. John Paul Jones (John)voter 20Dr. Srinivas Kandalavoter 21Dr. Parviz Kermani (Parviz)voter 22Mr. Stuart Kerry (Stuart)voter 23Mr. Patrick Kinney (Pat)voter 24Mr. Bruce P. Kraemer (Bruce)voter 25Dr. Yunxin Li (Yunxin)voter 26Mr. Daniel R. McGlynnvoter 27Mr. Michael D. McInnis (Mike)voter 28Dr. Akira Miura (Akira)voter 29Dr.Thomas Müller (Thomas)voter 30Mr. Peter Murry (Peter)voter 31Mr. Erwin R. Noble (Erwin)voter 32Mr. Mike Paczonay (Mike)voter 33Mr. Arto Palin (Arto)voter 34Dr. Davis Pan (Davis)voter 35Mr. Ivan Reede (Ivan)voter 36Mr. Carlos A. Rios (Carlos)voter 37Mr. Brian E. Roan (Brian)voter 38Mr. Karlheinz Schwarz voter 39Dr. Stephen J. Shellhammervoter 40Mr. Thomas Siep (Tom)voter 41Mr. Nick Stapleton (Nick)voter 42Mr. Steve Torp (Steve)voter 43Dr. Fujio Watanabe (Fujio)voter = Resignation prior to the LB #1 Start

doc.: IEEE /132r0 Submission November 1999 Ian Gifford, M/A-COM, Inc.Slide 7 Draft Posted 4ov99, WG Voter’s need to review and understand: Before a draft is submitted to WG letter ballot it shall in addition have met the following requirements: –It must be complete with no open technical issues. –It must be made available on the web site a week before the meeting before it is to be discussed. All changes made to the draft after the initial posting shall be presented for review during the closing plenary immediately prior to the vote for approval to go to WG ballot. –It must be formatted according to the IEEE style specified the WG templates –It must be approved for submittal to WG ballot at the WG closing plenary. For a WG letter ballot to be considered valid the abstention rate must be less than 30%. When present, state diagrams shall take precedence over text.

doc.: IEEE /132r0 Submission November 1999 Ian Gifford, M/A-COM, Inc.Slide 8 Motion: To empower the TG1 Chair and Vice Chair to release the Bluetooth submission on behalf of TG1 to the WG and to make a motion to the WG to submit the Draft to Letter Ballot. Moved:Tom Siep Second:Chatschik Bisdikian All in Favor:16 All Opposed:1 Abstaining:0 Santa Rosa - Vote on TG1 Draft Processing Requires 75% Passed Already Approved

doc.: IEEE /132r0 Submission November 1999 Ian Gifford, M/A-COM, Inc.Slide 9 Santa Rosa - Motion Analysis “To empower the TG1 Chair and Vice Chair to release the Bluetooth submission on behalf of TG1 to the WG...” –Done. 4Nov99 “...and to make a motion to the WG to submit the Draft to Letter Ballot.” –Need to do. TG1 Recommends Wednesday, 10Nov99 during the Full WG Session.

doc.: IEEE /132r0 Submission November 1999 Ian Gifford, M/A-COM, Inc.Slide 10 Pre Letter Ballot Analysis 4Nov99 TG1 Posts Draft –Thursday 4Nov99 to Wednesday 10Nov99 (7 Days) 10Nov99 LB #1 Motion To Commence –Wednesday 10Nov99 to Thursday 9Dec99 (30 Days) or  Thursday 11Nov99 to Friday 10Dec99 (30 Days)

doc.: IEEE /132r0 Submission November 1999 Ian Gifford, M/A-COM, Inc.Slide 11 Post Letter Ballot Analysis 10Dec99 LB #1 Motion Ends 11pm EST Process and Consolidate Comments –Monday 13Dec99 to Thursday 16Dec99 (4 Days) 17Dec99 Distribute LB #1 Voting Results and, if any, Comments Comment Resolution? –20-24Dec99?, 27-31Dec99?, 3-7Jan00? –10-14Jan00 Interim Meeting in Tel-Aviv? Recirculation LB?

doc.: IEEE /132r0 Submission November 1999 Ian Gifford, M/A-COM, Inc.Slide 12 Motion 2: I move to submit the contents of document IEEE P802-15/D0.6 to Sponsor Ballot [default recirculation ballot]; Draft_0-6.zip, available via: Moved:? Second:? All in Favor: All Opposed: Abstaining: LB #1 Requires 50% (Procedural) Passed or Failed?

doc.: IEEE /132r0 Submission November 1999 Ian Gifford, M/A-COM, Inc.Slide 13 Motion 3: I move to empower the P to conduct LB #1 Comment Resolution during the Interim Meeting in 10-14Jan00 in Tel-Aviv, Israel Moved:? Second:? All in Favor: All Opposed: Abstaining: LB #1 Interim Empowerment Requires 50% (Procedural) Passed or Failed?

doc.: IEEE /132r0 Submission November 1999 Ian Gifford, M/A-COM, Inc.Slide 14 What does the organizational representative (OR) membership category mean? Participation in IEEE standards development traditionally was on an individual basis. In addition, a spokesperson for the consensus of an organization, committee, segment of industry, or similar group could participate. OR status indicates that the representative is acting for the organization and not as an individual. The term of an organizational representative is granted for the life of the project described in the Project Authorization Request (PAR) (including reballots), and the IEEE-SA Standards Board reserves the right to terminate this voting privilege. Please note that individual companies are not considered organizations. The IEEE-SA has corporate/entity members who can participate in the standards process, including balloting on standards projects earmarked for corporate/entity balloting.

doc.: IEEE /132r0 Submission November 1999 Ian Gifford, M/A-COM, Inc.Slide 15 Motion 4: I move to approve the Bluetooth SIG IEEE-SA Organizational Representative (OR) and/or IEEE 802 WPAN Ballot Group membership request. Forward to SEC. Moved:? Second:? All in Favor: All Opposed: Abstaining: Bluetooth IEEE-SA OR Status Requires 50% (Procedural) Passed or Failed?