Design of One Way Slabs CE A433 – RC Design T. Bart Quimby, P.E., Ph.D. Spring 2007.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
COMPRESSION FIELD THEORY FOR SHEAR STRENGTH IN CONCRETE
Advertisements

Example (10.2): Redesign the stair shown in Example (10.1) if it is a cantilever type of a clear span of 1.6 m. Solution : Minimum stair thickness required.
Chp12- Footings.
Parts of typical slab formwork
Design of Slabs-on-Grade
Design of Concrete Structure I
Reinforced Concrete Design-8
Lecture 9 - Flexure June 20, 2003 CVEN 444.
Elastic Stresses in Unshored Composite Section
Lecture 33 - Design of Two-Way Floor Slab System
Overview Waffle Slab.
Reinforced Concrete Flexural Members
STAIRCASES. STAIRCASES Introduction Staircases provide means of movement from one floor to another in a structure. Staircases consist of a number of.
Shear and Diagonal Tension
Lecture 15- Bar Development
1 Design and drawing of RC Structures CV61 Dr. G.S.Suresh Civil Engineering Department The National Institute of Engineering Mysore Mob:
Design of Cantilevered Retaining Walls
Chapter-7 Bond Development Length & Splices
Lecture Goals Slab design reinforcement.
Abstract This project is a structural analysis and design of a residential building located in JENIEN City, The building is consisted of 7 floors. The.
Chp-6:Lecture Goals Serviceability Deflection calculation
ONE-WAY SLAB. ONE-WAY SLAB Introduction A slab is structural element whose thickness is small compared to its own length and width. Slabs are usually.
Chp.12 Cont. – Examples to design Footings
Section 3 design of post-tensioned components for flexure Developed by the pTI EDC-130 Education Committee lead author: trey Hamilton, University of.
Wall Form Design Example (Continued)
Torsion in Girders A2 A3 M u = w u l n 2 /24 M u = w u l n 2 /10M u = w u l n 2 /11 B2 B3 The beams framing into girder A2-A3 transfer a moment of w u.
BEARING OR CRUSHING Bearing Stresses (Compression Perpendicular to the Grain) Allowable stresses for compression perpendicular to the grain are available.
CM 197 Mechanics of Materials Chap 14: Stresses in Beams
Copyright © 2011 Pearson Education South Asia Pte Ltd
786 Design of Two way floor system for Flat slab
Slab Design.
Footings.
Code Comparison between
COLUMNS. COLUMNS Introduction According to ACI Code 2.1, a structural element with a ratio of height-to least lateral dimension exceeding three used.
Composite Beams and Columns
Beam Design.
EXAMPLE 9.2 – Part II PCI Bridge Design Manual
SHEAR IN BEAMS. SHEAR IN BEAMS Introduction Loads applied to beams produce bending moments, shearing forces, as shown, and in some cases torques. Beams.
Lecture 21 – Splices and Shear
Umm Al-Qura University Department of Civil & Structural Engineering 1 Design of reinforced concrete II Design of one-way solid slabs Lecture (1)
University of Palestine
Plain & Reinforced Concrete-1 CE-313
Reinforced Concrete Design
FOOTINGS. FOOTINGS Introduction Footings are structural elements that transmit column or wall loads to the underlying soil below the structure. Footings.
Graduation Project Thesis  
Structural Design of Movenpick Hotel
©Teaching Resource in Design of Steel Structures IIT Madras, SERC Madras, Anna Univ., INSDAG 1 COMPOSITE FLOORS - II.
CE A433 – RC Design T. Bart Quimby, P.E., Ph.D. Revised Spring 2009
Fordham Place Bronx, NY Aric Heffelfinger Structural Option Spring 2006.
Isolated footing with axial load and moment
By Dr. Attaullah Shah Swedish College of Engineering and Technology Wah Cantt. Reinforced Concrete Design-3 Flexural Design of Beams.
6- Calculation of shear stress at composite interface: A)Under service load: Strain and stress distributions across composite beam cross- section, under.
Shear Stresses in Concrete Beams
Footing.
Reinforcement Information - Code
Beam Design Beams are designed to safely support the design loads.
By Dr. Attaullah Shah Swedish College of Engineering and Technology Wah Cantt. Reinforced Concrete Design-6 Shear Design of Beams.
Dr Badorul Hisham Abu Bakar
AHSANULLAH UNIVERSITY OF SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY DEPT
Lecture 5 - Flexure June 11, 2003 CVEN 444.
Shear in Straight Members Shear Formula Shear Stresses in Beams
786 Design of Two Way floor system for Flat Plate Slab
Structural Design of Technology College in Hebron University
Slender Columns and Two-way Slabs
(i) proper arrangement of reinforcing bars and
Lecture 39 - Design of Two-Way Floor Slab System
Reinforced Concrete Design-6
An Najah National University Submitted to : Dr.Munther Diab .
Reinforced Concrete Design-3 Flexural Design of Beams
Presentation transcript:

Design of One Way Slabs CE A433 – RC Design T. Bart Quimby, P.E., Ph.D. Spring 2007

Definition A One Way Slab is simply a very wide beam that spans between supports A One Way Slab is simply a very wide beam that spans between supports Span, L Width, b

Design for a 12” Width When you solve for A s, you are solving for A s /ft width. When you solve for A s, you are solving for A s /ft width.

Beam Profile Design variables: Thickness (h) and Reinforcing Design variables: Thickness (h) and Reinforcing

Solving for Thickness, h Thickness may controlled by either: Thickness may controlled by either: Shear Shear Flexure Flexure Deflection Deflection

Thickness Based on Shear Shear stirrups are not possible in a slab so all you have is  V c for strength. Shear stirrups are not possible in a slab so all you have is  V c for strength. ACI (a) exempts slabs from the requirement that shear reinforcement is required where ever V u exceeds  V c /2. ACI (a) exempts slabs from the requirement that shear reinforcement is required where ever V u exceeds  V c /2.

Thickness Based on Flexure Use the three equations that were presented earlier in the semester for computing bd 2 for singly reinforced concrete beams, using b = 12”. Use the three equations that were presented earlier in the semester for computing bd 2 for singly reinforced concrete beams, using b = 12”. Largest beam size (based on A smin as specified in the code) Largest beam size (based on A smin as specified in the code) Smallest beam size (based on the steel strain being.005) Smallest beam size (based on the steel strain being.005) Smallest beam size not likely to have deflection problems (c ~.375c b ) Smallest beam size not likely to have deflection problems (c ~.375c b )

Thickness Base on Deflection We haven’t covered deflection calculations yet. We haven’t covered deflection calculations yet. See ACI See ACI You must comply with the requirements of ACI Table 9.5(a) if you want to totally ignore deflections You must comply with the requirements of ACI Table 9.5(a) if you want to totally ignore deflections

Other Considerations For thinner multi-span slabs, it might be useful to put the steel at mid depth so that it can act as both positive and negative reinforcing. For thinner multi-span slabs, it might be useful to put the steel at mid depth so that it can act as both positive and negative reinforcing. Then h = d*2 Then h = d*2 Cover requirements are a bit different Cover requirements are a bit different See ACI (c) See ACI (c) You might need to make allowance for a wear surface You might need to make allowance for a wear surface

Flexural Steel Consider as a rectangular singly reinforced beam where b = 12” Consider as a rectangular singly reinforced beam where b = 12” M u <  A s f y (d-A s f y /(1.7f’ c b))  Solve for A s M u <  A s f y (d-A s f y /(1.7f’ c b))  Solve for A s The resulting A s is the req’d A s PER FOOT OF WIDTH. The resulting A s is the req’d A s PER FOOT OF WIDTH. Also consider min A s requirement ACI Also consider min A s requirement ACI All bars can provide this A s by selecting an appropriate spacing All bars can provide this A s by selecting an appropriate spacing Spacing = A b /(req’d A s /ft width) Spacing = A b /(req’d A s /ft width) Watch units!!!! Watch units!!!!

Spacing Limits ACI has an upper limit on bar spacing ACI has an upper limit on bar spacing S < min(3h, 18”) S < min(3h, 18”) The lower limit is as used in previous beam problems.. The lower limit is as used in previous beam problems.. The clear distance between bars > max(1”, max aggregate size/.75) The clear distance between bars > max(1”, max aggregate size/.75)

Typical Calculation Controlling Flexural Steel Requirement0.294in^2/ftw BarAbdbmax sUse sAct. AsAct dpMnMu/pMncStl Strain (in^2)(in) (in^2/ftw)(in)(ft-k/ftw) (in) # # # # # # # # # # # Note: Check development lengths

Temperature & Shrinkage Steel ACI ACI Req’d A s /ft width = (12”)h  Req’d A s /ft width = (12”)h   = for f y < 60 ksi  = for f y < 60 ksi  = for f y = 60 ksi  = for f y = 60 ksi This steel is placed TRANSVERSE to the flexural steel. This steel is placed TRANSVERSE to the flexural steel. ACI ACI Spacing < min(5h,18”) Spacing < min(5h,18”)

T&S Calculation

Layout Flexural Steel Temperature & Shrinkage Steel

Example Problem Materials: f’ c = 3 ksi, f y = 60 ksi Materials: f’ c = 3 ksi, f y = 60 ksi Imposed Loads: Live = 100 psf, Dead = 25 psf Imposed Loads: Live = 100 psf, Dead = 25 psf

Finding “h” At this point, we have enough information to determine h using ACI Table 9.5a: At this point, we have enough information to determine h using ACI Table 9.5a: Cantilevers: h > L/10 = 24”/10 = 2.4” Cantilevers: h > L/10 = 24”/10 = 2.4” Main Spans: h > L/24 = 120”/28 = 4.29” Main Spans: h > L/24 = 120”/28 = 4.29” We still need to check shear and flexure requirements… but need more info! We still need to check shear and flexure requirements… but need more info!

Determine Loads Consider only a 1 ft width of beam (b = 12”) Consider only a 1 ft width of beam (b = 12”) w LL = 100 psf = 100 plf/ft width w LL = 100 psf = 100 plf/ft width w DL = 25 psf + weight of slab w DL = 25 psf + weight of slab Make a guess at a slab thickness or write the equations of shear and moment in terms of slab thickness… Let’s try h = 6”… we will need to fix this later if it turns out to be greater. Make a guess at a slab thickness or write the equations of shear and moment in terms of slab thickness… Let’s try h = 6”… we will need to fix this later if it turns out to be greater. w DL = 25 psf + (150 pcf)*.5 ft = 100 psf = 100 plf/ftw w DL = 25 psf + (150 pcf)*.5 ft = 100 psf = 100 plf/ftw w u = 1.2(100 plf/ftw) + 1.6(100 plf/ftw) = 280 plf/ftw w u = 1.2(100 plf/ftw) + 1.6(100 plf/ftw) = 280 plf/ftw

An Almost Arbitrary Decision We will place the steel at mid-depth of the slab so that it handles both positive and negative moments We will place the steel at mid-depth of the slab so that it handles both positive and negative moments This means that we only need to design for the worst case moment (positive or negative) along the span. This means that we only need to design for the worst case moment (positive or negative) along the span. As a result, d = h/2 As a result, d = h/2 This is a good choice for a short relatively thin (less than 8”) slab. This is a good choice for a short relatively thin (less than 8”) slab. This makes things pretty simple. Only have to design one set of flexural steel! This makes things pretty simple. Only have to design one set of flexural steel!

Determine Maximum Shears Use ACI (the slab meets the criteria!) to compute internal forces (or you can do a full elastic analysis) Use ACI (the slab meets the criteria!) to compute internal forces (or you can do a full elastic analysis) The cantilevers are exempt from 8.3 since they are statically determinant (i.e. don’t meet the criteria to use 8.3) The cantilevers are exempt from 8.3 since they are statically determinant (i.e. don’t meet the criteria to use 8.3) V u = w u *L n = (280 plf/ftw)*(1.5 ft) = 420 lb/ftw V u = w u *L n = (280 plf/ftw)*(1.5 ft) = 420 lb/ftw The two center spans are the same The two center spans are the same V u = w u *L n /2= (280 plf/ftw)*(9 ft)/2 = 1260 lb/ftw V u = w u *L n /2= (280 plf/ftw)*(9 ft)/2 = 1260 lb/ftw

Determine Req’d h Based on Shear For our choice: For our choice: d = h/2 > V u /[  2sqrt(f’c)bw)] d = h/2 > V u /[  2sqrt(f’c)bw)] d > (1260 lb/ftw)/[.75(2)sqrt(3000)(12”)] d > (1260 lb/ftw)/[.75(2)sqrt(3000)(12”)] d > 1.28 in d > 1.28 in h > 2.56 in h > 2.56 in Deflection criteria (Table 9.5a) still controls!!! Deflection criteria (Table 9.5a) still controls!!!

Determine Maximum Moments Main spans: L n = 9 ft Main spans: L n = 9 ft Can use ACI : Can use ACI : Max positive M u = w u *L n 2 /16 = 1,418 ft-lb/ftw Max positive M u = w u *L n 2 /16 = 1,418 ft-lb/ftw Max negative M u = w u *L n 2 /11 = 2,062 ft-lb/ftw Max negative M u = w u *L n 2 /11 = 2,062 ft-lb/ftw Cantilevers are statically determinate: L n = 1.5 ft. Cantilevers are statically determinate: L n = 1.5 ft. M u = w u *L n 2 /2 = 315 ft-lb/ftw M u = w u *L n 2 /2 = 315 ft-lb/ftw Design for M u = 2,062 ft-lb/ftw Design for M u = 2,062 ft-lb/ftw

Select “h” Based on Flexure Can use the equations derived for choosing the size of rectangular singly reinforced beams earlier in the semester. Can use the equations derived for choosing the size of rectangular singly reinforced beams earlier in the semester. Use b = 12” and solve for d. Use b = 12” and solve for d. Try solving the equations for both max and min size to bracket the possibilities. Try solving the equations for both max and min size to bracket the possibilities. Max size (based on min reinforcing): h = 6.41 in Max size (based on min reinforcing): h = 6.41 in Min size (based on stl strain = 0.005): h = 3.40 in Min size (based on stl strain = 0.005): h = 3.40 in

Now… Make a Choice! I choose to use h = 5”… it is in the range for flexure and meets Table 9.5a deflection criteria and Shear Strength criteria I choose to use h = 5”… it is in the range for flexure and meets Table 9.5a deflection criteria and Shear Strength criteria Other choices that meet the limits computed are also valid Other choices that meet the limits computed are also valid No real need to go back and fix the “h” that our load estimate since they are close and the assumption was conservative, but can do it to refine the design if we want to. No real need to go back and fix the “h” that our load estimate since they are close and the assumption was conservative, but can do it to refine the design if we want to.

Determine the Flexural Steel Solve the flexural design inequality for A s : Solve the flexural design inequality for A s : M u <  A s f y (d-A s f y /(1.7*f’ c b)) M u <  A s f y (d-A s f y /(1.7*f’ c b))  A s > in 2 /ftw  A s > in 2 /ftw Watch those units!!! Watch those units!!! Also check to make sure that the minimum A s is met Also check to make sure that the minimum A s is met A s > min(200,3sqrt(f’ c ))*b w d/f y = in 2 /ftw A s > min(200,3sqrt(f’ c ))*b w d/f y = in 2 /ftw The larger value controls The larger value controls Use A s > in 2 /ftw Use A s > in 2 /ftw

Select the Flexural Steel Use 12” O.C. Use 12” O.C.

Consider T&S Steel For our case,  = For our case,  = Req’d A s > (12”)(5”) = in 2 /ftw Req’d A s > (12”)(5”) = in 2 /ftw Max allowed spacing = min(18”,5h) = 18” Max allowed spacing = min(18”,5h) = 18” Compute some spacing and choose a bar: Compute some spacing and choose a bar: For #3 bar: For #3 bar: s < 0.11 in 2 / (0.108 in 2 /ftw) = 1.02 ft = 12.2 in s < 0.11 in 2 / (0.108 in 2 /ftw) = 1.02 ft = 12.2 in For #4 bar: s < 22.2 in … use 18” For #4 bar: s < 22.2 in … use 18” #3 is the better choice! #3 is the better choice! Use 12” O.C. for T&S steel Use 12” O.C. for T&S steel

Final Design Slab Thickness = 5” Slab Thickness = 5” Longitudinal Steel = 12” mid-depth Longitudinal Steel = 12” mid-depth Transverse Steel = 12” O.C. Transverse Steel = 12” O.C.