Measured by accelerometers Newtonian contributions from the Moon, Sun and Planets A semi-classical relativistic motion integrator (SCRMI), to model the.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Sect. 3.12: The Three Body Problem So far: We’ve done the 2 Body Problem. –Central forces only. –Eqtns of motion are integrable. Can write as integrals.
Advertisements

The fundamental astronomical reference systems for space missions and the expansion of the universe Michael Soffel & Sergei Klioner TU Dresden.
Orbit Determination Software at ESOC Flight Dynamics
July 2005 Einstein Conference Paris Thermodynamics of a Schwarzschild black hole observed with finite precision C. Chevalier 1, F. Debbasch 1, M. Bustamante.
Pioneer Anomaly Test – Jonathan Fitt 1 System Design Assessment for a Mission to Explore the Pioneer Anomaly Jonathan Fitt Monday, 15 June 2015
Coordinate-systems and time. Seeber 2.1. NON INERTIAL SYSTEM CTS: Conventional Terrestrial System Mean-rotationaxis Greenwich X Y- Rotates.
General Relativity Physics Honours 2006 A/Prof. Geraint F. Lewis Rm 557, A29 Lecture Notes 5.
Gravitation Applications Lecturer: Professor Stephen T. Thornton
General-Relativistic Effects in Astrometry S.A.Klioner, M.H.Soffel Lohrmann Observatory, Dresden Technical University 2005 Michelson Summer Workshop, Pasadena,
Modelling and scientific programming. Objectives To learn to develop computer programs that are  Correct  Efficient  Adaptable  Portable.
Gravitomagnetism The Myth and the Legend
Modern Navigation Thomas Herring MW 11:00-12:30 Room
ESPACE Porto, June 2009 MODELLING OF EARTH’S RADIATION FOR GPS SATELLITE ORBITS Carlos Javier Rodriguez Solano Technische Universität München
1 Samara State Aerospace University (SSAU) Modern methods of analysis of the dynamics and motion control of space tether systems Practical lessons Yuryi.
Determination of the Geodetic Rotation of the Solar System Bodies by means of Spectral Analysis Method G.I. Eroshkin and V.V. Pashkevich Central (Pulkovo)
Kinetics of Particles:
ChE 452 Lecture 24 Reactions As Collisions 1. According To Collision Theory 2 (Equation 7.10)
Chapter 26 Relativity. General Physics Relativity II Sections 5–7.
System Design Assessment for a Mission to Explore the Pioneer Anomaly Jonathan Fitt School of Physics and Astronomy, University of Birmingham, Edgbaston,
Abstract Despite many estimations found in the past, Phobos mass is still largely unknown. Strong correlations in the reduction techniques and some obvious.
O n t h e T r a c k o f M o d e r n P h y s i c s Equation of motion to post-Newtonian order In 1918 J. Lense and H. Thirring, noted from the general relativity.
Recent determination of Gamma with Cassini M.T. Crosta, F. Mignard CNRS-O.C.A. 5th RRFWG, June, Estec.
Essential Idea:  The Newtonian idea of gravitational force acting between two spherical bodies and the laws of mechanics create a model that can be.
1 Ephemerides in the relativistic framework: _ time scales, spatial coordinates, astronomical constants and units Sergei A.Klioner Lohrmann Observatory,
MAGE Mid-term review (23/09/04): Scientific work in progress « Integrating the motion of satellites in a consistent relativistic framework » S. Pireaux.
Determination of seasonal geocenter variations from DORIS, GPS and SLR data.
Correspondence of The Principle of Maximum Entropy With other Laws of Physics Maximum Proper Time Least Action Least Time Minimum Energy How may the Maximum.
General Relativity Physics Honours 2005 Dr Geraint F. Lewis Rm 557, A29
A Relativistic and Autonomous Navigation Satellite System Pacôme Delva SYRTE / Observatoire de Paris Uroš Kostić Andrej Čadež Faculty of Mathematics and.
Fundamental Principles of General Relativity  general principle: laws of physics must be the same for all observers (accelerated or not)  general covariance:
On the geodetic rotation of the major planets, the Moon and the Sun G.I. Eroshkin and V.V. Pashkevich Central (Pulkovo) Astronomical Observatory of the.
Relativity and Space Geodesy S. Pireaux UMR 6162 ARTEMIS, Obs. de la Côte d’Azur, Av. de Copernic, Grasse, France IAU.
Gravimetry Geodesy Rotation
Franz Hofmann, Jürgen Müller, Institut für Erdmessung, Leibniz Universität Hannover Institut für Erdmessung Hannover LLR analysis software „LUNAR“
Space-Time coordinates are not fundamental,
LLR Analysis Workshop John Chandler CfA 2010 Dec 9-10.
Hirophysics.com PATRICK ABLES. Hirophysics.com PART 1 TIME DILATION: GPS, Relativity, and other applications.
ASSESSMENT OF THE MARS EXPRESS ORBIT DETERMINATION FOR THE IMPROVEMENT OF MARS’ GRAVITY FIELD P. ROSENBLATT (1), J.C. MARTY (3), M. PÄTZOLD (2), V. DEHANT.
Parameters : Temperature profile Bulk iron and olivine weight fraction Pressure gradient. Modeling of the Martian mantle Recently taken into account :
LLR Analysis – Relativistic Model and Tests of Gravitational Physics James G. Williams Dale H. Boggs Slava G. Turyshev Jet Propulsion Laboratory California.
Physics 211 Force and Equilibrium Hookes Law Newtons Laws Weight Friction Free Body Diagrams Force Problems 4: Classical Mechanics - Newtons Laws.
The Newtonian contributions from the Moon, Sun and Planets Basis for a native relativistic software integrating the motion of satellites Sophie PIREAUX.
Satellite geodesy (ge-2112) Introduction E. Schrama.
Advanced Computer Graphics Spring 2014 K. H. Ko School of Mechatronics Gwangju Institute of Science and Technology.
Modern Physics “Modern” physics means physics based on the two major breakthroughs of the early twentieth century (1900): relativity and quantum mechanics.
Geodesy with Mars lander Network V. Dehant, J.-P. Barriot, and T. Van Hoolst Royal Observatory of Belgium Observatoire Midi-Pyrénées.
University of Colorado Boulder ASEN 5070: Statistical Orbit Determination I Fall 2015 Professor Brandon A. Jones Lecture 2: Basics of Orbit Propagation.
Celestial Mechanics IV Central orbits Force from shape, shape from force General relativity correction.
PHYS 2006 Tim Freegarde Classical Mechanics. 2 Newton’s law of Universal Gravitation Exact analogy of Coulomb electrostatic interaction gravitational.
Thomas Herring, IERS ACC, MIT
The Science of Orbits (Power Point 04) Image Credit: NASA.
Introduction.
Mission Analysis with STK
Lunar Trajectories.
MAGE Mid-term review (23/09/04): network report
CE 102 Statics Chapter 1 Introduction.
Introduction.
Classical Mechanics PHYS 2006 Tim Freegarde.
Classical Mechanics PHYS 2006 Tim Freegarde.
Keldysh Institute of Applied Mathematics
Introduction.
Introduction.
X SERBIAN-BULGARIAN ASTRONOMICAL CONFERENCE 30 MAY - 3 JUNE, 2016, BELGRADE, SERBIA EARTH ORIENTATION PARAMETERS AND GRAVITY VARIATIONS DETERMINED FROM.
Normal gravity field in relativistic geodesy
Chapter 13 Gravitation In this chapter we will explore the following topics: -Newton’s law of gravitation that describes the attractive.
Chapter 13 Gravitation In this chapter we will explore the following topics: -Newton’s law of gravitation, which describes the attractive force between.
The fundamental astronomical reference systems for space missions and the expansion of the universe Michael Soffel & Sergei Klioner TU Dresden.
Physics 319 Classical Mechanics
Introduction.
Presentation transcript:

measured by accelerometers Newtonian contributions from the Moon, Sun and Planets A semi-classical relativistic motion integrator (SCRMI), to model the orbits of space probes around the Earth and other planets. Sophie PIREAUX, Jean-Pierre BARRIOT and Pascal ROSENBLATT, UMR 5562, Observatoire Midi-Pyrénées, Toulouse, France - tel. +33 (0) – Fax +33 (0) Royal Observatory of Belgium, Brussels, Belgium. ABSTRACT Today, the motion of spacecrafts is still described according to the classical Newtonian equations plus the so-called « relativistic corrections », computed with the required precision using the Post-(Post-…) Newtonian formalism. The current approach, with the increase of tracking precision (Ka-Band Doppler, interplanetary lasers) and clock stabilities (atomic fountains) is reaching its limits in terms of complexity, and is furthermore error prone. Those problems are especially relevant when modeling tiny geophysical effects through orbitography, like for example the waxing-waning mechanism of the Martian polar caps, with temporal frequencies in the same band as relativistic effects. In the more appropriate frame of General Relativity, we study a method to numerically integrate the native relativistic equations of motion for a weak gravitational field, taking into account not only gravitational forces, but also non gravitational forces (atmospheric drag, solar radiation pressure, albedo pressure, thermal emission…). The latter are treated as perturbations, in the sense that we assume that both the local structure of space-time ( ) is not modified by these forces, and that the unperturbed satellite motion follows the geodesics of the local space-time. We also advice the use of a symplectic integrator to compute the unperturbed geodesic motion, in order to insure the constancy of the norm of the proper velocity quadrivector ( ). Figure 1Figure 2Figure 3 THE (SEMI CLASSICAL) RELATIVISTIC APPROACH: (SC)RMI Method: GINS provides template orbits to validate the RMI orbits: - simulations with 1) Schwarzschild metric => validate Schwarzschild correction 2) (Schwarzschild + GRIM4-S4) metric => validate harmonic contributions 3) Kerr metric => validate Lens-Thirring correction 4) GCRS metric with(out) Sun, Moon, Planets => validate geodetic precession (other bodies contributions) RMI will go beyond GINS capabilities: - will include 1) IAU 2000 standard GCRS metric [6,7] 2) IAU 2000 time transformation prescriptions [6,7] 3) IAU 2000/IERS 2003 new standards on Earth rotation [5,6] 4) Post Newtonian parameters in the metric and space-time transformations - separate modules allow to easily update for metric, potential model (EGM96)… prescriptions. REFERENCES: [1] GRGS. Descriptif modèle de forces: logiciel GINS. Note technique du Groupe de Recherche en Géodesie Spatiale (GRGS), (2001). [2] X. Moisson. Intégration du mouvement des planètes dans le cadre de la relativité générale (thèse). Observatoire de Paris (2000). [3] A. W. Irwin and T. Fukushima. A numerical time ephemeris of the Earth. Astronomy and Astrophysics, 338, (1999). [4] SOFA homepage. The SOFA libraries. IAU Division 1: Fundamental Astronomy. ICRS Working Group Task 5: Computation Tools. Standards of Fundamental Astronomy Review Board. ( 2003) Observatoire Midi-Pyrenees The classical Newton plus relativistic corrections method briefly described below faces three major problems. First of all, it ignores that in General Relativity time and space are intimately related, as in the classical approach, time and space are separate entities. Secondly, a (complete) review of all the corrections is needed in case of a change in conventions (metric adopted), or if precision is gained in measurements. Thirdly, with such a method, one correction can sometimes be counted twice (for example, the reference frequency provided by the GPS satellites is already corrected for the main relativistic effect), if not forgotten. For those reasons, a new approach was suggested. The prototype is called (Semi-Classical) Relativistic Motion Integrator (whether non gravitational forces are considered). In this relativistic approach, the relativistic equations of motion are directly numerically integrated for a chosen metric. 1 1 Gravitational potential model for the Earth THE CLASSICAL APPROACH: GINS * * Géodésie par Intégrations Numériques Simultanées is a software developed by CNES Relativistic corrections on the forces Figure 5Figure 6 Figure 7 Figure 4 Financial support provided through: European Community's Improving Human Potential Program under contract RTN , MAGE; where Newton’s 2nd law of motion with [1] is due to satellite colliding with residual gas molecules (hyp: free molecular flux);is due to change in satellite momentum owing to solar photon flux;is the Earth tide potential due to the Sun and Moon, corrected for Love number frequencies, ellipticity and polar tide;is the ocean tide potential (single layer model); and is a gravitational acceleration induced by the redistribution of atmospheric masses (single layer model). Figure 1-10: The following graphs were plotted by selecting only certain gravitational contributions. Those examples show the correction to tangential/ normal/ radial directions on the trajectory of LAGEOS 1 satellite, due to the selected effect, after one day. Integration is carried out during one day, from JD17000 to JD The corresponding induced acceleration on JD17000 is given below each graph. We clearly see the orbital periodicity of revolution/day in each figure, as well as the additional periodicities due to J2 (Fig.2) and higher orders in the gravitational potential (Fig.3). Capital letters are used for geocentric coordinates and velocities; while lower cases are used for barycentric quantities. Name of planets/Sun are shown by indices; no index is used in case of the satellite. Figure 8Figure 9 For the appropriate metric, the relativistic equation of motion contains all needed gravitational effects (blue terms). Non gravitational forces [8] are encoded in measured by accelerometers. When, this equation reduces to the geodesic equation of motion. withand (…) withthe normalizedsemi-major axis of the Earth, harmonic coefficients, given in GRIM4-S4 model [5] D. D. McCarthy and G. Petit. IERS conventions (2003). IERS technical note 200?. (2003). [6] IAU 2000 resolutions. IAU Information Bulletin, 88 (2001). Erratum on resolution B1.3. Information Bulletin, 89 (2001). [7] M. Soffel et al. The IAU 2000 resolutions for astrometry, celestial mechanics and metrology in the relativistic framework: explanatory supplement. astro-ph/ v1 ( 2003). [8] A. Lichnerowicz. Théories relativistes de la gravitation et de l’électromagnétisme. Masson & Cie Editeurs TAI J2000 (“inertial”) INTEGRATOR TAI J2000 (“inertial”) ORBIT PLANET EPHEMERIS DE403 for in and TDB GRAVITATIONAL POTENTIAL MODEL FOR EARTH GRIM4-S4 Earth rotation model ITRS (non inertial) GCRS (“inertial”) INTEGRATOR TCG GCRS (“inertial”) ORBIT PLANET EPHEMERIS DE403 for in TDB GRAVITATIONAL POTENTIAL MODEL FOR EARTH GRIM4-S4 Earth rotation model METRIC MODEL IAU2000 GCRS metric ITRS (non inertial) [5] with quadri-”force” + first integral Need for symplectic integrator Earth tides with l=2,3 in the Earth gravitational potential, due to Sun and Moon. Figure 10 Royal Observatory of Belgium 1 2 Belgian ESA/PRODEX 7 contract.