DOE 8/21-22/06R. Prepost1 DOE REVIEW TASK C Aug. 21-22, 2006 * WORK AT SLAC – Babar & ILC R. Prepost Faculty S. Dasu Faculty H. Band Senior Scientist K.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Measurement of  David Hutchcroft, University of Liverpool BEACH’06      
Advertisements

Record Values of Electron Beam Polarization and Quantum Efficiency for Semiconductor Photocathodes Yu.A.Mamaev St. Petersburg State Polytechnic University.
23, June, 2005Beauty2005, Assisi, Italy Electroweak Penguin decays at Belle Akimasa Ishikawa KEK.
Measurements of the angles of the Unitarity Triangle at B A B AR Measurements of the angles of the Unitarity Triangle at B A B AR PHENO06 Madison,15-18.
Mixing at the B- Factories Daniel Marlow Princeton University Beauty /16/03 the “Iron City”
Electroweak and Radiative Penguin Transitions from B Factories Paoti Chang National Taiwan University 2 nd KIAS-NCTS Joint Workshop on Particle Physics,
Laboratory for Particle Physics and Cosmology
Title Gabriella Sciolla Massachusetts Institute of Technology Representing the BaBar Collaboration Beauty Assisi, June 20-24, 2005 Searching for.
For the BaBar and Belle Collaborations CKM 2008: 5 th International Workshop on the CKM Unitarity Triangle Rome, Italy, September 9-13, 2008 Bruce A. Schumm.
BABAR Status & Plans David B. MacFarlane SLAC EPAC Meeting January 25, 2006.
1 Measurement of f D + via D +   + Sheldon Stone, Syracuse University  D o D o, D o  K -  + K-K- K+K+ ++  K-K- K+K+ “I charm you, by my once-commended.
DPF Victor Pavlunin on behalf of the CLEO Collaboration DPF-2006 Results from four CLEO Y (5S) analyses:  Exclusive B s and B Reconstruction at.
Measurements of Radiative Penguin B Decays at BaBar Jeffrey Berryhill University of California, Santa Barbara For the BaBar Collaboration 32 nd International.
CHARM 2007, Cornell University, Aug. 5-8, 20071Steven Blusk, Syracuse University D Leptonic Decays near Production Threshold Steven Blusk Syracuse University.
Rare and Radiative B Decays M.-Z. Wang ( 王名儒 ) on behalf of the Belle Collaboration ICFP2005Outline IntroductionIntroduction B → XB → X s γ moments B →B.
Koji Ikado Beauty 2006 Rare B Decays : B  l, ll, ll  Nagoya University Koji Ikado The 11 th International Conference on B-Physics at Hadron Machines.
Takeo Higuchi Institute of Particle and Nuclear Studies, KEK Jan 21, 2004 Hawaii, USA Super B Factory Workshop Charged Higgs Search with B  D   
ILC Polarized Electron Source Annual DOE HEP Program Review June 5 – 8 International Linear Collider at Stanford Linear Accelerator Center A. Brachmann,
Moriond EW, 3 Mar 2008Tagir Aushev (EPFL, ITEP)1  B → K S  0  0  B → K S K S  B → K S  0  B → D *+ D *-  B → a 1 , a 1 K, b 1 , b 1 K...  
1. Outline 2 Dr. Prafulla Kumar Behera, IIT Madras 9 th June 2015.
The BaBarians are coming Neil Geddes Standard Model CP violation BaBar Sin2  The future.
Optical control of electrons in single quantum dots Semion K. Saikin University of California, San Diego.
Radiative Leptonic B Decays Edward Chen, Gregory Dubois-Felsmann, David Hitlin Caltech BaBar DOE Presentation Aug 10, 2005.
Summary of Recent Results on Rare Decays of B Mesons from BaBar for the BaBar Collaboration Lake Louise Winter Institute Chateau Lake Louise February.
CP Violation and CKM Angles Status and Prospects Klaus Honscheid Ohio State University C2CR 2007.
SuperKEKB to search for new sources of flavor mixing and CP violation - Introduction - Introduction - Motivation for L= Motivation for L=
Philip J. Clark University of Edinburgh Rare B decays The Royal Society of Edinburgh 4th February 2004.
SuperKEKB to search for new sources of flavor mixing and CP violation - Introduction - Introduction - Motivation for L= Motivation for L=
Polarized Electrons for Linear Colliders J. E. Clendenin, A. Brachmann, E. L. Garwin, R. E. Kirby, D.-A. Luh, T. Maruyama, R. Prepost, C. Y. Prescott,
1 High Polarization and Low Emittance Electron Source for ILC Nagoya University Dept. of Physics (SP-Lab) Masahiro Yamamoto.
Irakli Chakaberia Final Examination April 28, 2014.
Photo-induced ferromagnetism in bulk-Cd 0.95 Mn 0.05 Te via exciton Y. Hashimoto, H. Mino, T. Yamamuro, D. Kanbara, A T. Matsusue, B S. Takeyama Graduate.
M. Adinolfi - University of Bristol1/19 Valencia, 15 December 2008 High precision probes for new physics through CP-violating measurements at LHCb M. Adinolfi.
Operated by the Southeastern Universities Research Association for the U.S. Depart. Of Energy Thomas Jefferson National Accelerator Facility Strained Superlattice.
BaBar physics, recent highlights and future prospects Owen Long, BaBar physics analysis coordinator U. C. Riverside & SLAC December 5, 2008.
D.-A. Luh, A. Brachmann, J. E. Clendenin, T. Desikan, E. L. Garwin, S. Harvey, R. E. Kirby, T. Maruyama, and C. Y. Prescott Stanford Linear Accelerator.
Gavril Giurgiu, Carnegie Mellon, FCP Nashville B s Mixing at CDF Frontiers in Contemporary Physics Nashville, May Gavril Giurgiu – for CDF.
Physical Program of Tau-charm Factory V.P.Druzhinin, Budker INP, Novosibirsk.
Polarization comparison of InAlGaAs/GaAs superlattice photocathodes having low conduction band offset K. Ioakeimidi, T. Maruyama, J.E. Clendenin, A. Brachmann.
SUPERLATTICE PHOTOCATHODES: An Overview Tarun Desikan PPRC, Stanford University
 3 measurements by Belle Pavel Krokovny KEK Introduction Introduction Apparatus Apparatus Method Method Results Results Summary Summary.
1 Highlights from Belle Jolanta Brodzicka (NO1, Department of Leptonic Interactions) SAB 2009.
Andrzej Bożek nz11Highlights of the Belle Experiment SAB Review Selection of the most important Belle results since last SAB review (2005):  B 0.
Polarized Photocathode Research Collaboration PPRC R
11 th July 2003Daniel Bowerman1 2-Body Charmless B-Decays at B A B AR and BELLE Physics at LHC Prague Daniel Bowerman Imperial College 11 th July 2003.
Thomas Jefferson National Accelerator Facility G0 Collaboration Meeting, June 18-19, 2003 Updates G0 Tiger Laser High Polarization Photocathodes Mott polarimeter.
B  K   p  and photon spectrum at Belle Heyoung Yang Seoul National University for Belle Collaboration ICHEP2004.
International Linear Collider at Stanford Linear Accelerator Center 9/13/2006 Americas Regional Team FY08-09 Planning Meeting 1 1/11 ILC-Americas FY08-09.
Sep/19/2008 Su Dong Stanford Student Orientation: Accelerator based Particle Physics1 Accelerator Based Particle Physics Su Dong Stanford Student Orientation.
CP Violation Studies in B 0  D (*)  in B A B A R and BELLE Dominique Boutigny LAPP-CNRS/IN2P3 HEP2003 Europhysics Conference in Aachen, Germany July.
1 EPS03, July 17-23, 2003Lorenzo Vitale Time dependent CP violation studies in D(*)D(*) and J/ψ K* Lorenzo Vitale INFN Trieste On behalf of BaBar and Belle.
BNM Tsukuba (KEK) Sep Antonio Limosani KEK Slide 1 Antonio Limosani JSPS Fellow (KEK-IPNS JAPAN) BMN
CP violation in B decays: prospects for LHCb Werner Ruckstuhl, NIKHEF, 3 July 1998.
Search for dark-sector Higgs and gauge bosons at B A B AR Adrian Bevan 1July 2012 h'h' A'A' χ A0A0.
DØ Beauty Physics in Run II Rick Jesik Imperial College BEACH 2002 V International Conference on Hyperons, Charm and Beauty Hadrons Vancouver, BC, June.
Room 105 Status and Laser project update Brachmann.
Belle and Belle II Akimasa Ishikawa (Tohoku University)
Beauty and charm at the LHC, Jeroen van Tilburg, FOM Veldhoven 2014 Jeroen van Tilburg Beauty and charm at the LHC: searches for TeV scale phenomena in.
Quantum Efficiency Improvement of Polarized Electron Source using Strain compensated Superlattice photocathode N. Yamamoto 1, X.G. Jin 1, T. Miyauchi 3,
MBE Growth of Graded Structures for Polarized Electron Emitters
David B. MacFarlane SLAC EPAC Meeting January 25, 2006
high performance photocathodes for microscopy and accelerators
Polarized e- Source Design and R&D 10/24/05
Heavy Flavor Results from CMS
Radiative and electroweak penguin processes in exclusive B decays
CKM Status In this lecture, we study the results summarized in this plot. November 17, 2018 Sridhara Dasu, CKM Status.
CP violation in the charm and beauty systems at LHCb
B  at B-factories Guglielmo De Nardo Universita’ and INFN Napoli
CP Violation lectures Measurement of the time dependence of B0B0bar oscillation using inclusive dilepton events [BABAR-CONF-00/10] G. Cerminara.
Presentation transcript:

DOE 8/21-22/06R. Prepost1 DOE REVIEW TASK C Aug , 2006 * WORK AT SLAC – Babar & ILC R. Prepost Faculty S. Dasu Faculty H. Band Senior Scientist K. Flood PostDoc M. Pierini PostDoc Students J. Hollar Graduates 8/06 C. Vuosalo Started 6/06 * R. Prepost Presentation

DOE 8/21-22/06R. Prepost2 Task Activities BaBar Physics Analysis BaBar System Work IFR Muon System Management BaBar Particle ID Muon ID/Neural Net Development ILC Polarized Photocathode R&D Source Laser Development SiD Muon System KPIX ADC IC Testing

DOE 8/21-22/06R. Prepost3

DOE 8/21-22/06R. Prepost4 Projected data sample growth Integrated Luminosity [fb -1 ] L peak = 9x10 33 oPEP-II: 9xIR-2 vacuum chambers (including 2xnew Q1/Q2 bellows), 2xrf stations, BPM work, feedback systems oBABAR: LST installation 4-month down for LCLS, PEP-II & BABAR Double from 2004 to 2006 ICHEP06 Double again from 2006 to 2008 ICHEP08

DOE 8/21-22/06R. Prepost5 Babar Analyses Completed Theses

DOE 8/21-22/06R. Prepost6 Babar Analyses Current Analyses

DOE 8/21-22/06R. Prepost7 Constraints to CKM Triangle from V td /V ts Limits. (From Thesis of P. Tan)

DOE 8/21-22/06R. Prepost8 Status of the Unitarity Triangle by Utfit collaboration

DOE 8/21-22/06R. Prepost9 Sensitivity to New Physics in B mixing for different size data sets.  m Bd EXP = C Bd  m Bd SM A CP (J/  K 0 ) = sin (2(  +  Bd )) extrapolation to BaBar+Belle final sample(~2008) C Bd =1 and  Bd =0 in the Standard Model ICHEP06: C B d = 1.25 ± 0.43  B d = (-2.9 ± 2.0) o extrapolation to 10 ab -1 of SuperB factory Now 08Super B

DOE 8/21-22/06R. Prepost10 BaBar System Work - Band RPC Management RPC Studies and Gas Chemistry Forward EndCap Upgrade RPC Operations – Band and Students BaBar Particle ID –Flood/Hollar/Band Muon Identification

DOE 8/21-22/06R. Prepost11 Near Term Plans (Analyses using 400 fb –1 ) –Complete D mixing analysis Use complete dataset through 2006 (K. Flood) –Complete b  s l + l – analysis including asymmetries Improvements from NN  ID and reconstruction of several X s final states, much like in Eichenbaum b  s  analysis (K. Flood) –Continue Global analysis of CKM parameters Add new results from BaBar and Belle (M. Pierini) –Time dependent CP asymmetries Update of B  K K K analyses (M. Pierini) Update of B  K  0  analysis (M. Pierini) New study of B  K  +  – analysis (M. Pierini) –Rare decays Finish B  l + l – analysis (M. Pierini) –Recoil technique to study difficult rare decays (C. Vuosalo) Improve the technique to study, e.g., B  K   and B  K 

DOE 8/21-22/06R. Prepost12 Long Term Plans (Analyses using 1 ab –1 ) –Exclusive B  K*  & semi-inclusive b  s  A CP and  I measurements continue to be sensitive –Semi-inclusive b  s l + l – Improve A CP and forward-backward asymmetry zero-crossing point –B   / B  K*  Improve V td /V ts to compete with mixing measurement –Measure CKM parameters in rare decays Continue to probe for deviations from Standard Model –Recoil method Fully reconstruct one B to reduce backgrounds –Reduced signal statistics compensated by improved systematics Access to rare decays with neutrinos, K, K  … Cleaner samples of inclusive decays of the other B –Lepton flavor violating  decays Similar to the recoil method

DOE 8/21-22/06R. Prepost13 Papers Eichenbaum PRL 93, (2004); PRD 72, (2005). Ping/Dasu PRD 70, (2004); PRL 94, (2005). Hollar Lepton Photon 05 Paper; PRD 73, (2006). Band (IFR) NIM A552, 27 (2005); NIM A539, 155 (2005); NIM A538, 801 (2005). Prepost Appl. Phys Lett. 85, 2640 (2004). Pierini JHEP 0603, 080 (2006); PRD 72, (2005); PRD 71, (2005); PRL 95, (2005).

DOE 8/21-22/06R. Prepost14 TALKS Conference Presentations 05-06

DOE 8/21-22/06R. Prepost15 TALKS (Continued)

DOE 8/21-22/06R. Prepost16 ILC Polarized Source Proposal to LC Accelerator R&D at Universities. Awards FY05 and FY06 of $34.6k/FY Budget for X-Ray Analysis, SIMS Analyses and Photoluminescence Hardware. Group expands effort to include full electron polarized source system.

DOE 8/21-22/06R. Prepost17 Components of Polarized Source R&D Source Laser R&D Photocathode Structures Measurement of Photocathode Spin Relaxation Times: Faraday Rotation (new experiment & setup)

DOE 8/21-22/06R. Prepost18 Polarized Source R&D Program

DOE 8/21-22/06R. Prepost19

DOE 8/21-22/06R. Prepost20 Source Laser Block Diagram Wisconsin Hardware Pockels Cell & Amplifier

DOE 8/21-22/06R. Prepost21 Wisconsin Hardware

DOE 8/21-22/06R. Prepost22 New SBIR with SVT Associates Completed 2002 Phase 2 SBIR Study of GaAs/GaAsP Superlattice. Submitted new Phase 1 SBIR for Study of GaAs/InGaP Superlattice. Approved “Highly Polarized Photocathodes Via Minimization of Spin Relaxation InGaP has lower spin relaxation than GaAsP: expect reduced depolarization. Also expect Quantum Efficiency Enhancement.

SVT SBIR Phase I Structures GaAs/InGaP strained superlattice

DOE 8/21-22/06R. Prepost24 Three structures with 1.25% lattice mismatch Ec (eV) Ev (eV) Strained wells Strained barriers HH LH

DOE 8/21-22/06R. Prepost25 Structures Strained wells 1) 5 nm GaAs cap Be: 1x10^19 2) 4 nm In(0.32)Ga(0.68)P Be: 1x10^17 3) 4 nm GaAs Be: 1x10^17 repeat 2) and 3) 12 times 4) 2.5 um In(0.32)Ga(0.68)P Be: 5x10^18 5) 2.5 um In(x)Ga(1-x)P x=0.48 -> 0.32 Be: 5x10^18 6) In(0.48)Ga(0.52)P buffer lattice- matched to GaAs 7) GaAs substrate Strained Barriers 1) 5 nm GaAs cap Be: 1x10^19 2) 4 nm In(0.65)Ga(0.35)P Be: 1x10^17 3) 4 nm GaAs Be: 1x10^17 repeat 2) and 3) 12 times 4) 1 um Al(0.3)Ga(0.7)As Be: 5x10^18 5) GaAs buffer 6) GaAs substrate = 767 nm E hh-lh = 109 meV = 832 nm E hh-lh = 62 meV

DOE 8/21-22/06R. Prepost26 SVT SBIR Phase-I Wafers I) Strained wells – SVT ) 5 nm GaAs cap Be: 1x10^19 2) 4 nm In(0.31)Ga(0.69)P Be: 1x10^17 3) 4 nm GaAs Be: 1x10^17 repeat 2) and 3) 12 times 4) 2.5 um In(0.31)Ga(0.69)P Be: 5x10^18 5) 2.5 um In(x)Ga(1-x)P x=0.48 -> 0.31 Be: 5x10^18 6) In(0.48)Ga(0.52)P buffer lattice-matched to GaAs 7) GaAs substrate II) Strained barrier – SVT ) 5 nm GaAs cap Be: 1x10^19 2) 4 nm In(0.65)Ga(0.35)P Be: 1x10^17 3) 1.5 nm GaAs Be: 1x10^17 repeat 2) and 3) 18 times 4) 1 um Al(0.3)Ga(0.7)As Be: 5x10^18 5) GaAs buffer 6) GaAs substrate SVT nm In(0.65)Ga(0.35)P 4 nm GaAs Three wafers have been grown.

DOE 8/21-22/06R. Prepost27 Polarization and QE SVT-3039 First Measurements Will re-measure all three samples. Will X-ray all three samples.

DOE 8/21-22/06R. Prepost28 Faraday Effect Rotation to Measure Spin Relaxation Times Prepare Pump/Probe Laser Pulses with Variable Probe Delay Time. Pump with Circularly Polarized Light to Create Polarized Electrons in the Conduction Band. Probe with Linearly Polarized Light Laser Pulse at Time t wrt Pump. Measure the Rotation Angle of the Linear Polarization as a Function of time t. The Rotation Angle is Proportional to the Polarization. A Series of Measurements will give P(t) and thus the Relaxation  Requires a laser with femtosecond pulses to be able to measure picosecond values of .

DOE 8/21-22/06R. Prepost29 Status of Faraday Rotation Experiment Femtosec laser to be delivered to Wisconsin on Sep. 1. The laser will be tested at Wisconsin. 480 V power and AC crash buttons installed. Argon Ion laser can be operated. Fieguth, Bower, and Schmerge came to the lab on Aug. 10 to go over the SOP and laser safety issues. –Interlock switches need to be installed. –New goggles to be purchased. –SOP to be revised. Shooting for a laser safety approval in mid September.

DOE 8/21-22/06R. Prepost30 Faraday Rotation Laser