ACADEMIC PUBLISHING How a manuscript becomes an article.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Peer Review Process and Responding to Reviewers APS Professional Skills Course: Writing and Reviewing for Scientific Journals.
Advertisements

Feminism & Psychology Publishing Workshop Virginia Braun (& Nicola Gavey) Incoming Co-editor(s)
Work Flows of the Online Review System Copernicus Office Editor Copernicus Publications | April 2014.
Journal of Social Work Education Editor in Chief S usan P. Robbins, Ph.D., LCSW UNIVERSITYofHOUSTON.
What happens after submission? Sadeghi Ramin, MD Nuclear Medicine Research Center, Mashhad University of Medical Sciences.
Submission Process. Overview Preparing for submission The submission process The review process.
GETTING PUBLISHED Chapter 18.
1) You as the publisher, submit the article directly to PubMed Central after acceptance. 2) The publication contract sent to the author,
University of Ottawa Medical Journal Workshop Feb 11, 2014 Diane Kelsall MD MEd Deputy Editor, CMAJ and Editor, CMAJ Open.
Webinar January 30, 2012 Dr. Rhonda Phillips Editor, Community Development.
Publishing Journal Articles Simon Hix Prof. of European & Comparative Politics LSE Government Department My experience How journals work Choosing a journal.
Publication Process Submitting and peer review. Overview Submit –Where to submit –How to submit Editor –Sends to Reviewers –Reads it themselves –Send.
Manuscript Preparation Step by Step Guide
Getting Your Article Published: The Mysteries of Peer-Review and the Decisions of Journals Howard Bauchner, MD, FAAP, FRCPCH Editor-in-Chief, ADC Professor.
The Rosabeth Moss Kanter Award Module 2, Class 2 A Teaching Module Developed by the Curriculum Task Force of the Sloan Work and Family Research Network.
How does the process work? Submissions in 2007 (n=13,043) Perspectives.
Reasons of rejection Paolo Russo Università di Napoli Federico II Dipartimento di Fisica Napoli, Italy 8th ECMP, Athens, Sep. 13th,
Some Suggested Guidelines for Publishing in “A” Journals Rick Iverson 1.Contribution of your work: Originality of ideas  Demonstrate how have you extended.
Manuscript Writing and the Peer-Review Process
Publishing a Journal Article: An Overview of the Process Barbara Gastel, MD, MPH Texas A&M University
Publication Process Submitting and peer review. Overview Submit –Where to submit –How to submit Editor –Sends to Reviewers –Reads it themselves –Sends.
Top Ten Ways to Get Published (in a scholarly journal) with apologies to David Letterman Jim Levin Education Studies University of California, San Diego.
Writing and Reviewing Papers for Medical Physics
Publishing the Scholarly Article. Why publish? Scholarship is meant to be shared. –How else will your work encourage social change? –Publications are.
Give Your Online Teaching a JOLT Michelle Pilati, PhD Professor of Psychology Rio Hondo College Edward H. Perry, PhD Professor of Mechanical Engineering.
So you want to publish an article? The process of publishing scientific papers Williams lab meeting 14 Sept 2015.
Thomas HeckeleiPublishing and Writing in Agricultural Economics 1 … 4 The review process  Overview  The author’s role  The referee’s role  The editor’s.
A Tutorial for Associate Editors (AEs) 5 May 2013.
Passive vs. Active voice Carolyn Brown Taller especializado de inglés científico para publicaciones académicas D.F., México de junio de 2013 UNDERSTANDING.
Writing a Research Manuscript GradWRITE! Presentation Student Development Services Writing Support Centre University of Western Ontario.
The Publication Process. Publication Steps Pre-Submission Initial Submission Behind the Scenes First Response Revise and Resubmit Revise for Submission.
THE REVIEW PROCESS –HOW TO EFFECTIVELY REVISE A PAPER David Smallbone Professor of Entrepreneurship and Small Business, SBRC, Kingston University Associate.
What Does it Take to Publish in the AJAE? Get a good idea. Turn the idea into a well-posed, answerable question. Do the research right. Write Effectively.
REVIEWING MANUSCRIPTS TIPS FOR REVIEWING MANUSCRIPTS IN PEER REVIEWED JOURNALS Bruce Lubotsky Levin, DrPH, MPH Associate Professor & Head Dept. of Community.
FOR 500 The Publication Process Karl Williard & John Groninger.
Giving Your Vitae a JOLT Michelle Pilati Professor of Psychology Rio Hondo College Edward H. Perry Professor of Mechanical Engineering University of Memphis.
AuthorAID Workshop on Research Writing Tanzania June 2010.
IADSR International Conference 2012 Aiwan-e-Iqbal Lahore, Pakistan 27–29 April 2012.
Manuscript Review Prepared by Noni MacDonald MD FRCPc Editor-in-Chief Paediatrics and Child Health Former Editor-in -Chief CMAJ
Jim Neaton PubH 8403 Presentation. Perspective of an Editor: How it Works Controlled Clinical Trials (now Clinical Trials) –25 Associate Editors; a Book.
Science & Engineering Research Support soCiety Guest Editor Guidelines for Special Issue 1. Quality  Papers must be double -blind.
Guide for AWS Reviewers Lois A. Killewich, MD PhD AWS AJS Editorial Board.
Publishing Papers© Dr. Ayman Abdel-Hamid, CS5014, Fall CS5014 Research Methods in CS Dr. Ayman Abdel-Hamid Computer Science Department Virginia.
Dr. Sundar Christopher Navigating Graduate School and Beyond: Sow Well Now To Reap Big Later Writing Papers.
Thank You for Serving as a Reviewer for Obstetrics & Gynecology 2010 Year in Review James R. Scott, MD, Editor-in-Chief John T. Queenan, MD, Deputy Editor.
Dr Karen Smith Educational Development Unit. We will (briefly) cover:  the mechanics of getting published in journals  how to choose the right journal.
Jim Neaton PubH 8400 December 12, Perspective of an Editor: How it Works Controlled Clinical Trials (now Clinical Trials) –25 Associate Editors;
How to Get Published: Surviving in the Academic World Stephen E. Condrey, Ph.D. Vice President, American Society for Public Administration Editor-in-Chief,
Publishing research in a peer review journal: Strategies for success
Work Flows of the Online Review System Copernicus Office Editor
Manuscript Submission and Review: Perspective of an Editor and Author
Survive Peer Reviews: How to Respond to Peer Reviewers Comments
GETTING PUBLISHED IN URBAN LIBRARY JOURNAL
Publishing a paper.
APHE Editorial Process
BUILDING “JOURNAL KARMA”: Tips for reviewing manuscripts to uphold integrity of peer review process and enhance the quality of paper Bruce Lubotsky Levin,
The Role of the Editor Maria J Grant
Role of peer review in journal evaluation
How to Publish with IEEE
IEEE Transactions on Evolutionary Computation Status Report
Journal of Social Work Education Former Editor-in-Chief Susan P
Academic Writing and Publishing
Information Literacy Peer Reviewed Sources
Adam J. Gordon, MD MPH FACP DFASAM
Journal of Social Work Education Former Editor-in-Chief Susan P
Advice on getting published
Chapter 18: Submitting a paper
Scholarly Writing: Term Papers to Publication
Launch And Information Session
Presentation transcript:

ACADEMIC PUBLISHING How a manuscript becomes an article

Overview of Process

Submission The author(s) decide(s) upon a journal for submission The author(s) research(es) the types of manuscripts accepted by that journal and the guidelines/requirements for that submission The author(s) write(s) a cover letter specifically addressing the journal guidelines The author(s) submit(s) the article, typically using an online system

Types of Submissions Every journal is different, so you must do your research!

Assignment The administrator assigns the manuscript to an editor-in-chief (EIC) The EIC reads it and makes sure it is appropriate for peer review If it is not appropriate (quality is too low or the topic is outside the scope of the journal) it is desk-rejected and the author(s) get(s) notified If it is appropriate, it gets assigned to an associate editor (AE) with expertise in that field

Peer Review The associate editor (AE) is responsible for carrying out the peer review process Reviewers with appropriate expertise are identified and invited to review The peer review process is blinded (i.e. the reviewers do not know who the author is and the authors do not know who the reviewers are) Typically three outside reviews are completed before a decision is made about a manuscript

Possible Decisions Acceptance (rare) Conditional Acceptance - revisions must be made, but it does not need to go back out for peer review Rejection with encouragement to revise and resubmit - authors can address the concerns in the reviews and resubmit; goes back out for peer review Rejection after peer review

Editors’ Feedback At the ER, we strive to provide authors with high quality, constructive feedback This ensures the integrity of the journal and educational research in general

Decision Time The AE makes a decision based on the reviewers' comments and recommendations This decision gets approved by the EIC The authors get notified, and get copies of the reviews (without identifying information) The reviewers get notified of the final decision and get copies of the other reviews (this is blinded) If the decision is acceptance, it gets published! If they are not rejected, they are often a conditional acceptance, so the editors work with the authors on the revisions

Decision Process

Wait Time The entire publication process can take 6 months to a year; authors should get notified of a decision within 3 months, however, there are many roadblocks (getting reviewers to agree and get the review in on time, mediating contrary reviews, multiple revisions, etc.); if they are accepted, manuscripts go into the queue for publication

Submission Stats (ER)

Remember…. Every journal is different—Submission requirements, acceptance rates, scope, etc. ER rates It is RARE that a paper is accepted on the first round Do not get discouraged! 1. Rate of desk rejection51.2% 2. Rate of rejection after review19.8% 3. Rate of acceptance15.4%

Questions?