Using the Interactive Whiteboard to Model Higher Order Thinking Skills.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
What do you know about the Rigor/Relevance framework?
Advertisements

Thinking Skills and Personal Capabilities Unit 1
Literacy Across Learning for Managers 25 August 2009 and 23 February 2010.
Effective Questioning
Benjamin Samuel Bloom, one of the greatest minds to influence the field of education, was born on February 21, 1913 in Lansford, Pennsylvania. As a.
What makes effective questioning? How can you use questioning to differentiate? Questioning.
Balanced Literacy J McIntyre Belize.
REVISED BLOOM’S TAXONOMY BY FAIZA RANI DA MHS PHASE- IV REVISED BLOOM’S TAXONOMY BY FAIZA RANI DA MHS PHASE- IV.
Intellectual Challenge of Teaching
Continuous Professional Development in Mathematics
Communication & Educational Models. Communication n Process of sending and receiving messages n Transmission requires a mutual understanding between communicator.
Teaching and Learning with Case Studies. Agenda Understand how a case study is different How to effectively use a case study How to expand a case study.
6 th Grade 2013 INTRODUCTION TO BLOOM’S TAXONOMY.
6 th Grade 2013 INTRODUCTION TO BLOOM’S TAXONOMY.
Thinking, reasoning and working mathematically
Learning Goals and Alignment: What, Why, How Joshua Caulkins Department of Geosciences University of Rhode Island.
Science Inquiry Minds-on Hands-on.
Wednesday 16 June 2010 e5 ELABORATE. Justine kate slide Refresher e5 PLEASE FORWARD.
UNIT 9. CLIL THINKING SKILLS
Module 1: A Closer Look at the Common Core State Standards for Mathematics High School Session 2: Matching Clusters of Standards to Critical Areas in one.
Assessment and differentiation with Bloom’s Taxonomy
Higher-order Thinking at Otahuhu Intermediate. He who learns but does not think is lost (Chinese Proverb)
We learned about what powerful social studies instruction entails According to the NCSS social studies is most powerful when it is: Meaningful – Students.
Math Log #2 Student A, B, and C(ordered from left to right) are walking down the hall and get stopped by administration. Which student(s) will receive.
Reading at Brightwalton Reading for enjoyment is encouraged and fostered. Reading is taught in small groups. Reading skills are applied across the whole.
The New Studies of Religion Syllabus Implementation Package: Session Two.
Effective Lesson Planning EnhanceEdu. Agenda  Objectives  Lesson Plan  Purpose  Elements of a good lesson plan  Bloom’s Taxonomy – it’s relevance.
Sample Questions Task-Based Activities Define each level shallow processing, simply recalling Demonstrate understanding Knowing when and why to apply.
Ferris Bueller: Voodoo Economics Voodoo_Economics_Anyone_Anyone. mp4Voodoo_Economics_Anyone_Anyone. mp4.
Building Assessments with Differentiation in Mind Fonda Vadnais
LESSON STUDY INSTRUCTIONAL LEARNING TEAMS – LIVING WITHIN A PROFESSIONAL LEARNING COMMUNITY By Nancy J. Larsen, Ph.D.
Who is Benjamin Bloom? Bloom developed the “Taxonomy of Cognitive Objectives.” In the 1950’s, the taxonomy was developed by Benjamin Bloom, a professor.
DA DEGREE COLLEGE, PH-VI SEEMAB QADEER Assistant Professor DEPARTMENT OF ECONOMICS 1 ACTION PLAN.
Bloom’s Taxonomy.
The City School O Levels Economics INSET 2010 The best teachers are those who equip students to THINK for themselves.
Wilkes County Schools Tracee McManus & Nikki Patrick.
Bloom’s Taxonomy.
Inquiry-Based Learning How It Looks, Sounds and Feels.
From Here to There “ From Here to There ” Louise Van de Water Kelston Girls College.
Shake it up, baby! Differentiation in middle and high school classrooms. Tanya B. O’Berry.
ACTION PLAN Sana Adnan The City School Senior Girls Branch P.E.C.H.S.
Constructing Knowledge “The single most important factor influencing learning is what the learner already knows.”
Wednesday 16 June 2010 e5 A closer look atELABORATE.
INTEGRATED SCIENCE PROCESS SKILLS BASIC SCIENCE PROCESS SKILLS
Teaching and Thinking According to Blooms Taxonomy human thinking can be broken down into six categories.
Year 1 and 2. This was planned just before Hanan Harrison’s first visit with the cluster. It shows that we are trying to integrate curricula areas and.
E5 – An Instructional Model in a P-6 Mathematics classroom Andrea Hillbrick.
Mrs. Kenny Sophomore Seminar February 2011 Name: ____________________________.
How to structure good history writing Always put an introduction which explains what you are going to talk about. Always put a conclusion which summarises.
Classroom Strategies That Work. Questions, Cues, and Advance Organizers Helping Students Activate Prior Knowledge.
Original Terms New Terms
Bloom’s Taxonomy The Concept of “Levels of Thinking”
A Guide to Higher Order Thinking Questions. Bloom’s Taxonomy Benjamin Bloom (1956) developed a classification of levels of intellectual behavior in learning.
Presented by Ms. Vayas At Bancroft MS March 25, 2008.
Cognitive explanations of learning Esther Fitzpatrick.
Writing Learning Outcomes Best Practices. Do Now What is your process for writing learning objectives? How do you come up with the information?
Planning for Instruction and Assessments. Matching Levels Ensure that your level of teaching matches your students’ levels of knowledge and thinking.
The mind is not a vessel to be filled, but a fire to be ignited. welcome To Every body.
Higher Order Thinking Skills
Strategies That Support Differentiated Processing
Using Bloom’s Taxonomy
Planning questioning into lessons
Strategies That Support Differentiated Processing
Critical thinking in Health and Physical education
BLOOM’s Taxonomy Parent Information Session: Monday 23rd April 2018.
Bloom's Revised Taxonomy.
Writing Learning Outcomes
Knowledge Arrange Define Duplicate Label List
Presentation transcript:

Using the Interactive Whiteboard to Model Higher Order Thinking Skills.

In an ever changing world our students will need to develop skills to: - Solve problems - Think creatively – invent and generate new ideas and knowledge - Think critically – challenge, debate, refute, acknowledge - Make decisions – compare, analyse, select, justify - Analyse/evaluate information and ideas - Make predictions and plan for future and changing events.

Higher Order Thinking activities are one of many learning process that can be used to assist our students as they meet the challenges of the modern world. As teachers we can create Higher Order Thinking activities across all curriculum areas from Prep to Year 12. In many cases we only have to make slight adjustments to our current teaching practise to be using Higher Order Thinking approaches.

What is Higher Order Thinking? Higher Order Thinking occurs when students combine facts and ideas then synthesise, generalise, explain, hypothesise and are able to arrive at some conclusion or interpretation. Higher Order Thinking activities allow students to manipulate information and ideas to solve problems, gain understanding and discover new meaning. Department of Education, Qld. – A Guide to Productive Pedagogies: Classroom Reflection Manual.

When students are engaged in Higher Order Thinking activities an element of uncertainty is introduced into the instructional process and the outcomes are not always predictable or necessarily the same. This can be confronting, as teachers are not certain what the students might produce. However as students skills develop they become producers of knowledge. The teachers task is to create activities or environments that allow students the opportunity to engage in Higher Order Thinking. Department of Education, Qld. – A Guide to Productive Pedagogies: Classroom Reflection Manual.

Students are only engaged in Lower Order Thinking when they: - Receive information - Recite facts - Recall information - Regurgitate information (locate, cut, paste, present) - Participate in routine practice. It does not mean that teachers should not include Lower Order Thinking activities in their day to day teaching. They have their place and are powerful approaches to consolidate skills.

How often have we given students the task to provide information on a given country? We set criteria, explain how we would like it presented, discuss research skills and help students start the task. Are we in fact just regurgitating facts? Is this a Higher Order or Lower Order Thinking activity?

If we changed the focus of this activity could we make it a more Higher Order Thinking activity. Remember most Higher Order Thinking activities include aspects of the three top levels of Bloom’s Revised Taxonomy, that is the art of analysing, evaluating and creating.

Instead of gathering information on one country what could the outcome be if we decided to compare two countries. Students could research, analyse, evaluate and compare each countries cultures, physical attributes, agriculture, religion, food, dress, language, etc. Could they compare how different cultural expectations influence peoples way of life?

The following Interactive Whiteboard activity has been changed from a Lower Order Thinking activity to a Higher Order Thinking activity. In its Lower Order Thinking form we could create a number of ‘_at’ words and ‘_ot’ and scatter them individually on the IWB screen. We would then make two boxes. One labelled ‘at words’ and the other labelled ‘ot words’. The students task would be to drag each word into the appropriate box.

hot pot cot ot wordsat words dot bat mat cat fat rat got

We can change this activity to a Higher Order Thinking activity by allowing the students to categorise words by using their 'eye', 'mind' and 'ear'. eye – to see the similarity mind – to think about a similarity ear – to hear the similarity It is their task to categorise these words according to headings they establish. How do we do this?

1.The teacher can pre-type the words on the IWB or type the words up while the group watches. 2.Put the students in groups and create an IWB page for each group. (Copy and paste using the ‘storyboard’ in Easiteach.) 3.Give each group a piece of paper and ask them to put the words in groups. Don’t give them clues. Let them decide on the categories. Will it be letter patterns, will it be starting letters, will it be objects, etc.

4. Can the students add other words that are not listed, yet still fit the categories they have established 5. Each group can now use the wireless key board to arrange the words using the categorising approaches they decided on. - Can the other groups see how the words have been categorised? - Can the group explain its conclusions? - The group could add pictures, boxes or shapes to help organise their work.

hop pat pot mop rat rot cot chop dot mat sat top hot got pop bat cat fat Group 1 hat