Jet Validation Kittikul Kovitanggoon*, Chiyoung Jeog, Sung-Won Lee Texas Tech University 1.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
GCT Software Jim Brooke GCT ESR, 7 th November 2006.
Advertisements

Transverse momentum of Z bosons in Zee and Zmm decays Daniel Beecher 12 December 2005.
1 B-tagging meeting overview Li bo Shandong University.
On Calorimeter Thresholds for Jet Reconstruction Marek Zieliński ( Rochester) Jet MET, 12 February 2008.
Overview of results on trigger efficiencies for ttbar CSA07 samples (Part of the work towards AN note: Trigger performance for top events: evaluation,
JetMET DQM Status Kenichi Hatakeyama, Anwar Bhatti, Frank Chlebana, Jared Sturdy DQM Meeting November 4th, 2008.
LPC Jet/Met meeting 1/12/2006L. Perera1 Jet/Calorimeter Cluster Energy Corrections – Status Goal: To improve the individual jet energy determination based.
US LPC Muon Group CMSSW code development efforts N. Terentiev Carnegie Mellon University CMS EMU Meeting, Florida Institute of Technology February 17-18,
1 N. Davidson Calibration with low energy single pions Tau Working Group Meeting 23 rd July 2007.
Introduction to Hadronic Final State Reconstruction in Collider Experiments Introduction to Hadronic Final State Reconstruction in Collider Experiments.
Energy Flow and Jet Calibration Mark Hodgkinson Artemis Meeting 27 September 2007 Contains work by R.Duxfield,P.Hodgson, M.Hodgkinson,D.Tovey.
Preliminary comparison of ATLAS Combined test-beam data with G4: pions in calorimetric system Andrea Dotti, Per Johansson Physics Validation of LHC Simulation.
Sung-Won Lee 1 Study of Hadronic W Decays in the Jets + MET Final LHC Kittikul Kovitanggoon * & Sung-Won Lee Texas Tech University Michael Weinberger.
73X Validation, Feb. 23 rd, 2015 Robert Schöfbeck, Mariarosaria D’Alfonso, Matthias Weber report on 73X rereco Feb. 23 th, 2015 Robert Schoefbeck, Mariarosaria.
Sung-Won Lee 1 Study of Hadronic W Decays in the Jets + MET Final State Study of Hadronic W Decays in the Jets + MET Final State Kittikul Kovitanggoon.
Jets at CMS Fedor Ratnikov, University of Maryland MIT, August 1, 2008.
Detector Diagnostics Calibration Analysis Ped/LED/Laser RadDam Analysis Detector Optimization Lumi Detector Performance Monitoring DQM On/Offline Prompt.
CHEP06, Mumbai-India, Feb 2006V. Daniel Elvira 1 The CMS Simulation Validation Suite V. Daniel Elvira (Fermilab) for the CMS Collaboration.
Ratio of Three over Two Jet Cross Sections: Update 36 pb -1 P.Kokkas, I.Papadopoulos, C.Fountas University of Ioannina, Greece QCD High p T Meeting 17.
1 High PT Status of data workflow and first analyses plans for October exercise K. Kousouris (Fermilab) K. Rabbertz (University of Karlsruhe)
HCAL DPG Status1 Olga Kodolova / Frank Chlebana HCAL DPG Status Olga Kodolova for the HCAL DPG October 20, 2011.
7 December SLHC Calo Trigger Simulation Status Report Kevin Flood, Michail Bachtis University of Wisconsin, Madison.
JETS 1 Konstantinos Kousouris Fermilab USCMS JTERM III.
Hadronic Event Shapes at 7 TeV with CMS Detector S,Banerjee, G. Majumdar, MG + ETH, Zurich CMS PAS QCD M. Guchait DAE-BRNS XIX High Energy Physics.
Jet Validation of Summer11 MC Artur Apresyan Caltech Joanna Weng ETH Zurich Kittikul Kovitanggoon Texas Tech University 1.
ICD Studies Problem and MG Bug Fix Remaining Horns Confirmation with Tracks In MC Stephanie Beauceron Gregorio Bernardi LPNHE-Paris.
1 Silke Duensing DØ Analysis Status NIKHEF Annual Scientific Meeting Analysing first D0 data  Real Data with:  Jets  Missing Et  Electrons 
HCAL General Meeting: DPG Status1 Olga Kodolova / Frank Chlebana HCAL DPG Status Olga Kodolova Frank Chlebana HCAL General Meeting Apr 21, 2011.
1 Hadronic Event Shape Variables in pp collision at 7 TeV Introduction Data-set and Event Selection Comparison of Basic Jet Objects in Data and MC Event.
Update on Diffractive Dijet Production Search Hardeep Bansil University of Birmingham Birmingham ATLAS Weekly Meeting 24/01/2013.
1 Checks on SDD Data Piergiorgio Cerello, Francesco Prino, Melinda Siciliano.
November, 15 HCAL General S. Banerjee, O. Kodolova1 HCAL DPG report Sunanda Banerjee – SINP Olga Kodolova – SINP MSU November 15, 2012.
Diffractive Dijet Production Issues with Analysis Hardeep Bansil Birmingham Weekly ATLAS Meeting 15/09/2011.
Current Analysis Activity/Results (Only brief overview) Sunil Bansal (Panjab University, Chandigarh) Approved results marked.
Reconstruction of Z->tt->e+t jet events with early data in CMS Konstantinos A. Petridis IOP Conference Lancaster 31st March 2008 Overview Motivation.
Update on Diffractive Dijet Production Search Hardeep Bansil University of Birmingham Soft QCD WG Meeting 29/04/2013.
24/08/2009 LOMONOSOV09, MSU, Moscow 1 Study of jet transverse structure with CMS experiment at 10 TeV Natalia Ilina (ITEP, Moscow) for the CMS collaboration.
Monika Grothe, DQM for MC from EWK PAG, Sep DQM for MC from EWK PAG Monika Grothe U Wisconsin September Currently 3 modules: 1.EwkDQM in.
DN/d  and dN/dp T analysis status Gabor Veres for the working group QCD meeting, Jan 12, 2010.
394 Data ValSkim Validation JetMET DQM and Validation Group.
Update on Diffractive Dijets Hardeep Bansil University of Birmingham 12/07/2013.
New Cell Energy Density weights and scale factors parameterization MC09 Belen Salvachua High Energy Physics Division Argonne National Laboratory Sebastian.
CMS week1 Agenda Sarah Eno: Status of project Volker Drollinger: jet energy scale and top mass Ritua Kinnunen: Higgs mass resolution E. Doroshkevic:
JetMET Status and Plans Robert Harris and Daniele del Re February 10, 2011.
Update on Diffractive Dijets Search Hardeep Bansil University of Birmingham SM Soft QCD meeting 12/12/2011.
Electron Identification Efficiency from Z→ee Maria Fiascaris University of Oxford In collaboration with Tony Weidberg and Lucia di Ciaccio ATLAS UK SM.
Current Status of the Tracking Trigger Software Andrew W. Rose.
JetMET basic result for pp & status report 19 Jan 2010 University of Seoul Kang Seo Kon [High-pT ] Heavy Ion subgroup meeting.
R. Croft, Exclusive Diffractive Higgs Signal at L1, Jan 2005 Diffractive Higgs Events in the L1 Trigger ( Work in progress ) Richard Croft, University.
H->WW->lνlν Analysis - Improvements and results - - Data and MC - Higgs Working group meeting, 6 January 2011 Magda Chełstowska & Rosemarie Aben.
Diffractive Dijet Production: Update on analysis issues Hardeep Bansil Birmingham Weekly ATLAS Meeting 22/09/2011.
Jet Energy Scale and Calibration Framework
RPC Data Certification
Electroweak Physics Towards the CDR
Electroweak Physics Towards the CDR
University of Seoul 26 Sep 2009 Seokon Kang*, Minkyoo Choi
Effect of t42 algorithm on jets
Efficiency of Muon Reconstruction
Electroweak Physics Towards the CDR
CMS status A walk through the performance of CMS at LHC
HCAL DPG News Sunanda Banerjee – SINP Olga Kodolova – SINP MSU
First physics from the ALICE electromagnetic calorimeters
tt+jets simulation comparisons
CMS Pixel Data Quality Monitoring
RecoTracks Revisited.
EW precision measurement at Z pole
Comparing RS RecoTracks to CTF RecoTracks
Feb. 25,2009 Jongseok Lee (Sungkyunkwan University)
LC Calorimeter Testbeam Requirements
Peter Loch University of Arizona Tucson, Arizona USA
Presentation transcript:

Jet Validation Kittikul Kovitanggoon*, Chiyoung Jeog, Sung-Won Lee Texas Tech University 1

Jet Collections 2

Jet Collections with Algorithms Icone5 Calo Jets Icone5 Pflow Kt4 Calo Jets Kt6 Calo Jets AntiKt5 Calo Jets AntiKt5 JPT AntiKt5 PFlow AntiKt7 Calo Jets 3

Histograms to Validate Jet energy Jet Momentum Jet pT - Jet pT scale Jet Mass Jet η and φ Em Energy Had energy HF Gen Jet - pT, η,and φ Miscellaneous - Leading Jet Energy and pT - Had and Em timing - Dijet Mass L2L3 Corrected Jets pT in AK jets - pT ratio wrt η - pT ratio wrt pT 4

5 Validation Procedures After the MC RelVals for new version of CMSSW are released and posted on HN. We pick up the jet datasets like QCD and TTbar to be run on our validation module. We compare the histograms between new version and previous version. If no discrepancy is indicated, we report this version pass. If discrepancy is indicated, we ask the experts what causes this discrepancy. The validation result can be found at

Histograms The black dot histogram is for new release. Red line filled histogram is for reference. 6 Jet EnergyEm energy Fraction of Jets

Histograms Corrected jets The black dot histogram is for new release. Red line filled histogram is for reference. 7 Corrected jet pTCorrected jet pT ratio

Jet Validation in Winter 2010 CMSSW ReleaseValidation status 3_11_0_pre5 64 bit wrt 32 bitPass 3_11_0_pre5 64 bitPass HF timing is changed (Fullsim) HF response improve (Fastsim) 3_10_1Pass HF timing is changed (Fullsim) HF response improve (Fastsim) 3_11_0Pass 4_1_0_pre1Pass 4_1_0_pre2Pass 4_2_0_pre1Pass 8

Jet Validation in Winter 2010 CMSSW ReleaseValidation status 4_2_0_pre2Pass 4_2_0_pre4Pass EE SR threshold changes(Fullsim) 3_11_1Pass 4_2_0_pre5Pass 4_2_0_pre6Pass new HCAL MC calibration (Full and Fast) 4_2_0_pre6 HCALPass Confirmed the result HCAL calibration changes 9

3_11_0_ pre5 64 bit and 3_10_1 Time phase and Reco: 4TS->2TS so that the soft part of spectra (noise) and entire HF timing is changed. HF response improve wrt 3110pre3 10 Full Sim HF timing is changed Fast Sim HF response improve

4_2_0_pre4 11 The change is expected due to the changes in the EE SR threshold settings.

4_2_0_ pre6 and 4_2_0_pre6 wrt HCAL 12 There is a substantial effect of SamplingFactors (Digi) and to smaller extent of HcalRespCorrs (Reco) on the HCAL energy scale. HE and HB/HE gap increase is more pronounced than HB one, HF is not affected. 4_2_0_pre6 wrt 420pre5 4_2_0_pre6 wrt HCAL dataset

13 JetMET Data validation We currently look at DQM plots created centrally and posted on DQM GUI This validation using RelVal_run2010B dataset (previous valskim) for this validation We do this validation for every new CMSSW version after MC RelVal validation The black line histogram is for new release. The filled histogram is for reference.

JetMET Data validation 14 CMSSW ReleaseValidation status 3_9_7Pass 3_11_0_pre2Pass 3_11_0_pre3Pass 3_11_0_pre5 64 bit wrt 32 bitPass 3_11_0_pre5 64 bitPass 3_10_1Pass

Conclusion and Plans Jet Validation is moving smoothly. We added corrected jets for AK jets. Implementing our new validation module to the central DQM sequence. 15