Effects of household cleaners on Escherichia coli Brian Agee Undergraduate Microbiology Major Department of Biology Tennessee Technological University.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
THE ANTIBACTERIAL EFFECTS OF MULTI-SURFACE WIPES Courtney Teeple 11 th Grade Western Wayne High School.
Advertisements

Direct Sensitivity Performed when : * Gram stain shows large number of one type of reaction * To get quick result for serious cases * Used only.
Bailey McCue Grade 9.  The purpose of this experiment was to find the weakest solution of bleach in water that would effectively inhibit the growth of.
Do Antibacterial Products Really Kill?. Question Will Germ-X really kill 99.99% of germs on hands, as claimed in their advertisements? Will Germ-X really.
RESULTS With increasing amounts of Novobiocin there was an obvious decrease in survival of colony forming units of bacteria (Fig. 8). Triclosan was more.
Optimal Cutting Board Disinfectants By Joellie Hernandez.
Bacterial lawn Learning objectives
A B C D E F G H I J L K Infectious Diseases Unit 2 Lesson 7 plan.
Bailey McCue Grade 9 Academy of Notre Dame de Namur.
The Effect of Ultra Violet Light Exposure On The Growth of Antibiotic Resistant Bacteria Brad Kauffman, Department of Biology, York College Methods Introduction.
Susceptibility of Antibacterial Chemicals on Pseudomonas aeruginosa Research performed by: Clayton Brady Health Science Biology Major Tennessee Technological.
The Effectiveness of Disinfectants on Pseudomonas fluorescens
Microbiology of Kitchen Sponges Jim Abshire, Maggie Crenshaw May 10, 2006 BSCI 223H.
The Effect of Three Surface Disinfectants on Four Types of Bacteria Done By: Fatimah Al Bazron Undergraduate Student (Microbiology Concentration) Department.
The Effect of Three Surface Disinfectants on Four Types of Bacteria Done By: Fatimah Al Bazron Undergraduate Student (Microbiology Concentration) Department.
Screening for new antibiotics
Microbiology and Cell Culture
Antibiotic susceptibility testing Modified Kirby-Bauer method
Identification of Bacteria by Enzymatic Activitiy Courtney Ballinger Department of Biology, Tennessee Technological University, Cookeville, TN Introduction.
Mouthwash Effectiveness in Eliminating Bacteria By: Matthew Mancuso Department of Biology Tennessee Technological University, Cookeville, TN
PHT 381 Lab # 8. MIC: MIC: It is the lowest concentration of the antimicrobial agent that inhibits the growth of the test organism but not necessarily.
Titles Good and Bad Titles. Below you will find an abstract from one of the Bio3B projects. Which of the following title would be most appropriate for.
ORAL MICROBES  The microorganisms that form the plaque/biofilm on the surfaces of the teeth are mainly Streptococcus mutans.  Other species :- › Streptococcus.
Good Hygiene = Good Health. Facts Did you know? The flu virus can remain active on surfaces for up to 48 hours One single bacterium can become more than.
The Antibiotic Sensitivity Test Presented by Marian Mikhail Undergraduate student Biology Major Health and Science Concentration Health and Science Concentration.
Frequency of Antibiotic Resistance among Bacteria Isolated From a High School Setting Katie Amato Columbia High School.
IN THE NAME OF ALLAH ALMIGHTY THE MOST COMPASSIONATE THE MERCIFUL.
Biosafety.  NO FOOD OR DRINKS!  Wash hands thoroughly  Disinfect counters and work area  Tie hair back  Smock, apron, or lab coat optional  Gloves.
Results Phenylalanine (Figure 1A) P. aeruginosa grew logarithmically in the presence of phenylalanine. P. aeruginosa increased 100 fold over 10 days in.
Antibacterial Inhibition of Common Cooking Spices Against Escherichia coli Mariah Weir Department of Biological Sciences, York College of Pennsylvania.
Study the effect of industrial antibiotics on microbial growth.
Introduction Nutraceuticals: a food that is potentially beneficial to one’s health Many cultures use natural products in remedies to fight illness We sought.
Eric Carnivale Grade 9 Pittsburgh Central Catholic High School.
Antimicrobial Coatings By Nikki Buck and David Brink-Roby Mentors: Danielle Leiske and Alia Mulder.
PHT 416 Lab no 10 Minimum Inhibitory Concentration [MIC]
The Study of Triazine Antimicrobial Compounds Jillian Greenaway New York University Dr. Neville Kallenbach.
Field Turf Microbial Survivorship by Teddy Larkin.
The Effects of Lysol on Living Bacteria Final Platform Presentation Ashley Pruitt Undergraduate Student Health Science Biology concentration Department.
Effects of pH on the Growth of Staphylococcus aureus, Streptococcus bovis, and Escherichia coli species Pam Shelton Biology Undergraduate, Health Science.
Effects of Herbicides on Raphanus sativus Plant Growth Allison Paige Provey Undergraduate Student (Biology, Pre-Pharmacy) Department of Biology Tennessee.
The effect of different disinfectants on sterilizing the bacterial concentration of Staphylococcus epidermidis on computer keyboards Arlen Chen Spring.
It was observed by many employees at a local supermarket that their hands were commonly dirty after handling money. A question arose in that is the money.
Lab 13 Microbial Control with Chemical Agents. Staphylococcus aureus Escherichia coli Do all disinfectants and antiseptics work equally well against.
testing sensitivity of the pathogen to specific antibiotics in order to choose best antimicrobial therapy. judged by determination of MIC and MBC. judged.
Microbiology / Lab. 8. o Culture (Growth) Media I.What is a medium (plural media)? II.What is culture medium? III.What is meant by Inoculation of Media?
How Effective Iodine Is Against Acanthamoeba Paul E. Seibers III Undergraduate Student (Microbiology Concentration) Department of Biology Tennessee Technological.
Bacterial Comparisons Of Used and Unused Medication Vials Whitney Baker Undergraduate Student (Biology-Health Science Concentration) Biology Department.
GK-12 Saturday Workshop December 3, Kirby-Bauer Method The Kirby-Bauer method is the most widely used antibiotic susceptibility test in determining.
Sponge Soup Lab.
IN THE NAME OF ALLAH ALMIGHTY THE MOST COMPASSIONATE THE MERCIFUL.
Susceptibility (Sensitivity) Testing: Results Pharmaceutical Microbiology – Practical Course Semester One_ Sensitivity Results & MIC Broth Dilution/
Bailey McCue Grade 9.  The purpose of this experiment was to find the weakest solution of bleach in water that would effectively kill E. Coli and B.
Introduction Staphylococcus aureus is a pathogen that is common in our surrounding environment. It is “responsible for a wide range of human disease, including.
Mouthwash Effectiveness Against Oral Bacteria David A. Adams Microbiology Undergraduate Tennessee Technological University Cookeville, TN
The Effects of Lysol on Living Bacteria Ashley Pruitt Undergraduate Student Health Science Biology concentration Department of Biology Tennessee Technological.
PHT 226 Lab no 9. MIC: It is the lowest concentration of the antimicrobial agent that inhibits the growth of the test organism but not necessarily kills.
Testing the Efficiency of HindIII Restriction Enzyme at Various Temperatures using Plasmid DNA Kathleen West Marietta Wright, M.S. and Chad Sethman, Ph.
The antimicrobial effect of garlic extract on Escherichia coli.
Microbiological Tests
Purell vs. Liquid Hand Soap: Purell vs. Liquid Hand Soap: which solution is more effective at killing bacteria commonly found on the surface of the hands?
Testing the effects of various disinfectants on the growth of E. coli
Effects of Facial Cleaner on E. coli and Staph
Effects of household cleaners on Escherichia coli
ANTIBIOTIC SENSITIVITY
22 –Bacteriostatic Compounds, and Antibiotic Resistance
Antibiotic Susceptibility Testing
Antibiogram By:Dr. S. S. Khoramrooz In the name of God
By: Sapna Seth, Julia Feldman, & Ashley Elmore
Antibiotic susceptibility testing
Disinfectant Wipe Extract Effects on Bacteria
Presentation transcript:

Effects of household cleaners on Escherichia coli Brian Agee Undergraduate Microbiology Major Department of Biology Tennessee Technological University Cookeville, TN Introduction -Thousands of people develop illnesses due to contact with Escherichia coli everyday. -Over the years, various disinfectants have been developed claiming to reduce the chances of coming into contact with this bacterium. (Levy 2001) -However, every year there are numerous cases in which someone becomes sick due to contact with Escherichia coli. (Rusin 1998) Objective The objective of my experiment is to determine if Escherichia coli is susceptible to common household cleaners, and in the process determine which cleaners are the most effective at inhibiting and killing the bacteria. Hypothesis Escherichia coli will be susceptible to the common household cleaners and therefore will not be able to grow in their presence. Results Assay 1:Disc Diffusion Assay Methods and Materials Two assays were used to determine the cleaning agents effectiveness against Escherichia coli. The procedure for both assays was performed according to that of Dr. Susan Goss. (Goss 2005) Assay 1: Disc Diffusion Assay - Determines the effectiveness of the cleaning agent at inhibiting Escherichia coli. - Each cleaning agent was applied to a disc and placed on a TSA plate with Escherichia coli. - TSA plates were then incubated for 48 hours at 35.6°C. - After the 48 hour incubation, the zone of inhibition was measured in millimeters. Assay 2: Tube Growth Assay - Determines the effectiveness of the cleaning agent as a bactericidal agent. - Escherichia coli was placed into a test tube with each of the cleaning agents and incubated for 48 hours at 35.6°C. - Samples from each test tube were streaked on TSA plates and also placed in the incubators for a period of 48 hours. - If growth occurred on the TSA plate, then the cleaning agent was ineffective at killing Escherichia coli. All cleaning agents that were tested were proven to inhibit Escherichia coli. Clorox bleach was found to be the best inhibitor, with a zone of inhibition 3-4 times greater than any of the other cleaning agents. Assay 2: Tube Growth Assay Conclusions As hypothesized, Escherichia coli was susceptible and did not survive in the presence of all of the cleaning agents. The most effective cleaning agent proved to be Clorox bleach, which had a zone of inhibition 3-4 times larger than any other cleaning agent tested. In order to keep our society healthy, cleaning agents must be used on a daily basis to prevent the spread of bacteria. Acknowledgements I would like to acknowledge Dr. Susan Goss, Professor of Biology at Tennessee Technological University for allowing me to use the Microbiology Laboratory and for all of the assistance that she provided. - All cleaning agents were effective at killing Escherichia coli, even when reduced by 50% concentration. - All cleaning agents were effective at killing Escherichia coli, even when reduced by 50% concentration. - The only growth occurred where the control, which consisted of nutrient broth and Escherichia coli, was streaked. - The only growth occurred where the control, which consisted of nutrient broth and Escherichia coli, was streaked. Cleaning AgentCloudiness (+/-) Growth (+/-) None++ Clorox-- Clorox (50%)-- Germ-X-- Germ-X (50%)-- Ajax-- Ajax (50%) (50%)-- Lysol-- Lysol (50%)-- Vinegar-- Vinegar (50%)--