Alabama Accountability Act Impact on Huntsville City Schools June 18, 2013.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
1 Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) U.S. Department of Education Adapted by TEA September 2003.
Advertisements

Accountability Updates Testing & Evaluation Department May 21, 2014 Mission High School MISSION CISD DEIC MEETING.
Simpson County Schools Accountability Results, Fall of 2013 Franklin-Simpson High School 97 th Percentile* DISTINGUISHED *percentile rank based on 2012.
School Report Cards 2004– The Bottom Line More schools are making Adequate Yearly Progress. Fewer students show serious academic problems (Level.
Lodi Unified School District Accountability Progress Report (APR) & CAHSEE Results Update Prepared for the September 21, 2010 Board of Education.
Subtitle Title I Federal School Accountability Office of School Improvement and Turnaround Indiana Department of Education March 2012.
1 School Designation Detailed Methodology Reward Identify the “highest-performing schools” and “high-progress schools” based in all-students group over.
The Center for the Future of Teaching and Learning The Status of the Teaching Profession 2005 California State University, Office of the Chancellor Policy.
Grade 3-8 English Language Arts and Mathematics Results August 8, 2011.
1 Graduation Rates: Students Who Started 9 th Grade in 2004, 2005, 2006, 2007, and 2008.
New England Common Assessment Program (NECAP) Summary of October 2011 Results Developed for the Providence School Board February 27, 2012 Presented by:
Michigan’s Accountability Scorecards A Brief Introduction.
District Assessment & Accountability Data Board of Education Report September 6, 2011 Marsha A. Brown, Director III – Student Services State Testing and.
Torrance Unified School District Annual Student Achievement Dr. George W. Mannon, Superintendent Dr. E Don Kim, Senior Director of Elementary Education.
Loudon County Schools Student Achievement Data Results
MARSHALL PUBLIC SCHOOLS STATE ACCOUNTABILITY RESULTS Multiple Measurement Rating (MMR) – Initial Designation.
Maryland School Assessment (MSA) 2010 Results Leslie Wilson, Assistant State Superintendent Division of Accountability and Assessment July 20, 2010 State.
Collecting data & information Talking with teachers, administrators, service providers Progress Monitoring Consolidated Planning /Use of Data Alternative.
1 Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) U.S. Department of Education Adapted by TEA Modified by Dr. Teresa Cortez September 10, 2007.
Suspension Data Fall 2009 Compared to Fall Number of Students Suspended – Grade Level.
School Achievement and Progress List Conference Call with Superintendents March 29, 2010.
Data Overview ~ Writing Achievement October 4, 2010 Presentation to South Middle School Seventh Grade Language Arts and Social Studies Teachers In good.
Changes to the School Grading. Student Assessment FCAT 2.0 in Reading and Mathematics Next Generation Sunshine State Standards (NGSSS) with new cut scores.
Public School Accountability System. Background One year ago One year ago –100 percent proficiency required in –AMOs set to increase 7-12 points.
1 Mitchell D. Chester Commissioner of Elementary and Secondary Education Report on Spring 2009 MCAS Results to the Massachusetts Board of Elementary and.
MCC MCA Data Discoveries. What does Minnesota think is important? What do we want kids to do?  Pass important tests “Be Proficient”  Grow.
Arkansas State Report Card Are We 5 th or 49 th ? July 8, 2013 Arkansas Rural Ed Association.
TENNESSEE SUCCEEDS.. In the spring of 2007, the U.S. Chamber of Commerce released an education report card for all states. Tennessee received an “F” in.
Federal and State Student Accountability Data Update Testing Coordinators Meeting Local District 8 09/29/09 1.
1 Accountability Systems.  Do RFEPs count in the EL subgroup for API?  How many “points” is a proficient score worth?  Does a passing score on the.
No Child Left Behind California’s Definition of Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) July 2003.
1 Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) U.S. Department of Education Adapted by TEA Modified by Dr. Teresa Cortez January 2010.
University of Colorado at Boulder National Center for Research on Evaluation, Standards, and Student Testing Challenges for States and Schools in the No.
Annual Progress Report Summary September 12, 2011.
Public School Accountability System. Uses multiple indicators for broad picture of overall performance Uses multiple indicators for broad picture of overall.
Measuring Turnaround Success October 29 th, 2015 Jeanette P. Cornier, Ph.D.
1 Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) U.S. Department of Education Adapted by TEA Modified by Dr. Teresa Cortez September 1, 2008.
1 Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) U.S. Department of Education Adapted by TEA May 2003 Modified by Dr. Teresa Cortez for Riverside Feeder Data Days February.
Minnesota’s Proposed Accountability System “Leading for educational excellence and equity. Every day for every one.”
March 2013 Training Session The content of this PowerPoint is contingent upon approval of the Alabama PLAN 2020 ESEA Flexibility Request by the USDOE.
Testimony to the the Legislative Task Force on School Finance July 31, 2012 Myron Orfield Director Institute on Metropolitan Opportunity University of.
NDE State of the Schools Adequate Yearly Progress Persistently Lowest Achieving Schools Nebraska Performance Accountability System Board of Education.
Legislative Requirement 2013 House File 215. Category Cut Scores Based on a Normal Distribution across Measures.
1. Every Student Succeeds Act ESSA December
1 Graduation Rates: Students Who Started 9 th Grade In 2003, 2004, 2005, 2006, and 2007.
Mount Olive Township Public Schools PARCC Results.
Legislative Requirement 2013
Improvements in Child Nutrition under the leadership of Dr
Huntsville City Schools Student Performance Trends
Accountability in California Before and After NCLB
Bloomington Public Schools Districtwide Achievement Report Including Challenge Index August, 2017.
TESTING, RESEARCH & ACCOUNTABILITY
Network Update Laquita Nelson July 10, 2012.
Huntsville City Schools Superintendent Evaluation
Weaver Elementary School
Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP)
Danvers Public Schools: Our Story
Huntsville City Schools 2014 Summer Feeding Program
Birmingham City Schools Report Card Indicators
Huntsville City Schools – 3rd Benchmark Assessment Report
Technology Update September 4, 2012.
NSTA Summer Congress July, 2002
Student Growth Data by Classroom Teacher and School
NEW STAR Enterprise Student Growth Percentile (SGP)
Summer Feeding Program
Understanding How the Ranking is Calculated
2009 NCLB Blue Ribbon School
Community Eligibility Provision
Network Update July 26, 2012.
Presentation transcript:

Alabama Accountability Act Impact on Huntsville City Schools June 18, 2013

Due to the Alabama Accountability Act Definition of a “Persistently Failing” School, Three of Our Most Improved Schools Are Categorized as Failing Schools Persistently Failing School – Bottom 6% of Schools in the State on the Alabama Reading and Math Test (ARMT) or the High School Graduation Exam (HSGE) in 3 of the Past 6 Years Dawson Elementary 81%77%57%53%55%52% Lakewood Elementary77%64%62%54%60%49% MLK Elementary87%78%60%54%57%53% Under the Alabama Accountability Act These Schools Will Remain Failing Schools Until: Fall of 2014 – Dawson Elementary Fall of 2014 – MLK Elementary Fall of 2015 – Lakewood Elementary Year in Which a School was in the Bottom 6% for Student Achievement Percent of Students Who are Proficient or Advanced on the ARMT

Several of Our Schools on the Failing School List Showed Significant Improvement In Reading & Math Proficiency Over the Past Year 3 Share of Students Proficient at Grade Level School Continued Improvement Improvement

Huntsville Ranked 6th of 134 School Systems In Terms of Percent Increase in Graduation Rate for the 2013 Reporting Period Percentage Point Change in School System Graduation Rate Alabama School Systems Systems with Increasing Graduation Rates Systems with Decreasing Graduation Rates Huntsville City Schools

Under the Accountability Act, Huntsville, With One of the Highest Rates of Graduation Rate Improvements, Now Faces a Potential Loss of $19 Million In State Funding Dawson Elementary Lakewood Elementary MLK Elementary Chapman Middle Davis Hills Middle Ed White Middle Westlawn Middle Butler High Johnson High Across Our 3 “Failing” Elementary Schools, None of Which Met the Criteria for a Failing School Last Year, We Face a Potential Loss of $5.6 Million in Funding Over the Coming Years Across Davis Hills and Westlawn, Which Are Showing Rapid Improvement, We Face a Potential Loss of $5.2 Million in Funding Over the Coming Years Huntsville Already Faces a Loss of $1.2 Million During Due to the Accountability Act’s Creation of a Private School Scholarship Fund. Across Chapman, Ed White, Butler, and Johnson We Face a Potential Loss of $9 Million in Funding Over the Coming Years Note - Due to Its Marked Improvement, Westlawn has been Nominated as a National Model Turnaround School Of Note, While Huntsville is in the Top 4.5% of Systems With Regard to Improvement in Graduation Rates, It Will See the Greatest Negative Impact from the Accountability Act Under the Accountability Act, Huntsville Has 9 Priority Schools:

Student Grade Level Math Proficiency, Grades 1 thru 12 Is Up 26 Percentage Points in the Past Two Years Based Upon STAR Assessments 6 Share of Students Proficient at Grade Level STAR Assessment Period

Student Grade Level Reading Proficiency, Grades 1 thru 12 Is Up 19 Percentage Points Over the Past Two Years Based Upon STAR Assessments 7 Share of Students Proficient at Grade Level STAR Assessment Period