Developing High-Quality Campus Plans for Student Achievement.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Instructional Learning Cycle
Advertisements

1 Phase III: Planning Action Developing Improvement Plans.
Spring ED 7304 Group Presentation Yvonne Avila Darren Cole Patricia Macias Yolanda Ortega.
April 6, 2011 DRAFT Educator Evaluation Project. Teacher Education and Licensure DRAFT The ultimate goal of all educator evaluation should be… TO IMPROVE.
The Marzano School Leadership Evaluation Model Webinar for Washington State Teacher/Principal Evaluation Project.
TeacherSchoolStudent Percentile Average 50 The Effects of Teachers and Schools on Student Achievement Over 2 consecutive years Marzano, R. J. (2003).
1 Introduction to the Professional Teaching and Learning Cycle (PTLC)
Providing High-Quality Professional Development. Session Questions Why is alignment of curriculum, instruction, and assessments to state standards a critical.
1 Why is the Core important? To set high expectations – for all students – for educators To attend to the learning needs of students To break through the.
National Center on Educational Outcomes N C E O Strategies and Tools for Teaching English Language Learners with Disabilities April 9, 2005 Kristi Liu.
Example of “nested” goals 8.1
Curriculum & Alignment Institute Susan McCauley, Ph.D.
Stone-Robinson Math Information Night Dr. Nicholas King, Principal December 9, 2014.
1. 2 Why is the Core important? To set high expectations –for all students –for educators To attend to the learning needs of students To break through.
Agenda for New Teacher Induction Brief overview of Formative Assessment Brief Overview of Differentiated Instruction Standards Aligned System-
Texas Education Agency Updated F-2 FOUNDATION.
INSTRUCTIONAL EXCELLENCE INVENTORIES: A PROCESS OF MONITORING FOR CONTINUOUS IMPROVEMENT Dr. Maria Pitre-Martin Superintendent of Schools.
PUTTING OUR FOOT DOWN TO ACCELERATE STUDENT ACHIEVEMENT FROM WITHIN.
Reaching for Excellence in Middle and High School Science Teaching Partnership Cooperative Partners Tennessee Department of Education College of Arts and.
AGENDA  A teacher’s perspective  Barb Schmidt Stevens High School  Acacia Trevillyan South Park Elementary  Review steps to create a quality CFA 
Compass: Module 2 Compass Requirements: Teachers’ Overall Evaluation Rating Student Growth Student Learning Targets (SLTs) Value-added Score (VAM) where.
Utilizing the School Restructuring Resources Lauren Morando Rhim & Bryan C. Hassel Public Impact For Center on Innovation and Improvement.
Using the Nine Characteristics to Test Assumptions in School Improvement G. Sue Shannon OSPI Senior Researcher WERA/OSPI Assessment Conference December.
Full Implementation of the Common Core. Last Meeting Performance Tasks Smarter Balanced Assessment Consortium Upcoming Accountability Measure Strong teaching.
Parma City School District Professional Learning Model Committing to the Core Rethinking Mathematics & Literacy for the 21 st Century LITERACY COACHES.
Write To Learn Stephanie Needham J Glenn Edwards Elementary/ Lee County Schools April 25, A Race to the Top Initiative.
360 0 Walkthrough TEACHER TRAINING. Develop and support Professional Learning communities Strengthen the Teaching Profession Support the success of every.
Using the Indistar® Web-based Planning Tool to Support School Improvement Session #2 Presenters: Yvonne A. Holloman, Ph.D. Michael Hill Office of School.
1. Housekeeping Items June 8 th and 9 th put on calendar for 2 nd round of Iowa Core ***Shenandoah participants*** Module 6 training on March 24 th will.
Will Growth Models Improve School Accountability and NCLB/AYP? Results From New Research Survey and Analysis of Current AYP Growth Proposals Kimberly O'Malley.
Comprehensive Curriculum Now that I have it, what do I do with it? July 2005.
Washington State Teacher and Principal Evaluation Project Update 11/29/12.
Snapshot Survey of School Effective Factors
Standard VI Teachers Contribute to the Academic Success of Students.
Massachusetts Tiered System of Supports State Personnel Development Grant National Meeting Fall 2014 Madeline Levine
The Professional Teaching and Learning Cycle As a Strategy for Alignment and Refinement: An Overview Stacey Joyner Program Associate - SEDL
Assessment: Purpose, Process, and Use OCR Grade 6.
A HANDBOOK FOR PROFESSIONAL LEARNING COMMUNITIES AT WORK CHAPTERS 1-3 Learning by Doing.
Mathematics Performance Tasks Applying a Program Logic Model to a Professional Development Series California Educational Research Association December.
Standard VI Teachers Contribute to the Academic Success of Students.
A Guide to Formative Assessment Astrid Fossum & Sharonda M. Harris, Mathematics Teaching Specialists Milwaukee Public Schools
Impact of Instructional Strategies
Enhancing Implementation of the CEW Standards through the PA SAS (Standards Aligned Systems)
Jigsaw Activity. * The room has 3 sections: * Elementary * Middle * High * Please move to the section for your grade level and take your electronic device(s)
BETTER LEARNING THROUGH PLCS CHOLLA HIGH MAGNET SCHOOL PLC TRAINING P.L.C. AT WORK.
A Learning System – we’re all in this together Kapiti Collective Lead Team Day September 2010.
Gifted and Talented Academy Year 2 Curriculum and Instruction Session 1 HAEAnet Password: education
About District Accreditation Mrs. Sanchez & Mrs. Bethell Rickards Middle School
Differentiating the Process. Process Instructional Strategies Group/Individual Tasks & Learning Activities.
9 Common Characteristics of Successful Schools From: What we know about successful school leadership (2003). - American Education Research Association.
Helping Teachers Help All Students: The Imperative for High-Quality Professional Development Report of the Maryland Teacher Professional Development Advisory.
Coaching in an Urban District: Academy of Accomplished Teaching in Mathematics and Science, A 2 TeaMS Math + Science + Coaching = Success Houston Independent.
DESE District Review Center for District and School Accountability Site Visit: April 11-14, 2011.
Larry Fazzari Program Supervisor k12.wa.us 1 TITLE I, PART A PROGRAMS SCHOOLWIDE VS. TARGETED
Policy and Practice Implications for Secondary and Postsecondary Education and Employment for Youth With Disabilities September 18 and 19, 2003 Washington,
Ensuring Teacher Quality Leader's Resource Guide: Algebra I EOC study1 Improving Algebra I End-of-Course Exam Scores: Evidence from the Field An examination.
Assessing Impact on P12 Learning: A Multiple Measures Approach Leslee PetersonLeslee Peterson, Assessment Coordinator Micki M CaskeyMicki M Caskey, Associate.
Name of School District | Date | Presenter’s Name | Curriculum Specialist Introduction to Pearson Forward.
OCES MAP Data Team Meeting and And
1 Testing Various Models in Support of Improving API Scores.
Shelton School District
Study Questions To what extent do English language learners have opportunity to learn the subject content specified in state academic standards and.
The Georgia Department of Juvenile Justice
Teaching and Learning Guiding Principles
Connecticut Core Standards for English Language Arts & Literacy
Understanding by Design
Project Outcomes (separate handout)
February 21-22, 2018.
Professional Learning Communities
Ann D. Murray School of Family Studies and Human Services
Presentation transcript:

Developing High-Quality Campus Plans for Student Achievement

NCLB Requirements Relating to Student Achievement Continuous and substantial academic improvement for all students [NCLB 1111(b)(2)(C)(iii)] Reading and Mathematics (Science in ) [NCLB1111(b)(3)(A)] 100% proficiency for all student groups by [NCLB1111(b)(2)(F)]

Student Achievement Establishing high expectations for student learning and providing the needed support Ensuring alignment of curriculum, instruction, and assessment Using data to improve instruction at the school, classroom, and student levels

Student Achievement Establishing high expectations for student learning and providing the needed support There was an average 21% difference (with a range from 18%–41%) in student achievement between classes where high expectations were established and classes in which high expectations were not established. Marzano,R. J. (2003). What Works in Schools. Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.

Student Achievement Ensuring alignment of curriculum, instruction, and assessment In his meta-analysis of school factors, Marzano ranks a guaranteed and viable curriculum as the element that has the most impact on student achievement. Marzano, R. J. (2003). What Works in Schools. Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.

Student Achievement Using data to improve instruction at the school, classroom, and student levels In her study of 22 schools across eight states, Massell (2000) identifies interpreting and using data as one of four key capacity-building strategies to improve teaching and learning. Massell, D. (2000, September), The district role in building capacity: Four strategies. CPRE Policy Briefs. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania.

Activity Overview Part 1 (40 minutes) Jigsaw Task: ERS Publication: A Practical Guide to School Improvement: Meeting the Challenges of NCLB, pp. 7–38. A chime will sound at the end of each step. Step 1) Each team member reads a section. Guiding questions will be provided. (15 minutes) Step 2) Each team member, using guiding questions, discusses the information read with others at the same table (or a nearby table) who read the same section. (10 minutes) Step 3) Share your learnings with your school team. (15 minutes) Part 2 (20 minutes) Participants will identify action steps to incorporate into their CIPs, rank their status on those steps, and identify data to assess the impact of those action steps on student achievement.

Part 1, Step 1 Each member of the team selects a section to read: Chapter 2, Chapter 3, or Chapter 4. As you read your section, think about these questions:  What are the important points of this section?  What are the implications of these for your campus improvement plan? Begin.

Part 1, Step 2 With those who have read the same section, from your table or a nearby table, discuss the important points of the section you read and the implications of those points to your campus improvement plan. You have 10 minutes. Begin.

Part 1, Step 3 Return to your school team and share the important points of the section you read and the implications of those points to your campus improvement plan. Each team member has 5 minutes to share their learnings. Begin.

Part 2 The Campus Development Guides Participants will identify action steps to include in their campus improvement plans, rank their status on those steps, and identify data to assess the impact of the steps on student achievement. (20 minutes)