REAL-TIME CALIBRATION OF ACTIVE CROP SENSOR SYSTEM FOR MAKING IN-SEASON N APPLICATIONS K.H. Holland and J.S. Schepers Holland Scientific and USDA-ARS,

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Do In and Post-Season Plant-Based Measurements Predict Corn Performance and/ or Residual Soil Nitrate? Patrick J. Forrestal, R. Kratochvil, J.J Meisinger.
Advertisements

Missouri algorithm for N in corn
Determine seeding rate and hybrid effects on: Phenotypical and physiological plant measurements Canopy and leaf sensor measurements A goal in precision.
Morteza Mozaffari Soil Testing and Research Laboratory, Marianna Efforts to Improve N Use Efficiency of Corn in Arkansas Highlights of Research in Progress.
FIELD-SCALE N APPLICATION USING CROP REFLECTANCE SENSORS Ken Sudduth and Newell Kitchen USDA-ARS Translating Missouri USDA-ARS Research and Technology.
Development of a National Research and Development Network for Agricultural Uses of FGD Gypsum Warren Dick, The Ohio State University Ken Ladwig, EPRI.
N Reflections on Years of Sensor Research Algorithm Development and Jim Schepers.
1 Validation and Verification of Simulation Models.
Using Remote Sensing to Characterize Yield Loss due to Water and N stress in Corn. David E. Clay, K. Kim, J. Chang, S.A. Clay, C.G. Carlson, and K. Dalsted.
The Calibration Process
The Nitrogen Requirement and Use Efficiency of Sweet Sorghum Produced in Central Oklahoma. D. Brian Arnall, Chad B. Godsey, Danielle Bellmer, Ray Huhnke.
Power Analysis How confident are we that we can detect an important difference, if it exists? Power = 1 - , where ES = Effect Size Used to design an experiment.
Plant tissue analysis for testing nutrients deficiency in Banana
Use of Multispectral Imagery for Variable Rate “Application-zone” Identification in Cotton Production Tim Sharp Beltwide Cotton Conference January 6-10,
Comparison of Active Optical Sensors
Impressions of China and More Dr. Chuanguo Xu. Dr. Fang Chen Regional Director IPNI Mr. Maury Keonig Vice-President Ag Services.
Precision Agriculture in Europe Olga S. Walsh BIOEN/SOIL 4213 Spring 2007.
Outline Introduction – Importance for SE Mississippi State – Sensor Comparison – Wavelength/Index Analysis University of Arkansas – Active detection of.
Site-Specific Management Factors influencing plant growth Water Light Temperature Soil Compaction Drainage.
Comparison of Commercial Crop Canopy Sensors Ken Sudduth Newell Kitchen Scott Drummond USDA-ARS, Columbia, Missouri.
Integrating Weather and Soil Information With Sensor Data Newell Kitchen USDA ARS Cropping Systems and Water Quality Research Unit Columbia, Missouri.
Nitrogen Use Efficiency Workshop Canopy Reflectance Signatures: Developing a Crop Need-Based Indicator for Sidedress Application of N Fertilizer to Canola.
Introduction Stomatal conductance regulates the rates of several necessary processes in plants including transpiration, carbon dioxide assimilation, and.
1 Applying Remote Sensing Technology to Agricultural Statistics of Beijing Wang Yanyan Beijing Municipal Bureau of Statistics October 2008.
GreenSeeker® Handheld Crop Sensor
Use of Alternative Concepts for Determining Preplant and Mid-Season N rates.
Are NDVI Readings Sensors Dependent? Tremblay, N., Z. Wang, B. Ma, C. Bélec and P. Vigneault St-Jean-sur-Richelieu, Quebec.
Beyond Sensor Technologies Where Do We Go ? What’s Next ? Where Others Have Been.
Reverse N lookup, sensor based N rates using Weather improved INSEY Nicole Remondet Rationale Weather is an aspect of agricultural sciences that cannot.
Update PI-SWERL Sampling on Owens Lake Maarten Schreuder, Air Sciences Inc. 3/17/2010 Maarten Schreuder, Air Sciences Inc. 3/17/2010.
Remote sensing of canopy reflectance on a field scale has been proposed as a useful tool for diagnosing nitrogen (N) deficiency of corn plants. Differences.
The Use of Red and Green Reflectance in the Calculation of NDVI for Wheat, Bermudagrass, and Corn Robert W. Mullen SOIL 4213 Robert W. Mullen SOIL 4213.
Optimizing Nitrogen and Irrigation Timing for Corn Fertigation Applications Using Remote Sensing Ray Asebedo, David Mengel, and Randall Nelson Kansas State.
UTILIZATION OF CROP SENSORS TO DETECT COTTON GROWTH AND N NUTRITION
Active-Crop Sensor Calibration Using the Virtual-Reference Concept K. H. Holland (Holland Scientific) J. S. Schepers (USDA-ARS, retired) 8 th ECPA Conference.
Group 6 Application GPS and GIS in agricultural field.
Wireless communications and mobile computing conference, p.p , July 2011.
Chapter 3: Soil Sampling And Soil Sensing
Variable-Rate N Fertilization of Wheat and Corn in the Mid-Atlantic Variable-Rate N Fertilization of Wheat and Corn in the Mid-Atlantic Wade Thomason,
West Hills College Farm of the Future The Precision-Farming Guide for Agriculturalists Chapter Seven Variable Rate Technologies.
NITROGEN FERTIGATION OF SUBSURFACE DRIP IRRIGATED BERMUDAGRASS M.A. Maurer* 1, J.A. Moken 2 and J.L. Young 1 1 Department of Agriculture, Stephen F. Austin.
Refinement of the Missouri Corn Nitrogen Algorithm Using Canopy Reflectance Newell Kitchen, Ken Sudduth, and Scott Drummond USDA-Agricultural Research.
N Fertilization in Colorado Raj Khosla Colorado State University May 19 th & 20 th Oklahoma State University Raj Khosla Colorado State University May 19.
Demonstration of In-Season Nitrogen Management Strategies for Corn Production John Sawyer John Lundvall Jennifer Hawkins Department of Agronomy Iowa State.
Three Alternative Nitrogen Management Strategies for Cereal Grain Production Brian Arnall Brian Arnall Plant and Soil Sciences Department Oklahoma State.
Nutrient Management: Ways to Save Money, From Simple to High Tech Brian Arnall Precision Nutrient Management Plant and Soil Sciences Department Oklahoma.
Locations Efaw Lake Carl Blackwell Haskell Years2005, 2006 Objectives: 1)To determine the minimum preplant N fertilizer needed to achieve maximum yield.
Plant tissue analysis for testing nutrients deficiency in Banana Next End.
Corn Nitrogen Management: Progress in Missouri Newell R. Kitchen, Kenneth A. Sudduth, and John Hummel USDA-ARS, Columbia, MO USDA-ARS, Columbia, MO Peter.
Generalized Algorithm for Variable Rate Nitrogen Application on Cereal Grains John B. Solie, Regents Professor Biosystems and Agri. Engineering Dept. William.
NFOA for Wheat and Corn. Yield Potential Definitions INSEYIn Season Estimated Yield = NDVI (Feekes 4 to 6)/days from planting to sensing (days.
Oklahoma State University Precision Agriculture / Soil Fertility / Soil Nutrient Management Why should Nitrogen Use Efficiencies be improved? What technologies.
Dave Franzen – North Dakota State University Newell Kitchen – USDA-ARS, Columbia, MO Laura Stevens, Richard Ferguson – University of Nebraska-Lincoln.
Theory of Predicting Crop Response to Non-Limiting Nitrogen.
Drew Tucker and Dave Mengel KSU Agronomy An update on Kansas sensor based N recommendations.
DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY Laboratory for Agriculture and Environmental Studies Sensor Based Variable Rate N Management in Mid-Atlantic.
Exploratory Research in Corn
Variable Rate Nitrogen Application in Corn Production
Developing Sidedress N Recommendations for Corn in Central PA
Crop-based Approach for In-season N Application
G. V. Johnson and W. R. Raun Dept. Plant & Soil Sciences
E.V. Lukina, K.W. Freeman,K.J. Wynn, W.E. Thomason, G.V. Johnson,
Irrigated Corn VT VT Irrigated Corn
Dave Franzen – North Dakota State University
Utilizing Indicator crop N-rich strips for anticipating pre plant and side dress Nitrogen rates for maize. Rationale Nitrogen use efficiency (NUE) in cereal.
Annual ASA Meeting, Indianapolis
UNL Algorithm for N in Corn
Late-Season Prediction of Wheat Grain Yield and Protein
Eric Miller August 3rd, 2010 Dr. Camberato & Dr. Nielsen
Tastes Great. Less Filling
Presentation transcript:

REAL-TIME CALIBRATION OF ACTIVE CROP SENSOR SYSTEM FOR MAKING IN-SEASON N APPLICATIONS K.H. Holland and J.S. Schepers Holland Scientific and USDA-ARS, Lincoln, NE INTRODUCTION Reluctance of commercial applicators and corn producers to endorse the concept of using a high-N strip to calibrate active crop sensors prompted consideration of other approaches. The use of starter fertilizers and some preplant N applications is common among corn producers. The in-season N application strategy relies on enough planting- time N to supply the corn crop until the V8-V14 growth stages. Considering the natural spatial variability in fields, early season N applications are very likely to result in parts of the field with more than adequate N. Conceptually, these areas could serve as a high-N reference if they could be readily identified and quantified. Scanning one or more field transects would therefore constitute a virtual reference strip (VRS) from which a sensor reference value could be extracted. The inclusion of management zone scalars (k) can aid in optimizing N application for various soil types. The purpose of this research was to compare N application rates using the reference values derived from an high-N strip and virtual reference strip. A second goal was to evaluate a “Drive and Apply” method that relies on software to progressively update the reference while driving through the field and making variable rate N applications. Lessons Learned Wavebands – Analysis of the data demonstrated that the Red-Edge/NIR Chl Index had better sensitivity to respond to plant nutrient deficiencies than the Red/NIR Chl Index at the growth stages and plant populations sampled. Reference Value Selection – Both real-time statistical and histogram techniques generated reasonable VI reference values. However, because of data distribution asymmetry, the real-time approach had to be corrected for skew and kurtosis. Conclusions and Future Work 1.Testing and evaluation is ongoing in order to validate additional statistical models and adaptive learning algorithms for determining optimum reference values. 2.This study has demonstrated the feasibility of the VRS technique and is in agreement with on-farm tests conducted in 2008 and Continued testing of the “Drive-and- Apply” methodology, using hardcoded “plug values” in conjunction with the VRS methodology, is currently underway for the 2010 field season. 3.Real-time calibration of optical sensor technology promises to be a useful calibration method and may possibly aid in reducing technology adoption barriers. MATERIALS AND METHODS Two eight-row wide strips of sprinkler-irrigated corn each containing four replications with six pre-plant N rates (plots 15-m long) were monitored on 21 July, 2009 (V12) with two ACS-470 Crop Circle sensors fitted with 670 nm, 730 nm and 760 nm interference filters. Adjacent strips either received 50 or 150 kg N at planting. The strips were scanned several days prior to testing in order to obtain and hardcode reference values into software for the Drive-and-Apply methodology. The basic form of the algorithm used to calculate the proposed N rate was: where N OPT was the optimum N rate, N CRD was the N applied at planting, SI was the sufficiency index of the plot in question, and ΔSI was the difference in SI values between plots receiving zero N and N OPT rates. For this experiment, ΔSI was set to 0.3 for use with Red-Edge based SI’s and the k factor was set 1.0. Irrigated Sensed transect RESULTS AND DISCUSSION Each field strip containing the six N-rates was scanned to determine the virtual reference value (red-edge chl index) to establish the reference value. Reference values were derived from scans of the 50 and 150 kg N/ha strips. The 95 percentile values from the collected data were used to establish the reference value. This reference value was then used by the software to calculate the SI as the sensors then traveled through the field as though N fertilizer was being applied. Finally, “Drive-and-Apply” software, that comparatively updated the reference value based on the hardcoded reference value and the crop status thus-far within the strip, was tested using the same algorithm to make N recommendations. Once the system had traveled ~90 m and encountered relatively high and low vigor plants, the N recommendation nearly mimicked the N rates where the strip was scanned before N application. Scan Crop Begin Material Application k = 1.0 k = 0.75 k = 0.87 k = 0.25 k = 0.50 VRS Field TransectsVRS Field Transects using Management Zone Factors Test Site Shelton, NE High N reference strip comparison to moderate and zero preplant N rates. 252 kg N/ha Preplant (Reference) 84 kg N/ha Preplant 0 kg N/ha Preplant (Check) BACKGROUND The VRS methodology is a non-reference strip approach to variable-rate agrochemical application that utilizes a random walk through the field, or rather, one or more transects through the field in order to measure crop growth variability resulting from differences in soil type, drainage, cropping history, mineralization, etc. Some aspects of the virtual reference strip concept have evolved from cropping systems where multiple applications of nutrients are common. In some cases, nutrients must be rationed to the crop in order to maintain strong plant architecture (e.g., wheat is known to lodge when excess N is available in soil). In certain situations, producers are limited on how much N fertilizer that can be applied before planting or prohibited from applying excess N above the recommended amount during any one application period. This spectrum of conditions presents an opportunity to use the crop as a bio-indicator of relative nutrient status because multiple places in the field the crop will represent N-rich plants. The virtual reference concept capitalizes on this reality and uses the capacity and speed of modern computational devices and statistical procedures to characterize plant attributes that are traditionally extracted from a reference strip.