THEMIS SRR Mission Requirements - 1 UCB July 8-9 2003 MISSION REQUIREMENTS Ellen R. Taylor Mission Systems Engineer Space Science Laboratory University.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
PLATO Phase A/B1 Status TOU Meeting Catania 28 Feb 2011 PLAnetary Transits and Oscillation of stars.
Advertisements

1 ESAIL proof of concept mission Juha-Pekka Luntama Pekka Janhunen Petri Toivanen.
Frank Stocklin Ron Vento Leslie Ambrose June 28,2001 SUPERNOVA/ACCELERATION PROBE (SNAP) Data Systems.
GLAST LAT ProjectLAT Engineering Meeting, April 1, 2003 GLAST Large Area Telescope: Performance & Safety Assurance Darren S. Marsh Stanford Linear Accelerator.
1 08 January 2015 Stephen Horan Cube Quest Kick-off: Communications Rules PI for Avionics Space Technology Mission Directorate.
Technical Performance Measures Module Space Systems Engineering, version 1.0 SOURCE INFORMATION: The material contained in this lecture was developed.
THEMIS INSTRUMENT PER 1 UCB, May, 2005 EMC / Mag Instrument Test Plan & Results Michael Ludlam University of California - Berkeley.
1 wp4 – Technical Issues for payload integration within the Nacelle for High Altitude flight Budapest 24/11/04 Marco Bobbio Pallavicini Carlo Gavazzi Space.
NASA’s Goddard Space Flight Center LRO Integration and Test Joanne Baker GSFC Code 568 August 16-17, 2005.
Tielong Zhang On behalf of the CGS Team in the Institute of Geology and Geophysics, Chinese Academy of Science Spacecraft System and Payload China Geomagnetism.
NASA’s Goddard Space Flight Center LRO Operations Concept Richard Saylor Jr. HTSI/Code 444 August 16-17, 2005.
20a - 1 NASA’s Goddard Space Flight Center Attitude Control System (ACS) Eric Holmes, Code 591 Joe Garrick, Code 595 Jim Simpson, Code 596 NASA/GSFC August.
Van Allen Probes Spacecraft Operations July 29, 2015 Kristin Fretz
THEMIS SRR Requirement Overview - 1 UCB, 07/08/2003 REQUIREMENT DEVELOPMENT OVERVIEW Ellen R. Taylor Mission Systems Engineer Space Science Laboratory.
THEMIS MISSION PDROVERVIEW- 1 UCB, November, 2003 Mechanical / ACS Recent dynamic simulations have shown that the following requirements are not valid.
4 th NASA Space Weather & Robotic Mission Operations Workshop, NASA/GSFC, Greenbelt, MD, September 27, THEMIS Operations & Anomalies Manfred Bester.
MG 1/10/01 1 PCS SMOV-3B Review Objectives Overview Activity Descriptions Requirements.
MPEREMC 1 UCB, June 23, 2006 THEMIS MISSION PRE-ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW Probe 2 EMC Test Results David Curtis University of California - Berkeley.
Mechanical SuperNova/Acceleration Probe SNAP Study Dave Peters George Roach June 28, a man who's willing to make a decision in the first place can.
Aurora, Substorms, and THEMIS D. G. Sibeck NASA/GSFC THEMIS Project Scientist.
Philip Luers NASA/GSFC Code 561 August 16-17, 2005
THEMIS MISSION PDROVERVIEW- 1 UCB, November 12, UCB/Swales should identify an individual that will assume responsibility for magnetic cleanliness.
Section Number - 1 NASA’s Goddard Space Flight Center Communication Systems Jason A. Soloff NASA/GSFC Code 567 August 16-17, 2005.
THEMIS Mission PDR/CAR 1 UCB, November 12-14, 2003 Search Coil Magnetometer (SCM) Mission PDR/CAR Alain Roux CETP-Velizy Co-i: O.Le Contel Technical Manager:
THEMIS FGM CDR Peer ReviewBerlin, April 6, UCB/Swales should identify an individual that will assume responsibility for magnetic cleanliness on.
1 Mission Discussion & Project Reviews 祝飛鴻 10/14/93.
TRIO-CINEMA Meeting at KHU 1 October 19-23, 2009 CINEMA Operations Manfred Bester.
Polar Gateways 2008THEMIS Constellation Operations − Jan 2008 THEMIS Constellation Operations Dr. Manfred Bester University of California at Berkeley.
Henry Heetderks Space Sciences Laboratory, UCB
Idaho RISE System Reliability and Designing to Reduce Failure ENGR Sept 2005.
NASA’s Goddard Space Flight Center Lunar Reconnaissance Orbiter Ground System Requirements.
THEMIS SUITE PRE-ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW 1 UCB May 2, 2005 THEMIS Pre-Environmental Review Instrument Verification Overview Ellen Taylor University of California.
THEMIS IDPU PDR I&T REQUIREMENTS- 1 UCB, October 16, 2003 I&T REQUIREMENTS Ellen Taylor University of California - Berkeley.
Solar Probe Plus A NASA Mission to Touch the Sun March 2015 Instrument Suite Name Presenter's Name.
THEMIS FDMO Review Propellant Budget Update − 1 October 5, 2004 PROPELLANT BUDGET UPDATE Vassilis Angelopoulos Covered in this presentation: Allocations.
Competition Sensitive Gabe Karpati June 28, 2001 SuperNova / Acceleration Probe (SNAP) System Overview.
THEMIS MISSION PDROVERVIEW- 1 UCB, November 12, 2003 THEMIS MISSION SYSTEM OVERVIEW Dr. Ellen Taylor University of California - Berkeley.
THEMIS INSTRUMENT PDROVERVIEW- 1 UCB, October 15, 2003 THEMIS SYSTEM OVERVIEW Dr. Vassilis Angelopoulos, Science Overview Dr. Ellen Taylor, Mission and.
Dec 1, FIELDS Top Level Requirements Review S. Harris (UCB)
SWT Overview 1 UCB, Nov15/16, 2006 THEMIS SCIENCE WORKING TEAM MEETING Mission Overview Peter R. Harvey Project Manager University of California - Berkeley.
20c - 1 NASA’s Goddard Space Flight Center Propulsion Chuck Zakrwski NASA/GSFC Code 597 August 16-17, 2005.
FM1 Instrument Suite Pre-Ship Review (PSR)INT- 1 UCB September 21, 2005 THEMIS FM1 INSTRUMENT SUITE PRE-SHIP REVIEW (PSR) INTEGRATION AND TEST PLANS Jeremy.
THEMIS MISSION PDRINSTRUMENT OVERVIEW- 1 UCB, November, 2003 THEMIS INSTRUMENT PAYLOAD SYSTEM OVERVIEW Dr. Ellen Taylor University of California - Berkeley.
CINEMA PDR, UCB/SSL 1 August 22, 2008 CINEMA Communications & Ground Systems Manfred Bester.
SRR and PDR Charter & Review Team Linda Pacini (GSFC) Review Chair.
Spaceweather Working Group Spaceweather Working Group Earth Science Mission Operations Eric Moyer ESMO Deputy Project Manager - Technical
THEMIS Engineering Peer Review 1 UCB, October 15-16, 2003 Electric Field Instrument (EFI) Operational Concept.
Spacecraft Systems Henry Heetderks Space Sciences Laboratory, UCB.
GLAST LAT ProjectCDR/CD-3 Review May 12-16, 2003 Document: LAT-PR Section 5 IOC Subsystem 1 GLAST Large Area Telescope: IOC Subsystems WBS: 4.1.B.
TRIO-CINEMA 1 UCB, 2/08/2010 Integration and Test Program Dave Curtis UCB/SSL Space Sciences Laboratory University of California, Berkeley.
TRIO-CINEMA 1 UCB, 2/08/2010 Mission Design Dave Curtis UCB/SSL Space Sciences Laboratory University of California, Berkeley.
THEMIS MRRSystems - 1 GSFC, Jan 5, 2007 Systems Engineering.
ACE Science Workshop March 10 th, 2009 Armin T. Ellis, Deborah Vane, Mark Rokey Jet Propulsion Laboratory.
FM4/FM5 IPSRSYS - 1 UCB, May 5, 2006 THEMIS INSTRUMENT SUITE FM4/FM5 PRE-SHIP REVIEW SYSTEM OVERVIEW Ellen Taylor University of California - Berkeley.
THEMIS MISSION PDROVERVIEW- 1 UCB, November 12, 2003 THEMIS MISSION SYSTEM OVERVIEW Dr. Ellen Taylor University of California - Berkeley.
TRIO-CINEMA 1 UCB, 2/08/2010 System Design Dave Curtis UCB/SSL Space Sciences Laboratory University of California, Berkeley.
Power Philip Luers NASA/GSFC Code 561 August 16-17, 2005.
Planetary Lander PDR Team Name
FDMO Peer Review RFA Summary
Gayle K. Martin November 14, 2016
INSTRUMENT DATA PROCESSING UNIT (IDPU) REQUIREMENTS
Liquid LVs propellant consumption control terminal system
Fault Protection Techniques in JPL Spacecraft
CINEMA System Engineering
Technical Resource Allocations
Science Requirements The FGM shall measure DC and low frequency perturbations of the magnetic field  see performance requirements The FGM shall measure.
THEMIS program: an Overview
Preliminary Design Review
Presentation transcript:

THEMIS SRR Mission Requirements - 1 UCB July MISSION REQUIREMENTS Ellen R. Taylor Mission Systems Engineer Space Science Laboratory University of California - Berkeley

THEMIS SRR Mission Requirements - 2 UCB July Mission Requirements Lifetime and Radiation Fault Tolerance Mission Design Resource Budgets Contamination Requirements Interface Requirements Test Requirements Launch Vehicle Ground Station Mission Requirement Overview

THEMIS SRR Mission Requirements - 3 UCB July Lifetime M-1. The THEMIS operational system shall be designed for at least a two year lifetime. Rationale: Sufficient to achieve baseline science requirements - allows for two full tail seasons, ensuring conjunction time >188 hrs per year M-2. THEMIS shall meet the NASA orbital debris guidelines of re-entry in NASA Safety Standard (NSS) Rationale: Required per NASA guidelines: Re-entry in <25 yrs and debris footprints <8 m2

THEMIS SRR Mission Requirements - 4 UCB July Radiation M-3. THEMIS shall be designed for a total dose environment of 33 krad/year (66 krad total) (TBR) Rationale: Survival in predicted radiation environment - based on dose/depth curve calculations indicating 33 krad TID behind 5mm Al for a one year mission (includes a RDM of 2 for uncertainty of model and variability of environment). From PAIP: Parts shall meet these criteria based on manufactures data sheet, demonstrated technology hardness, or lot testing. Shielding or special packaging may be used to achieve the desired tolerance. M-4. THEMIS shall be Single Event Effect (SEE) tolerant and immune to destructive latch-up. Rationale: Ensures operability in radiation environment. Protection occurs on several levels: Parts, Local Circuit Protection, Scrubbing, Reset. From PAIP: Parts shall be SEL-immune to a LET >80 MeV-cm2/mg – TBR), or else shall be protected against damage by a protection circuit. Parts that may affect critical functions that could damage the instrument shall be SEU immune, or else shall use a Triple-Modular-Redundancy scheme to avoid an single SEU causing a failure. Parts shall meet these criteria based on manufactures data sheet, demonstrated technology hardness, or lot testing

THEMIS SRR Mission Requirements - 5 UCB July Fault Tolerance and Redundancy M-5. To the maximum extent possible, THEMIS operational system shall be designed to be single fault tolerant and still meet minimum mission success criteria Rationale: Project guidelines direct the design of the most robust and fault tolerant system within the constraints of allocated resources. Reflects accepted design practice commensurate with mission scope; use of redundancy; and system design promoting graceful degradation in the event of an anomaly or failure. M-6. THEMIS Probe 3 or 4 shall be capable of replacing any other probe during the minimum mission Rationale: Allows for failure of one probe and still meet minimum mission success

THEMIS SRR Mission Requirements - 6 UCB July Failure Recovery M-7. Each Probe shall have a viable safe-hold mode after carrier separation Rationale: Allows for anomaly investigation and correction from the ground. Safe-hold mode is defined as power safe, thermally safe, able to communicate with ground throughout orbit, etc. Safe-hold mode will be fully defined early in the design process. M-8. THEMIS Probes shall implement Failure Detection and Correction (FDC). Rationale: Indicates some autonomy in detecting and correcting faults.

THEMIS SRR Mission Requirements - 7 UCB July Mission Design M-9. THEMIS shall perform science observations with identical probes in multiple period, near-equatorial orbits (five probes required for baseline science, four probes required for minimum) Rationale: Supports science requirements - multiple spacecraft allows probes to simultaneously measure substorm signatures over long distances along the magnetotail. M-10. Each THEMIS Probe shall have a unique ID that can not be changed on-orbit. Rationale: All probes share the same frequency. Required to contact one probe at a time. M-11. The THEMIS probe conjunctions shall be coordinated with ground- based observations during prime geo-tail season Rationale: Fundamental part of science mission – space-based observations coordinated with ground-based observations to aid in determining the onset of substorms (M-12 through M-18: Orbit Design will be discussed later)

THEMIS SRR Mission Requirements - 8 UCB July Resource Budgets - Mass M-19. THEMIS maneuvers shall be optimized to not exceed a delta-V of 566m/s +15% contingency (TBR) (for limiting case P1) Rationale: Design decision based on current best estimate of Delta-V plus some contingency for design margin. Fixing number allows sizing of propellant tanks. M-20. All THEMIS Probes shall have (TBR) propellant margin at launch Rationale: Allows for operational errors, possible anomalies after launch. M-21. No THEMIS Probe shall exceed a dry mass of 70.8kg Rationale: 62.0 kg CBE % contingency M-22. Each THEMIS Probe shall be designed to accommodate a 82kg (TBR) dry mass, Delta-V of 650m/s (TBR), and a (TBR) propellant margin at launch Rationale: System design allocation accommodates dry mass 62.0kg CBE % contingency (not-to-exceed 70.8kg) plus 16% Program Margin; and a delta-V 566m/s + 15% contingency (not-to-exceed 650m/s) plus propellant margin at launch. Sizes propellant tanks. Note: Numbers are TBR due to on-going tank trade study and procurement.

THEMIS SRR Mission Requirements - 9 UCB July Mass Allocation Flow-down from M-21: No THEMIS Probe shall exceed a dry mass of 70.8kg IN-5. The Instrument Payload shall not exceed a mass of 23.6 kg. IN-6. No component of the Instrument Payload shall exceed the allocated mass budget PB-9. The Probe Bus shall not exceed a dry mass of 47.2 kg (instrument payload not included) PB-10. No Probe Bus subsystem shall exceed the allocated mass budget INSTRUMENTCBE (kg) Contingency Allocated (kg) FGM 1.35* SCM 1.50* ESA SST EFI 11.22* IDPU Total SUBSYSTEMCBE (kg) Contingency Allocated (kg) ACS Avionics RF/Comm Power Harness Propulsion Thermal Mechanical Total Rationale: 21.0 kg CBE % contingency Rationale: 41.0 kg CBE % contingency Note: Tables are summary only. System allocations in MRD. Subsystem allocations are controlled separately in detailed budget. * Includes boom and harness, sensor only allocation provided in detailed budget.

THEMIS SRR Mission Requirements - 10 UCB July Resource Budgets - Power M-23. No THEMIS Probe shall exceed an on-orbit power draw of W Rationale: 24.5 W CBE % contingency M-24. The Probe power system shall be designed to accommodate an EOL on-orbit average power of 41.5W. Rationale: System design allocation is 24.5 W CBE % contingency (not-to-exceed 29.24W) plus 42% Program Margin. Sizes solar array area and battery capacity. M-25. Each Probe shall be designed to achieve electrical energy balance over an orbit assuming a 30 minute transmitter power on time and 180 minute eclipse. Rationale: Electrical power system must be sized to accommodate peak and on-orbit power loads (eclipse, downlink, etc). Transmitter on-time and eclipse duration indicates system design trade considering power and thermal constraints versus downlink budget and orbit optimization.

THEMIS SRR Mission Requirements - 11 UCB July Power Allocation Flow-down from M-23: No THEMIS Probe shall exceed an on-orbit power draw of W IN-7. The Instrument Payload shall require less than 14.7 W (on-orbit average) IN-8. No component of the Instrument Payload shall exceed the allocated power budget PB-11. The Probe Bus shall require less than 14.5 W average power PB-12. No Probe Bus subsystem shall exceed the allocated power budget INSTRUMENTCBE (kg) Contingency Allocated (kg) FGM 0.01* SCM 0.08* ESA 1.87* SST 0.85* EFI 0.48* IDPU Total SUBSYSTEMCBE (kg) Contingency Allocated (kg) ACS Avionics RF/Comm Thermal Total Rationale: 12.1 W CBE % contingency Rationale: 12.4 W CBE % contingency * Includes sensor only. Power allocation for instrument support electronics in IDPU provided in detailed budget. Note: Tables are summary only. System allocations in MRD. Subsystem allocations are controlled separately in detailed budget.

THEMIS SRR Mission Requirements - 12 UCB July Resource Budgets - Data M-26. Each THEMIS Probe shall be designed to accommodate 750 Mbits/orbit (uncompressed) Instrument science and housekeeping data and 87 Mbits/orbit Probe Bus housekeeping data. Rationale: Reflects expected instrument data rate collected over an orbit for all mission modes (survey and burst); and expected probe data rate (1kpbs) collected for P3,4,5 (1 day orbit). Drives need to reduce data rate for P1 (4 day orbit) and P2 (2 day orbit). M-27. THEMIS shall be capable of storing 1 orbit + 1 days worth of Instrument and Probe Bus housekeeping data. Rationale: Provides contingency if ground station pass is missed.

THEMIS SRR Mission Requirements - 13 UCB July Program Margin M-29. All resource budgets (mass, power, data) shall show sufficient positive margin at each project milestone Rationale: Sufficient margins are evaluated at each major review and addressed in Risk Mitigation Plan. Mass and Power resources are considered ‘high’ risk (triggering risk mitigation plan) if they don’t meet the margin schedule.

THEMIS SRR Mission Requirements - 14 UCB July Contamination - Magnetics M-30. AC magnetic noise radiated by the Probe and the other instruments shall not exceed 10Hz and 1pT/Hz^1/2 at 1kHz at the SCM sensor Rationale: Sensitivity required by SCM M-31. DC magnetic noise radiated by the Probe and the other instruments shall not exceed 1nT at the FGM sensor Rationale: Sensitivity required by FGM M-32. All THEMIS elements shall comply with the Magnetics Cleanliness standard described in the THEMIS Magnetics Cleanliness Plan. Rationale: Adherence to document ensures residual and induced magnetic fields does not corrupt mission science

THEMIS SRR Mission Requirements - 15 UCB July Contamination - Electrostatic M-33. Quasi-DC voltages produced by the Probe and the other instruments shall not affect the quality of the EFI measurement Rationale: Sensitivity of EFI M-34. All THEMIS elements shall comply with the THEMIS Electrostatic Cleanliness (ESC) Plan Rationale: Adherence to document mitigates potential of contaminating quasi-DC voltages affecting quality of EFI measurement. Compliance will be assured via a ESC Czar.

THEMIS SRR Mission Requirements - 16 UCB July Contamination - Molecular M-35. The molecular contamination of the ESA sensor shall be less than 0.01 ug/cm^2 (TBR). Particulate level TBD. Rationale: ESA Contamination (instrument driver) M-36. The molecular contamination of the SST sensor shall be less than 0.1 ug/cm^2 (TBR). Particulate level TBD. Rationale: SST Contamination M-37. All THEMIS Elements shall comply with the THEMIS Contamination Control Plan Rationale: Adherence to document ensures contamination of sensitive portions of the Probes by condensable and particulates does not prevent the ESA and SST from meeting its performance requirements

THEMIS SRR Mission Requirements - 17 UCB July Interfaces M-38. All hardware shall meet the general electrical system requirements documented in the THEMIS Electrical System Specification. Rationale: Adherence to document provides electrical design guidelines and alleviates interface problems during system integration M-39. All THEMIS Elements shall be compatible per their ICDs Rationale: Adherence to ICDs ensures interface requirements are met

THEMIS SRR Mission Requirements - 18 UCB July Test Requirements M-40. All THEMIS components shall verify mission performance requirements are met per the Verification Plan and Environmental Test Specification Rationale: Supports mission science – verifies performance is as expected prior to launch M-41. All THEMIS components shall survive and function prior to, during and after exposure to the launch and space environments described in the Verification Plan and Environmental Test Specification Rationale: Adherence to document ensures all elements are subjected to expected launch and space environments as part of a comprehensive test program M-42. All THEMIS components shall be sufficiently testable during all levels of integration and test Rationale: Ensures system function and performance throughout integration and test phase. Drives subsystem designs to include integrated test capability

THEMIS SRR Mission Requirements - 19 UCB July Launch Vehicle M-43. THEMIS shall be compatible with a Delta II Rationale: Provides sufficient performance capability and reliability to place THEMIS Probes into the desired initial parking orbit M-44. Within the schedule cap (March 2007), the THEMIS launch date shall not be restricted Rationale: System is sized to allow launch any day of the year. A launch date of August 2006 plus or minus 2 months is preferred in accordance with schedule and minimum time to prime observation season. Launch period would allow time to commission the probes prior to the operational period starting in December The launch window is approximately 40 minutes every day. M-45. The THEMIS Probe Carrier Assembly (5 Fueled Probes plus Probe Carrier) mass-to-orbit shall not exceed 807kg. Rationale: Preliminary estimate of Delta lift capability

THEMIS SRR Mission Requirements - 20 UCB July Launch Vehicle Derived M-46. The fundamental frequency of the Probe Carrier Assembly (Probe Carrier + 5 Fueled Probes) in launch configuration shall be greater than 15 Hz in lateral and 35 Hz in axial. M-47. The CG location of the Probe Carrier Assembly (Probe Carrier + 5 Fueled Probes) shall be within TBD of the PCA centerline. Rationale: Delta II requirements.

THEMIS SRR Mission Requirements - 21 UCB July Ground Stations M-48. THEMIS shall be compatible with BGS, USN, TDRSS, and NASA/GN Rationale: Ensures data downlink requirements during operations phase are met with dedicated ground station (BGS), secondary (USN) and back-up (NASA/GN). TDRSS provides continuous coverage as needed during launch, early operations phase, maneuvers and potential anomalous conditions. M-49. THEMIS shall be S-Band, CCSDS-compatible and COP-1 compatible Rationale: Provides a standard to simplify back-up by other stations

THEMIS SRR Mission Requirements - 22 UCB July Downlink Rates M-50. THEMIS Probes shall be capable of downlinking all stored data for each Probe: 325 Mbits/orbit science and instrument housekeeping data (assumes x2 compression) plus 87 Mbits/orbit Probe Bus housekeeping data. Rationale: Reflects expected data volume. M-51. THEMIS Probes shall be capable of downlinking minimum housekeeping data from all probes at least once a day. Rationale: Operational Goal. Safe-guards against anomaly going unnoticed. M-52. THEMIS Probes shall be capable of downlinking all data within 30 minutes per day per probe (maximum transmitter on time). Rationale: Reflects power generation capabilities of body mounted solar arrays. Affects thermal and data rates. M-53. THEMIS Probes shall provide housekeeping telemetry downlink capability from maximum altitude (apogee of 30RE) Rationale: Desire to know state of probe at any time (no black-out)

THEMIS SRR Mission Requirements - 23 UCB July Uplink Rates M-54. THEMIS Probes shall be capable of receiving ground commands to maximum altitude (apogee of 30RE) Rationale: Desire to communicate with probe at anytime (no black-out) M-55. The THEMIS uplink data rate shall be 1 kbps for all probes Rationale: Baseline uplink rate

THEMIS SRR Mission Requirements - 24 UCB July Link Budget M-56. The S-Band uplink and downlink shall have a link margin of ≥ 3dB at all points in the orbit through all mission phases Rationale: Ensures a stable and reliable RF communications path. Design driven by limiting cases (P-1). Drives need for variable downlink rates M-57. The THEMIS link analysis shall assume a 10E-6 BER downlink and 10E-7 BER uplink Rationale: Downlink BER minimizes error rate of data recovered after transmission and recovery at ground station. Uplink BER (along with command checking) precludes the execution of an invalid command

THEMIS SRR Mission Requirements - 25 UCB July Ranging, Gnd Processing M-58. Probe orbits shall be known to an accuracy of 10km at Perigee and 100km at Apogee. Rationale: Adequate for ground station antenna pointing. Meets Science Requirements. M-59. The THEMIS Ground System shall monitor and take appropriate action to maintain the health and safety of the Probes Rationale: Defines Ground System Role. M-60. The THEMIS Ground System shall calculate and propagate all orbit and attitude parameters necessary for orbit maintenance and attitude control of each Probe. Rationale: Design decision to simplify Probe Bus design, given spinning probes are highly stable once fully deployed and spinning.