NAPEOS: The ESA/ESOC Tool for Space Geodesy

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Reference Frames for GPS Applications and Research
Advertisements

Accurate reference frame access at arbitrary points on Earth GPS Dancer project Henno Boomkamp Dancer algorithms, JAVA programming, JXTA, P2P & internet,
On the alternative approaches to ITRF formulation. A theoretical comparison. Department of Geodesy and Surveying Aristotle University of Thessaloniki Athanasios.
Effect of Surface Loading on Regional Reference Frame Realization Hans-Peter Plag Nevada Bureau of Mines and Geology and Seismological Laboratory University.
2-3 November 2009NASA Sea Level Workshop1 The Terrestrial Reference Frame and its Impact on Sea Level Change Studies GPS VLBI John Ries Center for Space.
Impact of SLR tracking on GPS Position Paper presented at the ILRS Workshop on SLR tracking of GNSS constellations September 14-19, 2009 Metsovo, Greece.
Tide Gauge Benchmark Monitoring Need for Reprocessing in Europe Tilo Schöne & the IGS TIGA Working Group.
International Terrestrial Reference Frame - Latest Developments Horst Müller 16th International Workshop on Laser Ranging, Poznan, Poland, October
ESOC Navigation Support Office ILRS Workshop 2008 Poznan, Poland ESOC IGS, IDS, ILRS (Re-) processing T. Springer, M. Otten, I. Romero, J. Dow.
Better Positions and Improved Access to the National Spatial Reference System  Multi-Year CORS Solution  National Adjustment of 2011  New NGS Datasheet.
Attempts to separate apparent observational range bias from true geodetic signals Graham Appleby, Philip Gibbs, Matthew Wilkinson, Vicki Smith Space Geodesy.
Laser Ranging Contributions to Earth Rotation Studies Richard S. Gross Jet Propulsion Laboratory California Institute of Technology Pasadena, CA 91109–8099,
ESTIMATION OF THE ELASTICITY EARTH PARAMETERS FROM THE SLR TECHNIQUE M.Rutkowska Space Research Centre, Polish Academy of Sciences M. Jagoda Technical.
Workshop, Miami, June 2008 ITRF2005 residuals and co-location tie issues Zuheir Altamimi IGN, France Some features of ITRF2005 residuals ITRF2005 vs IGS05.
IGS Analysis Center Workshop, Miami Beach, 2-6 June 2008 M. Fritsche, R. Dietrich, A. Rülke Institut für Planetare Geodäsie (IPG), Technische Universität.
Recent IERS Site Survey of Multiple Co-located Geodetic Techniques by NGS Kendall Fancher, Dru Smith, Steve Breidenbach, Jeff Olsen, Nagendra Paudel NOAA’s.
DORIS - DAYS Toulouse May 2-3, 2000 DORIS Doppler Orbitography and Radiopositioning Integrated by Satellite  Basic system concept  Main missions  Schedules.
RFWG report ______________________ IGS 39th Governing Board Meeting San Francisco, 3 December
Linking GPS to Tide Gauges and Tide Gauge Benchmarks Tilo Schöne GeoForschungsZentrum Potsdam Understanding Sea-level Rise and Variability, WCRP Workshop,
A New & Improved National Spatial Reference System Refinements of the North American Datum of 1983 through the Multi-Year CORS Solution and the National.
Future IGS & inter-technique SINEX combinations: Issues and challenges D. Lavallée (aka Peter Clarke), R. Ferland, D. Thaller, T. Herring, R. Biancale.
ESOC Navigation Support Office IGS Workshop 2008 Miami ESOC New Developments and Innovations T.A. Springer, F. Dilssner, E. Schoenemann, M. Otten, I. Romero,
Reference Frame Theory and Practice Kristine Larson University of Colorado.
Regional and Global Measurements: The Reference Frame for Understanding Observations Geoff Blewitt University of Nevada, Reno, USA Zuheir Altamimi IGN,
October 8, session 2REFAG2010 Paris1 Distributed processing systems for large geodetic solutions IAG WG “Comparison and combination of precise.
ILRS WorkshopEastbourne, UK October 3 -7, 2005 Global Geodetic Observing System (GGOS) A project of the IAG.
Ground Support Network operations for the GRAS Radio Occultation Mission R. Zandbergen, the GRAS GSN team (ESOC) and the Metop GRAS team (EUMETSAT) 09/09/2011.
Space Geodesy (1/3) Geodesy provides a foundation for all Earth observations Space geodesy is the use of precise measurements between space objects (e.g.,
Titelmaster Geometrical and Kinematical Precise Orbit Determination of GOCE Akbar Shabanloui Institute of Geodesy and Geoinformation, University of Bonn.
Recent GNSS Activities at Geoscience Australia Gary Johnston, Guorong Hu, Anna Riddell Geodesy & Seismic Monitoring Branch, Geoscience Australia.
IGS Analysis Center Workshop, 2-6 June 2008, Florida, USA GPS in the ITRF Combination D. Angermann, H. Drewes, M. Krügel, B. Meisel Deutsches Geodätisches.
Geodetic Networks: The Supporting Framework Terrestrial Reference Frame is ‘Critical Infrastructure’ for all Earth science research and applications. Global.
Determination of seasonal geocenter variations from DORIS, GPS and SLR data.
SPACE GEODESY NETWORK & ITRF Z Minchul LEE 1.
ESOC Navigation Support Office EGU Vienna, , 1/18 Ground support network for the Metop GRAS atmospheric sounding mission R.Zandbergen, A.Ballereau,
01/0000 HEO and Daylight Ranging “Reality and Wishes” Ramesh Govind ILRS Fall Workshop, 4 th October 2005.
AGU Fall meeting Quality assessment of GPS reprocessed Terrestrial Reference Frame 1 IGN/LAREG and GRGS 2 University of Luxembourg X Collilieux.
Calibration of geodetic (dual frequency) GPS receivers Implications for TAI and for the IGS G. Petit.
Assessment of Reference Frame Stability trough offset detection in GPS coordinate time series Dragan Blagojević 1), Goran Todorović 2), Violeta Vasilić.
Wiesław Kosek 1,2, Agnieszka Wnęk 1, Maria Zbylut 1, Waldemar Popiński 3 1) Environmental Engineering and Land Surveying Department, University of Agriculture.
ESOC Navigation Support Office IGS Workshop 2008 Miami ESOC IGS Reprocessing T.A. Springer, F. Dilssner, E. Schoenemann, I. Romero, J. Tegedor, F. Pereira,
Geocenter Variations Derived from GRACE Data Z. Kang, B. Tapley, J. Chen, J. Ries, S. Bettadpur Joint International GSTM and SPP Symposium GFZ Potsdam,
CEGRN 2015 Campaign A. Caporali (1), J. Zurutuza (1), O. Khoda (2), G. Stangl (3), M. Becker (4), M. Bertocco (1), L. Gerhatova (5), M. Mojzes (5), M.
Unified Analysis Workshop, December 5-7, 2007, Beach Resort Monterey, CA GG S Proposals for Extended Parameterization in SINEX Markus Rothacher GeoForschungsZentrum.
Earth Surface and Interior Focus Area Space Geodetic Networks for Maintaining the Reference Frame Geodesy's Critical Contributions to NASA (Earth Science)
Информационно-аналитический навигационный центр ЦУП-М ЦНИИмаш GLONASS Status. ILRS support for GLONASS. ILRS Fall 2005 Workshop October 2-7, 2005, Eastbourne.
1. The International Terrestrial Reference Frame (ITRF) needs to be made more robust and stable over multi-decadal time scales. –target accuracy is 0.1.
C H A M P International Laser Ranging Service - General Assembly, October 2005 Eastbourne, UK L. Grunwaldt, R. Schmidt, D. König, R. König, F.-H. Massmann.
SHA: the GNSS Analysis Center at SHAO Junping Chen, Bin Wu, Xiaogong Hu Haojun Li, Xiao Pei, Yize Zhang Shanghai Astronomical Observatory (SHAO)
International Association of Geodesy Apr 17, GGOS2020 – Chapter 10 G. Beutler Astronomical Institute, University of Bern EGU Assembly Vienna April.
Water vapour estimates over Antarctica from 12 years of globally reprocessed GPS solutions Ian Thomas, Matt King, Peter Clarke Newcastle University, UK.
Satellite geodesy (ge-2112) Introduction E. Schrama.
Geodetic Networks: The Supporting Framework Terrestrial Reference Frame is ‘Critical Infrastructure’ for all Earth science research and applications. Global.
Workshop, Miami, June 2008 IGS Contribution to ITRF Zuheir Altamimi & Xavier Collilieux IGN, France.
Site Surveys at HartRAO NERC Space Geodesy Facility, Herstmonceux ILRS Fall 2005 Workshop 3 October 2005 Ludwig Combrinck HartRAO Space Geodesy Programme.
National Height Modernization Eastern Regional Meeting March 4, 2014 Continuously Operating Reference Stations (CORS) Neil D. Weston National Geodetic.
Armasuisse Swiss Federal Office of Topography swisstopo Determination of Tectonic Movements in the Swiss Alps using GNSS and Levelling E. Brockmann, D.
Importance of SLR in the Determination of the ITRF Zuheir Altamimi IGN, France Geoscience Australia, Canberra, August 29, 2005 SLR Strength: its contribution.
Determination of the SLR station coordinates and velocities on the basis of laser observations of low satellites Paweł Lejba, Stanisław Schillak Space.
Insensitivity of GNSS to geocenter motion through the network shift approach Paul Rebischung, Zuheir Altamimi, Tim Springer AGU Fall Meeting 2013, San.
Ggim.un.org Positioning geospatial information to address global challenges Global and National Geodetic Reference Frames: how they are connected and why.
I.Prochazka,et al, KOM ESOC, Darmstadt, April 2016 SPACE SITUATIONAL AWARENESS PROGRAMME P2-SST-VII EXPERT COORDINATION CENTRES (PHASE 1) Contribution.
IERS Combination WG and CPP Meeting, April 27, 2005, TU of Vienna, Austria Status and Future of the IERS Combination Efforts Markus Rothacher GeoForschungsZentrum.
IERS Combination WG and CPP Meeting, April 27, 2005, TU of Vienna, Austria Strategies for Weekly Routine Generation of Combined IERS Products Markus Rothacher.
IERS Directing Board Meeting No.39, BIPM Paris, September 23, 2004 IERS2005: Plan “Integrated Earth orientation parameters, Radio sources, and Site coordinates.
Thomas Herring, IERS ACC, MIT
Reference Frame Representations: The ITRF from the user perspective
Presentation of Public ESA Multi-GNSS Products
ESOC IGS Reprocessing T. Springer, F. Dilssner, E. Schoenemann,
VLBI Estimates of Vertical Crustal Motion in Europe
Presentation transcript:

NAPEOS: The ESA/ESOC Tool for Space Geodesy Tim Springer, Florian Dilssner, Diego Escobar, Drazen Svehla, Claudia Flohrer, Rene Zandbergen EGU 2011, Vienna, Austria 07/04/2011

NAPEOS Facts (1) ESOC Navigation Support Office does all its operational work with NAPEOS ESOC uses NAPEOS operational for three space geodetic techniques GNSS, DORIS, SLR ESOC is a full analysis centre in the three technique services IDS, ILRS, and IGS Performance is excellent in all three services ESOC contributed significantly to the ITRF2008 by participating in the reprocessing of all three techniques NAPEOS is very well suited for analysing the data from all three space geodetic techniques

Excellent Performance in IGS

Source of plot: Cecilia Sciarretta based on weekly ILRS combination Excellent Performance in ILRS Source of plot: Cecilia Sciarretta based on weekly ILRS combination

NAPEOS can efficiently and accurately handle GNSS LEO data NAPEOS Facts (2) NAPEOS has been used extensively for GNSS LEO data JASON-1/2 complete time frame from 2001-2011 High accuracy LEO orbits Using ESOC IGS reprocessing with 30 second clocks PPP-like solution for JASON-1 and JASON-2 Reference: Paper by Claudia Flohrer et al. in “Advances in Space Research” GNSS PCVs for LEO processing based on combined GNSS solution JASON-1/2 + 100 IGS stations as “normal” IGS solution No external reference frame needed to derive z-PCOs! Reference: Poster by Florian Dilssner at EGU 2011 Resulting PCV product: ideal for LEO GNSS processing NAPEOS can efficiently and accurately handle GNSS LEO data

Excellent quality of LEO orbits

NAPEOS Facts (3) NAPEOS is used in the “Combination at the Observation Level” project of the IERS Provided 3 different solutions: GNSS + SLR (IGS-like + SLR of the GNSS sats.) DORIS + SLR (IDS-like + SLR of the DORIS sats.) SLR only solution (LAGEOS 1/2, ETALON 1/2) Description: ftp://dgn6.esoc.esa.int/cool/000readme.cool Reference: COL-WG poster here at the EGU 2011 Next steps: Adding JASON GNSS data to “GNSS + SLR” solution Combination of the 3 solutions on NEQ level NAPEOS is capable of combining the observations from all three space geodetic techniques on the observation level

Observed – Computed Statistics of SLR observations from GNSS Satellites Small bias and small RMS for GNSS satellites Combination of the techniques is feasible Document title | Author Name | Place | Data doc | Programme | Pag. 8

Main Goals with NAPEOS at ESOC Connect the three space geodetic techniques on the observation level which has as advantages (compared to ITRF 2008 realization): It makes full use of the common parameters E.g. GNSS and JASON orbit parameters We can introduce JASON-1 and JASON-2 for SLR and GPS solutions (for ITRF only IDS made use of this satellites) Connect the techniques in space (“space-ties”) using the local ties between the on-board instruments (but also using the local site-ties on the ground) Main differences compared to ITRF 2008 realization: Includes SLR observations from the GNSS targets Includes GNSS and SLR observations from JASON-1 and -2 Uses “space-ties” and local ties but will lack VLBI data

Summary and Conclusions Combination of GNSS, SLR and DORIS will allow Determination of “unified” reference frame Absolute estimation of GNSS satellite antenna offsets Already possible with just GNSS when including a LEO like JASON Absolute estimation of SLR station biases (where needed) Definitely needed for some sites. Combination also makes it easier to detect the biases Determine the orbits of all satellites in the unified reference frame NAPEOS is the unique tool that is capable of doing this

THANK YOU Tim Springer and Florian Dilssner Tim.Springer@esa.int Florian.Dilssner@esa.int