Examining IEP s for Educational Benefit East Haven Public Schools March 28, 2006 25 Industrial Park Road, Middletown, CT 06457-1520 · (860) 632-1485.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Curriculum Based Measurements
Advertisements

New Eligibility and Individualized Educational Program (IEP) Forms 2007 Illinois State Board of Education June 2007.
Participation in Texas Assessment of Knowledge and Skills.
Connecticut State Department of Education
NCLB Basics From “What Parents of Students with Disabilities Need to Know & Do” National Center on Educational Outcomes University of Minnesota
Special Education Collaborative Meeting Policies, Procedures, Practices Fall 2011.
Standards-Based IEPs Writing Goals and Objectives
Report Cards 101. ELD Progress Report Cards Complete ELD portfolios. Only score the standards you have taught. Score individual standards on assessments/work.
ACCOMMODATIONS MANUAL How to Select, Administer, and Evaluate Use of Accommodations for Instruction and Assessment of Students with Disabilities.
Large Scale Assessment Conference June 22, 2004 Sue Rigney U.S. Department of Education Assessments Shall Provide for… Participation of all students Reasonable.
National Center on Educational Outcomes June, 2004 How do we keep kids from being stuck in our gap? A frame, a series of discussion questions, and some.
MARCH 12, 2015 Testing at Lees Corner ES. Still Online? Online Testing  Grade Level Common Assessments Mostly in grades 3-6  eCart Windows Grades 3-6.
1 Common IEP Errors and Legal Requirements. 2 Today’s Agenda Parent Survey Results Procedural Compliance Self Assessment Results.
 Meaningful  Measureable  Able to be Monitored  Useful in Making instructional decisions.
D ATA, D ATA, AND MORE D ATA Paraeducator Recertification Presented by: Lisa Andreasen April 17, 2013.
STANDARDS BASED GOALS and OBJECTIVES
Examining the Relationship of Quality IEPs to Student Progress A Reflective Process to Promote Reasonable Calculations for Educational Benefit 25 Industrial.
Beginning the Process for IEP Development 25 Industrial Park Road, Middletown, CT · (860) ctserc.org.
Wisconsin Extended Grade Band Standards
 Special Education is mandated by federal law and we have to do what they say.
Let’s Get S.T.A.R.T.ed Standards Transformation and Realignment in Thompson.
Fall Testing Update David Abrams Assistant Commissioner for Standards, Assessment, & Reporting Middle Level Liaisons & Support Schools Network November.
California English Language Development Test CELDT Whittier Union high School District Federal & State Categorical Programs Office.
Assessing Students With Disabilities: IDEA and NCLB Working Together.
STATE MONITORING VISIT Montgomery County Schools Week of April 18, 2016.
Developing Modifications Aligned with General Education Curriculum 25 Industrial Park Road, Middletown, CT · (860) ctserc.org.
A Reflective Process Designed by the California Department of Education 25 Industrial Park Road, Middletown, CT · (860) Revised 03/08.
Adolescent Literacy – Professional Development
Administrator Update January Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA) 1997 –Students with disabilities must participate in statewide assessment.
25 Industrial Park Road, Middletown, CT · (860) ctserc.org Using the PCF and the PAF to Develop IEPs October 11, 2006 Anne Marie Davidson.
Reevaluation Using PSM/RTI Processes, PLAFP, and Exit Criteria How do I do all this stuff?
Martha Thurlow Laurene Christensen Courtney Foster April 22, :15-2:15 MONITORING ACCOMMODATIONS FOR INSTRUCTION AND ASSESSMENT.
25 Industrial Park Road, Middletown, CT · (860) ctserc.org.
Educational Benefit Review (EBR) October Training Goals ► To define “Educational Benefit” ► To learn a process for reviewing your district’s IEPs.
State and Local Processes for Monitoring Educational Benefit
Educational Benefit Review (EBR)
Educational Benefit Review (ED Benefit). Educational Benefit Purpose To determine if the student’s Individualized Education Program (IEP) was reasonably.
Claremont Graduate University Teacher Education Special Education Seminars Dr. Phyllis B. Harris, Executive Director Oakland Unified School District Programs.
CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION Jack O’Connell, State Superintendent of Public Instruction Bilingual Coordinators Network September 17, 2010 Margaret.
Test Accommodations Students with Disabilities 2012 Presented by Janice Koblick, Curriculum Supervisor Exceptional Student Education 1.
The Educational Benefit Review Process A Reflective Process Designed by the California Department of Education 25 Industrial Park Road, Middletown, CT.
State Practices for Ensuring Meaningful ELL Participation in State Content Assessments Charlene Rivera and Lynn Shafer Willner GW-CEEE National Conference.
Alternate Proficiency Assessment Erin Lichtenwalner.
Alternative Assessment Chapter 8 David Goh. Factors Increasing Awareness and Development of Alternative Assessment Educational reform movement Goals 2000,
Assessing the Educational Benefit for Students with IEPs A Sharing of a New Professional Opportunity 25 Industrial Park Road, Middletown, CT
Assessing Very Low-Achieving Children with Disabilities Using Large Scale Assessments Sue Rigney, U.S. Department of Education OSEP 2006 Project Directors’
1 Queens Integrated Service Center Presents Clinical Components of the IEP: Testing to Teaching.
1 The Development of a Compliant and Instructionally-Relevant Individualized Education Plan Solitia Wilson ADMS 625 Summer 2014.
Ohio’s Alternate Assessments for Students with Disabilities Thomas Lather Office for Exceptional Children (614)
Steps to Creating Standards-Based Individualized Education Programs The following highlights the major steps Committees on Special Education (CSEs) can.
Using Assessments to Monitor and Evaluate Student Progress 25 Industrial Park Road, Middletown, CT · (860) ctserc.org.
Tools for Developing High Quality IEPs Barbara Slone Kimberly Mearman
The Standards-based IEP Process: What You Need to Know Standards-Based IEP State-Directed Project - January 2011.
Assessing the Educational Benefit for Students with IEPs A Sharing of a New Professional Opportunity 25 Industrial Park Road, Middletown, CT
FAPE Free, Appropriate Public Education : the standard for providing services to students with disabilities under I D EA.
Educational Benefit Review (EBR) October Educational Benefit Review (EBR) Purpose Determine if the student’s IEP is reasonably calculated for the.
Analyzing for Bridges and Gaps Beginning the Process for IEP Development 25 Industrial Park Road, Middletown, CT · (860) ctserc.org.
Teacher Roles and Responsibilities in the IEP Process Amanda Strong Hilsmier EDUC 559.
1 A FREE APPROPRIATE PUBLIC EDUCATION (FAPE) and FAPE REVISED Sherrie Brown Special Education and the Law February 11, 2008.
The Educational Benefit Review Process A Reflective Process Designed by the California Department of Education 25 Industrial Park Road, Middletown, CT.
Mississippi Department of Education Office of Special Education
American Institutes for Research
Analyses of Passing and Failing Data in IEP Courses
Educational Benefit Review
Diagnosis and Remediation of Reading Difficulties
Is Your Child’s IEP Individualized?
Academic Affairs Cluster 10 December 2015
Unit 7: Instructional Communication and Technology
Standards-based Individualized Education Program (IEP) Module One: Introduction SBIEP Module one: Introduction - The standards-based reform movement has.
Assessing Students With Disabilities: IDEA and NCLB Working Together
Presentation transcript:

Examining IEP s for Educational Benefit East Haven Public Schools March 28, Industrial Park Road, Middletown, CT · (860)

10/27/05 SERC 2 What is “Educational Benefit”? Dialogue with your neighbor What does this term mean to you?

10/27/05 SERC 3 Educational Benefit Educational Benefit can be measured by… Passing marks Advancement from grade to grade Progress toward goals and objectives Improved scores on district/statewide assessments/ alternate assessment Passing the high school exit exam

10/27/05 SERC 4 Focused Monitoring “The primary focus of Federal and State monitoring activities… improving educational results and functional outcomes for all children with disabilities” § 616 (a)(2)) (H.R § 616 (a)(2))

10/27/05 SERC 5 Why Procedural Compliance is Not Enough? “You can be in compliance with all 755 required items and not be achieving results for students with disabilities.” Alan Coulter

10/27/05 SERC 6 Current Underlying Concept Compliance Consists of Two Interrelated Elements: Educational Procedures + Educational Benefit (Results) BOE v. Rowley, decision, June 28,

10/27/05 SERC 7 How is Educational Benefit Obtained? “instruction… should be reasonably calculated to enable the child to achieve passing marks and advance from grade to grade” Judge Rehnquist BOE v. Rowley decision, June 28,1982

Assessing for Educational Benefit A Process for Districts to Examine IEPs

10/27/05 SERC 9 Educational Benefit Analysis Reviewing IEP documentation for a 3-year cycle Analyzing the relationship among needs, goals, and services Comparing progress across annuals Looking for patterns in the planning process Discussing if the IEP was reasonably planned to result in educational benefit Reviewing the child’s progress ("State and Local Processes for Monitoring Educational Benefit", 2004)

10/27/05 SERC 10 Steps for the Process STEP 1 Chart what is recorded in the IEPs about needs, goals and objectives, services and progress. STEP 2 Analyze the needs, goals and services within each IEP for alignment. STEP 3 Compare across each IEP to determine progression of progress (or lack of progress). ("State and Local Processes for Monitoring Educational Benefit", 2004)

10/27/05 SERC 11 STEP 1 Jigsaw the documentation of each IEP Look for… Present Level of Performance (p 3, 4-5) Goals & Objectives, Accommodations & Modifications (pp 4 & 8, 7 & 8) Services (p 5, 11) Progress made on annual goals (p 4, 7) ("State and Local Processes for Monitoring Educational Benefit", 2004)

10/27/05 SERC 12 STEP 1 For each IEP Record what is written on the IEP. Information must be present in the IEP Information is verbatim as much as possible Short-hand and abbreviations are ok, but paraphrasing or summarizing is not Color Coded Green- what is written in IEP Blue-strengths Red-supporting documents (psy. evals)

Present Levels ConcernsGoals/ Objectives Services Progress Academic/ Cognitive Language Arts: Domain

Present Levels ConcernsGoals/ Objectives Services Progress Academic/ Cognitive Language Arts: KTEA Reading 3.4 G.E. Oral Reading Inventory 3.2 G.E. Present Level

Present Levels ConcernsGoals/ Objectives Services Progress Academic/ Cognitive Language Arts: KTEA Reading 3.4 G.E. Oral Reading Inventory 3.2 G.E. Comp. is sig. below grade level Concerns

Present Levels ConcernsGoals/ Objectives Services Progress Academic/ Cognitive Language Arts: KTEA Reading 3.4 G.E. Oral Reading Inventory 3.2 G.E. Comp. is sig. below grade level Improve comp of read material from 3.2 to 5.0 Given passage state 2 details Given passage ans correctl y 5/6 W quest Goals, Objectives, Accommodations, & Modifications

Present Levels ConcernsGoals/ Objectives Services Progress Academic/ Cognitive Language Arts: KTEA Reading 3.4 G.E. Oral Reading Inventory 3.2 G.E. Comp. is sig. below grade level Improve comp of read material from 3.2 to 5.0 Given passage state 2 details Given passage ans correctl y 5/6 W quest Learning center 3.75 hrs/wk Service

Present Levels ConcernsGoals/ Objectives Services Progress Academic/ Cognitive Language Arts: KTEA Reading 3.4 G.E. Oral Reading Inventory 3.2 G.E. Comp. is sig. below grade level Improve comp of read material from 3.2 to 5.0 Given passage state 2 details Given passage ans correctl y 5/6 W quest Learning center 3.75 hrs/wk SSSSSS Progress

Present Levels ConcernsGoals/ Objectives Services Progress Academic/ Cognitive Language Arts: KTEA Reading 3.4 G.E. Oral Reading Inventory 3.2 G.E. Comp. is sig. below grade level Improve comp of read material from 3.2 to 5.0 Given passage state 2 details Given passage ans correctl y 5/6 W quest Learning center 3.75 hrs/wk SSSSSS

10/27/05 SERC 20 STEP 2 For each IEP The group will determine the alignment between each component The recorder will draw circles and arrows to show alignment

Present Levels ConcernsGoals/ Objectives Services Progress Academic/ Cognitive Language Arts: KTEA Reading 3.4 G.E. Oral Reading Inventory 3.2 G.E. Comp. is sig. below grade level Improve comp of read material from 3.2 to 5.0 Given passage state 2 details Given passage ans correctl y 5/6 W quest Learning center 3.75 hrs/wk SSSSSS

Present Levels ConcernsGoals/ Objectives Services Progress Academic/ Cognitive Language Arts: KTEA Reading 3.4 G.E. Oral Reading Inventory 3.2 G.E. Comp. is sig. below grade level Improve comp of read material from 3.2 to 5.0 Given passage state 2 details Given passage ans correctl y 5/6 W quest Learning center 3.75 hrs/wk SSSSSS

10/27/05 SERC 23 STEP 3 Comparing each IEP The group will determine if there was a change from the previous IEP to the next IEP The recorder will note the changes using 0, +, or –

Present Levels ConcernsGoals/ Objectives Services Progress Academic/ Cognitive Language Arts: KTEA Reading 3.4 G.E. Oral Reading Inventory 3.2 G.E. Comp. is sig. below grade level Improve comp of read material from 3.2 to 5.0 Given passage state 2 details Given passage ans correctl y 5/6 W quest Learning center 3.75 hrs/wk SSSSSS oNo change from prior year +Increased complexity or progress -Decreased complexity or progress

Present Levels ConcernsGoals/ Objectives Services Progress Academic/ Cognitive Language Arts: KTEA Reading 3.4 G.E. Oral Reading Inventory 3.2 G.E. Comp. is sig. below grade level Improve comp of read material from 3.2 to 5.0 Given passage state 2 details Given passage ans correctl y 5/6 W quest Learning center 3.75 hrs/wk SSSSSS KTEA Reading 2.1 G.E. Oral Reading Inventory 2.5 G.E. +

Present Levels ConcernsGoals/ Objectives Services Progress Academic/ Cognitive Language Arts: KTEA Reading 3.4 G.E. Oral Reading Inventory 3.2 G.E. Comp. is sig. below grade level Improve comp of read material from 3.2 to 5.0 Given passage state 2 details Given passage ans correctl y 5/6 W quest Learning center 3.75 hrs/wk SSSSSS Comp. is sig. below grade level + O

Present Levels ConcernsGoals/ Objectives Services Progress Academic/ Cognitive Language Arts: KTEA Reading 3.4 G.E. Oral Reading Inventory 3.2 G.E. Comp. is sig. below grade level Improve comp of read material from 3.2 to 5.0 Given passage state 2 details Given passage ans correctl y 5/6 W quest Learning center 3.75 hrs/wk SSSSSS + O Improve comp of read material from 2.5 to 4.0 +

Present Levels ConcernsGoals/ Objectives Services Progress Academic/ Cognitive Language Arts: KTEA Reading 3.4 G.E. Oral Reading Inventory 3.2 G.E. Comp. is sig. below grade level Improve comp of read material from 3.2 to 5.0 Given passage state 2 details Given passage ans correctl y 5/6 W quest Learning center 3.75 hrs/wk SSSSSS + O Given passage state 2 details + O

Present Levels ConcernsGoals/ Objectives Services Progress Academic/ Cognitive Language Arts: KTEA Reading 3.4 G.E. Oral Reading Inventory 3.2 G.E. Comp. is sig. below grade level Improve comp of read material from 3.2 to 5.0 Given passage state 2 details Given passage ans correctl y 5/6 W quest Learning center 3.75 hrs/wk SSSSSS + O Given passage ans correctly 6/6 W quest + O -

Present Levels ConcernsGoals/ Objectives Services Progress Academic/ Cognitive Language Arts: KTEA Reading 3.4 G.E. Oral Reading Inventory 3.2 G.E. Comp. is sig. below grade level Improve comp of read material from 3.2 to 5.0 Given passage state 2 details Given passage ans correctl y 5/6 W quest Learning center 3.75 hrs/wk SSSSSS + O + O - O

Present Levels ConcernsGoals/ Objectives Services Progress Academic/ Cognitive Language Arts: KTEA Reading 3.4 G.E. Oral Reading Inventory 3.2 G.E. Comp. is sig. below grade level Improve comp of read material from 3.2 to 5.0 Given passage state 2 details Given passage ans correctl y 5/6 W quest Learning center 3.75 hrs/wk SSSSSS + O + O - O

Present Levels ConcernsGoals/ Objectives Services Progress Academic/ Cognitive Language Arts: KTEA Reading 3.4 G.E. Oral Reading Inventory 3.2 G.E. Comp. is sig. below grade level Improve comp of read material from 3.2 to 5.0 Given passage state 2 details Given passage ans correctl y 5/6 W quest Learning center 3.75 hrs/wk SSSSSS + O + O - O

10/27/05 SERC 33 Summary of Reflection + Needs for Improvement