ENHANCING INQUIRY TEACHING Karen Hollweg Building a Presence for Science Education in Florida Jacksonville, FL October 16, 2003.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Mentoring New Educators
Advertisements

LESSON-DESIGN ELEMENTS THAT REFLECT THE COLLEGE-AND CAREER- READY STANDARDS FOR MATHEMATICS AND THE STANDARDS FOR MATHEMATICAL PRACTICE. CCRS IMPLEMENTATION.
A Vehicle to Promote Student Learning
A Guide to Implementation
Secondary District Professional Development October 14, 2011 Welcome! Please put on a name tag with your name and school, find any open seat and introduce.
1 Introduction to the Professional Teaching and Learning Cycle (PTLC)
Science PCK Workshop March 24, 2013 Dr. Martina Nieswandt UMass Amherst
Science Inquiry Minds-on Hands-on.
The 5 E Instructional Model
Standards Aligned System April 21, 2011 – In-Service.
CYCO Professional Development Packages (PDPs) Teacher Responsiveness to Student Scientific Inquiry 1.
COSEE California Communicating Ocean Sciences Session 8: Designing a Lesson.
An Overview of the New HCPSS Teacher Evaluation Process School-based Professional Learning Module Spring 2013 This presentation contains copyrighted material.
Pedagogical Approaches to Science Instruction ~Defining Inquiry~ Bay Area Science Oakland Unified School District POSIT ~ 2007.
Our Leadership Journey Cynthia Cuellar Astrid Fossum Janis Freckman Connie Laughlin.
“Teaching Electricity and Circuits Through Inquiry” Shawna Young EdTech Leaders Online.
Schoolwide Preparation for English Language Learners: Teacher Community and Inquiry-Based Professional Development.
Improving Teaching and Learning: One District’s Journey Curriculum and Instruction Leadership Symposium February 18-20, 2009  Pacific Grove, CA Chula.
The SIOP ® Model Continuing Professional Development.
Making Group Work Productive PowerPoints available at Click on “Resources”
Introduction to the Framework: Unit 1, Key Topic 2http://facultyinitiative.wested.org/1.
Math and Science Institute Exploring Physical Science Today’s Agenda Review of homework and participant sharing of their ENGAGE components of 5E. Engage.
Mississippi Teacher Evaluation System (MTES) Updates
Science Pacing and Content Grade 3 Millard E. Lightburn, Ph.D. District Science Supervisor 8/9-8/16/101.
MATH 90 CURRICULUM RENEWAL & MATH MAKES SENSE 9 WORKSHOP June 25th, 2010.
The Power of Formative Assessment to Advance Learning.
01.1 WELCOME TO COMMON CORE HIGH SCHOOL MATHEMATICS LEADERSHIP SCHOOL YEAR SESSION 1 16 SEPTEMBER 2015 EMBARKING ON A LEADERSHIP JOURNEY.
The Principles of Learning and Teaching P-12 Training Program
Enriching primary student teachers’ conceptions about science teaching: Towards dialogic inquiry-based learning Ilkka Ratinen, Sami Lehesvuori, Otto Kulhomäki,
District Meeting # East Bay BTSA Induction Consortium.
Elementary District Professional Development October 14, 2011 Welcome! Please put on a name tag with your name and school, find any open seat and introduce.
Twilight Training October 1, 2013 OUSD CCSS Transition Teams.
Community Context Series of Community Math Nights Leadership Development for Math Support Team Mathematics Content Courses for K-20 Teachers Ongoing support.
SCIENCE COMPANION, SESSION 3 INTRODUCTION TO THE ________________ MODULE [Your name here] January 24, 2011.
S-TEAM PROJECT: Dialogic Inquiry University of Leeds January 2010 Jaume Ametller and Phil Scott School of Education University of Leeds.
Standards-Based Curricula Dr. Dennis S. Kubasko, Jr. NC Teach Summer 2009.
Lesson Study Opening Activities (Movement Activity) Grouping Subgroup Article Sharing –Subgroup Reporting.
LESSON PLANNING What? Why? And How?. Goals of this session Participants will be able to identify and explain: 1.What is a lesson plan and how to develop.
WELCOME BACK TO CAMP!. Agenda Warm-Up for statistical and probabilistic thinking Norms for our PD Teaching through problem solving Break Lesson Study:
Copyright © 2008, Intel Corporation. All rights reserved. Intel, the Intel logo, Intel Education Initiative, and Intel Teach Program are trademarks of.
1 Support Provider Workshop # East Bay BTSA Induction Consortium.
Literacy Coaching: An Essential “Piece” of the Puzzle.
Introduction to the Framework: Unit 1, Getting Readyhttp://facultyinitiative.wested.org/1.
Professional Learning Resources Download presentations and resources from today’s sessions!  Go to BISD homepage  Departments  Professional Learning.
ASTE Session: EQUIPping Teachers to Achieve Meaningful Inquiry- based Teaching and Learning Jeff C. Marshall Clemson University 2010 NSTA Presentation.
M= Math in STEM College and Career Ready- Conference Summer, 2015.
TIG Ensuring Vertical Articulation in the Science Curriculum.
The 5 E Instructional Model. Concepts of Science Science Content Process Skills of Science.
Instructional Leadership Planning with Indicators of Quality Instruction.
Lead Teach Learn PLC Fundamental I: Core Curriculum & Instruction Session 3.
Metacognition to Motivate Learning
PBL Instructional Design. PBL Instructional Design Name: Name of PBL: Grade Level: Content Area:
Pre-Session Checklist MUTE mic TEST Bridgit PRINT Handouts Sign-in sheet Alberta Assessment Consortium Winter Seminar 2010 Student Engagement.
Instructional Leadership: Planning Rigorous Curriculum (What is Rigorous Curriculum?)
Science Notebooks Research-Based Strategies on how to implement them in today's science classroom by Karen Shepherd.
Academic Language and Standards-Based Instruction Session 4 1/28/16.
Gifted and Talented Academy Year 2 Curriculum and Instruction Session 4 HAEAnet-public Password: education0309.
SCIENCE COMPANION: TRAIN THE TRAINERS OCTOBER 13, 2009 Debbie Leslie, University of Chicago Center for Elementary Mathematics and Science Education (CEMSE)
History–Social Science: Unit 2, Key Topic 2http://facultyinitiative.wested.org/1.
Using Student Assessment Data in Your Teacher Observation and Feedback Process Renee Ringold & Eileen Weber Minnesota Assessment Conference August 5, 2015.
Inquiry Primer Version 1.0 Part 4: Scientific Inquiry.
4:00 – 4:05pm Welcome and Introductions 4:05 – 4:20pm Ice Breaker 4:20-4:30 pm Norms 4:30 – 5:00pm Journaling 5:00 – 5:30 pm Enquiry activity stations.
Instructional Leadership Supporting Common Assessments.
Introduction Dr. Sallimah Salleh-Universiti Brunei Darussalam Workshop Format: Simulation of classroom Technological, Pedagogical, Content Knowledge (TPACK)
MAKING THINKING VISIBLE Feb 6, 2012 Partnership for Professional Practice.
NORTH CAROLINA TEACHER EVALUATION INSTRUMENT and PROCESS
Seeing Is Believing: Successful Co-Teaching for English Learners
Elementary District Professional Development
Introducing the Course: Power Up Your Students’ Research Projects
Presentation transcript:

ENHANCING INQUIRY TEACHING Karen Hollweg Building a Presence for Science Education in Florida Jacksonville, FL October 16, 2003

Expectations/Outcomes 1.Develop clear images and a deeper understanding of what Inquiry looks like in classrooms 2.Use & consider applying these PD strategies/techniques for enhancing inquiry teaching “back home”. During this session, I expect you to

My Assumptions:  To work on improving Inquiry teaching, we have to inquire about it.  There's not enough time to teach ONLY inquiry, inquiry needs to be focused on other Big Ideas/standards content.  There are many different ways to teach Inquiry.  We can learn from each other. I don't know everything.

Introduce yourself to a neighbor. Working with your neighbor, list 3 essential characteristics of inquiry teaching.

Learning Cycle Engage Explore Propose explanations Apply Evaluate

AGENDA I. Introduction – of participants & session format II. ENGAGE - Look inside a Japanese classroom, analyze the lesson in terms of characteristics of inquiry teaching III. EXPLORE the use of new tools for analyzing inquiry instruction while looking inside a Colo. classroom IV. EXPLAIN/PROCESS FOR MEANING - and frame questions you'd like to discuss with the class's teacher &/or colleagues V. REFLECTION - quiet time to think about what you've seen and done so far VI. APPLY - Thinking about the level of use of Inquiry in your school/district, what PD strategies could you use to lead teachers/colleagues in advancing their understanding of Inquiry and use of Inquiry in teaching?

Evidence of Good Inquiry Teaching Things Observed That I Question

On your group’s chart paper, list the most compelling evidence to show that this was a good inquiry lesson. At the bottom of the paper, attach the blue copy of Table 2.6 on which you have circled the cell in each row that best describes the lesson you observed.

More Amount of Learner Self-Direction Less Less Amount of Direction from Teacher or Material More

CSSS Instructional Inquiry Rubric Instruction.htm

As you observe this class, use the CSSS/NLIST rubric for inquiry instruction to describe what you observe.

A Key Principle of Adult Learning Adult learners need opportunities to safely explore questions about how something they already know connects to new concepts and ideas and to examine and modify their thinking as they challenge assumptions and beliefs. S. Mundry, et al., Designing Successful Professional Meetings and Conferences in Education, 2000

from Looking Inside the Classroom

One condition that promotes adult learning is "careful and continuous guided reflection and discussion about the proposed ideas or changes.“ (S. Mundry, et al., Designing Successful Professional Meetings and Conferences in Education, 2000)

Reflections on this BAP PD Session 1. What did I learn about teaching science as inquiry from today’s experience? 2. What strategies/activities used so far today would I like to try using with others? 3. How could I use/apply this experience in working with Points of Contact/other teachers to make changes in teaching through inquiry? 4. Think about the schools/teachers in your District. On a range of 1 (ineffective instruction) to 5 (exemplary instruction), where do you think the majority of them stand?

Set Goals and Develop a Plan for leading teachers/colleagues in advancing their understanding of Inquiry and use of Inquiry in teaching

Professional Development Rubric  Professional development includes instruction on content topics.  Teacher reads books on inquiry- based instruction.  Teacher takes workshops or college-level courses on inquiry- based instruction, participates in inquiry discussion groups.  Teacher does workshops and/or writes articles on inquiry-based instruction.  Teacher is not aware of NSES.  Teacher is familiar with but does not us NSES.  Teacher frequently uses and cites NSES in teaching.  Teacher consistently uses NSES as part of teaching and professional development.  Teacher participates in one-day workshops based on current topics.  Teacher occasionally participates in ongoing university- sponsored inquiry workshops.  Teacher regularly participates in ongoing university-sponsored inquiry professional development sessions & seminars.  Teacher participates in ongoing inquiry by working with local or university-level scientists or by developing original inquiry investigations.  Teacher is not concerned with learning about inquiry pedagogy.  Teacher attempts to use Internet resources, videos, software, and CD-ROMs to search for inquiry articles and best practice pedagogy.  Teacher regularly uses Internet resources, videos, software, and CD- ROMs to search for inquiry articles and best practice pedagogy.  Teacher frequently uses Internet resources, videos, software, and CD-ROMs to enhance practice of inquiry pedagogy.  Teacher works as an individual.  Teacher works with another teacher to share inquiry strategies and activities.  Teacher works in collaboration with others to develop and share inquiry strategies.  Teacher works in collaboration with others in study-group sharing units, articles, and success stories. From Inquire Within: Implementing Inquiry-Based Science Standards, Douglass Llewellyn, Corwin Press, 2002.