Lesson 2-2: Logic 1 Lesson 2-2 Logic. Lesson 2-2: Logic 2 Venn diagrams: show relationships between different sets of data. can represent conditional.

Slides:

Advertisements

Similar presentations

Sec.2-3 Deductive Reasoning

Advertisements

Truth Tables and Venn Diagrams

Geometry 2.3 Big Idea: Use Deductive Reasoning

Lesson 2-2 Practice Modified by Lisa Palen. Venn diagrams: Diagram that shows relationships between different sets of data. can represent conditional.

Lesson 2-2 Logic Lesson 2-2: Logic.

Lesson Conditional Statements. Lesson Conditional Statement Definition:A conditional statement is a statement that can be written in if-then.

Definitions © 2006 by Mr. Mayers Reasoning Conditional Statements Properties Undefined Terms Symmetry Team 1Team 2Team 3Team

If (-3,y) is a solution to the equation -2x+7y=-8, what is the value for y ? a / 2 b. -2 c. - 2 / 7 d warm-up 4.

Chapter Logic. Conjecture 4 A conjecture is an educated guess. 4 Example: If you walk into a DRHS classroom where the teacher is speaking Spanish,

Logic, Conditional statements and deductive reasoning

Venn Diagrams. Venn diagrams:  Show relationships between different sets of data.  Can represent conditional statements.  Is usually drawn as a circle.

Do Now (partner #1) p: you live in San Francisco

Inductive Reasoning. The process of observing data, recognizing patterns and making generalizations about those patterns.

Review! It’s Go Time!.

Geometry Unit 2 Power Points Montero to 2.3 Notes and Examples Patterns, Conditional Statements, and BiConditional Statements Essential Vocabulary.

Section 2.3 Deductive Reasoning.

L OGIC. A conjecture is an educated guess that can be either true or false. A statement is a sentence that is either true or false but not both. Often.

L OGIC Sol: G.1 b, c Sec: A conjecture is an educated guess that can be either true or false. A statement is a sentence that is either true or.

Chapter 2.3 Notes: Apply Deductive Reasoning Goal: You will use deductive reasoning to form a logical argument.

Deductive Reasoning What can you D…D….D…. DEDUCE ?

Applying Deductive Reasoning Section 2.3. Essential Question How do you construct a logical argument?

Deductive Reasoning Chapter 2 Lesson 4.

Deductive Reasoning.  Conditional Statements can be written using symbolic notation  p represents hypothesis  q represents conclusion  is read as.

Inductive and Deductive Reasoning. Inductive Observing the data, recognizing a pattern and making generalizations Do you see a pattern Can you describe.

2.2 Inductive and Deductive Reasoning. What We Will Learn Use inductive reasoning Use deductive reasoning.

Inductive Reasoning and Conditional Statements

Inductive and Deductive Reasoning. Notecard 30 Definition: Conjecture: an unproven statement that is based on observations or given information.

Section 2-5: Deductive Reasoning Goal: Be able to use the Law of Detachment and the Law of Syllogism. Inductive Reasoning uses _________ to make conclusions.

WARM UP. DEDUCTIVE REASONING LEARNING OUTCOMES I will be able to use the law of detachment and syllogism to make conjectures from other statements I.

Venn Diagrams and Logic Lesson 2-2. Venn diagrams: show relationships between different sets of data. can represent conditional statements.

2.1 Conditional Statements Ms. Kelly Fall Standards/Objectives: Students will learn and apply geometric concepts. Objectives: Recognize the hypothesis.

Inductive and Deductive Reasoning. Definitions: Conditionals, Hypothesis, & Conclusions: A conditional statement is a logical statement that has two parts:

2-4 Venn Diagrams & Deductive Reasoning 1. Venn diagrams :  Diagram that shows relationships between different sets of data.  can represent conditional.

2.2 Inductive and Deductive Reasoning. Deductive reasoning is the process of reasoning logically from given statements to a conclusion.

Ch. 2.3 Apply Deductive Reasoning

Warm-up - Sept 22 (Tuesday) 8. Which conditional and its converse form a true biconditional? a. Write the two conditional statements that make up this.

Lesson 21 LAW OF DETACHMENT AND SYLLOGISM. Review and New Vocabulary Inductive reasoning is the process of reasoning that a rule or statement is true.

Section 2-4: Deductive Reasoning Objectives: Use the Law of Detachment Use the Law of Syllogism Inductive Reasoning: based on observing what has happened.

Entry Task. Using Deductive Reasoning 2.4 Learning Target: Given a true statement I can use deductive reasoning to make valid conclusions.

V ENN D IAGRAMS (G.1 C ) O BJ : SWBAT WRITE STATEMENTS GIVEN A VENN DIAGRAM ( AND THE CONVERSE ). H OMEWORK ( DAY 19) Worksheet day 19 (2-34Even, 36-64all)

Difference between inductive and deductive reasoning.

2.3 Deductive Reasoning p. 87 Reminders Statement Conditional statement Converse Inverse Contrapositive Biconditional Symbols p → q q → p ~p → ~q ~q.

Section 2.2 Inductive and Deductive Reasoning. Definition: Conjecture an unproven statement that is based on observations or given information.

Overview of Sections 1.1, Sections 1.1, 2.1, 2,2 and 2.3 Combined like Transformers!

Reasoning and Proof Chapter Use Inductive Reasoning Conjecture- an unproven statement based on an observation Inductive reasoning- finding a pattern.

LG 1: Logic A Closer Look at Reasoning

Chapter 2: Reasoning & Proof Conditionals, Biconditionals, & Deductive Reasoning.

Lesson 2-2 Logic Lesson 2-2: Logic.

Reasoning and Proof Unit 2.

Chapter 1 Lessons 1-4 to 1-8.

2.2 Inductive and Deductive Reasoning

2-1 Patterns and Inductive Reasoning

Deductive Reasoning Geometry 2-3.

Sec. 2.3: Apply Deductive Reasoning

Logic Lesson 2-2: Logic.

2.4 Deductive Reasoning.

Warmup Write the two conditionals(conditional and converse) that make up this biconditional: An angle is acute if and only if its measure is between 0.

Venn Diagrams & Deductive Reasoning

Drawing and Supporting Conclusions

2.3 Apply Deductive Reasoning

Venn Diagrams & Deductive Reasoning

Lesson 2-2 Logic.

Notes 2.3 Deductive Reasoning.

Chapter 2.3 Notes: Apply Deductive Reasoning

Lesson 2-2 Logic Lesson 2-2: Logic.

UNIT 2 Geometric Reasoning 2.1

Lesson 2-2 Practice Modified by Lisa Palen.

Presentation transcript:

Lesson 2-2: Logic 1 Lesson 2-2 Logic

Lesson 2-2: Logic 2 Venn diagrams: show relationships between different sets of data. can represent conditional statements. is usually drawn as a circle. Every point IN the circle belongs to that set. Every point OUT of the circle does not. Example: A =poodle... a dog B= horse... NOT a dog. B DOGS.A.A...B   dog

Lesson 2-2: Logic 3 For all..., every..., if...then... All right angles are congruent. Congruent Angles Right Angles Example1: Example 2:Every rose is a flower. Flower Rose Example 3:If two lines are parallel, then they do not intersect. lines that do not intersect parallel lines

Lesson 2-2: Logic 4 To Show Relationships using Venn Diagrams: Blue or Brown (includes Purple) …A  B AB A  B

Lesson 2-2: Logic 5 Example: Twenty-four members of Mu Alpha Theta went to a Mathematics conference. One-third of the members ran cross country. One sixth of the members were on the football team. Three members were on cross country and football teams. The rest of the members were in the band. How many were in the band? Hint:Draw a Venn Diagram and take one sentence at a time...

Lesson 2-2: Logic 6 Solution: Three members were on cross country and football teams… 3 The above sentence tells you two draw overlapping circles and put 3 in CC  F Twenty-four members of Mu Alpha Theta went to a Mathematics conference. One-third of the members ran cross country. 24 / 3 = 8; 8 members run cross country. So put 5 in cross country as there are already 3 in cross country. CCFootball 5 One sixth of the members were on the football team. 24/6 = 4; 4 members play football. So put 1 in football as there are already 3 in football. 1 Continued….

Lesson 2-2: Logic 7 Example: Continued…… The rest of the members were in the band. How many were in the band? Out of 24 members in Mu Alpha Theta, 9 play football or run cross country. Therefore, 15 are in the band. CC Football Band 15 Mu Alpha Theta

Lesson 2-2: Logic 8 Law of Detachment Given: a true conditional statement and the hypothesis occurs p  q is true p is given Conclusion: the conclusion will also occur q is true

Lesson 2-2: Logic 9 Law of Detachment - Example Given: If three points are collinear, then the points are all on one line. E, F, and G are collinear. Conclusion: E, F, and G are all on one line. Example 1: Given: If I find $20 in the street, then I’ll take you to the movies. On October 10 I found $20 in the street. Conclusion: I will take you to the movies. Example 2:

Lesson 2-2: Logic 10 Law of Syllogism Given: Two true conditional statements and the conclusion of the first is the hypothesis of the second. p  q and q  r Conclusion: If the hypothesis of the first occurs, then the conclusion of the second will also occur. prpr

Lesson 2-2: Logic 11 Law of Syllogism - Example If it rains today, then we will not see our friends. Example: If it rains today, then we will not have a picnic. If we do not have a picnic, then we will not see our friends. Conclusion: Given:

Lesson 2-2: Logic 12 Example 1: Mr. Puyat has worn a SAE t-shirt every Friday for the last couple of weeks. Because of this observation, Franco concludes that Mr. Puyat will wear a SAE t-shirt this Friday. What comes next? Based on the above, give your own definition of “inductive reasoning”. Inductive Reasoning - Example

Lesson 2-2: Logic 13 The process of observing data, recognizing patterns, and making conjectures (conclusions) about those patterns Inductive Reasoning - Definition

Lesson 2-2: Logic 14 Example 1: Franco saw a school memo saying that all staff must wear their SAE t-shirts on Fridays. Because of this, Franco concludes that Mr. Puyat will wear a SAE t-shirt this Friday. Example 2: The area of a whole circle is given by the formula: A = Πr². So if Franco wants to find the shaded area in this diagram, he can use the formula A = ½( Πr²). How is deductive reasoning different from inductive reasoning? Deductive Reasoning - Example

Lesson 2-2: Logic 15 The process of showing that certain statements follow logically from agreed- upon assumptions and proven facts or statements. Deductive Reasoning - Definition