Copyright © The Center for Educational Effectiveness, 2003-10. All Rights Reserved. EES Parent 2-way Comparison 1 EDUCATIONAL EFFECTIVENESS SURVEY - PARENT.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
[Imagine School at North Port] Oral Exit Report Quality Assurance Review Team School Accreditation.
Advertisements

Ohios Educator Standards. Ohios Standards for the Teaching Profession.
EFFECTIVE SCHOOLS CORRELATES 1. Strong instructional leadership 2. Clear-focused mission 3. Safe and orderly environment 4. Climate of high expectations.
Professional Learning Communities Connecting the Initiatives
Leading Continuous Improvement in the School Day 3.
School Leadership that Works:
Ohio Valley Educational Service Center CIP expanded for Agency Improvement Planning September 8-9, 2011 CIP expanded for Agency Improvement Planning September.
Theory of Action If teachers…. Curriculum: Teach targeted guided Math lessons based on reading data. Ensure student with disabilities are in the general.
April 6, 2011 DRAFT Educator Evaluation Project. Teacher Education and Licensure DRAFT The ultimate goal of all educator evaluation should be… TO IMPROVE.
1 The Nebraska Leadership Initiative Overview of Rationale and Research A Collaboration between NCSA, NDE, and ESUs.
Campus Improvement Plans (CIP) Schoolwide Programs.
Copyright © The Center for Educational Effectiveness, All Rights Reserved. EES Staff v9.0 Comparison 1 EDUCATIONAL EFFECTIVENESS SURVEY v9.0-
Forward Moving Districts Information Summarized by Iowa Support Team as they Study Identified Buildings and Districts Actions in those Buildings and Districts.
1 Why is the Core important? To set high expectations – for all students – for educators To attend to the learning needs of students To break through the.
Title I Needs Assessment and Program Evaluation
Title I Needs Assessment/ Program Evaluation Title I Technical Assistance & Networking Session October 5, 2010.
© 2013 ESD 112. All rights reserved. Putting Evidence Into Context, Trainer.
Cisco Confidential 1 © 2010 Cisco and/or its affiliates. All rights reserved. Meeting with Minsitry Of Education on Quality Support in the Cisco Netacad.
Welcome What’s a pilot?. What’s the purpose of the pilot? Support teachers and administrators with the new evaluation system as we learn together about.
1. 2 Why is the Core important? To set high expectations –for all students –for educators To attend to the learning needs of students To break through.
Copyright © The Center for Educational Effectiveness, All Rights Reserved. 1 EDUCATIONAL EFFECTIVENESS SURVEY - STUDENT v2.0.
January 31, 2014 Data Use Information and Guide. Copyright © 2014 New Teacher Center. All Rights Reserved. What is “TELL Oregon” ? TELL Oregon is an anonymous.
EES-Student v3.0 (Student Engagement Edition) Copyright © The Center for Educational Effectiveness, All Rights Reserved. EDUCATIONAL EFFECTIVENESS.
1 Teacher tube- “Learning to Change and Changing to Learn” “Death of education, but dawn of learning.”
EES Student v2.1 Copyright © The Center for Educational Effectiveness, All Rights Reserved. EDUCATIONAL EFFECTIVENESS SURVEY TM Student Edition.
Using the Nine Characteristics to Test Assumptions in School Improvement G. Sue Shannon OSPI Senior Researcher WERA/OSPI Assessment Conference December.
EES Parent v2.1 Copyright © The Center for Educational Effectiveness, All Rights Reserved. EDUCATIONAL EFFECTIVENESS SURVEY TM Parent Edition.
EES Staff v10.0 Copyright © The Center for Educational Effectiveness, All Rights Reserved. EDUCATIONAL EFFECTIVENESS SURVEY TM Staff Survey 3-Way.
Copyright © The Center for Educational Effectiveness, All Rights Reserved. 1 EDUCATIONAL EFFECTIVENESS SURVEY - PARENT v2.2.
COMPREHENSIVE NEEDS ASSESSMENT (CNA) Schoolwide Programs.
Curriculum Mapping: its MANY benefits of investing time and effort.
What is HQPD?. Ohio Standards for PD HQPD is a purposeful, structured and continuous process that occurs over time. HQPD is a purposeful, structured and.
Copyright © The Center for Educational Effectiveness, All Rights Reserved. EDUCATIONAL EFFECTIVENESS SURVEY - STUDENT v2.0.
1. Housekeeping Items June 8 th and 9 th put on calendar for 2 nd round of Iowa Core ***Shenandoah participants*** Module 6 training on March 24 th will.
Intro to TPEP. A new evaluation system should be a model for professional growth, supporting collaboration between teachers and principals in pursuit.
A state-wide effort to improve teaching and learning to ensure that all Iowa students engage in a rigorous & relevant curriculum. The Core Curriculum.
AdvancED District Accreditation Process © 2010 AdvancED.
Building and Recognizing Quality School Systems DISTRICT ACCREDITATION © 2010 AdvancED.
Anderson County Schools. 1. Providing technology to support instruction and to assist with stakeholder communication. 2. Identifying and providing new.
Common Core State Standards: Supporting Implementation and Moving to Sustainability Based on ASCD’s Fulfilling the Promise of the Common Core State Standards:
Federal Flexibility Initiative and Schoolwide Programs.
Staying on Message in Changing Times Oklahoma Statewide System of Support (SSOS) January 7, 2011 Dr. Cindy Koss, Assistant State Superintendent Oklahoma.
Copyright © The Center for Educational Effectiveness, All Rights Reserved. STAFF EDUCATIONAL EFFECTIVENESS SURVEY v9.0.
You can replace this text with art Goal Setting Process for the Verona Public Schools Board of Education Facilitated by: Charlene Peterson, NJSBA Field.
CAMPUS IMPROVEMENT PLANS (CIP) Schoolwide Programs.
High Performance Leaders in Irving Independent School District (IISD) Administrator’s Leadership Conference August 3, 2010 Leadership 1.
District Leadership Module Preview This PowerPoint provides a sample of the District Leadership Module PowerPoint. The actual Overview PowerPoint is 73.
Amy Alexander. Analyzing Effectiveness Participants’ Reactions Participants’ Learning Organization Support and Change Participants’ Use of New Knowledge.
Breeding Corn for Two Traits. Activity 6: Breeding Corn for Two Traits LIMITED LICENSE TO MODIFY. These PowerPoint® slides may be modified only by teachers.
Connecticut Accountability for Learning Initiative District and School Capacity Building Leadership No Child Left Behind Partnerships & Professional Learning.
August 2, Welcome Who is the TSD Continuous Improvement Team ? What is the work of the TSD Continuous Improvement Team? What is.
9 Common Characteristics of Successful Schools From: What we know about successful school leadership (2003). - American Education Research Association.
Office of Service Quality
Sustainability Case Studies. Activity 3: Sustainability Case Studies LIMITED LICENSE TO MODIFY. These PowerPoint® slides may be modified only by teachers.
Federal Flexibility Initiative and Schoolwide Programs.
Champaign Unit 4 Parent Advocacy Committee Update Cheryl Camacho & Tony Howard April 22, 2013.
Learning Resource Team: Aligning Systems To Support All Learners What does this look like in our school? 3/9/20161.
Continuous School Improvement Planning: Developing a School Improvement Plan October 24, 2011 Intermediate Unit 1 Instructional Support Services.
School Improvement Needs Assessment – © Iowa Association of School Boards Assessment Conducted by the Iowa Association of School Boards.
Working With Parents as Partners To Improve Student Achievement Taylor County Schools August 2013.
Cross State Analyses of Results TELL Survey. New Teacher Center (NTC) worked collaboratively with 11 state coalitions—including governors,
Long Range Technology Plan, Student Device Standards Secondary Device Recommendation.
Effective Professional Learning Communities (PLC) Where do we begin at Myers Middle School? (Adapted from Professional Learning Communities at Work Robert.
Outcomes By the end of our sessions, participants will have…  an understanding of how VAL-ED is used as a data point in developing professional development.
EES Parent v2.1 Copyright © The Center for Educational Effectiveness, All Rights Reserved. EDUCATIONAL EFFECTIVENESS SURVEY TM Parent Edition.
EES Staff V10.1 © Center for Educational Effectiveness, Inc. All Rights Reserved. 1 EDUCATIONAL EFFECTIVENESS SURVEY™ Staff edition V Characteristics.
EDUCATIONAL EFFECTIVENESS SURVEYTM
COLlaboration time survey
EDUCATIONAL EFFECTIVENESS SURVEYTM
EDUCATIONAL EFFECTIVENESS SURVEY - STUDENT v2.0
Presentation transcript:

Copyright © The Center for Educational Effectiveness, All Rights Reserved. EES Parent 2-way Comparison 1 EDUCATIONAL EFFECTIVENESS SURVEY - PARENT v2.1

Copyright © The Center for Educational Effectiveness, All Rights Reserved. EES Parent 2-way Comparison 2 The Center for Educational Effectiveness, Inc. The Center for Educational Effectiveness (CEE) is a service, consulting, and research organization dedicated to the mission of partnering with K-12 schools to improve student learning. NOTICE The Center for Educational Effectiveness, Inc. (CEE) makes substantial effort to ensure the accurate scoring, analysis, and reporting of the results of the Educational Effectiveness Survey. However, CEE makes no warranty of any kind with regard to this material, including, but not limited to, the implied warranties of merchantability and fitness for a particular purpose. CEE shall not be liable for errors contained herein or for incidental or consequential damages in connection with the furnishing, performance, or use of this material. Reproduction rights granted for non-commercial use-- including all school and district improvement activities. Published by: The Center for Educational Effectiveness, Inc nd Ave. NE. Redmond WA Copyright © Center for Educational Effectiveness, Inc Printed in the U.S.A. Contact Information: Phone: Fax:

Copyright © The Center for Educational Effectiveness, All Rights Reserved. EES Parent 2-way Comparison 3 This report represents a comparative perspective on your EES Parent data (i.e. a cross tabulation).

Copyright © The Center for Educational Effectiveness, All Rights Reserved. EES Parent 2-way Comparison While most schools focus on the outcomes they are reaching for, truly successful schools focus on organizational effectiveness and the programs and systems that drive and sustain improvement in the outcomes. The Educational Effectiveness Survey (EES), was developed to assist schools in continuous, sustainable improvement by helping schools understand their strengths and challenges in the areas known to impact the effectiveness of a school. While there is no single solution for all schools, research on effective schools has identified common characteristics of high performing schools (Marzano, 2003). Successful schools and schools engaged in improvement focus on these characteristics to create and improve the system(s) that drive the outcomes. To help schools identify and leverage these drivers and focus on what makes a school successful, the EES quantifies these characteristics. This results report contains a summary of the information your parent community provided on the EES survey form. CHARACTERISTICS OF HIGH PERFORMING SCHOOLS: Clear and Shared Focus High Standards and Expectations Effective School Leadership Supportive Learning Environment High Levels of Community and Parent Involvement High Levels of Collaboration and Communication Frequent Monitoring of Teaching and Learning Curriculum, Instruction and Assessment Aligned with Standards (Note: Focused Professional Development is one of the Nine Characteristics of High Performing Schools not measured in the EES Parent Survey)

Copyright © The Center for Educational Effectiveness, All Rights Reserved. EES Parent 2-way Comparison 5

Copyright © The Center for Educational Effectiveness, All Rights Reserved. EES Parent 2-way Comparison 6