Analysis of TF Load Paths and Vacuum Vessel Loading H. M. Fan Jan. 22, 2009.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
FEA as an aid in Design 1.Applying FEA to a fairly complex design can initially overburden us with information. We therefore need a method of analysing.
Advertisements

Mechanical Design & Analysis Igor Novitski. Outlines Electromagnetic Forces in the Magnet Goals of Finite Element Analysis Mechanical Concept Description.
Reinforced Concrete Design
NSTX Thomson Scattering and NB Analysis Update: Maxwell Generated EM Loads and ANSYS WB Static Stresses
FEA as an aid to Design Andrei Lozzi 2014
ITER VV supports Cadarache 6 September 2007 A. Capriccioli.
NSTX outer TF leg analysis (with diamonds not uniformly distributed) *Full 360º model *Al blocks connected to springs to simulate umbrella structure (stiffness.
NSTX Center Stack Upgrade Workshop Brainstorming on Design Solutions for TF Joint C Neumeyer Jan 22, 2009.
ENGR 225 Section Saint-Venant’s Principle When loading is applied at a point on a body, it tends to create a stress distribution that becomes.
1 CM 197 Mechanics of Materials Chap 9: Strength of Materials Simple Stress Professor Joe Greene CSU, CHICO Reference: Statics and Strength of Materials,
Analysis of Basic Load Cases Axial Stress
Axially loaded member Axial load and normal stress under equilibrium load, Elastic Deformation.
10 Pure Bending.
MECHANICS OF MATERIALS
Luca Dassa – 23/02/ / 8 CRAB cavities meeting Preload Bolt size (1) Shear load: 602 N (p=0.26 MPa) -> Min preload: 2006 with Static friction coefficient:
Design Example The 10” TH. wall system shown in the figure below is to be checked for a service gravity load of 3 Kips/ft and a lateral load of 25 Kips,
Multiple Coil Lift Calculation. Purposes of the Study  To investigate the stress distribution in the MCWF and the lifting device.  To make sure mounting.
Joint Institute for Nuclear Research Further optimization of the solenoid design A.Efremov, E.Koshurnikov, Yu.Lobanov, A.Makarov, A.Vodopianov GSI, Darmstadt,
Proposed TF Joint Design C Neumeyer 2/26/9 Notes: 1)Several concepts included are based on ideas developed by R Woolley 2)No analysis has yet been performed.
Analyses of Bolted Joint for Shear Load with Stainless Steel Bushing and Frictionless Shim-Flange Interface Two cases of shim plates were investigated.
 2005 Pearson Education South Asia Pte Ltd TUTORIAL-1 : UNIAXIAL LOAD 1 PROBLEM-1 1 m P A composite A-36 steel bar shown in the figure has 2 segments,
NSTX Center Stack Upgrade Workshop Requirements & Design Point C Neumeyer Jan 22, 2009.
Redesign of the STOL CH 701 Landing Gear Strut
NSTXU-CALC Vessel Port Rework for NB and Thomson Scattering
ENT 153 TUTORIAL 1.
FEA as an aid to Design Andrei Lozzi 2015
JLAB CLAS12 Torus Structure The cold mass is composed of 6 coils, each inside a coil case, joined together at the inner radius by a hub and at the outer.
Supported by NSTX Centerstack Upgrade Project Meeting P. Titus October Aluminum Block Analyses.
Features: 1. 2D structural analysis (plane stress) 2. Static analysis 3. Quarter symmetric 4. SI units 5. Only the yoke is modeled 6. Material properties.
1 FEA an aid in - the short story - Find out how the load is transmitted, from application to reaction. Are there stiff paths and soft paths ? Are the.
NCSX VACUUM VESSEL PL Goranson Status Report Sept 5, 2006 Support Rod Revision NCSX.
Magnets and Supports Bob Wands October 20, 2006 PPD/MD/Engineering Analysis Group Fermilab 4 th Concept Detector at Fermilab October, 2006.
Vacuum Vessel lateral loading (Neutral beam port only)
Brookhaven - fermilab - berkeley US LHC ACCELERATOR PROJECT LHC IRQ Inner Triplet Review Q1, Q2, and Q3 Mechanics T. Nicol April 24-25, 2007.
NSTX Supported by NSTX Centerstack Upgrade Project Meeting P. Titus January 27, 2010 Umbrella Leg Sliding Blocks TF OOP Support to the Vessel Seismic (Static.
Nonlinear Analyses of Modular Coils and Shell structure for Cooldown and Modular Coil EM Loads Part 2 – Results of Clamp Assembly, Wing Bags, Poloidal.
Results of Linear Stress Analyses for Modular Coils and Coil structure For 2T High Beta Currents at 0 Seconds and Initial Coil Shrinkage of in/in.
An Analysis of Shell Structure for Dead Load H.M. Fan PPPL September 16, 2005.
Analyses of Bolted Joint for Bolt Preload and Shear Load
Finite Element Analysis of the18 Turn Beam H. F. Fan November 5, 2004.
56 MHz SRF Cavity Cryostat support system and Shielding C. Pai
Figure 1 – NSTX Upper Umbrella Assembly Upgrade Design: Version 3.
NSTX NSTX Center Stack Upgrade, PF1a/b/c Stress Analysis (draft)25 April NSTX Supported by NSTX Center Stack Upgrade 25 April, 2011 Structural Analysis.
Twin Solenoid Study Infinite and Short Models. Infinitive Twin Solenoid Induction in the Detector area B d = µ 0 (i d -i a ) with radius R d Induction.
NSTX Supported by NSTX Centerstack Upgrade Project Meeting P. Titus April 14, 2010 PF4/5 Terminal Stress Existing PF4/5 Support Weld Algorythm Moment Influence.
56 MHz SRF Cavity and Helium vessel Design
1 MC Assembly over the VV FPA Station 3 FDR Review July 13, 2007 T. Brown.
Shear Stresses in Concrete Beams
Update: TF Outer Ring and Clevis Design TF Outer Ring – Implemented recommendations from P. Rogoff. Modified Bolted Joint. Modified weldment to reduce.
issues 40 min. rep. rate Fabrication of flex sections –Water jet cut copper –Copper flat cable –Others – electroform brazed straps –Shape –OOP support.
Nonlinear Analyses of Modular Coils and Shell structure for Coil Cool-down and EM Loads Part 1 – Results of Shell Structure and Modular Coils H.M. Fan.
FEM Analysis of the Stage3 Support Frame H.M. Fan March 14, 2007.
AWB NSTX TF Flag Joint Design Review April 10, 2003 Art Brooks.
A View of NCSX Structural System and Load Path for the Base Support Structure.
NSTX Supported by NSTX Centerstack Upgrade Project Meeting P. Titus March F.
NSTX Supported by NSTX Centerstack Upgrade Project Meeting P. Titus Feb 3, 2010 Dome Rib Tab Weld Stress Removing TF OOP Support to the Vessel.
A PROPOSED TF JOINT DESIGN FOR THE NSTX CENTERSTACK UPGRADE Robert D Woolley 25 February 2009.
NSTX TF outer leg analysis Because the stress on umbrella structure is too high, there are some ideas to reduce it, like adding a case to enhance the stiffness.
MESF593 Finite Element Methods
NSTX Supported by NSTX Centerstack Upgrade Project Meeting
PRESSURE VESSEL. 1.Determine the bursting steam pressure of a steel shell with diameter of 10 inches and made of ¼ in thick steel plate. The joint efficiency.
16 T dipole in common coil configuration: mechanical design
FEA as an aid to Design Andrei Lozzi 2017
Pure Bending.
LARP Technology Quadrupole Review
16 T dipole in common coil configuration: mechanical design
rd IFHTSE Conference Hot Hydroforging of Lightweight Bimaterial Gears and Hollow Products Bulent Chavdar1, Robert Goldstein2, Lynn Ferguson3 1Eaton,
MKQXF FEA Model Haris Kokkinos
Chapter 1 Stress and Strain.
Ch. 2: Fundamental of Structure
Presentation transcript:

Analysis of TF Load Paths and Vacuum Vessel Loading H. M. Fan Jan. 22, 2009

Upper PF1A Lower PF2 Upper PF1B Lower PF1B Upper PF1C Lower PF5 Upper PF3 Lower PF4 Upper PF2 Lower PF3 Upper PF5 Lower PF1C Upper PF4 Lower PF1A OH Outer TF coil Inner TF coil TF and PF Coils

Outer TF Coil Supports Tension only tie rod Flexible TF coil Ring bar Al block assembly Flexible TF coil Al block assembly Outer TF leg is supported by umbrella structure, tie rod, ring bar and vacuum vessel The ring bars and tie rods may reduce the in- plane and out-of-plane forces at the umbrella structure

CoilTurnsFillMin Curr Max Curr Usage Worst Case Current (kA)(kA-Turn)(kA)(kA-Turn) (kA) OH PF1a PF1b PF1c PF2a PF2b PF3a PF3b PF4b PF4c PF5a PF5b PFAB PFAB Max. and Min. Upgraded PF Coil Currents

TF=71.16, OH=-20, PF1a=-11.35, PF2=-16.93, PF3=-18.83, PF4=-10.73, PL=1000 TF=130, OH=-24, PF1a=-4, PF1b=-8, PF1c=-10, PF2=0, PF3=-16, PF4=-20, PF5=-32, PL=0 F  = lbs Reactions of Outer TF Leg w/wo Upgrade Fz = lbs F  = lbs Fr = lbs lbs lbs 0 lbs lbs 0 lbs 6285 lbs Fz = lbs Fr = lbs 2130 lbs 6285 lbs 0 lbs 6285 lbs 0 lbs Note: For the upgrade coil currents, forces in the ring becomes compression. compressiontension No PF5

Radial Displacement of Ring Bar Decides the Ring Force – For Currents without Upgrade At ring, the radial displacement is mm

At ring, the radial displacement is mm Radial Displacement of Ring Bar Decides the Ring Force – For Currents with Upgrade

ItemForce Without current upgrade Upgrade A - with tension- only tie rods Upgrade A - w/o rings and tie rods Upgrade A - w/o rings Upgrade A - move ring 7” toward midheight Upgrade B - tension and comp. tie rods Reactions atFrlb-13,969-42,628-66,248-30,638-46,778-47,352 Al block FF lb-12,177-48,793-80,169-52,817-52,228-45,929 Fzlb-11,617-42,664-22,504-55,081-41,558-38,548 Ratios ofFrlb Reactions FF lb Fzlb Reactions atFrlb-1,199-28, ,685-33,008-1,827 tie-rods FF lb-1,678-39, ,539-41,661-43,354 Fzlb , , Totallb2,13050,347N/A43,83353,15543,400 Axial forcesFrlb00 00 at ring bar FF lb6,285-32, ,14625,946 Fzlb00 00 Totallb6,28532,615N/A 50,14625,946 Negative force mean compression Force is mainly in vessel plane Structural Responses to Ring and Tie Rod Variations Note – The results above are responses of upper Aluminum block, ring bar and tie rod.

PF2aFzlb00 PF2bFzlb00 PF2 total lb00 PF3aFzlb80,904 PF3bFzlb-13,248 PF3 total lb67,655 PF4cFzlb83,602 PF4bFzlb10,130 PF4 total lb93,732 PF5aFzlb161,783 PF5bFzlb-193,781 PF5 total lb-31,999 Vertical Reactions of PF2 to PF5 Coils

Vacuum Vessel Model 90° cyclically symmetric model All ports with covers Not include TF coils, but the TF loadings were applied on the umbrella structure and the vacuum vessel Not include PF coils, but the PF loadings were applied on the PF support brackets Weight of TF and PF coils are also included.

Dead LoadsVacuum Loads Max. stress in support leg Max. stress Von Mises Stress Plots excluding Umbrella Structure

EM Loads EM, Vacuum and Dead loads Max. stress

Summary of Vacuum Vessel for Upgraded Loads Loads Dmax. (m) Max. Seqv (Pa) Dmax. (in) Max. Seqv (ksi) Max. stress location EM E near mid- height Vacuum E NB port DL E near leg support EM, Vac., DL E near mid- height Max. stress was found at the edge of port opening

Summary EM load is the most crucial load case in the vacuum vessel design. Because of symmetry in the EM load, ring bar can be used to reduce the in-plane load caused by the outer TF legs. Tie rod can minimize the deformation of the ring bar and take the out-of- plane loading without causing bending moment in the vacuum vessel. Provide struts between upper and lower PF4 and PF5 coils will effectively restrain the PF vertical force to the vacuum vessel. The highest stress was found at the welded joint area between vacuum vessel and port, the allowable stress for welding should also be checked. In the FEA model, the cross-sectional area of ring bar and tie rod is 4.0 in 2 and 1.0 in 2, respectively. Other design considerations may include but not limit to: 1.Modify dimension and location of the ring bar and tie rod 2.Improve the outer TF leg stiffness 3.Reinforce the vacuum vessel 4.And ………..