MuID Twopack Efficiencies: Measurements with Cosmic Rays & High Voltage inforamtion.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
VDC Tracking P.E. Ulmer Old Dominion University Expert … or, nobody else wanted to talk about it; You decide Hall A Analysis Workshop December 11, 2001.
Advertisements

Giuseppe Roselli (CMS-RPC) Università degli Studi di Bari – INFN RPC Efficiency with Track Reconstruction Giuseppe Roselli.
1 Geometry layout studies of the RICH detector in the CBM experiment Elena Belolaptikova Dr. Claudia Hoehne Moscow State Institute of Radioengineering,
Micromegas studies using cosmic rays Franck Sabatié May 7th 2009 Saclay cosmic ray bench Data acquisition system and analysis tools MIP detection Position.
One of the most important problems is Computational Geometry is to find an efficient way to decide, given a subdivision of E n and a point P, in which.
TOF offline and calibration A. De Caro (University and INFN of Salerno)
1 Scintillating Fibre Cosmic Ray Test Results Malcolm Ellis Imperial College London Monday 29 th March 2004.
Cluster Threshold Optimization from TIF data David Stuart, UC Santa Barbara July 26, 2007.
Octal ASD Certification Tests at Michigan J. Chapman, Tiesheng Dai, & Tuan Bui August 30, CERN.
In order to acquire the full physics potential of the LHC, the ATLAS electromagnetic calorimeter must be able to efficiently identify photons and electrons.
CS Brick connection at Nagoya O.Sato
Grade 6 Data Management Unit
MUID Status: General Detector Health In addition to two disabled HV chains there are four other chains (out of a total of 600) that are largely or totally.
The Transverse detector is made of an array of 256 scintillating fibers coupled to Avalanche PhotoDiodes (APD). The small size of the fibers (5X5mm) results.
The Physics of Generations (Update) 11-Dec-03 Don Lincoln f.
Muon alignment with Cosmics: Real and Monte Carlo data S.Vecchi, S.Pozzi INFN Ferrara 37th Software Week CERN June 2009.
NSW background studies Max Bellomo, Nektarios Benekos, Niels van Eldik, Andrew Haas, Peter Kluit, Jochen Meyer, Felix Rauscher 1.
Level 3 Muon Software Paul Balm Muon Vertical Review May 22, 2000.
Real data reconstruction A. De Caro (University and INFN of Salerno) CERN Building 29, December 9th, 2009ALICE TOF General meeting.
GEM MINIDRIFT DETECTOR WITH CHEVRON READOUT EIC Tracking Meeting 10/6/14 B.Azmoun, BNL.
TRD and Global tracking Andrey Lebedev GSI, Darmstadt and LIT JINR, Dubna Gennady Ososkov LIT JINR, Dubna X CBM collaboration meeting Dresden, 27 September.
Status of production at LNF E. Dane, C. Forti, D. Pinci, A. Sarti – LHCb Muon CERN 25-may-04 Monday 24-may: closed chamber 30. Will close 2 more this week.
STAR Collaboration Meeting Rene Bellwied – Wayne State University July 2004 SVT Calibration and STI tracking status An update of work since the SVT review.
NA60 Group meeting, 31 March 2005, Markus Keil1 Update on the pixel efficiencies in the Indium run 2003.
BesMUC Reconstruction Current Status You zhengyun, Mao yajun School of Physics, PKU
Run13 MUID Hit Efficiency RIKEN/RBRC Itaru Nakagawa 1.
Hit rate at high luminosity logical channels - ghosts – efficiency Toy Monte Carlo : # I have assumed a uniform particle distribution inside the TS # I.
MuID Software Status/Future Plan Yajun Mao (RIKEN/CIAE) PHENIX Muon Collaboration Meeting, BNL, Dec. 16, 2000.
Mitglied der Helmholtz-Gemeinschaft Calibration of the COSY-TOF STT & pp Elastic Analysis Sedigheh Jowzaee IKP Group Talk 11 July 2013.
5/2/  Online  Offline 5/2/20072  Online  Raw data : within the DAQ monitoring framework  Reconstructed data : with the HLT monitoring framework.
CMS WEEK – MARCH06 REVIEW OF MB4 COMMISSIONING DATA Giorgia Mila
Cosmic Ray Workshop May 15, Cosmic Ray Detector Kit.
MuID LL1 Study (update) 09/02/2003 Muon Trigger Upgrade Meeting.
Performance of the PHENIX Muon Identifier Introduction Calibration with cosmic rays Performance in Au+Au collisions Summary Hiroki Sato, Kyoto University.
Geant4 Tracking Test (D. Lunesu)1 Daniela Lunesu, Stefano Magni Dario Menasce INFN Milano GEANT4 TRACING TESTs.
Noise and Cosmics in the DHCAL José Repond Argonne National Laboratory CALICE Collaboration Meeting University Hassan II Casablanca, Morocco September.
Status of Reconstruction in sidloi3 Ron Cassell 5/20/10.
PERFORMANCE OF THE PHENIX SOUTH MUON ARM Kenneth F. Read Oak Ridge National Lab & University of Tennessee for the PHENIX Collaboration Quark Matter 2002.
Quality control for large volume production GEM detectors Christopher Armaingaud On behalf of the collaboration GEMs for CMS.
PMT Calibration R.Sawada 7/Jan/2007. Time calibration Method was talked at the previous meeting. The problems which was shown before were because I used.
Detector Effects and Backgrounds In the following, I examine the following possible sources of spurious signals which could simulate the parity signal:
The Detector Performance Study for the Barrel Section of the ATLAS Semiconductor Tracker (SCT) with Cosmic Rays Yoshikazu Nagai (Univ. of Tsukuba) For.
Adam Blake, June 9 th Results Quick Review Look at Some Data In Depth Look at One Anomalous Event Conclusion.
A. De Caro for the ALICE TOF Offline Group (University of Salerno and INFN)
Muons at CalDet Introduction Track Finder Package ADC Corrections Drift Points Path Length Attenuation Strip-to-Strip Calibration Scintillator Response.
Online Consumers produce histograms (from a limited sample of events) which provide information about the status of the different sub-detectors. The DQM.
1 EMCAL Reconstruction in Pass pp 900 GeV 29/03/2010 Gustavo Conesa Balbastre.
David Silvermyr Lund University for the PHENIX Collaboration Early global event results using the PHENIX Pad Chambers at RHIC.
MuID Efficiency Study RIKEN/RBRC Itaru Nakagawa This analysis has been done by Sarah Caussin (ENSICAEN) 1.
HI July Exercise and Muon DQM preparation Mihee Jo Mihee Jo / Lab meeting.
Kalanand Mishra February 23, Branching Ratio Measurements of Decays D 0  π - π + π 0, D 0  K - K + π 0 Relative to D 0  K - π + π 0 decay Giampiero.
Валидация TRT DCS CONDITIONS SERVICE Евгений Солдатов, НИЯУ МИФИ “Physics&Computing in ATLAS” – 22/09/2010.
LL1 CheckOut Run. This Run Run Data Information Run# , full HV, gap0 antimasked, LVL1 delay=10 (default) Total Number of Trigger = 2.4M/16min.
Comparison of MC and data Abelardo Moralejo Padova.
M. Brooks, 28-Mar-02 Heavy/Light meeting 1 Muon Analysis Work Getting Code ready for first data pass - DONE Get ready for second pass on DSTs - muon identification.
Tau31 Tracking Efficiency at BaBar Ian Nugent UNIVERSITY OF VICTORIA Sept 2005 Outline Introduction  Decays Efficiency Charge Asymmetry Pt Dependence.
Possible Improvement of MUID Performance Itaru Nakagawa, Seyoung Han (RIKEN, Ewha/RIKEN)
BES III Software: Beta Release Plan Weidong Li 19 th October 2005.
Object-Oriented Track Reconstruction in the PHENIX Detector at RHIC Outline The PHENIX Detector Tracking in PHENIX Overview Algorithms Object-Oriented.
Tracking software of the BESIII drift chamber Linghui WU For the BESIII MDC software group.
S.DusiniOPERA meeting, LNGS May 2003 Cosmic Test Status Reports Remind of test setup Status report Gas and HVOK Strips and ElectronicsOK DAQalmost.
Analyzing Data Week 1. Types of Graphs Histogram Must be Quantitative Data (measurements) Make “bins”, no overlaps, no gaps. Sort data into the bins.
LCFI physics studies meeting, 7 th December 04Sonja Hillertp. 1 Charge efficiency and leakage rates  purity vs efficiency plots give only part of the.
Beam Gas Vertex – Beam monitor
The Standard Analysis chain
TPC status - Offline Q&A
Monitoring SCT Efficiency and Noise
Efficiency Study of Prototype Scintillator for INGRID
RPC approved plots.
Presentation transcript:

MuID Twopack Efficiencies: Measurements with Cosmic Rays & High Voltage inforamtion.

Purposes To get a twopack by twopack understanding of detector health. To examine how well the High Voltage state correlates with detector efficiency. Obtain a reasonable set of twopack efficiencies for use in response chain... (Hiroki has already started) Develop possible tools/procedure for physics run efficiency calculations

Procedure Take cosmic data with known voltages and gap of interest out of trigger. Reconstruct roads with offline roadfinder which doesn’t use information from gap of interest. Analyze DST events with only one road to find number of hits expected and found for each twopack. Use macro to calculate error bars and make plots.

Algorithm (one event) 1.Find number of raw hits that are within 20cm of reconstructed road in appropriate direction. 2.Get a list of twopacks hit by reconstructed road (expected hits). 3.If in 1. any hits were found for orient a then do following for orient b. (this check is currently only done for Gap0 and Gap4) 4.For each expected hit mark the closest raw hit twopack(s) within 2 twopacks (closest 5 twopacks) as “matched”. 5.If no match is found for an expected hit., that twopack’s number of expected hits is incremented. 6.For each raw hit twopack marked as “matched”, increase the twopacks number of found and expected hits.

Road projection predicts a hit. Hit present in data  Num  Den Reminder: Search width = 2 Reconstructed Roads Efficiency = Num/Den Algorithm response examples

Distance to Match is Gap Dependent (and orientation dependent)

Short Commings Some smearing from twopack to twopack. Can create lower efficiencies at panel edges. Does better with inner gaps (interpolation vs. extrapolation)

Example: Gap 2 Vertical HV seems OK Gas Problem? Geometry Problem? Points with error width > 10 not included in panel average. twopack Efficiency

How well does this describe p+p running? I have started analyzing the p+p HV logging to see how the status deviates from these cosmic runs.

May be slightly misleading due to run control crashes, detector being turned off just before the run ended or on just after run started. Z is number of runs “golden runs”?

Next Steps Continue investigating, characterizing and cleaning up HV logs. Implement twopack by twopack efficiencies in response chain. Hiroki has done a panel by panel study Decide if some similar run by run… efficiency calculation need to be done on the data.