FAIMER 2007 1 Program Evaluation 2 Stewart Mennin Bill Burdick.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Student Learning Contracts
Advertisements

MODULE 8: PROJECT TRACKING AND EVALUATION
April 6, 2011 DRAFT Educator Evaluation Project. Teacher Education and Licensure DRAFT The ultimate goal of all educator evaluation should be… TO IMPROVE.
Lecturette 1: Planning Curriculum
Overall Layout of Curriculum Development System in Organization of Educational Research and Programming.
Faculty & Course Evaluation: was it worth all the effort ? Trevor Gibbs.
E-portfolio in TaskStream (DRF) Signature Assignments Signature Assignments Classroom Community (1 st & 2 nd semesters) Classroom Community (1 st & 2 nd.
Professional Development: Components for Technology Integration  Vision  Planning  Technology Skills Training  Evaluation & Assessment.
Analysing the Vision for the New Curriculum. Overall aims? Methods of delivery? How do students learn? How should they be assessed? How do you know that.
Understanding the Effects of Technology Based Enhancement of Professional Development Alan Lesgold February, 2000.
Writing Objectives Rationale and Strategies 1. Session Goals Appreciate the value of writing clear and measurable behavioral objectives. Re-evaluate objectives.
1 Writing Objectives Rationale and Strategies Presented by Dennis Baker, Ph.D., Assistant Dean for Faculty Development.
Reflective Pathways from Theory to Practice Brewton-Parker College Education Division.
ICT Integration in the Curriculum Planning for. Section One: Course participants will be shown how to:  Assess their school’s current situation in relation.
Program Evaluation Debra Spielmaker, PhD Utah State University School of Applied Sciences, Technology & Education - Graduate Program Advisor USDA-NIFA,
Evaluation of Math-Science Partnership Projects (or how to find out if you’re really getting your money’s worth)
Raising Attainment Evidence and Challenges Jim Cameron, Head of Schools with Education Support West Lothian Council.
Developing an Effective Evaluation to Check for Understanding Susan E. Schultz, Ph.D. Evaluation Consultant PARK Teachers.
ISTEP: Technology Field Research in Developing Communities Instructor: M. Bernardine Dias CAs: Sarah Belousov and Ermine Teves Spring 2009.
Instructional Design Aldo Prado. Instructional Design Instructional design is the process of easing the acquisition of knowledge and making it more efficient.
Instructional Design Hany Alzahri. Instructional Design Instructional Design is a systematic process that is well designed in order to improve the education.
Instructional Design Rehab Aldakhil. Instructional Design Instructional Design is development of education through using skills and tools to make it more.
Lecturette 2: Universal Designs for Learning. Great Urban Schools: Learning Together Builds Strong Communities Universal Designs.
Delaware Professional Teaching Standards 3.0 Content Knowledge 4.0 Human Development and Learning 5.0 Diverse Learners 6.0 Communication 7.0 Learning Environment.
Program evaluation 2: program theory Bill Burdick and Stewart Mennin.
İlke Büyükduman, PhD. Istanbul Şehir University ASSESSMENT: GREENER SIDE OF THE FENCE.
THE KEY TO CLOSING THE ACHIEVEMENT GAP The key to predictable results in improving student achievement requires connecting curriculum, assessment and instruction.
INAM EVALUATION Paul T. Bucci PhD, LLC Westat, Inc. GEM Software Development, Inc.
1Management Sciences for Health Principles of Curriculum Development.
Program evaluation 1: outcomes Bill Burdick and Stewart Mennin.
Session Objectives At the end of the session you should be able to:- Explain how learning theories such as Kolb and Blooms impact teaching practice Identify.
WHO Global Standards. 5 Key Areas for Global Standards Program graduates Program graduates Program development and revision Program development and revision.
Anderson County Schools. 1. Providing technology to support instruction and to assist with stakeholder communication. 2. Identifying and providing new.
Identify a Health Problem Qualitative Quantitative Develop Program -theory -objectives -format -content Determine Evaluation -design -sampling -measures.
Disciplined Curriculum Innovation Developing and implementing the curriculum is a major investment for all involved and it is important for schools and.
FAIMER Program Evaluation 1 Stewart Mennin Bill Burdick.
We worry about what a child will be tomorrow, yet we forget that he is someone today. --Stacia Tauscher.
Camille Catlett, FPG Child Development Institute, University of North Carolina Marilou Hyson, Early Childhood Consultant, and University of Pennsylvania.
What is a Planned Curriculum?
Southwest Educational Development Laboratory Austin, Texas Section F Strategy Four: Invest in Training and Professional Development.
Leslie Fetzer 2012 National Online Teacher of the Year Online Learning Reaching students where they are.
Towards a Comprehensive Education Sector Response to HIV and AIDS UNESCO EFA Working Group 20 July 2006.
Tuning Indiana: Education. Originally focused on: Elementary education Math education Special education.
FAIMER Program Evaluation 3: How is it used? Evaluation as Research Stewart Mennin Bill Burdick.
Evaluation and Assessment Mike Fleming. Assessment can be source of disagreement and tension implications for a Framework of reference for Languages of.
DEPARTMENT OF EMPLOYMENT, EDUCATION AND TRAINING DEPARTMENT OF EMPLOYMENT, EDUCATION AND TRAINING (Insert appropriate.
Developing an Effective Evaluation to Check for Understanding Part 1 Susan E. Schultz, Ph.D. Evaluation Consultant PARK Teachers.
Teacher Evaluation MEASURING EDUCATOR IMPACT / / / CONTINUOUS IMPROVEMENT.
International Summit on ICT in Education EDU-SUMMIT 2009 Working groups Panel Session June 11, 2009 Leadership Perspective Sara Dexter, University of Virginia,
Workshop on Impact Assessment at National Judicial Academy, Bhopal (02-06 Sept., 2015) Existing Practices in SJAs for evaluating training impact Santosh.
Assessment Small Learning Communities. The goal of all Small Learning Communities is to improve teaching, learning, and student outcomes A rigorous, coherent.
Key Areas Environmental Structuring Scaffolding Feedback Attitudes, values and beliefs Motivation Modelling.
Self Evaluation Therese Laing QIO Primary. Key Features This indicator relates to the school’s arrangements for improvement through self- evaluation and.
Curriculum Committee Quality Training Assessment Learning Activities Content Learning Outcomes.
Phase 1 Day 1 Session 6 School working groups. What new ideas do you want to explore? What will learning and schools be like in your future? What would.
January 25, 2012 Special Education Opportunities Review Progress Report.
Teacher Professional Learning and Development Presentation for PPTA Curriculum Workshops 2009.
4 th Biennial SAMEA Conference Meaningful Evaluation: Improving Use and Results Evaluation of Teacher-Directed ICT Initiatives Presenter Mokete Mokone.
HSC Provide information about health and social care or children and young people’s services EDUC8TIONS LTD.
Planning Literacy Learning Essential Skills Practitioners Level 3.
Professional Portfolio Introduction
MATERIALS ASSESSMENT AND TEACHING
ACS WASC/CDE Visiting Committee Final Presentation
Instructional Design Models
School Self-Evaluation
Differentiation & Personalised Learning
مدل زنجیره ای در برنامه های سلامت
به نام خدا ارزشيابی برنامه درسی
Curriculum Framework for MHSC in SA
Presentation transcript:

FAIMER Program Evaluation 2 Stewart Mennin Bill Burdick

2 FAIMER 2007 Program Evaluatıon Key Components Research Questions Evaluation Theory & Design Stakeholders Methods What is studied? Common problems & strategies Research Questions Evaluation theory & design Stakeholders What is studied Methods

3 FAIMER 2007 Research Questions To what extent & in what way has the curriculum had an impact on:  Learning & learner outcomes  Teachers  Community  University To what extent do assessment & learning methods mutually support outcomes?

4 FAIMER 2007 Evaluation Theory & Design Changes in & around the learning environment are related to desired outcomes Short-loop feedback informs curriculum  Supports Prog Eval HIV

5 FAIMER 2007 Evaluation Design Levels of curriculum evaluation  Process & content  Assessment of learners  Staff/Faculty experience  Maturation of program  Longitudinal evaluation Tracking graduates

6 FAIMER 2007 Stakeholders Who are they? What do they care about? What do they need? When do they need it? In what form do they need it?