Combining Clinical Supervision with Teacher Evaluation

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Options for Supervision Offering choices to teachers.
Advertisements

PD Plan Agenda August 26, 2008 PBTE Indicators Track
S-1 SUPERVISION. S-2 Instructional Leadership Development Framework for Data-driven Systems QUALITY STUDENT PERFORMANCE ETHICS AND INTEGRITY Curriculum/Instruction/
PEP 590 The Supervision of Physical Education. View of Clinical Supervision The teacher is viewed as a professional who is actively seeking greater expertise,
Direct Assistance to Teachers R. Martin Reardon’s summary of Chapter 16. Glickman, C. D., Gordon, S. P. & Ross- Gordon, J. M. (2009),
NORTH CAROLINA TEACHER EVALUATION PROCESS TRAINING 2-Day Training for Phase I, II and III *This 2-Day training is to be replicated to meet.
1 The Professional Teaching and Learning Cycle in Action.
Clinical Supervision Foundations Module Six Performance Evaluation.
Teacher Evaluation Update
Making the Most of Teacher Evaluation, Charlotte Danielson 1 Making the Most of Teacher Evaluation Charlotte Danielson
Arkansas Teacher Excellence and Support System: Guide to Evidence & Artifacts.
Conestoga Valley’s C&I Framework Effective Planning & Instruction.
Developing and Supporting Highly Effective Teachers in Every Classroom Leaders of Learning Implementation Norman Public Schools Date.
Grade 12 Subject Specific Ministry Training Sessions
Evaluating Teacher Performance: Getting it Right CPRE Annual Conference November 21-23, 2002 Charlotte Danielson
What should be the basis of
performance INDICATORs performance APPRAISAL RUBRIC
Differentiated Supervision
Observations A Mirror of the Classroom. Objectives  Gain specific strategies for communicating with teachers to promote successful teaching and learning.
Your Mentoring Program: Step by Step including the Danielson Framework North Palos #117 Presenters: Marilyn Marino, NBCT – Mentor Coordinator David Creagan.
Learning Centered Conferencing Using the Marzano Framework Beth McGibbon and Brent Perdue Part 1: The Preconference.
In order to succeed, your desire for success should be greater than your fear of failure. McPherson
An Overview of the New HCPSS Teacher Evaluation Process School-based Professional Learning Module Spring 2013 This presentation contains copyrighted material.
Welcome to... Doing Teacher Evaluation Right: 5 Critical Elements Day 2: Evidence 9/3/2015PBevan, D.ED.
Welcome to... Doing Teacher Evaluation Right: 5 Critical Elements 9/9/2015PBevan, D.ED.
Teacher Keys Effectiveness System Forsyth County Schools Orientation May 2013 L.. Allison.
CLASS Keys Orientation Douglas County School System August /17/20151.
Student Learning Objectives: Setting Goals for Student Growth Countywide Professional Development Day Thursday, April 25, 2013 This presentation contains.
PILOT REQUIREMENTS FOR EACH DISTRICT: Select a minimum of 10% of schools to participate. A minimum of 1 school MUST meet the minimum participant requirements.
Student Learning Objectives: Approval Criteria and Data Tracking September 17, 2013 This presentation contains copyrighted material used under the educational.
Learning Centered Conferencing with the Using the Danielson Framework John Hellwich & Michelle Lewis.
South Western School District Differentiated Supervision Plan DRAFT 2010.
NC Teacher Evaluation Process
Peer coaching is a strategy where one or more teachers form a partnership with one another for the purpose of observing, recording, and providing feedback.
1 Teacher Evaluation Leadership for Innovative Omani Schools in the 21st Century.
ED 578 Sullivan & Glanz Chapters 4 & 5. Definition Clinical Supervision may be defined as a supervision focused upon the improvement of instruction by.
A Support & Supervision Model Joanne Hincks Eileen Paulsen Sharon Rajabi TESL Ontario Conference 2010.
Presenter Shereen Khan August 17 th,  A school based activity that engages teachers in meaningful, non-judgmental and on-going instructional dialogue.
Lincoln Intermediate Unit 12 August 11, 2014 Differentiated Supervision: The Danielson Framework.
CognitiveCoaching21 st Century Teachers : It’s All about Student Learning! Cognitive Coaching 21 st Century Teachers : It’s All about Student Learning!
Copyright © Allyn & Bacon 2007 Power Point Presentations for Each Chapter of SuperVision and Instructional Leadership: A Developmental Approach Carl D.
 Development of a model evaluation instrument based on professional performance standards (Danielson Framework for Teaching)  Develop multiple measures.
In-Service September 19, 2012 Teacher Evaluation System.
Ohio Department of Education March 2011 Ohio Educator Evaluation Systems.
Education Unit The Practicum Experience Session Two.
Idaho Principal Evaluation Process Tyson Carter Educator Effectiveness Coordinator Idaho State Department of Education
Teacher Growth and Assessment: The SERVE Approach to Teacher Evaluation The Summative or Assessment Phase.
Jeffrey Freund. Jeff Freund: Education and Work History Class of 2000 Class of 2004 Elementary Education Middle Level Mathematics.
Chapter 19: Action Research: The School as the Center of Inquiry
Supervisory Behavior Continuum: Know Thyself Chapter 6
Complex Activity of Teaching 4 domains of teaching responsibility 22 Components defining distinct aspects of the domains 2-5 elements describe specific.
DANIELSON MODEL SAI 2016 Mentor Meeting. Danielson Model  Framework with rubrics  Define specific types of behaviors expected to be observed  A common.
Focused Evaluation. Who?  Teachers who completed the Comprehensive cycle  Proficient or distinguished.
1 OBSERVATION CYCLE: CONNECTING DOMAINS 1, 2, AND 3.
New Teacher Orientation 2009 Cheryl Dyer Assistant Superintendent Teacher Observation and Evaluation in BRRSD.
Tri City United Public Schools August 6, 2013 “Leading for educational excellence and equity. Every day for every one.”
Educator Recruitment and Development Office of Professional Development The NC Teacher Evaluation Process 1.
In-Service September 19, 2012 Teacher Evaluation System.
Differentiated Teacher Supervision and Evaluation Models
Direct Assistance to Teachers
Cooperative Clinical Supervision
SuperVision and Instructional Leadership: A Developmental Approach Chapter 15 Mefleh Althamer.
An Introduction to Teacher Evaluation
Teacher Evaluation System
Reflections on Educational Beliefs, Teaching and Supervision Chapter 5
Instructional Personnel Performance Appraisal System
State Board of Education Progress Update
Adapt – Adopt Module 7 Activity Overview Approximate Time: ___ minutes
Instructional Personnel Performance Appraisal System
Instructional Personnel Performance Appraisal System
Presentation transcript:

Combining Clinical Supervision with Teacher Evaluation Nancy Marsho Cardinal Stritch University

Purposes of Teacher Evaluation/Supervision Student Learning Curriculum, Assessment, & Instruction Professional Development Quality Assurance

EffectiveTeacher Evaluation Six Critical Attributes: Clear and Distinct Purposes Clear, Understandable Criteria and Indicators Use of a variety of data sources Differentiated delivery Consistent Implementation Periodic Assessment Process does not work if these factors are not in place

A definition of Clinical Supervision: Clinical supervision may be defined as supervision focused upon the improvement of instruction by means of systematic cycles of: Planning conference The observation The post conference (based on intensive intellectual analysis of actual teaching performance in the interest of rational modification) Professional development Has been around since 1920’s – updated in the 1970’s. This adds the change process

Reflective Clinical Supervision Assumptions It is a deliberate instructional intervention It is goal oriented – combining school needs with the personal growth needs It assumes a professional working relationship It requires a high degree of mutual trust It assumes that the supervisor knows a great deal about the analysis of instruction and learning and also about productive human interaction

The Planning Conference Determine collaboratively (if possible) the focus of the observation (directive informational, collaborative, or self-directed) Determine the method and form of observation (determine standard, criteria and tool choices) Set the time of the observation and the post-conference May desire or have a required form – see page 69 (module) See page 23 of SIT

Sources of Criteria for Teacher Evaluation National Professional Teaching Standards The Danielson Framework – Domains-p.67-68 module DPI Ten Teacher Standards –p. 66: module Marzano’s The Art & Science of Teaching Other- Board Policy and Legal Requirements

The Observation Finalize the choice of the tool to be used Conduct the observation Verify the post-conference meeting time, and offer a copy of the completed observation tool to the teacher Analyze the facts; begin thinking of interpretations Choose a post conference interpersonal approach See pages 124-125 of SIT

The Post Conference Teacher self analyzes – ask reflective questions Preview conference – may desire or have required form- (see page 55 of the module) Teacher self analyzes – ask reflective questions Provide feedback from the data Teacher analyzes the data with supervisor support Reinforce teacher behaviors in evidence in terms of positive impact on student learning Explore alternative behaviors/skills Create a follow up plan

Data Sources Danielson & McGreal: Chapter 5 Sullivan & Glanz: Version 3: 78 & ff. Observation with specific data form Goal Completion Evidence Self-Assessment Structured Reflection on Practice Planning Documents Teaching Artifacts Student Learning Evidence/Work Samples Other- Communications; Prof. Development Activities; Feedback from Others

Differentiated Levels/Options 1. Beginning Teacher Directive-Informational 2. Experienced Teacher Collaborative Nondirective 3. Teacher Assistance Directive control