Dzero Collaboration Meeting, Sept. 14, 2001 - M. DemarteauEric Flattum - Fermilab 1 Slide 1 Alice Bean Fermilab/University of Kansas for the D0 Run2b silicon.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Fermilab PAC Meeting, April 12-14, M. Demarteau Slide 1 Fermilab PAC Meeting April 12, 2001 Marcel Demarteau Fermilab Status and Scope DØ Run 2b.
Advertisements

Proposal for a new design of LumiCal R. Ingbir, P. Ruzicka, V. Vrba October 07 Malá Skála.
H1 SILICON DETECTORS PRESENT STATUS By Wolfgang Lange, DESY Zeuthen.
DCS meeting, CERN, 17 June 2002Børge Svane Nielsen, NBI1 Forward Detectors DCS Forward Detectors (FWD): T0- quartz Cherenkov V0 - plastic scintillator.
ATLAS SCT Endcap Detector Modules Lutz Feld University of Freiburg for the ATLAS SCT Collaboration Vertex m.
The Intermediate Silicon Layers detector OUTLINE ISL inside CDFII Why the ISL? Conceptual Design Ladders and Spaceframe Rasnik Online Alignment System.
The Origami Chip-on-Sensor Concept for Low-Mass Readout of Double-Sided Silicon Detectors M.Friedl, C.Irmler, M.Pernicka HEPHY Vienna.
ISL David Stuart, UC Santa Barbara May 11, 2006 David Stuart, UC Santa Barbara May 11, 2006.
PHENIX Vertex Tracker Atsushi Taketani for PHENIX collaboration RIKEN Nishina Center RIKEN Brookhaven Research Center 1.Over view of Vertex detector 2.Physics.
The new Silicon detector at RunIIb Tevatron II: the world’s highest energy collider What’s new?  Data will be collected from 5 to 15 fb -1 at  s=1.96.
For high fluence, good S/N ratio thanks to: Single strip leakage current I leak  95nA at T  -5C Interstrip capacitance  3pF SVX4 chip 10 modules fully.
November Vertex 2002 Kazu Hanagaki1 Layer 0 in D0 Silicon Tracker for run2b Kazu Hanagaki / Fermilab for D0 run2b Silicon Tracker group Motivation.
1 Module and stave interconnect Rev. sept. 29/08.
ATLAS SCT module performance: beam test results José E. García.
Module Production for The ATLAS Silicon Tracker (SCT) The SCT requirements: Hermetic lightweight tracker. 4 space-points detection up to pseudo rapidity.
Brenna Flaugher Oct. 31 th CDF Meeting1 RunIIb Silicon Project Successful Lehman Review Sept Workshop at LBL 10/23-10/25: Wednesday-Thursday  hybrids.
Sensors for CDF RunIIb silicon upgrade LayerR min (cm)1 MeV eq-n cm * * * * * *10.
Performance of the DZero Layer 0 Detector Marvin Johnson For the DZero Silicon Group.
VELO upgrade electronics – HYBRIDS Tony Smith University of Liverpool.
SSD Operations Manual March 2014 SSD: 4 th layer of vertex detector Heavy Flavor Tracker Silicon Strip Detector – Operations Manual PXL Inserted from this.
SVX4 chip 4 SVX4 chips hybrid 4 chips hybridSilicon sensors Front side Back side Hybrid data with calibration charge injection for some channels IEEE Nuclear.
D. Lissauer, BNL. 1 ATLAS ID Upgrade Scope R&D Plans for ATLAS Tracker First thoughts on Schedule and Cost.
BEACH Conference 2006 Leah Welty Indiana University BEACH /7/06.
1 November 18, 2014 DOE SC-OPA Review of 12 GeV ENC vs. preamp load FSSR2 by FNAL Single chip on a PCB Load from capacitors SVT module testing.
U.S. ATLAS Executive Meeting Upgrade R&D August 3, 2005Toronto, Canada A. Seiden UC Santa Cruz.
Simulation issue Y. Akiba. Main goals stated in LOI Measurement of charm and beauty using DCA in barrel –c  e + X –D  K , K , etc –b  e + X –B 
Silicon Inner Layer Sensor PRR, 8 August G. Ginther Update on the D0 Run IIb Silicon Upgrade for the Inner Layer Sensor PRR 8 August 03 George Ginther.
Mapping for Silicon Run IIb L. Bagby, A. Nomerotski, E. von Toerne December 2002
Installation and operation of the LHCb Silicon Tracker detector Daniel Esperante (Universidade de Santiago de Compostela) on behalf of the Silicon Tracker.
Lehman DOE Review, September 24-26, M. Demarteau Slide 1 Lehman DOE Review September 24-26, 2002 Marcel Demarteau Fermilab ‘ The DØ Run 2b Silicon.
ACFA-7; Taipei, Nov 2004 H.Weerts status Si licon D etector Status H.Weerts Fermilab/Michigan State Univ. (Progress on Si-tracker layout)
Ronald Lipton PMG June Layer 0 Status 48 modules, 96 SVX4 readout chips 6-fold symmetry 8 module types different in sensor and analog cable length.
Operation of the CMS Tracker at the Large Hadron Collider
Swadhin Taneja Stony Brook University On behalf of Vertex detector team at PHENIX Collaboration 112/2/2015S. Taneja -- DNP Conference, Santa Fe Nov 1-6.
The CMS detector as compared to ATLAS CMS Detector Description –Inner detector and comparison with ATLAS –EM detector and comparison with ATLAS –Calorimetric.
Director's Baseline Review, April 16-18, M. Demarteau Slide 1 Director’s Baseline Review (Temple Review) April 16-18, 2002 Marcel Demarteau Fermilab.
Andrei Nomerotski, Fermilab Silicon Electronics & Readout Silicon Electronics & Readout Andrei Nomerotski, D0/Fermilab April , Temple Review Overview.
25/9/2006Dmitri Tsybychev Stony Brook1 Vertex 2006 Perugia, Italy September 24-29, 2006 DØ Silicon Detector and Experience at Tevatron D. Tsybychev (Stony.
Tevatron II: the world’s highest energy collider What’s new?  Data will be collected from 5 to 15 fb -1 at  s=1.96 TeV  Instantaneous luminosity will.
Vertex ‘99, 6/21-25/1999 p. 1 CDF Run II SiliconAlan Sill, Texas Tech University CDF Run II Silicon Tracking Projects 8th INTERNATIONAL WORKSHOP ON VERTEX.
Rev of Run IIb, Nov 4-8, 2002, A. Bean 1 Silicon Management  Organization and Management  Schedule  Resources  Conclusions Alice Bean Univ. of Kansas.
Dzero Beaune Workshop, June 15-20, M. Demarteau Slide 1 DØ Beaune Workshop June 15-20, 2003 Marcel Demarteau Fermilab ‘ The DØ Run 2b Silicon Tracker.
12/17/01 Ron Sidwell 1 Run2b Datapath 17 Dec Update Bill Reay, Ron Sidwell, Noel Stanton, Russell Taylor, Kansas State University.
D. M. Lee, LANL 1 07/10/07 Forward Vertex Detector Overview Technical Design Overview Design status.
The DØ Silicon Microstrip Tracker (SMT) Breese Quinn, FNAL Vertex2001 September 24, 2001 (presented by Frank Lehner, Universitaet Zuerich) Design Production.
WG3 – STRIP R&D ITS - COMSATS P. Riedler, G. Contin, A. Rivetti – WG3 conveners.
1. Efficient trigger for many B decay topologies Muon System CALORIMETERS PRS + ECAL+ HCAL RICH1 VERTEX LOCATOR Efficient PID Good decay time resolution.
Susan Burke DØ/University of Arizona DPF 2006 Measurement of the top pair production cross section at DØ using dilepton and lepton + track events Susan.
R. Lipton Vertex ‘98 Santorini, Greece The D0 Silicon Microstrip Tracker (D0SMT) Outline  Design  Detector Studies Coupling capacitors Radiation Damage.
Run2b Silicon Detector Design goals of Run2b Si system Stave design Silicon sensors Schedule K. Hara (U. Tsukuba)
Upgrade PO M. Tyndel, MIWG Review plans p1 Nov 1 st, CERN Module integration Review – Decision process  Information will be gathered for each concept.
Rene BellwiedSTAR Tracking Upgrade Meeting, Boston, 07/10/06 1 ALICE Silicon Pixel Detector (SPD) Rene Bellwied, Wayne State University Layout, Mechanics.
A New Inner-Layer Silicon Micro- Strip Detector for D0 Alice Bean for the D0 Collaboration University of Kansas CIPANP Puerto Rico.
Upgrade with Silicon Vertex Tracker Rachid Nouicer Brookhaven National Laboratory (BNL) For the PHENIX Collaboration Stripixel VTX Review October 1, 2008.
SPHENIX Mid-rapidity extensions: Additional Tracking system and pre-shower Y. Akiba (RIKEN/RBRC) sPHENIX workfest July 29,
Simulation Plan Discussion What are the priorities? – Higgs Factory? – 3-6 TeV energy frontier machine? What detector variants? – Basic detector would.
The BTeV Pixel Detector and Trigger System Simon Kwan Fermilab P.O. Box 500, Batavia, IL 60510, USA BEACH2002, June 29, 2002 Vancouver, Canada.
B => J/     Gerd J. Kunde PHENIX Silicon Endcap  Mini-strips (50um*2mm – 50um*11mm)  Will not use ALICE chip  Instead custom design based on.
Atlas SemiConductor Tracker final integration and commissioning Andrée Robichaud-Véronneau Université de Genève on behalf of the Atlas SCT collaboration.
EC: 7 DISK concept Preliminary considerations
Tracking Upgrade R&D Meeting. Columbia University A. Seiden September 22, 2003.
Straw man layout for ATLAS ID for SLHC
SVT subchapters & editors
Status of the CDF II silicon tracking system
IBL Overview Darren Leung ~ 8/15/2013 ~ UW B305.
Silicon Pixel Detector for the PHENIX experiment at the BNL RHIC
SIT AND FTD DESIGN FOR ILD
The LHC collider in Geneva
Presentation transcript:

Dzero Collaboration Meeting, Sept. 14, M. DemarteauEric Flattum - Fermilab 1 Slide 1 Alice Bean Fermilab/University of Kansas for the D0 Run2b silicon group October 15, th International Conference on Advanced Technology and Particle Physics Design of an Upgraded DØ Silicon Microstrip Tracker for Fermilab Run 2b

Dzero Collaboration Meeting, Sept. 14, M. DemarteauEric Flattum - Fermilab 2 Slide 2 Outline u Run2b Concept u Boundary Conditions for Design u Tracker Layout u Performance u Conclusions

Dzero Collaboration Meeting, Sept. 14, M. DemarteauEric Flattum - Fermilab 3 Slide 3 Run 2 Physics Goals Need two experiments operating detectors with good b-tagging efficiency to see Higgs. Each experiment needs to obtain 15 fb -1

Dzero Collaboration Meeting, Sept. 14, M. DemarteauEric Flattum - Fermilab 4 Slide 4 Run 2b u Although we just built a major silicon detector and are still commissioning it, a new silicon detector is planned; major undertaking. u Current silicon detector designed for ~ 2 fb -1 u Laboratory supports extended running to ~ 15 fb -1 per experiment p Run 2a Lifetime studies by both collider experiments

Dzero Collaboration Meeting, Sept. 14, M. DemarteauEric Flattum - Fermilab 5 Slide 5 Implications of Run 2b u 2a Detectors will survive 2 fb -1 with high degree of confidence u Inner Layers will definitely not survive 15 fb -1 u Detectors will require modifications to exploit full physics potential of Tevatron ä Boundary conditions set by the laboratory  Limited budget for replacement  New detectors to be designed to operate with confidence throughout Run2b with integrated luminosity of at least 15 fb -1  Installation of new detectors in single shutdown of no more than 6 months duration in the year ’04 p Option chosen by both collider collaborations is to fully replace the existing silicon detectors, without retrofitting the existing DAQ system

Dzero Collaboration Meeting, Sept. 14, M. DemarteauEric Flattum - Fermilab 6 Slide 6 Boundary Condition: DAQ u Retain readout system downstream of adapter card u Cable plant allows for 912 low mass / high mass cables 3/6/8/9 Chip HDI Sensor 8’ Low Mass Cable ~19’-30’ High Mass Cable (3M/80 conductor) HV / LV Adapter Card KSU Interface Board CLKs retain p Some changes to voltage distribution will have to be made

Dzero Collaboration Meeting, Sept. 14, M. DemarteauEric Flattum - Fermilab 7 Slide 7 Irradiation Studies u Studies carried out with ELMA and CDF layer 00 sensors from Hamamatsu and Micron. u Measurements agree well with other measurements Conclude that the design value for Silicon operating temperature at the inner layer should be T= -10 o C

Dzero Collaboration Meeting, Sept. 14, M. DemarteauEric Flattum - Fermilab 8 Slide 8 Design Considerations u No compromise on performance compared to Run2a u Minimize the variety of different components u Modular design  Provide stand-alone tracking up to |  | < 2.0

Dzero Collaboration Meeting, Sept. 14, M. DemarteauEric Flattum - Fermilab 9 Slide 9 Design Choices  Drilled Be Beampipe with ID of 0.96”, 500  m wall thickness u Employ only single sided silicon u Three different sensor types: 2, 3 and 5-chip wide u Six layers, divided in two radial groups  Inner layers: Layers 0 and 1 »Axial readout only »Mounted on integrated support »Assembled into one unit »Designed for V bias up to 1000 V  Outer layers: Layers 2-5 »Axial and stereo readout »Stave support structure »Designed for V bias up to 300 V u No element supported from the beampipe

Dzero Collaboration Meeting, Sept. 14, M. DemarteauEric Flattum - Fermilab 10 Slide 10 Comparison 2a and 2b  2a: »Innermost radius 25.7 mm »Outermost radius 94.3 mm  2b: »Innermost radius 17.5 mm »Outermost radius mm End views drawn to scale

Dzero Collaboration Meeting, Sept. 14, M. DemarteauEric Flattum - Fermilab 11 Slide 11 Design Choices u Sensor lengths  Inner layers: 78.4 mm, 6 sensors per half-module  Outer layers: 100 mm, 5 or 6 sensors per half-module u Longitudinal segmentation  Readout is ganged in outer layers  Hybrids are double-ended and service two readout segments Layers 2 and 3 Layers 4 and 5 Sensors are wirebonded hybrid Two hybrids per stave 100mm long sensor

Dzero Collaboration Meeting, Sept. 14, M. DemarteauEric Flattum - Fermilab 12 Slide 12 Design Choices u Si temperature of inner layer should be kept at T=-10 o C  Heat Load »~30 Watts ambient »~20 Watts at 15 fb -1 at innermost layer (T= -10 o C) »~0.5 Watts per readout chip u Cooling will use 40%-60% water/ethylene-glycol mixture  T clnt = -15 o C  Option to go to T clnt = -20 o C with second chiller for inner layers u Heat load too high to allow for readout chips to be mounted on silicon: analogue cables, off-board electronics for innermost layer Detector Hybrid Analogue cable Digital cable DØ L0 CDF layer 00 Analogue cables

Dzero Collaboration Meeting, Sept. 14, M. DemarteauEric Flattum - Fermilab 13 Slide 13 Layer 0 Analog cables Silicon sensors Carbon foam structure lined with Carbon fiber Uses Peek cooling tubes Hybrids mounted off-board connected to silicon with Analog cables Hybrid out of detector volume

Dzero Collaboration Meeting, Sept. 14, M. DemarteauEric Flattum - Fermilab 14 Slide 14 Layer 1 Digital cables Hybrid circuit Silicon sensor Carbon foam structure similar to that of Layer 0 Layer 1 is mounted together with Layer 0 Hybrids are mounted directly on the silicon Layer 0

Dzero Collaboration Meeting, Sept. 14, M. DemarteauEric Flattum - Fermilab 15 Slide 15 Outer Layers u Staves are assembled from readout modules u There will be 6 types of readout modules:  (axial, stereo)  (axial, stereo)  (axial, stereo) u Ganged sensors will have traces aligned u Stereo angle determined by mechanical constraints  10cm readout:  = 2.5 o  20cm readout:  = 1.25 o Stereo Module

Dzero Collaboration Meeting, Sept. 14, M. DemarteauEric Flattum - Fermilab 16 Slide 16 Stave Structure u Stave is doublet structure of many readout modules  Two layers of silicon »Axial and stereo  separated by PEEK cooling lines u Staves are mounted in end carbon fiber bulkheads

Dzero Collaboration Meeting, Sept. 14, M. DemarteauEric Flattum - Fermilab 17 Slide 17 Stave Readout Schematic u Hybrid  Digitizes Si analogue signal, launches the digital signal on the … u Digital Jumper cable  Flex circuit which brings signals to the … u Junction card  Passive element which transfers signals to high quality twisted pair signal cable which brings the signal to the … u Adapter card  Active element that provides the differential drive for the svx4 chip HybridsDigital CablesJunction Card Twisted Pair Layers 2 and 3

Dzero Collaboration Meeting, Sept. 14, M. DemarteauEric Flattum - Fermilab 18 Slide 18 Hybrids u Characteristics:  Layer 0 »2-chip hybrids; each hybrid reads out one sensor  Layers 1-5 »Hybrids are double ended v 6-chip hybrids for layer 1 v 10-chip hybrids for layers 2-5  Made of ceramic (BeO) »Silkscreening and etching »Can have multiple layers u Hybrids carry the bias voltage for layers 2-5 (300 V)  One HV feed / hybrid;  HV is split between up to 4 sensors  HV fed through AVX 50 pin connector 6-chip hybrid

Dzero Collaboration Meeting, Sept. 14, M. DemarteauEric Flattum - Fermilab 19 Slide 19 SVX4 Chip u Nov ’00 decision to employ common readout chip for CDF and DØ  SVX4 in deep sub-micron, 0.25  m technology, intrinsically rad-hard »Brand new chip with own personality/features  Commercial foundries used u Test chip submitted to MOSIS 06/04/01 (Full submission 11/01)  16 channels LBL design preamp + pipeline  48 channels FNAL design preamp + pipeline »Common bias preamp+pipeline as in SVX3 »12 different input transistor sizes used to optimize noise  ENC = 450e e/pF (optimum) LBL Pre-amp FNAL Pre-amp Pipeline

Dzero Collaboration Meeting, Sept. 14, M. DemarteauEric Flattum - Fermilab 20 Slide 20 Parameters u Comparing channel count:  2a: channels  2b: channels u Cable plant is slightly smaller

Dzero Collaboration Meeting, Sept. 14, M. DemarteauEric Flattum - Fermilab 21 Slide 21 Performance  A full GEANT simulation has been done with D0 reconstruction code used to analyze the results  The occupancy as a function of radius is shown here with and without noise. For the innermost layer, the mean occupancy is around 2%

Dzero Collaboration Meeting, Sept. 14, M. DemarteauEric Flattum - Fermilab 22 Slide 22 Hit resolutions for WH events Resolution for inner layers for all clusters

Dzero Collaboration Meeting, Sept. 14, M. DemarteauEric Flattum - Fermilab 23 Slide 23 B-tagging and mis-tagging rates Efficiencies are found using a impact parameter significance algorithm as a function of  the efficiency is 19% higher than that for the Run2a detector at the same mistag rate

Conclusions u The goal of the D0 Run2b detector is to provide adequate b-tagging efficiency to help discover the Higgs with 15fb -1 of data u There were many constraints that led the design of the detector including those from time, space available, cost, and integration into the present D0 DAQ system. u A 6 layer barrel device was chosen to maximize our physics capacity u The design of the detector is proceeding on all fronts u The performance as benchmarked using a full GEANT simulation with the D0 reconstruction code shows that we will have a device superior to the Run2a silicon detector particularly for tagging b quark jets