1 Run IIb Event Builder upgrade Director’s Review Jan 18 2005 Steve TetherRon RechenmacherMarkus KluteBruce Knuteson MITFNAL/CDMITMIT RonSteve Motivation.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Final Commissioning Plan and Schedule Cheng-Ju Lin Fermilab Installation Readiness Review 09/27/2004 Outline: - Work to be done during shutdown - Work.
Advertisements

Slice Test DAQ. Two Systems Underway There are essentially two systems being designed concurrently: Trackfinder test, and EMU slicetest. Goals of the.
CDF CDF Operations Steve Hahn February 7, 2005 All Experimenters ’ Meeting.
The LAr ROD Project and Online Activities Arno Straessner and Alain, Daniel, Annie, Manuel, Imma, Eric, Jean-Pierre,... Journée de réflexion du DPNC Centre.
DAQ System  We need to build a clone of the new test stand DAQ that is being put together at D0.
Slide 1 FEC Software 21 April 2004 R.Stone Rutgers University Pixel FEC Workshop.
CHEP04 - Interlaken - Sep. 27th - Oct. 1st 2004T. M. Steinbeck for the Alice Collaboration1/20 New Experiences with the ALICE High Level Trigger Data Transport.
Lukens - 1 TDC Review – 28 September 2004 TDC Production Review - Introduction Pat Lukens.
CDF Silicon Workshop th May 2006 New BLM & BLM electronics Jose E. Garcia, Jennifer Gimmell, Ulrich Husemann.
Summary Ted Liu, FNAL Feb. 9 th, 2005 L2 Pulsar 2rd IRR Review, ICB-2E, video: 82Pulsar
DAQ Considerations For Increased Rep. Rate J. Leaver 01/12/2009.
A presentation by Angela Little SULI Program 8/4/04 Pulsar Boards and the Level II Trigger Upgrade at CDF.
DAQ WS03 Sept 2006Jean-Sébastien GraulichSlide 1 DDAQ Trigger o Reminder: DAQ Trigger vs Particle Trigger o DAQ Trigger o Particle Trigger 1) Possible.
Brenna Flaugher Oct. 31 th CDF Meeting1 RunIIb Silicon Project Successful Lehman Review Sept Workshop at LBL 10/23-10/25: Wednesday-Thursday  hybrids.
SVT L.Ristori1 SVT Workshop July 22, 2003 Summary (1) Minimal upgrade for run IIb silicon –Detailed bit level format for hits from HF’s to Mergers needs.
MICE CM26 March '10Jean-Sebastien GraulichSlide 1 Detector DAQ Issues o Achievements Since CM25 o DAQ System Upgrade o Luminosity Monitors o Sequels of.
F. Gianotti, AFP kick-off meeting, 20/9/2012 Recommendations for the next steps Reports from the:  Technical Review A.Henriques  Physics Review R.Hawkings.
Hall D Trigger and Data Rates Elliott Wolin Hall D Electronics Review Jefferson Lab 23-Jul-2003.
Hall A DAQ status and upgrade plans Alexandre Camsonne Hall A Jefferson Laboratory Hall A collaboration meeting June 10 th 2011.
Burkard Reisert June 11 th, 2004 Fermilab, High Rise, Hornet Nest Pulsar Meeting Ted’s overview talk: Pulsar production/testing success !  all hardware.
14 Sep 2005DAQ - Paul Dauncey1 Tech Board: DAQ/Online Status Paul Dauncey Imperial College London.
The MINER A Operations Report All Experimenters Meeting Howard Budd, University of Rochester Aug 5, 2013.
DAQ Issues for the 12 GeV Upgrade CODA 3. A Modest Proposal…  Replace aging technologies  Run Control  Tcl-Based DAQ components  mSQL  Hall D Requirements.
Data Acquisition for the 12 GeV Upgrade CODA 3. The good news…  There is a group dedicated to development and support of data acquisition at Jefferson.
Leo Greiner TC_Int1 Sensor and Readout Status of the PIXEL Detector.
The MINER A Operations Report All Experimenters Meeting Howard Budd, University of Rochester June 17, 2013.
1 Online Calibration of Calorimeter Mrinmoy Bhattacharjee SUNY, Stony Brook Thanks to: D. Schamberger, L. Groer, U. Bassler, B. Olivier, M. Thioye Institutions:
The BaBar Event Building and Level-3 Trigger Farm Upgrade S.Luitz, R. Bartoldus, S. Dasu, G. Dubois-Felsmann, B. Franek, J. Hamilton, R. Jacobsen, D. Kotturi,
Management of the LHCb DAQ Network Guoming Liu * †, Niko Neufeld * * CERN, Switzerland † University of Ferrara, Italy.
Status and planning of the CMX Wojtek Fedorko for the MSU group TDAQ Week, CERN April , 2012.
IPHC - DRS Gilles CLAUS 04/04/20061/20 EUDET JRA1 Meeting, April 2006 MAPS Test & DAQ Strasbourg OUTLINE Summary of MimoStar 2 Workshop CCMOS DAQ Status.
Sep. 17, 2002BESIII Review Meeting BESIII DAQ System BESIII Review Meeting IHEP · Beijing · China Sep , 2002.
18 March 2002 All Experimenters’ Meeting Alan L. Stone Louisiana Tech University 1 DØ Status: 03/11 – 03/18 Week integrated luminosity –1.1 pb -1 delivered.
June 17th, 2002Gustaaf Brooijmans - All Experimenter's Meeting 1 DØ DAQ Status June 17th, 2002 S. Snyder (BNL), D. Chapin, M. Clements, D. Cutts, S. Mattingly.
D0 Status: 04/01-04/08 u Week integrated luminosity –1.7pb -1 delivered –1.5pb -1 utilized (88%) –1.1pb -1 global runs u Data collection s global data.
ISEG HV power supplies for NA62 R. Fantechi 6/4/2011.
Tevatron BPM Upgrade Stephen Wolbers CD Accelerator Coordination Meeting August 3, 2004.
1 EIR Nov 4-8, 2002 DAQ and Online WBS 1.3 S. Fuess, Fermilab P. Slattery, U. of Rochester.
LNL 1 SADIRC2000 Resoconto 2000 e Richieste LNL per il 2001 L. Berti 30% M. Biasotto 100% M. Gulmini 50% G. Maron 50% N. Toniolo 30% Le percentuali sono.
Tevatron BPM Upgrade Stephen Wolbers CD Accelerator Coordination Meeting September 21, 2004.
FNAL All Experimenters Meeting January 7, Leslie Groer Columbia UniversityDØ Status 1 DØ Status and Progress Dec 17, 2001 – Jan 7, 2002  Reasonably.
CM19 Vassil Verguilov DAQ Status  Progress  DAQ  Next steps  Summary.
Pulsar Status For Peter. L2 decision crate L1L1 TRACKTRACK SVTSVT CLUSTERCLUSTER PHOTONPHOTON MUONMUON Magic Bus α CPU Technical requirement: need a FAST.
Leo Greiner IPHC beam test Beam tests at the ALS and RHIC with a Mimostar-2 telescope.
DAQ Status & Plans GlueX Collaboration Meeting – Feb 21-23, 2013 Jefferson Lab Bryan Moffit/David Abbott.
Main Injector Beam Position Monitor Upgrade: Status and Plans Rob Kutschke All Experimenters’ Meeting April 3, 2006 Beams-doc-2217-v3.
L2TS and Plan for Integration Cheng-Ju Lin Fermilab Pulsar Meeting 06/11/2004.
D0 PMG February 15, 2001 PMG Agenda February 15, 2001  Overview (Weerts) u Detector status u Reportable milestones u Summary  Operations Organization.
Management of the LHCb DAQ Network Guoming Liu *†, Niko Neufeld * * CERN, Switzerland † University of Ferrara, Italy.
Proton Plan Director’s Review 8/15/06 Prebys Proton Plan Summary Director’s Review August 2006 Eric Prebys.
Service Challenge Meeting “Review of Service Challenge 1” James Casey, IT-GD, CERN RAL, 26 January 2005.
Markus Frank (CERN) & Albert Puig (UB).  An opportunity (Motivation)  Adopted approach  Implementation specifics  Status  Conclusions 2.
All Experimenters MeetingDmitri Denisov Week of July 22 to July 29 D0 Summary  Delivered luminosity and operating efficiency u Delivered: 3.1pb -1 u Live:
ROM. ROM functionalities. ROM boards has to provide data format conversion. – Event fragments, from the FE electronics, enter the ROM as serial data stream;
COMPASS DAQ Upgrade I.Konorov, A.Mann, S.Paul TU Munich M.Finger, V.Jary, T.Liska Technical University Prague April PANDA DAQ/FEE WS Игорь.
Grzegorz Korcyl - Jagiellonian University, Kraków Grzegorz Korcyl – PANDA TDAQ Workshop, Giessen April 2010.
DAQ 1000 Tonko Ljubicic, Mike LeVine, Bob Scheetz, John Hammond, Danny Padrazo, Fred Bieser, Jeff Landgraf.
TDAQ and L1Calo and Chamonix (Personal Impressions) 3 Mar2010 Norman Gee.
The Evaluation Tool for the LHCb Event Builder Network Upgrade Guoming Liu, Niko Neufeld CERN, Switzerland 18 th Real-Time Conference June 13, 2012.
Overview B A B AR L1 DCT Upgrade FDR Masahiro Morii Harvard University Scope of the Project Current Status Schedule  Commissioning.
The MINER A Operations Report All Experimenters Meeting Howard Budd, University of Rochester June 3, 2013.
Update on SDSS-II DAQ Upgrade
Technical Review: DAQ/Online
Gu Minhao, DAQ group Experimental Center of IHEP February 2011
Project definition and organization milestones & work-plan
ProtoDUNE SP DAQ assumptions, interfaces & constraints
Regional Cal. Trigger Milestone: Production & Testing Complete
UK ECAL Hardware Status
CMX Status and News - post PRR -
PID meeting Mechanical implementation Electronics architecture
Presentation transcript:

1 Run IIb Event Builder upgrade Director’s Review Jan Steve TetherRon RechenmacherMarkus KluteBruce Knuteson MITFNAL/CDMITMIT RonSteve Motivation Scope Progress End game & Installation

2 CDF Run IIb TDR

3 RunIIa Run IIb Rate:300Hz1kHz Event size:250kB 500kB Throughput: 75MB/s 500MB/s Specs

4 Current Event Builder Replace

5 Milestones Sept2003switch technology choice, place order for final system switch Jan2004arrival of final system switch, install test stand Run IIb Event Builder Upgrade

6 “Complete overkill” Cisco GbE switch selected and installed

7 Milestones Sept2003switch technology choice, place order for final system switch Jan2004arrival of final system switch, install test stand May2004SCPU choice, place order for final system SCPUs, complete code design Sept2004arrival of final system SCPUs, code skeleton complete, start of testing during Summer shutdown Run IIb Event Builder Upgrade

8 Single board computers to read out VME crates 20 boards ordered and received Read/send rate of MB/s over VME backplane achieved, exceeding 30 MB/s spec

9 All hardware now in hand Gigabit switch (1) new SCPUs (20) Additional test stand hardware 16 PCs acting as “Level 3” Cisco 3750 switch We are also upgrading Level 3 Converter Nodes (16 nodes) and Output Nodes (8 nodes) Purchase order is being placed VRB crate Run IIb Event Builder Upgrade

10 Summer 2004 Shutdown Milestones Oct Small test 1 new SCPU dummy Level 3 limited Run Control interface no interface to Trigger Manager Nov Medium test several new SCPUs dummy Level 3 functional Run Control interface functional Trigger Manager interface Dec Large test all SCPUs full Level 3 full Run Control interface full Trigger Manager interface Run IIb Event Builder Upgrade

11 Extensive code design ( Real implementation ( bin/cvsweb.cgi/cdfevb2/) bin/cvsweb.cgi/cdfevb2/

12 Milestones Sept2003switch technology choice, place order for final system switch Jan2004arrival of final system switch, install test stand May2004SCPU choice, place order for final system SCPUs, complete code design Sept2004arrival of final system SCPUs, code skeleton complete, start of testing during Summer shutdown Jan 2005completion of Shutdown testing May 2005code complete, system ready for installation Sept2005Run IIb Event Builder installed Run IIb Event Builder Upgrade

13 Our bandwidth limit will be the VME backplane CDF-7327

14 Achiev[ed/able] rates (code currently in flux)

15 Projected Event Size through DAQ (sans Silicon) VRB crates (300 kB / 6 DAQ crates) / (30 MB/sec VME readout) = 1.7 ms → 600 Hz (300 kB / 12 DAQ crates) / (30 MB/sec VME readout) = 0.8 ms → 1.2 kHz Error bars show RMS, not uncertainty on the mean

16 We are therefore adding 6 extra DAQ VRB crates Cost:  40 k$ 6 VMIC 7805 boards at $2700 each = 16 k$ 4 Rittal VIPA crates at $4000 each = 16 k$ Misc infrastructure (power cables) ~ 10 k$ We are also rearranging Silicon VRB crates to balance load

17

18 Committee recommendations: 1. Optimize code We are concentrating on optimization while completing the full functionality of the system. Last week we eliminated two of two time-consuming copies of data in memory, and we are beginning to bundle messages for increased speed. 2. Error handling We are adding dumps of event information when an error is seen. Our design will handle most errors with a “HRR” (CDF jargon), which costs a few seconds.

19 Committee recommendations: 3. Commissioning and operations We have added hardware to the VRB crates so that switching between new and old systems costs ~ 15 min We will be conducting tests with the CDF DAQ this Spring, using our test stand to ensure good use of this time New personnel (2 graduate students, 1 postdoc) are being brought on board to learn system, carry pager 4. Additional VRB crates We are adding 6 additional DAQ VRB crates to the system, and are rearranging Silicon VRBs.

20 Summary (1 of 2) All hardware is in hand Significant progress in code development Desired rates have been demonstrated Combination of current CDF event builder expertise (Steve Tether) existing DO event builder expertise (Ron Rechenmacher) young blood (Markus Klute) has proven valuable Thanks to many involved in the CDF DAQ and operations Frank, JJ, Bill, Steve, Peter, Pat, Cheng-Ju, Rob, Dervin, and others

21 Summary (2 of 2) We are on target for completion by May-Aug 2005 Possibility exists to install before Summer Shutdown 2005 Quick swap between old and new systems enables commissioning of new system during hours without beam over the next few months We will use (occasional) access to the CDF DAQ to do this commissioning Looking forward to a tripling of rate and sextupling of throughput into CDF Level 3