Cost of KBA process Jessica D., Liza D., Joel G, Jaime GM, Frank H., David K., Francois M., Ricardo M., Yves P., José Vicente R., Jatna S., Romy T., Sebastian.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Information and Communication Technologies (ICT) in the Seventh Framework Programme Coordination actions ICT Calls Jan- March 2012.
Advertisements

Proposal Development Guidelines for Signature Grantee Semi-Finalists The Covenant Foundation.
Using Logic Models in Program Planning and Grant Proposals The Covenant Foundation.
Key Biodiversity Areas Process Overview Center for Biodiversity Conservation Conservation International Madagascar.
Cambodia Country Action Plan Asia-Pacific Regional CRB workshop 2014.
Key Biodiversity Areas: review and lessons learned workshop Five years of Key Biodiversity Areas Churchill Hotel, Washington DC 25 July 2006.
Moving to a Unified Grants Process and a Single Monitoring Framework Jim Gray Acting Head of Community Planning, Corporate Services Dept, Glasgow City.
OpportunitiesChallengesNeeds The Environment Department to coordinate the process of Amending the Environmental Management and Conservation Act to provide.
TRANSLINK Training Effective Management and Supervision of PhD Candidates University of Indonesia, 9-10 May 2006 Postgraduate Supervision Dr. Paul Timms.
OpportunitiesChallengesNeeds Already have 217 recognized FLMMA sites. Not ecologically representativeMaps of reef habitats to help optimize design Organizations.
Time and Cost Estimation
Education and Culture LESSONS LEARNED FROM THE FORMER GENERATION OF HIGHER EDUCATION PROGRAMMES IN RUSSIAN FEDERATION José Gutierrez Erasmus+ : Higher.
1 CASE STUDIES IN PROJECT MANAGEMENT Lecture 5 Monitoring Review Evaluation.
ADB/ ECA/ PARIS21 – NSDS design seminar, Addis Ababa, 8-11 August 2005 National Strategies for the Development of Statistics: Making the Case, NSDS Essentials.
One Council - One City Equality Framework for Local Government Peer Review for Excellent.
EU-Regional Policy and Cohesion Structural Funds and Accession 1 SPP BUILDING IMPLEMENTATION CAPACITY Training seminar on evaluation Prague February.
Realizing the Vision Board Governance Revisited Marion Thomson Howell ShaughnessyHowell Inc.
Review of the KBA process in Indo-Burma First iteration of KBAs identified by BirdLife International in collaboration with the Bird Society of Thailand,
RAPID ASSESSMENT PROGRAM (RAP) Terrestrial Ecosystems Freshwater Ecosystems Marine Ecosystems.
“Towards an Analytical Framework for Assessing Regional NRM Investment Strategies” National biodiversity conservation objectives & regional investment.
Children’s Trust Network 19 October 2011 Developments in Safeguarding Anthony May Corporate Director for Children, Families and Cultural Services.
th Street NW, Suite 1100 NW, Washington, DC | 5/6/2015 | Page 1 DEVELOP A BUDGET.
Part-financed by the European Union WS 3: Communication Joint Technical Secretariat Lead Applicant seminar, Hamburg, 2-4 April 2008.
Statistics and cooperation: Rome, 24 November 2005 Statistics to Inform Development Policy: the Role of PARIS21 Presentation by Antoine Simonpietri, PARIS21.
IAOD Evaluation Section, the Development Agenda (DA) and Development Oriented Activities Julia Flores Marfetan, Senior Evaluator.
Presented by James Atherton (Conservation Outcomes Manager) KBA Review and Lessons Learned Workshop Washington DC July 25-28, 2006 Presented by James Atherton.
Presented by James Atherton (Conservation Outcomes Manager, CI Pacific Islands Program) KBA Review and Lessons Learned Workshop Washington DC July 25-28,
Commissioning Self Analysis and Planning Exercise activity sheets.
MGPIF Dehcho Regional Investment Plan (RIP) Update to February 2009.
Survey Priorities Discussion Group Participants: Wang Hao, Cristiano, Megan, Wiggy, Curtis, Simon, Henni, Kristen, Naamal, Matt, Lisa, Leeanne, Tom L.
Eight key directions for science in CI. Biome coverage of our baseline biodiversity data Currently: largely terrestrial alone Direction: terrestrial +
Engaging Partners: Challenges and Recommendations Working Group Members: Ruth, Franklin, Grace, Philip, Romy, Jatna, Bruce, Jess, Zoo, Cristiano, Naamal,
PACIFIC AID EFFECTIVENESS PRINCIPLES. Purpose of Presentation Provide an overview of Pacific Principles on Aid Effectiveness Provide an overview of Pacific.
KBA Conservation Network Wanglang Nature Reserve, June 5-8, 2007.
Overview of the KBA Process : A report card for Melanesia Insert representative image or map here Outcome definition for CI Melanesia through Moore- funded.
© Dr. John T. Whiting All Rights Reserved Slide 1 Achieving Compliance with GBLA & Other Laws and Regulations Impacting.
Prioritization Marc (presenting) Lina (facilitating) Roger, Frank, James, Penny, Rob, Franklin, Daniel, Grace A., Grace W., Ruth, Willy, Zo, Adriana, Harison,
Engaging partners in the KBA process July 26, 2006 Lessons Learned from Building the China Ecopartners Network Philip Chou, China Program Officer.
Engaging partners for KBAs Harison Randrianasolo.
Monitoring for Conservation Planning and Management Elizabeth Kennedy Conservation International 5-8 June 2007 Intervention Monitoring Exchange, Wang Lang.
Using Logic Models in Program Planning and Grant Proposals The Covenant Foundation.
1 NOAA Priorities for an Ecosystem Approach to Management A Presentation to the NOAA Science Advisory Board John H. Dunnigan NOAA Ecosystem Goal Team Lead.
REFLECTION ON BEST PRACTICES AND SCALING-UP MULTI- RELIGIOUS ACTION Sarajevo, Bosnia | July 24-26, 2015.
Discussion session on freshwater KBAs: a message to the Freshwater Institutional Team Monday afternoon Curtis, Willy, Joel, Henni, Frank, Luciano, Harison,
Global Symposium Round Table Session – 23 rd June, 2006 Status & trends in Madagascar’s biodiversity Zo Lalaina Rakotobe Conservation International.
ELEMENTS OF STRATEGY FOR ACHIEVING SOCIAL PROTECTION FLOOR Global Network, Cape Town 7 December 2012 BY AFRICAN LABOUR RESEARCH NETWORK (ALRN)
Delineation Break-out Group A Wednesday, 26 th July 2006 Key Biodiversity Areas: review and lessons learned workshop James Atherton, Jerome Spaggiari,
Proposal Development Guidelines for Signature Grantee Semi-Finalists The Covenant Foundation.
Output Description Total Amount I. Team Building: Outcomes refinement and monitoring program is defined in collaboration with partners. $19,900 II. Database.
Measuring Conservation Outcomes for Biodiversity: Name Date Location An overview on monitoring the status of biodiversity and the Outcome Monitoring Program.
C ONSERVATION I NTERNATIONAL First Advisory Committee Meeting February 21, 2007 Regional Program Division (RPD) People, Protected Areas, and Conservation.
Wildlife Program Amendments Joint Technical Committees and Members Advisory Group Amendment Strategy Workshop.
Key Biodiversity Areas: review and lessons learned workshop agenda development Setting the agenda for a meeting on five years of Key Biodiversity Areas.
CEPF Strategic Funding Direction 3 Meeting: 28 th June, 2006 Outcomes Monitoring: Status & trends in biodiversity Establishing standard regional monitoring.
Issues arising in KBA delineation 1) How do we delineate KBAs in a vast area of contiguous habitat when the area teems with threatened and irreplaceable.
Key Biodiversity Areas: review and lessons learned workshop Aims and scope Churchill Hotel, Washington DC 25 July 2006.
Cost of the KBA process for the Polynesia-Micronesia Hotspot.
Developing recommendations for sustainable flows in the Great Lakes Basin of New York and Pennsylvania Sustainable Flows: The flow of water in a natural.
Overview (of developing landscape governance)
Mobilizing Resources through Programmatic Approaches
Enhancing employers’ involvement in Social Protection policy debates
Using Logic Models in Program Planning and Grant Proposals
The Biodiversity and Protected Areas Management (BIOPAMA) Programme
TSMO Program Plan Development
OE Project Alliance Meeting
Breakout sessions Outcome.
Mobilizing Resources through Programmatic Approaches
Mobilizing Resources through Programmatic Approaches
Sustainable Finance Status
Workshop Plenary Maintaining Protected Areas for Now and the Future
Presentation transcript:

Cost of KBA process Jessica D., Liza D., Joel G, Jaime GM, Frank H., David K., Francois M., Ricardo M., Yves P., José Vicente R., Jatna S., Romy T., Sebastian T.,

Goals  Review the process and the cost associated with it, and produce a template  What are the factors that influence the variations in the costs?  Consider the benefits of the KBAs  What is the cost of not delineating KBAs

Budget template Length and cost of KBA process depend on previous exercises and what data is available (e.g., IBAs, previous priority setting exercises, etc.) Budget presented here is for 18 months

Salaries

Travel

Workshops

Products

Supplies

External Grants and Overhead

DC Costs DC CABS Costs (Staff, Travel, etc.) DC Programmatic Costs (Regional Programs, etc.)

Financial Cost among Regions

Costs per KBA Range: $300-$2284 per KBA Mean: $896 per KBA Median: $555 per KBA

General issues around the KBA process Do CI target areas change pre and post KBA process? Are these changes different between places where previous priority settings have been conducted and places where no priority settings have been done? Need to gauge CI’s investment in the KBA process/evaluation based on assessment of previous priority setting Cost analysis of the added value of the KBA process inclusive/exclusive other priority setting process

Benefits of identifying KBAs I It was tackled in the “engaging partners” breakout group Provides support to governments to meet their intergovernmental commitments (e.g., national/regional gap analysis for protected areas) Gives you guidelines of allocating resources (CI and partners) Common Framework for partners and Government (safeguarding threatened species)

Benefits of identifying KBAs II Baseline for monitoring conservation impacts Scientific/data driven process Jumpstarts the conservation action in a region Refinement of previous priority setting processes

Costs of not identifying KBAs Lack of a full understanding of threatened species in the area Difficulty in setting priorities Resources are invested less effectively No clear baseline for monitoring conservation impacts No scientific/data driven process Lack of sound scientific argument in guiding or refuting development activities in/outside KBAs