Truth or Consequences Standard 4: Incentives, Sanctions, and Therapeutic Adjustments.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
13 Principles of Effective Addictions Treatment
Advertisements

Many people who end up working in the juvenile probation field never imagined they’d have a job as a juvenile probation officer. Sometimes it takes coming.
Pretrial Release and Diversion
Best Practices Standards Vol. I: An Overview. OBJECTIVES  Define Best Practices Standards  Identify the need for Best Practices Standards  Briefly.
Residential Community Supervision Programs
Douglas B. Marlowe, J.D., Ph.D. Treatment Research Institute at the University of Pennsylvania TRI science addiction Effective Strategies for Drug-Abusing.
Role of Drug Court Defense Attorneys and Prosecutors Presented by Mike Loeffler and Liesl Nelson.
Practical Application of the ORAS The Corrections Institute Center for Criminal Justice Research University of Cincinnati.
 Why would the Canadian Justice system have a separate system just for youth?  What age should “youth” be considered?  Is a separate system beneficial?
The Implementation and Impact of Drug Courts Drug Courts and the New Technology of Offender Change Nov. 10, 2010 Lecture James M. Byrne, Professor.
Misdemeanor Sanctions
MILWAUKEE COUNTY’S PRETRIAL RELEASE DECISION PROCESS & PRETRIAL SERVICES RE-DESIGN PRESENTED TO THE MILWAUKEE COUNTY COMMUNITY JUSTICE COUNCIL JULY 24,
The Use of Counseling and Discipline to Improve Employee Productivity.
REALIGNING RESOURCES TO FUND YOUR DTC CANADIAN ASSOCIATION OF DRUG TREATMENT COURT PROFESSIONALS – NATIONAL CONFERENCE BANFF, ALBERTA OCTOBER 24 – 27,
The Effective Management of Juvenile Sex Offenders in the Community Section 6: Reentry.
Drug Court ♦The alternative to incarceration  History žHow and why the experiment evolved  Main Features of Drug Court žCooperation within the adversarial.
To what extent is the justice system fair and equitable for youth?
Chapter 8 Residential Intermediate Sanctions. Introduction Intermediate Sanctions are sentencing options between prison and probation that provide punishment.
SAN JOAQUIN COUNTY 2011 PUBLIC SAFETY REALIGNMENT PLAN AUGUST 30, 2011.
Probation Supervision and Information Gathering Presentence Reports.
Principles of Drug Addiction Treatment (Section 5 continued…) UCLA Integrated Substance Abuse Programs Continuum of Care 1.
CJ © 2011 Cengage Learning Chapter 12 Probation and Community Corrections.
PREPARED BY NPC RESEARCH PORTLAND, OR MAY 2013 Florida Adult Felony Drug Courts Evaluation Results.
Learning to lead a drug-free life style for the chronically addicted often involves repeated relapses and related frustrations before drug-free behavior.
EXTENDING THE THERAPEUTIC JUSTICE MODEL TO PROBLEM GAMBLERS Mark G. Farrell, JD; Jessica Aungst Weitzel, MPH; Thomas H. Nochajski, PhD, Buffalo Center.
The Ohio Parole Board’s implementation of Select Strategies Presented by: Cynthia Mausser Chair.
Chapter 6 Postimprisonment Community Supervision.
TREATMENT COURTS Inns of Court Presentation By John Markson & Elliott Levine October 17, 2012.
Welcome to unit What’s New? Announcements Questions - Concerns.
RISK AND NEED TRACKS SAMHSA 2013 Orleans Parish Drug Court Expansion Grant.
© 2009 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved. McGraw-Hill Chapter 4 Diversion and Probation: How Most Offenders Are Punished 1.
The Need For Evidence Based Sentencing Chief Justice William Ray Price, Jr.
Juvenile Justice in America, 5 th Edition ©2008 Pearson Education, Inc. Bartollas/Miller Pearson Prentice Hall Upper Saddle River, NJ Chapter 6:
Chapter 2 Pretrial Release and Diversion. Pretrial Services Pretrial Services is a department with two overlapping functions: Assisting the court with.
Motivation: Concepts & Application Madiha Khalid.
Sanctions and Incentives Length of time is important: The longer a patient stays in treatment, the better they do. Coerced patients tended to stay longer.
PRINCIPLES OF DRUG ADDICTION TREATMENT Dr. K. S. NJUGUNA.
8/21/2015 Scott Ronan Idaho Supreme Court Senior Manager, Problem-Solving Courts and Sentencing Alternatives.
PROBATION TERMS AND OFFENDER BEHAVIOR Purpose: To align the terms of probation with a behavioral change model of probation and evidence-based practices.
Mandatory Outpatient Treatment Following Involuntary Inpatient Admission Allyson K. Tysinger Office of the Attorney General May 2010.
Substance Abuse & Dependence. Substance Abuse Maladaptive use of a substance by one of the following – Failure to meet obligations – Repeated use in situations.
Drug Abuse. Or, Rather, Treatment The treatment of SUDs (Substance Use Disorders) with adolescents varies somewhat from treatment with adults. There are.
Chapter 1 The Goals of Correctional Policy Corrections Content: Jails, probation, prisons, parole Context: Democracy, bureaucracy Goals: Fairness (law)
Immediate Sanction Probation Pilot Project Virginia Criminal Sentencing Commission June 8, 2015.
Introduction Results and Conclusions On counselor background variables, no differences were found between the MH and SA COSPD specialists on race/ethnicity,
Judge Neil Edward Axel District Court of Maryland (retired) Maryland Highway Safety Judicial Conference December 2, 2015 Best Practices & Sentencing Alternatives.
© BLR ® —Business & Legal Resources 1408 How to Manage Challenging Employees.
Section 5: Principles of Drug Addiction Treatment 1.
1 Progressive Discipline Training Employee Documentation -- No Surprises -- November 2008.
Principles of Effective Drug Addiction Treatment Health 10 The Truth About Drugs Ms. Meade.
Exercise Prescription The exercise prescription should be developed with careful consideration of the individual’s health status (including medications),
District of Massachusetts Court Assisted Recovery Effort.
PRINCIPLES OF ACCOUNTABILITY AND CONTINGENCY MANAGEMENT National Partnership on Alcohol Misuse and Crime Washington, DC November 10, 2009 Stephen G. Wing.
Key Moments in NADCP History J UVENILE D RUG C OURT G UIDELINES J UVENILE D RUG C OURT G UIDELINES “A P REVIEW ” T ERRENCE D. W ALTON, MSW, CSAC C HIEF.
Problem Solving Courts Bench Bar Conference Double Tree Hotel April 20, rd Judicial District Court of Common Pleas – Berks County.
Developing a Young Adult Track Detective David Doucett Thomas P. Essex King County Drug Diversion Court Treatment Manager.
History and Concepts of Drug Courts
Promising Practices in Criminal Justice Reform
Standard 4: Incentives, Sanctions, and Therapeutic Adjustments
Drugs and Neuron Communication
Judicial Best Practices in Drug & DUI Court
Chapter 4 Probation: How Most Offenders Are Punished
Standard 4: Incentives, Sanctions, and Therapeutic Adjustments
Developing an Effective Assisted Outpatient Treatment Program
Douglas B. Marlowe, J.D., Ph.D., FCPP
Evidence-Based Criminal Justice Reform
OHSC 2018 CONSULTATIVE WORKSHOPS CERTIFICATION AND ENFORCEMENT
Marie Crosson, Executive Director
Key Moments in NADCP History
A Decade of Youthful Offender Supervision
Presentation transcript:

Truth or Consequences Standard 4: Incentives, Sanctions, and Therapeutic Adjustments

The Bottom Line Consequences for participants’ behavior are predictable, fair, consistent, and administered in accordance with evidence – based principles of effective behavior modification.

The Background Based on scientific theories and research that dates back to the beginning of the 20 th century Behavior Modification via Operant Conditioning Our response (or lack of response) to participant behavior will make the behavior more or less likely to reoccur Contemporary studies applying behavioral learning science to criminal justice populations, including Drug Courts, have led to researched- based principles for success

The Basics

The Response Categories

Two Ways to Reward, Punish, or Treat

Rewarding Behavior Positive Reinforcement Verbal Praise Applause Tokens Gift Certificates Fish Bowl Drawings Negative Reinforcement Later Curfew Waiving Fees Reduced Court Appearances (as part of phase advancement)

Punishing Behavior Punishment Verbal Reprimand Early Curfew Community Service Jury Box Flash Incarceration Response Cost Collecting fines (removing money) Losing Points Return to More Frequent Court Appearances Replacing a Late Curfew with an Earlier Curfew

Treating Behavior Enhancements New Assessment Adding Trauma Groups Additional Treatment Groups Additional AA Meetings Moving from Intensive Outpatient to Residential Treatment Reductions Moving from Intensive Outpatient to Outpatient Fewer Treatment Groups Replacing Treatment Groups with Job Training

Essential Elements

The Standard Adult Drug Court Best Practice Standards Volume I: Incentives, Sanctions, and Therapeutic Adjustments Search: Standards

The Standard Advance Notice Opportunity to be Heard Equivalent Consequences Professional Demeanor Progressive Sanctions Licit Addictive or Intoxicating Substances Therapeutic Adjustments Incentivizing Productivity Phase Promotion Jail Sanctions Termination Consequences of Graduation & Termination

Advance Notice Provide to participants and team members written policies and procedures regarding program response strategy. Include range of possible responses for various behaviors, not precise response for each infraction. Allow reasonable degree of discretion to modify usual response due to unique circumstances.

Opportunity to be Heard Provide participant opportunity to explain their perspective regarding factual controversies and program responses. Explain to participants the justification for why a particular response is or is not imposed.

Equivalent Consequences Participants with similar risk/need levels, phase, etc. receive consequences that are equivalent to those received by others who are in engaged in comparable conduct. Equivalent does not necessarily mean identical. Equivalent means similar value, severity, magnitude, or intensity.

Professional Demeanor Sanctions are delivered without expressing anger or ridicule. Participants are not shamed or subject to foul or abusive language.

Progressive Sanctions Drug Courts have a range of sanctions of varying magnitudes that may be administered in response to infractions. For goals that are especially difficult for participants to accomplish (i.e., distal goals), sanctions increase gradually and progressively in magnitude. For goals that are somewhat easier to achieve (i.e., proximal goals), higher magnitude sanctions may be administered after only a few infractions.

Magnitude: Staying Centered High MAGNITUDE OF SANCTION EFFECTIVENESS Effective Zone CeilingEffects Habituation Effects MODERATE Utilize Wide Array of Intermediate Magnitude Sanctions LOW

Expectations

Infraction Response Magnitude

Considerations in Responding to Participant Behavior 1)WHO are they in terms of risk and need? 2) WHERE are they in the program (i.e., what phase)? 3) WHICH behaviors are we responding to (i.e., are they proximal or distal)? 4) WHAT is the response choice magnitude? 5) HOW to deliver and explain the response?

Licit Addictive or Intoxicating Substances Sanction the unauthorized, non-medically indicated use of intoxicating and addictive substances even if legal. Use of potentially intoxicating or addicting medications should only be authorized if prescribed by a physician who concludes there are no safe and effective alternative treatments. Encourage participants to utilized physicians knowledgeable in addiction medicine.

Therapeutic Adjustments Recommended and delivered by treatment professionals. For the drug addicted individual, respond with adjustments to treatment requirements and sometimes with lower magnitude sanctions in response to unauthorized drug use in the early phases of program. Sanction participants who willfully fail to comply with treatment attendance and participation requirements. Do not give augmented sentences, or otherwise punish participants who have to be discharged because adequate treatment is not available and accessible to them.

Incentivizing Productivity Place as much emphasis on incentivizing productive behaviors as on responding to infractions. Criteria for phase progression and graduation should include evidence that participant is engaged in productive activities likely to support recovery and reduce recidivism.

Incentivizing Productivity

Incentives Magnitude

Phase Promotion Predicated on achievement of defined behavioral objectives. Sanctions for infraction for behavior previously deemed to be distal may become more stringent. Incentives for positive behavior may decrease. Treatment, supervision, and court requirements may decrease. Drug testing frequency remains constant until the final phase and only after all other requirements have decreased and team determines that those reductions have not triggered relapse.

Jail Sanctions Are imposed judiciously and sparingly. Are used only after numerous lesser sanctions have been attempted and failed, unless an immediate risk to public safety exists. Are definite in duration and typically last no more than 3 to 5 days. Participants have access to counsel and a hearing when facing jail.

Terminations Participants are terminated if they can no longer be managed safely in community; or if they repeatedly fail to comply with treatment or supervision requirements. Participants are not terminated for continued use if they are otherwise compliant with treatment and supervision. Participants terminated because adequate treatment is not available (through no fault of their own), do not receive augmented sentence or disposition for failing to complete program.

Consequences of Graduation & Termination Graduates avoid criminal record, avoid incarceration, or receive reduced sentence or disposition as an incentive for completion. Participants who are terminated unfavorably receive a sentence or disposition for the underlying offense. Participant and program outcomes are poor if minimal consequences are imposed for withdrawing from or failing to complete program. Participants are informed in advance of the circumstances which may lead to their receiving an augmented sentence for failing to complete Drug Court.

Examples of I/S

Truth or Consequences Standard 4: Incentives, Sanctions, and Therapeutic Adjustments