US Government: Civil Rights & Civil Liberties Supreme Court Case Project By: Meadow Noonan.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
TEXAS V. JOHNSON. WHAT HAPPENED 1984 Gregory Lee Johnson was a member of the Revolutionary Communist Youth Brigade At a rally he burned the American flag.
Advertisements

Amendment #1 The First Amendment (Amendment I) to the United States Constitution prohibits the making of any law respecting an establishment of religion,
UNDERSTANDING THE CONSTITUTION
By Andrew Stivers GONZALEZ V. OREGON. You decide: Prelude to Gonzalez V. Oregon A 107 year old woman, who is a resident of Portland, Oregon, has three.
Landmark Cases.
Famous court cases #4 Emmitt and Jordan.
Texas v. Johnson DECIDED: June 21, 1989 ARGUED: March 21, 1989.
NAACP v. ALABAMA ~National Association for the Advancement of Colored People~ 1 st amendment case: 1958.
Our First Amendment Rights
“Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or.
Important Supreme Court Cases …and the affect the courts’ decisions have on our lives.
The United States Supreme Court The highest court in America.
Freedom of Expression Laura Lantrip Alina Mihelin.
The Rights of Individuals Analyze court cases that demonstrate how the U.S. constitution and the bill of rights protect the rights of individuals.
CALL TO ORDER Ms. Zeins decides that she is fed up with the national government’s education policy, and burns the United States’ flag in front the White.
Gabriella Shook.  Plaintiff- State of Oregon  Defendant- Attorney General John Ashcroft, then Alberto Gonzales org/historyfacts/gonzalesvore.
ET: What Would You Decide? DIRECTIONS: On a clean sheet of paper, place a heading in the upper- right corner. Read the brief case synopsis and then answer.
Supreme Court Case Story Project George Doyle. Island Trees School District Board of Education v. Pico The board of education ordered certain books deemed.
Texas v. Johnson What are the facts of the case? What is the constitutional issue before the US Supreme Court? What was the Supreme Court’s ruling.
Gonzalez v. Oregon Logan Oyler, Chris Cubra, Jake Macnair, Vikash Patel, Tyler Stallworth Tyler Stallworth.
Civil Liberties and Rights of the Accused. Civil Liberties vs. Civil Rights The gov’t has the power to rule over citizens, but its power has limits Civil.
De Jonge v. Oregon John Salinkas. Case facts  Case heard: December 9th,1936  Defendant: Dirk De Jonge  Decided by Chief Justice Charles E. Hughes 
Texas vs. Johnson Argued: March 21, 1989 Decided: June 21, 1989 By: Garialdy De Jesus.
TEXAS VS. JOHNSON 1989 By: Nick Limon Aliah Medina 7 th.
N EW Y ORK T IMES V S ULLIVAN G ONZALES V O REGON Nick Mihalyi.
Homework: 14 th questions for Wednesday; test Friday FrontPage: Where are the following “rights” mentioned in the Constitution? Privacy? Abortion? Physician-assisted.
Texas vs. Johnson and Tinker vs. Des Moines By Emily Franklin.
The First Amendment: Simplified. Congress shall make no law respecting…
Chapter 10: Judicial Branch Describe the organization, functions, and jurisdiction of courts within the American judicial system. Explain the kinds of.
Rachel Sturgis.  In 1994 Oregon enacted the Death with Dignity Act, which authorized physicians to prescribe lethal doses of controlled substances to.
By Zachary Webster. Right at Issue  Oregon stating that physician assisted suicide is legal.  John Ashcroft the Attorney General of Oregon stated this.
The Constitution needed 9 states to ratify it. Some states, like Massachusetts, opposed the Constitution because it did not list the rights of the people.
Baker v. Carr Facts  Charles Baker was a Republican who lived in Shelby County, Tennessee who argued that although the Tennessee Constitution requires.
Freedom of Speech: First Amendment “The test of democracy is freedom of criticism.” ~David Ben-Gurion.
COURT CASE BRIEFINGS XAVIER CUMMINS MICHAEL VIZZI CHRISTIAN DALUSUNG ALYSSA NEWSOM.
The Supreme Court Today…. RECENT SUPREME COURT NEWS Supreme Court & Chicago Gun Ban Obama’s Nominee to the Supreme Court Supreme Court in the News Chicago.
1 ST AMENDMENT; FREE SPEECH AND FREEDOM OF THE PRESS ELIZABETH MANWILL MIA MAY RAMI KHALAF MATT MARTY.
Court Cases. Wisconsin v. Yoder 1972 Jonas Yoder / Wallace Miller: Members of the Old Order Amish religion Prosecuted under Wisconsin law: required children.
Aim: What are the landmark First Amendment cases of the 20 th Century? Do Now: What does the First Amendment protect?
Landmark Cases. Short-answer question The Supreme Court is the highest court in the judicial branch. In what ways does the Supreme Court interact with.
Freedom of Speech Patriotism, flag burning and the first amendment – Texas v Johnson (1989) Contributions as Free Speech Citizens United v Federal Election.
Haley Jurbala Derek Hegna Ashley Hitchcock Andrew Howard COURT CASES- GROUP 2.
Right to Privacy. » Is There a Right to Privacy? ˃Definition: the right to a private personal life free from the intrusion of government +The right to.
THE JUDICIAL SYSTEM Part 1: The Federal Court System Part 2: Civil Liberties and the 1 st Amendment Part 3: Civil Rights, Equal Protection Under the Law.
Texas v. Johnson. Background Facts Johnson took place in a Republican national convention in Dallas, Texas. The purpose of the demonstration was to protest.
YOUR NAME DATE OF PRESENTATION COURSE NAME Texas vs. Johnson Flag Burning/Freedom of Speech.
The Supreme Court Intro The Court of Last Resort.
Brennan Novak and Robert Gardner
Texas v. Johnson(1989)Flag Burning, Freedom of Speech
1st Amendment.
The Judicial Branch Chapter 8 Section 1 CLUES.
The Supreme Court Today…
Texas Vs Johnson.
Chapter 10: Bill of Rights
Landmark Freedom of Speech Cases
Lesson 9 American Government
Chapter 10: Bill of Rights
By Katherine Ramirez & Alicia reta
Other Civil Liberties Issues
The Court System Appeals.
Freedom of Speech – Symbolic Speech
Modern Issues in the U.S. Agenda: DO NOW: Legal or Illegal?
The Role of the Judicial Branch (courts)
The Expansion of Expression
Texas v Johnson Decided 1989.
Warm Up – February 13 Read the article on Engel v. Vitale that is on my website under today’s date and answer the following questions: 1. Who was Steven.
Other Civil Liberties Issues
Texas v. Johnson, 491 U.S. 397 (1989) Alysha Gerba.
Texas v. Johnson By Kane Deyell.
Texas v. Johnson (1989) 491 U.S. 397 Morgan Fraley Pd. 7/8.
Presentation transcript:

US Government: Civil Rights & Civil Liberties Supreme Court Case Project By: Meadow Noonan

Texas v. Johnson (1989) Argued: March 21, 1989 Decided: June 21, 1989

Who’s involved? Gregory Lee Johnson

What’s the story? Gregory Lee Johnson burned an American flag as a means of protest against Reagan administration policies Johnson was tried and convicted under Texas law outlawing flag discretion He was sentenced to one year in jail and assessed a $2,000 fine After the Texas Court of Criminal Appeals reversed the conviction, the case went to the Supreme Court.

Court Determined Court struck down laws prohibiting flag burning. The Court held that laws banning flag burning violated the First Amendment right to freedom of speech.

Importance The Johnson v. Texas court case is so important because Johnson should not be convicted of flag discretion because then the constitution would be contradicting itself. Our first amendment rights grant us the freedom of expression and with this, Johnson did not break any laws burning the flag.

Gonzales v. Oregon (2006) Who’s involved?

What’s the story? Attorney General John Ashcroft issued a Directive stating that a doctor could lose his federal registration to prescribe controlled substances if that registration is used to prescribe federally controlled substances for assisted suicide.

Court Determined The Ninth Circuit declared that Ashcroft overstepped his authority in issuing the directive The Justice Department petitioned the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals to reconsider its May decision. The Court refused a rehearing. The Justice Department petitioned the U.S. Supreme Court to hear the case, the court agreed to do so

Importance The importance of the Gonzales v. Oregon case is that the CSA did not authorize Attorney General John Ashcroft to declare a medical practice authorized under state law to be illegitimate. So now the CSA did not authorize the attorney general to regulate physician-assisted suicide.