The zombie argument: objections Michael Lacewing

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Phenomenal Concepts and the Explanatory Gap
Advertisements

Week 2, Lecture 3 Dualism: mental events, substance vs. property dualism, four arguments.
Frank Jackson: What Mary Didn't Know
Michael Lacewing Is the mind the brain? Michael Lacewing © Michael Lacewing.
The ontological argument
Metaphysics Part II. Thought Experiment: Physical & Mental Properties A1. 2 more objects: quarters, books, grass… A2. 2 more physical descriptors: green,
Philosophy of Mind Matthew Soteriou. Functionalism and Qualia Critics of functionalist accounts of the mental often appeal to thought experiments in which.
Descartes’ cosmological argument
Descartes’ trademark argument Michael Lacewing
Philosophy 4610 Philosophy of Mind Week 12: Qualia Friends and Foes.
Malcolm’s ontological argument Michael Lacewing
Cosmological arguments from causation Michael Lacewing
Substance dualism: do Descartes’ arguments work? Michael Lacewing
The Modal Argument. Review: The “Hard Problem”  Remember that there are three arguments that make consciousness a ‘hard’ problem. 1. Knowledge Argument.
The “Explanatory Gap” Where it is said that identity theory is not necessary false, but merely unknowable.
The Euthyphro dilemma Michael Lacewing
The metaphysics of mind: an overview Michael Lacewing
Two objections to non- cognitivism Michael Lacewing
The knowledge argument Michael Lacewing
Cosmological arguments from contingency Michael Lacewing
Property dualism and mental causation Michael Lacewing
© Michael Lacewing Plato and Hume on Human Understanding Michael Lacewing
© Michael Lacewing Dualism and the Mind-Body Identity Theory Michael Lacewing
The Mind-Brain Type Identity Theory
Logical behaviourism: objections
© Michael Lacewing Functionalism and the Mind- Body Problem Michael Lacewing
© Michael Lacewing The Mind-Body Identity Theory Michael Lacewing
Functionalism and the Mind-Body Problem
Consciousness and biological naturalism
Michael Lacewing Logical behaviourism Michael Lacewing
Substance dualism and mental causation Michael Lacewing
Berkeley’s idealism (long) Michael Lacewing © Michael Lacewing.
Introduction to Philosophy Lecture 14 Minds and Bodies #3 (Jackson) By David Kelsey.
Section 2.3 I, Robot Mind as Software McGraw-Hill © 2013 McGraw-Hill Companies. All Rights Reserved.
© Michael Lacewing Substance and Property Dualism Michael Lacewing
Functionalism and consciousness
Substance dualism Michael Lacewing co.uk.
Ethical non-naturalism
Substance dualism Michael Lacewing
Property dualism Key Words Learning objective:
Knowledge rationalism Michael Lacewing
Eliminative materialism
Thought experiment Consider whether the person next to you might be a philosophical zombie. 1.List the evidence you have for thinking they have a mind.
Learning objective: To understand the objection that even if a zombie world is conceivable it may not be possible, and to evaluate how convincing this.
Feedback Jackson You can’t say it is conceivable but not possible If it is conceivable it must be possible Or we have to say that it is not conceivable.
Substance and Property Dualism Quick task: Fill in the gaps activity Quick task: Fill in the gaps activity ?v=sT41wRA67PA.
This week’s aims  To test your understanding of substance dualism through an initial assessment task  To explain and analyse the philosophical zombies.
Cosmological arguments from contingency
Philosophical behaviourism: two objections
Ryle’s philosophical behaviourism
Substance and Property Dualism
Michael Lacewing Ethical naturalism Michael Lacewing
The Ontological Argument
Philosophical behaviourism and consciousness
What do we mean by ‘mind’?
Descartes’ Ontological Argument
Descartes’ ontological argument
Descartes’ trademark argument
Descartes’ conceivability argument for substance dualism
Property dualism: objections
The zombie argument: responses
Introduction to Philosophy Lecture 14 Minds and Bodies #3 (Jackson)
Michael Lacewing The zombie argument Michael Lacewing
Michael Lacewing Descartes on the mind Michael Lacewing
Kant’s objection to ontological arguments
Plato and Hume on Human Understanding
Is the concept of substance innate?
Michael Lacewing Physicalism Michael Lacewing
What is good / bad about this answer?
Michael Lacewing Descartes on the mind Michael Lacewing
Presentation transcript:

The zombie argument: objections Michael Lacewing

The argument It is conceivable that there are zombies. If it is conceivable that there are zombies, it is metaphysically possible that there are zombies. If it is metaphysically possible that there are zombies, then, contra physicalism, physical properties do not determine all mental properties. Therefore physicalism is false.

Zombies are not conceivable We cannot assume that physicalism is false. But if it is true, then zombies are not conceivable. A zombie is a physical duplicate of a person with phenomenal consciousness, but without phenomenal consciousness. A physical duplicate is a functional duplicate. Therefore, a zombie is a physical and functional duplicate of a person, but without phenomenal consciousness.

Zombies are not conceivable Phenomenal properties are physical properties realising particular functional roles. Therefore, a physical and functional duplicate of a person with consciousness has phenomenal consciousness. A physical and functional duplicate of a person with consciousness cannot both have and lack phenomenal consciousness. Therefore, zombies are inconceivable.

Objection We cannot assume that there is a complete physical and functional analysis of consciousness –Phenomenal properties of consciousness are ‘qualia’ – intrinsic, non-representational properties of experience We can know all about something’s physical structure and function without being able to explain consciousness – so we can conceive the same physical thing as having consciousness or not

Zombies are conceivable, but not possible This objection requires us to get clearer on possibility It is not an analytic truth that water is H 2 O. People can meaningfully ask ‘Is water H 2 O?’ It is conceivable that water is not H 2 O

Zombies are conceivable, but not possible However, water is H 2 O. And identity is necessary. –Identity is a relation between something and itself. Being H 2 O is what makes water what it is. –In every possible world in which water exists, water is H 2 O. It is possible that water in the oceans is fresh, that water never falls as rain, etc. But it isn’t possible for water not to be water, i.e. H 2 O.

Zombies are conceivable, but not possible If phenomenal properties just are certain physical and/or functional properties, then you can’t have these physical/functional properties without consciousness. So if physicalism is true, zombies are impossible. The second premise fails: just because zombies are conceivable, that doesn’t show they are possible.

Reply There is a disanalogy between water and phenomenal properties. The concept of ‘water’ is a concept of something with a particular structure and causal role; likewise H 2 O –Identical structure and causal role entails identical property

Reply Concepts of brain function are also concepts of structure and function But the concept of, e.g., ‘pain’ is a concept of how a sensation feels, not what it does –The essence of pain is its feeling So there is no reason to think that certain brain properties cannot exist without the feeling

Possibility and reality Suppose zombies are possible. How does that show that property dualism is true in the actual world, rather than some other possible world? Because identity is necessary. Phenomenal properties cannot be physical-functional properties in this world and not be the same properties in another world. –So if phenomenal properties are not physical- functional properties in some other possible world, they are not physical-functional properties in this world.

Possibility and reality Physicalism defends supervenience: any two things that are exactly alike in their physical properties cannot have different mental properties –Cp. aesthetic properties: two paintings that are physically identical must be aesthetically identical –Once all the physical properties are fixed, the aesthetic properties are fixed

Possibility and reality Likewise, once all the physical properties are fixed, the mental properties are fixed. The zombie argument attacks this claim – once the physical properties of our world are fixed, something further (e.g. an additional law of nature) is needed to fix the mental properties.