RGVSG RENEWABLE ENERGY PROJECT FACT SHEET PUBLIC PARTICIPATION MEETING JANUARY 23, 2003 The RGVSG propose to construct a $23.8 million Clean Energy and.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
New Source Review NSR Reforms Oklahoma Department of Environmental Quality Air Quality Council Presented by Matt Paque, Attorney, ODEQ - AQD April 20,
Advertisements

Producing energy does not have to threaten the environment. In fact, its very production can reap major environmental benefits. The United States biomass.
RH Requirement for BART  §308 (e) contains BART requirements for regional haze visibility impairment…. The State must submit an implementation plan containing.
DEQ Mission By the end of the decade, Virginians will enjoy cleaner water available for all uses, improved air quality that supports communities and ecosystems,
Regulatory Drivers for Reducing Solvent Emissions Barbara Johnson, PE Kansas State University Kansas Small Business Environmental Assistance Program March.
Update on CAAAC Workgroup, EPA Guidance, and Possible Future EPA GHG Regulations.
The Massachusetts Approach to Power Plant Clean-up Policy Making and Standards Setting to Reach Clean Air Sonia Hamel Massachusetts Executive Office of.
RGVSG RENEWABLE ENERGY PROJECT FACT SHEET COMMUNITY OUTREACH PROGRAM.
SOLAR IMPACT ON FYI Kevin Meikle, Architect Airports Planning Manager 4995 E. Clinton Way Fresno, Ca (559)
EPA Rulemakings to Set GHG Emission Standards for Power Plants National Hydropower Association Webinar Kyle Danish February 14, 2014.
BIOMASS POWER PLANT Jo-Carroll Energy, Inc. (NFP).
Sustainable Energy Roundtable Series January, 2005 Pfizer Greenhouse Gas Management Program Experience.
Response to Comments on HAR Amendments Clean Air Branch Greenhouse Gas Rules Stakeholders Meeting 10/18/2013.
Air Permitting Overview.
Connecticut Department of Energy and Environmental Protection.
Katrina Pielli U.S. Environmental Protection Agency CHP Partnership
Economic Analyses of FPL’s New Nuclear Projects: An Overview Dr. Steven Sim Senior Manager, Resource Assessment & Planning Florida Power & Light Company.
Air Quality Regulations and Academic Institutions Steve Hall Environmental Engineer II NC DENR – Division of Air Quality Raleigh Regional Office.
ACC Open Meeting – November 18, 2010 Four Corners Power Plant 1.
Massachusetts’ Power Plant Mercury Regulations Sharon Weber Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection WESTAR Fall Business Meeting - September.
1 PSD - Case #1 Case #1: –A simple cycle natural gas power plant with PTE NOx of 300 tpy and GHGs of 150,000 tpy CO2e receives a PSD permit addressing.
Rural Development’s Rural Energy for America Program (REAP) Grants and Loans Guarantees & Renewable Energy Feasibility Studies June 5, 2009.
PERMITTING ELECTRIC GENERATING UNITS Jim Linville & Erik Hendrickson Air Permits Division.
RGVSG RENEWABLE ENERGY PROJECT Presentation prepared by.
BORDER ENVIRONMENT COOPERATION COMMISSION Mitigating Impacts on Water Resources: Environmental Infrastructure Investment.
Final Amendments to the Regional Haze Rule: BART Rule Making June 16, 2005.
Sacramento Local Agency Formation Commission (LAFCo) Final Environmental Impact Report Amendment of SMUD’s Sphere of Influence and SMUD Yolo Annexation.
Clean Energy and Air Quality Improvement Project Rio Grande Valley Sugar Growers Association, Inc. (RGVSG) Santa Rosa, Texas Jan. 28, 2003.
Rapid Assessment Process Project Strategic Plan City of Marfa Water and Wastewater System Improvements Marfa, Texas Presented to: Stakeholders and Project.
Overcoming Vancouver’s District Energy Barriers Renewable Cities Forum May 14, 2015.
BART Control Analysis WESTAR August 31, 2005 EPA Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards Todd Hawes
BECC Certification Criteria. Our Role in the US/Mexico Border  The Border Environment Cooperation Commission and the North American Development Bank.
Kimberton, PA | Kennesaw, GA | Strategic Air Planning: Is the Time for a PAL Here? Mark Wenclawiak, CCM|
Clean Air Act Section 111(d) Indiana State Bar Association Utility Law Section September 4, 2014 Thomas W. Easterly, P.E., BCEE Commissioner IN Department.
Sound solutions delivered uncommonly well Understanding the Permitting Impacts of the Proposed Ozone NAAQS Pine Mountain, GA ♦ August 20, 2015 Courtney.
1. Carbon dioxide (CO 2 ) – Naturally occurring and man- made. 5,505.2 mmts emitted in 2009, GWP = 1 Methane (CH 4 ) - Naturally occurring and man-made.
GHG BACT Analysis Case Study Russell City Energy Center May 2010 Donald Neal Vice President, EHS.
Best Available Retrofit Technology Rule - Colorado David R. Ouimette Colorado Air Pollution Control Division.
Greenhouse Gas (GHG) Permit Training Other Aspects of PSD Title V Permitting.
Lynne Welsh Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection.
Massachusetts Multi-pollutant Power Plant Regulations Sharon Weber Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection EPA Utility MACT Working Group.
1 Non-Attainment NSR Program Donald Law EPA Region 8.
PSD/Nonattainment Review You can do this! Marc Sturdivant Air Permits Division Texas Commission on Environmental Quality Environmental Trade Fair 2015.
January 27, 2003 NADB RGVSG Project Review Summary Presentation San Antonio, Texas January 27, 2003.
Best Available Control Technology/Lowest Achievable Emission Rate Evaluation Sarah Fuchs Air Permits Division Texas Commission on Environmental Quality.
Wingra Engineering, S.C.1 Evaluation of Gas Turbine Air Quality Impacts from a Community Perspective Steven Klafka, PE Wingra Engineering, S.C Electric.
24 th Annual Sustainability and Environmental, Health & Safety Symposium March 25, 2015 Thomas W. Easterly, P.E., BCEE Commissioner IN Department of Environmental.
WFEC and Its Rural Electric Cooperative Members Solar Power October 16, 2015 Fall PR-MR & Marketing Meeting.
Item #11 Alternative Approaches for Linking Greenhouse Gas Emissions Reductions to Metropolitan Transportation Planning Presentation to the National Capital.
Long Island’s Offshore Wind Farm David Tobias Project Evaluation.
Reproposal of the Regional Haze Rule and BART Guidelines.
2005 NSR Regulation Changes Dwight Wylie. Old Units vs. New Units  There is a broad disparity between air pollution control requirements and emissions.
Greenhouse Gas Permitting Sean O’Brien Air Permits Division Texas Commission on Environmental Quality Advanced Air Permitting Seminar 2015.
Summary of June 15, 2005 Revisions to RH BART and BART Guidelines.
GRIC Case Study Permit Review Dan Blair, Compliance and Enforcement Mgr. Gila River Indian Community (GRIC) Department of Environmental Quality.
Proposed Carbon Pollution Standard For New Power Plants Presented by Kevin Culligan Office of Air Quality Planning And Standards Office of Air and Radiation.
Nonattainment New Source Review (NA NSR) Program Raj Rao US Environmental Protection Agency Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards ,
Wind Power in New Hampshire 2016 ACEC / NHDOT Technical Exchange Conference April 7 th, 2016.
1 Energy/Compost Facility Action Plan City Council Meeting July 2, 2012.
Regulatory background How these standards could impact the permitting process How is compliance with the standards assessed.
MPCA Citizens’ Board Meeting: United States Steel Corporation-Keetac Air Emissions Permit Owen Seltz Industrial Division September 13, 2011.
FUEL CELLS.
Clean Air Act Glossary.
Section Update: Monitoring & Planning
Wind Industry Market and Policy Overview
Major New Source Review (NSR) Part 2
Boiler Sheltered Initiative
City Council April 30, 2018 Item 13
Kansas Air Quality Seminar March 5, 2008
Final Environmental Impact Report
Presentation transcript:

RGVSG RENEWABLE ENERGY PROJECT FACT SHEET PUBLIC PARTICIPATION MEETING JANUARY 23, 2003 The RGVSG propose to construct a $23.8 million Clean Energy and Air Project through the construction of a Bagasse (cane stalk) Handling System and the installation of a new High-Efficiency Boiler and Turbo- Generator. The proposed Project may be financed up to 50% of the Project Costs by the North American Development Bank (NADB). The remaining project costs will be financed through a combination of the CoBank loans and RGSG equity. NADB has hired Pollutech International for technical review of the Project. Prior to approval by NADB for financing, the Border Environment Cooperation Commission (BECC) must certify the Project in accordance with the following criteria: BECC CRITERIACOMPLIANCE Alternative Analysis  International Treaties and Agreements  Human Health and Environment  Compliance with State and Federal Regulations  Environmental Impact Assessment  Technical Feasibility  Appropriate Technology  Operation and Maintenance Plan  Design Regulations and Standards  Financial Feasibility  Community Participation Plan 

RGVSG RENEWABLE ENERGY PROJECT FACT SHEET PUBLIC PARTICIPATION MEETING JANUARY 23, 2003 The RGVSG Cooperative has a membership of 127 sugar growers and is the only sugar mill in the State of Texas The RGVSG members actively farm up to 47,000 acres of sugar cane (3% of the arable land in RGV) yet provides almost 12% of the GDP in the RGV ($75M/Yr) The proposed project includes… -conversion of all bagasse conveyors to fully automated belt conveyors -expansion and upgrade of the bagasse storage building -conversion of the boiler building to handle the modified bagasse conveyor system -installation of a new high efficiency boiler -new condensate storage tank -rebuilt 6,000 KW turbine generator Project Benefits include: - Reduction in use of fossil fuels through the implementation of a renewable energy source through production of 11 MW leaving 5 MW for sale - Eliminates the need for purchase of 1.7 MW of outside energy that will be available for use by others - A 42% reduction in total mass of air pollutants - Increased level of service to RGVSG members

RGVSG RENEWABLE ENERGY PROJECT FACT SHEET PUBLIC PARTICIPATION MEETING JANUARY 23, 2003 Project Costs and a Brief Financial Analysis are shown in the table below. The RGVSG expect to receive the draft permit from the TCEQ for the Mill Operations – issuance of final permit within 60 days after public comment period (Consolidated Permit No. 114) The RGVSG is defined as a “major stationary source” under the Federal Clean Air Act The RGVSG also has a Cane Burning Permit Process Upgrade (10,000 tcd) Capital CostAnnual Cost SavingsPayback Period (years) Bagasse Handling$6,442,532$247, Boiler Upgrades And Turbine Generator$17,384,405$1,853, Total Upgrade$23,826,937$2,100,

RGVSG RENEWABLE ENERGY PROJECT FACT SHEET PUBLIC PARTICIPATION MEETING JANUARY 23, 2003 RGVSG under their current Air Quality Permit is allowed the following: -2,490.4 tpy CO tpy SO tpy No x tpy CO tpy VOC As a result of the above-listed permit loadings, the RGVSG Mill is subject to PSD Regulations (Prevention of Significant Deterioration) thus must conduct analysis of BACT and these findings are listed below: - Growth Analysis – No additional air emissions from off-site growth - Air Quality Impact Analysis – modeling analysis adequately evaluates the total ground level concentrations of NO 2 from improvements - Soils/Vegetation Analysis – the projected NO 2 concentrations are below the standards and significant level thus no adverse impact - Visibility Impairment Analysis – plant is located in sparsely populated area with no scenic vistas or airports thus no impairment - Area Impacts – the plant is located 1,110 km from the closest Class 1 Area (Big Bend) thus no impact (>100 km separation)

RGVSG RENEWABLE ENERGY PROJECT FACT SHEET PUBLIC PARTICIPATION MEETING JANUARY 23, 2003 PROJECTED EMISSIONS are compared to existing in the table below… 1 – Actual reported emissions based on stack testing of October – Projections from Pollutech Analysis – Boilers #1 to #4 at 34%, new boiler at 90% Current Emission Rate (tpy) 1 Old Boilers at 34% Cap (tpy) New Boiler at 90% Cap (tpy) Total Plant Emissions 2 Emissions Change (tpy) Emissions Change (%) CO SOx Nox PM VOC Total

RGVSG RENEWABLE ENERGY PROJECT FACT SHEET PUBLIC PARTICIPATION MEETING JANUARY 23, 2003 TC&B has provided an environmental assessment of the project in support of the Step 2 Report These findings are summarized below: -Air Quality impacts are significantly reduced -Project promotes the use of renewable energy sources -Project reduces reliance on fossil fuels -There are no water/wastewater issues, Plant is effectively Zero Discharge although a Discharge Permit is in effect RGVSG has a Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan with proactive monitoring Cumulative Impacts are positive to the environment Positive socioeconomic impact through short-term impacts due to construction and long-term due to increased sustainability and efficiency RGVSG is proactive towards environment as evidenced by P2 Site Assistance Visit/Small Business Compliance Audit/TCEQ Pilot EMS Program

RGVSG RENEWABLE ENERGY PROJECT FACT SHEET PUBLIC PARTICIPATION MEETING JANUARY 23, 2003 Project approval by BECC scheduled for March 27, 2003 Completion of PPA and Loan Closings in late 2003/early 2004 Completion of Bagasse Handling Facilities in 2004 Completion of Boiler/Generator Facilities by April 2005 (12 months lag time from order to delivery of boiler) If you do not wish to speak, written comments may be submitted to: Rio Grande Valley Sugar Growers, Inc. P.O. Box 459 Santa Rosa, Texas Attention: Jack Nelson, President Comments will be accepted up to February 3, 2003